How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative simplicial approximation after subdivision
Statement
Let be finite complexes, a subcomplex, and continuous with the realization of a simplicial map. For some there is a simplicial agreeing pointwise with on and homotopic to rel . This is a homotopy of pairs into .
A prescribed compatible finite linear subdivision of can first be extended to a finite linear subdivision of . If is simplicial on this prescribed , the conclusion applies to , fixing it pointwise. The simpliciality condition must hold on the chosen triangulation; refining a source alone does not automatically retain it.
Source locators
Theorem and proof, pp.39–42; Maunder 2.5.20 pp.55–56.
Facts & Assumptions
Adjustment provides the near-A star condition and shrinking far stars. Relative subdivision neighbourhood adjustment.
Every compact metric open cover has a Lebesgue number. Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number: a such that every nonempty subset of diameter less than lies inside a single member of the cover.
The finite realization is compact metric with its Euclidean topology. Finite simplicial weak topology agrees with euclidean topology.
Star approximation gives a homotopy fixed wherever the maps agree. The open star criterion produces a simplicial map.
Compatible boundary coning extends finite triangulations. Relative derived subdivision of a finite simplicial pair.
Proof
Given: Finite , subcomplex , and continuous and simplicial on .
Take and from the neighbourhood-adjustment lemma. Compose its homotopy with to obtain a homotopy from to , fixed on . The inverse images under of the target vertex stars form an open cover of compact metric , so there is a Lebesgue number . For empty the empty map already proves the theorem.
Choose so that every star of a vertex in has diameter less than . For each such vertex the Lebesgue-number property gives a target vertex whose open star contains . For any remaining vertex , the adjustment lemma gives with . Since is simplicial, a point having positive coordinate has positive coordinate in its image, so ; take . On take , hence . These are finitely many choices.
All vertex stars now satisfy the criterion for , so extends simplicially and the criterion supplies . On , the simplicial maps and agree on vertices and therefore on all affine combinations; also is the identity there. Thus fixes . Concatenate for with for . At the join both equal , so this is a continuous homotopy from to , fixed on . Its restriction there always lies in the simplicial image , proving the pair assertion.
To extend a prescribed compatible , process simplices of outside by increasing dimension. Their boundary triangulations are already fixed and compatible. Cone each such boundary from an interior barycenter of its original simplex. Every ray meets the boundary once, so these cones triangulate the simplex and restrict to the already specified boundaries. This finite induction constructs restricting exactly to . If is simplicial there, apply the preceding argument to . When is empty it is ordinary approximation; when and is already simplicial take .
Remarks
The result approximates , not necessarily in the strict carrier sense. Zeeman, pp.40–43, explains the distinction: near a fixed edge the star cover need not become subordinate to the pullback cover for , even after relative subdivision. His p.43 circular-arc example rules out requiring the final map to stay in the carrier of at every point while fixing that edge. The two successive homotopies above impose no such additional claim. The prescribed-subdivision clause is conditional on simpliciality in that triangulation, not on the original one alone.
Depends on
- Relative subdivision neighbourhood adjustment
- Relative derived subdivision of a finite simplicial pair
- The open star criterion produces a simplicial map
- Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number: a $\delta > 0$ such that every nonempty subset of diameter less than $\delta$ lies inside a single member of the cover
- Finite simplicial weak topology agrees with euclidean topology
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. C. Zeeman, Relative simplicial approximation (1964) (standard reference, not scraped)