How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Smooth concordance implies stable filtered equivalence of knot Floer complexes
Statement
For the knot-level assertions, assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let be smooth oriented knots that cobound a smooth properly embedded annulus in . Then there are finite-rank free bifiltered chain complexes and with zero total homology such that where denotes a Maslov-graded chain homotopy equivalence whose maps and chain homotopies do not increase either filtration. The complexes and are acyclic after the filtrations are forgotten; they need not be acyclic in either associated-graded complex.
Statement references
Smooth annulus concordance and its direction conventions
The slice-complex splitting with its explicit external Hom input
The supplied normalized grid/analytic identification
Hom, A survey on Heegaard Floer homology and concordance, Theorem 1 and §3.2
Hom, The knot Floer complex and the smooth concordance group, §§2–3
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth annulus concordance from to , the filtered connected-sum tensor convention, and the normalized knot Floer complex of each boundary knot. Countable Choice is assumed for the knot-level constructions and geometric comparisons; finite algebra on the stated supplied complexes and maps requires no further choice.
Smooth and topological knot concordance classes form abelian groups: the smooth concordance classes form an abelian group with inverse represented by reverse mirror; the smooth proof branch is present and complete. The topological branch is not used.
The slice-complex stable-splitting lemma supplies exactly the finite-rank free totally acyclic stabilizations and filtered graded equivalence needed below. Its geometric slice input is explicitly external Hom, with the fixed finite/countable specialization stated there; no local movie theorem is inferred. A smooth slice knot has a knot Floer complex stably equivalent to the unknot
The supplied full connected-sum comparison is a Maslov-graded bifiltered Laurent chain homotopy equivalence, with inverse and filtered homotopies, and yields the actual tensor complex. The filtered knot Floer complex of a connected sum is a tensor product
The full normalized grid/analytic filtered comparison is supplied. Grid homology is independent of the grid and computes knot Floer homology
The actual chosen-data full-filtered disk analysis is supplied on its stated knot scope. Regularity, compactness, and gluing for pointed Heegaard disks
Proof
In the smooth concordance group, the annulus gives , so is smoothly slice. Also is slice by the group inverse law.
Apply the exact stable form of [F5] to the slice knots and . Write . It gives acyclic complexes with and . It does not supply an unstabilized direct-sum splitting of either slice complex, and none is assumed. These equivalences are supplied by the exact slice stable-splitting input [F5]. The supplied model and disk comparisons [F3]–[F4] do not replace the geometric slice input.
Tensor the first equivalence with and the second with . Under the supplied geometric tensor comparison [F2], their three-factor terms are filtered-equivalent to the same complex , by associativity and the graded flip, which is sign-free over . Put , , and . Then and . Each of has zero total homology. Indeed a finite free graded acyclic Laurent complex, after translating generators to degrees zero and one, has a finite acyclic parity matrix over . Splitting its cycles and boundaries in these finite vector spaces gives a contraction; inserting the required or degree shifts gives a Laurent-linear contraction. Tensoring with any free complex is still a contraction, because the cross terms cancel in characteristic two. No filtration-preserving contraction is claimed or required.
Add to the first equivalence of step 3.1 and to the second. The common middle term is , so composing and permuting direct summands gives . All added factors are finite-rank free and totally acyclic by step 3.1, and every equivalence preserves both filtrations and Maslov grading. This proves exactly the original stable Statement, without strengthening the slice supplier or cancelling a common complex by an unjustified cancellation law.
External-input boundary
The original Statement is proved using the explicitly external Hom slice splitting recorded in [F5], together with the preserved accepted tensor/model interfaces and local finite stabilization algebra. No whole decorated-map or movie-invariance construction is claimed. The original ACω branch uses the fixed finite/countable specialization stated in the slice supplier.
Depends on
- Smooth knot concordance
- Smooth and topological knot concordance classes form abelian groups
- Oriented connected sum and prime knot
- Reverse mirror of an oriented knot
- Knot Floer duality and exchange of the two filtrations
- Admissible multipointed Heegaard data for knot Floer complexes
- Toroidal grid diagrams and gradings for oriented knots
- Grid homology is independent of the grid and computes knot Floer homology
- Regularity, compactness, and gluing for pointed Heegaard disks
- The Alexander filtration and tau level
- The filtered knot Floer complex of a connected sum is a tensor product
- A genus-g knot cobordism bounds the tau difference
- A smooth slice knot has a knot Floer complex stably equivalent to the unknot
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jennifer Hom, A survey on Heegaard Floer homology and concordance, Theorem 1 and §3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jennifer Hom, The knot Floer complex and the smooth concordance group, §§2–3 (standard reference, not scraped)