How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Alexander filtration and tau level
Definition
Let be a smooth oriented knot in the standard oriented three-sphere. Let be a compact connected oriented Seifert surface with boundary , and let be an admissible doubly pointed Heegaard diagram representing . The associated one-pointed hat chain complex is the finite-dimensional chain complex over obtained from the minus complex by setting its basepoint variable to zero; its differential counts index-one disks with zero multiplicity at . Assume for this specified data that the differential is nonincreasing in the Alexander filtration, that the absolute Alexander formula below takes integer values, and that . Give a generator its absolute Alexander filtration where is the homology class of the nowhere-vanishing vector field assigned to by the pointed Morse construction, with its prescribed boundary data near the two basepoints; is the first Chern class of the oriented plane field perpendicular to that vector field. To form the zero-framed surgery, remove a tubular neighborhood of and glue in a solid torus whose meridian is the longitude induced by . The surface is obtained by deleting a boundary collar of and capping its longitude by the meridian disk of that solid torus. This is the standard integer normalization, with the one-generator diagram of the standard unknot at filtration zero. The subcomplex is spanned by generators of Alexander filtration at most .
More generally, a finite integer-filtered chain complex is a finite-dimensional chain complex over with subcomplexes such that for all sufficiently small integers and for all sufficiently large integers . If , define For the fixed diagram and surface above, write . Once diagram and surface independence is proved, their common value is the knot invariant . Until that comparison is proved, denotes only the value for the specified data.
Definition references
Pointed diagrams, the hat complex, and the Alexander filtration convention
Oriented Seifert surfaces for knots
Spin-c structures as lifts of the oriented frame bundle and their associated plane-field data
Ozsvath and Szabo, Knot Floer homology and the four-ball genus, §2.1
Hom, A survey on Heegaard Floer homology and concordance, §§2.2 and 3.1
Ozsvath, Stipsicz, and Szabo, Grid Homology for Knots and Links
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite integer-filtered chain complex over with .
The filtration is exhaustive, bounded below, and each is a subcomplex, as required in the Definition.
The total homology is nonzero and one-dimensional, as required in the Definition.
The Alexander levels are integers, as required in the Definition.
The well-ordering principle: every nonempty subset of has a least element.
Verification
Since for all sufficiently small , the inclusion-induced map is zero at those levels. Since for all sufficiently large , this map is the identity on at those levels and is nonzero by [A2].
Let . Step 1.1 shows is nonempty, and [A1] gives an integer lower bound for . Then is a nonempty subset of ; by [F1] it has a least element . For every , , so is the least element of . This proves that exists and is unique.
Depends on
Used by
- The s-invariant is not twice the knot Floer tau invariant Counterexample
- Vanishing tau does not imply smooth sliceness Counterexample
- Epsilon from the filtered knot Floer complex Definition
- The Upsilon function from the filtered knot Floer complex Definition
- Epsilon and Upsilon for the trefoil and its mirror Example
- Tau of the unknot and trefoils from filtered staircases Example
- Unknot, trefoils, and the 2-twisted positive Whitehead double Example
- A genus-g knot cobordism bounds the tau difference Lemma
- Epsilon is stable-equivalence invariant but not a homomorphism Lemma
- Knot Floer duality and exchange of the two filtrations Lemma
- The filtered knot Floer complex of a connected sum is a tensor product Lemma
- The Hedden–Ording t=2 positive Whitehead double has tau zero and s two Lemma
- The normalized filtered complex of a reverse mirror is dual Lemma
- The tau level adds under the filtered tensor product Lemma
- The tau level is independent of the normalized Heegaard model Lemma
- The tau level is preserved by filtered chain homotopy equivalence Lemma
- The tau level of the standard unknot is zero Lemma
- Epsilon and Upsilon concordance data Theorem
- Smooth concordance implies stable filtered equivalence of knot Floer complexes Theorem
- Tau is an additive smooth concordance invariant and bounds four-ball genus Theorem
- The grid Upsilon function agrees with the original Upsilon invariant Theorem
- Upsilon additivity, mirror symmetry, and four-ball genus bound Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter S. Ozsvath and Zoltan Szabo, Knot Floer homology and the four-ball genus (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jennifer Hom, A survey on Heegaard Floer homology and concordance (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peter S. Ozsvath, Andras I. Stipsicz, and Zoltan Szabo, Grid Homology for Knots and Links (standard reference, not scraped)