How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-dimensional Hom spaces in O
Statement
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and .
For , is finite dimensional. For every weight , .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The setting above and the hypotheses in the statement.
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and . The BGG category is the full subcategory of left -modules satisfying all three conditions: is finitely generated; where ; and is finite dimensional for each . Its morphisms are all -linear maps. The zero module is included, generated by the empty set. The enveloping and triangular conventions are those of thm-pbw-ordered-monomial-basis-for-the-enveloping-algebra and thm-triangular-decomposition-from-a-chosen-positive-root-system. (The classical BGG category O)
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and . Let be a finitely generated -semisimple -module. Then if and only if for some finite list of weights. In either case every is finite dimensional. The list may be empty for ; finite generation is an independent hypothesis. (The support description of category O with finite generation)
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and . The simple objects of are exactly the modules , , and if and only if . Simplicity here excludes zero. (The simple objects of O)
For a -module , sending a homomorphism to is a bijection onto the vectors of weight annihilated by . Here is def-verma-module. The nonzero vectors in this target are precisely the highest-weight vectors of weight from def-highest-weight-vector-and-cyclic-highest-weight-module; the zero vector corresponds to the zero homomorphism. (The universal property of Verma modules)
Proof
Choose finitely many weight generators . A map is determined by the tuple , and . Evaluation is therefore an injection into the finite-dimensional space . If there are no generators; if the target is zero.
The module is generated by its one-dimensional highest line (the image of the Verma generator). Every endomorphism preserves that line and is scalar there, hence is the same scalar on its entire generated module. Each scalar multiple of the identity is an endomorphism and these are distinct because .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lecture 6 §2 Proposition 2.6 and Lemma 2.7, p.6 (standard reference, not scraped)