How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The simple objects of O
Statement
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and .
The simple objects of are exactly the modules , , and if and only if . Simplicity here excludes zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The setting above and the hypotheses in the statement.
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and . The category is closed under submodules, quotients and finite direct sums and is an abelian category. If is exact, , and is -semisimple, then . The middle-term weight hypothesis is essential. (Category O is abelian and extension closed among weight modules)
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and . Every nonzero contains a nonzero weight vector killed by . (A nonzero O-object has a highest-weight vector)
For a -module , sending a homomorphism to is a bijection onto the vectors of weight annihilated by . Here is def-verma-module. The nonzero vectors in this target are precisely the highest-weight vectors of weight from def-highest-weight-vector-and-cyclic-highest-weight-module; the zero vector corresponds to the zero homomorphism. (The universal property of Verma modules)
The proper submodule which is the sum of all proper submodules is the unique maximal submodule of . The quotient is simple and is its unique simple quotient. (A Verma module has a unique simple quotient)
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and . Every Verma module , every quotient of it, and every finite-dimensional -semisimple -module belongs to . (Verma and finite-dimensional weight modules belong to O)
Proof
For a nonzero simple object , closure under submodules means simplicity in is the same as module simplicity. Choose a highest-weight vector of weight in . The Verma universal property yields a nonzero map , necessarily surjective. Its unique simple quotient identifies with .
Conversely belongs to and is simple as a module, hence as an object of this full subcategory. Its highest line survives the Verma quotient: killing that generator kills the whole quotient. Its other weights are below . These weight facts also follow directly from the induced Verma construction.
An isomorphism preserves weights, so the two highest weights give and . The positive root cone is pointed, so . Conversely equal labels give the same quotient up to its defining isomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lecture 6 §2 Proposition 2.2, p.5 (standard reference, not scraped)