Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Similarity is an equivalence relation, and two matrices represent the same endomorphism in two bases exactly when they are similar

Statement

Similarity is an equivalence relation on Mn(F). Moreover, matrices A,B∈Mn(F) are similar if and only if there are an n-dimensional F-vector space V, an endomorphism T:V→V, and ordered bases B,C such that A=[T]BB and B=[T]CC.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field F, a natural n, and matrices A,B,C∈Mn(F).

[L1]

A and B are similar when B=P−1AP for some invertible P (Similar matrices: B=P−1AP for an invertible P).

[L2]

The square change-of-basis formula conjugates the matrix of an endomorphism by the coordinate transition matrix ([T]B′C′=PC′←C[T]BCPB←B′).

[L3]

The matrices Ei0 are the standard coordinate columns in Mn×1(F) (Matrix units Eij and the Kronecker delta).

[L4]

Matrix multiplication is associative, unital, distributive, and compatible with scalar multiplication (Matrix multiplication is associative, unital, distributive, and compatible with scalar multiplication).

[L5]

A finite ordered list is an ordered basis exactly when it is linearly independent and spans the space (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Taking P=In proves reflexivity. If B=P−1AP, then A=(P−1)−1BP−1, proving symmetry. If also C=Q−1BQ, then associativity in [L4] gives C=(PQ)−1A(PQ), proving transitivity. Thus similarity is an equivalence relation.

givenL1L4
2.1

If A and B represent the same endomorphism in bases B and C, [L2] gives B=P−1AP with P=PB←C, so they are similar.

step 1.1L1L2
3.1

Conversely, suppose B=P−1AP. On V=Mn×1(F) let T=LA, which is linear by [L4], and let E=(Ei0)i<n. By [L3], every column y has the unique expansion y=∑i<nyiEi0, so [L5] makes E the standard ordered basis. The columns of invertible P form an ordered basis C: independence follows by multiplying Px=0 by P−1, and every column vector y equals P(P−1y), so [L5] applies. Moreover, [T]EE=A because T(Ej0) is the j-th column of A. The change matrix PE←C is P, so [L2] gives [T]CC=P−1AP=B.

step 2.1L1L2L3L4L5
4.1

Steps 2.1 and 3.1 prove both directions of the characterisation, including n=0, where the unique empty matrix represents the unique endomorphism of the zero space.

step 2.1step 3.1L1L2L3L4L5∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources