How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Slim triangles, the Gromov product, and the four-point condition are equivalent up to constants
Statement
Let be a nonempty geodesic metric space. The following are equivalent up to changing the constant:
- is hyperbolic, that is, all geodesic triangles are -slim for some .
- For every basepoint there exists such that one has
for all . 3. For some , one has
for all .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty geodesic metric space .
-slim triangles give the product inequality with constant at every basepoint (Slim triangles imply the gromov product inequality).
A geodesic space satisfying the four-point condition with constant has -slim triangles (The four point condition implies slim triangles).
Proof
If triangles are -slim, [F1] proves condition (2) with the same constant at every basepoint.
Now assume (2) and fix just one point . Let . For any four points , write and . On these four points define to be the maximum, over all simple edge paths from to in the complete graph, of the least -value of an edge on the path; put . There are finitely many paths. The one-edge path gives . Along a two-edge path the assumed product inequality gives , and along a three-edge path it gives . Hence . Also , since the first and last edges of every path satisfy these respective bounds.
Concatenate paths attaining and and erase any loops. Erasing loops cannot lower the minimum edge value. Thus : is an exact ultrametric similarity on these four labels. For completeness, its positive threshold relations are nested equivalence relations (on labels with ). Make a finite rooted tree from these nested clusters, with each leaf at height and each common ancestor of at height . Nonnegative edge lengths follow from the bound in step 1.2. The tree distance between leaves is . Removing the finite subtree spanned by four leaves at its central edge or central vertex shows that the largest two of its three opposite-pair distance sums are equal: each uses the central edge twice, while the third uses it zero times; zero-length edges and repeated leaves follow by the same calculation.
The original metric satisfies , so . Each opposite-pair sum therefore differs from its tree counterpart by a number in . Since the two largest tree sums are equal, the largest and second-largest original sums differ by at most : the two original sums corresponding to those equal tree sums both lie in one interval of length , while the remaining original sum can only increase the second-largest if it becomes larger. This is the four-point condition with constant (additive error ). The bound uses the one fixed basepoint , so condition (2)'s per-basepoint quantifier causes no uniformity gap.
Finally (3) is the four-point condition with constant . By [F2] every triangle is -slim. This proves (1) and closes the cycle.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Clara Löh, Geometric Group Theory, Sections 6.1.2-6.2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Brian H. Bowditch, A course on geometric group theory, Sections 1.2-2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)