Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

KZ monodromy of standard modules satisfies the reflection Hecke relations

Statement

For every finite-dimensional W-module E, each positive reflection meridian acts on KZ⁡(Δc(E)) with eigenvalues among μH,0,…,μH,eH−1 from The KZ monodromy functor and the reflection Hecke algebra. Consequently KZ⁡(Δc(E)) is a module over the defined finite reflection Hecke algebra Hq(c)(W). No semisimplicity assumption on Oc or on the Hecke algebra is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.

[F1]

Hecke relations specialize in the generalized-standard family proves the exact meridian polynomial identities on every generalized standard at every parameter, with the current endpoint and residue conventions.

[F2]

Standard modules for rational Cherednik category O: Δc(E) is induction of the finite W-module E with h acting by zero.

[F3]

The KZ monodromy functor and the reflection Hecke algebra: the specified reflection Hecke algebra is the braid-group algebra modulo these polynomial identities.

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The stated hypotheses and Facts.

1.1F1F2algebra

A standard is an induced nilpotent module with augmentation ideal acting by zero; equivalently it is a direct summand of a finite sum of the degree-zero generalized regular standard, by finite-group averaging. [F1] therefore gives ∏j=0eH−1(TH−μH,j)=0 on its KZ fiber for every H and every c. This proves an annihilating polynomial, including resonant parameters; no diagonalizability at such parameters is inferred from a characteristic polynomial.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra∎

Every eigenvalue of an operator annihilated by that polynomial is one of its roots. Since every defining relation of [F3] acts by zero, the braid representation factors through the stated Hecke quotient. This proves all assertions without a semisimplicity hypothesis.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources