How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every irreducible closed subset of an affine spectrum has a unique generic point
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every irreducible closed subset of has a unique generic point. Thus every affine spectrum is sober.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , the Axiom of Choice, and an irreducible closed subset of .
A nonempty irreducible closed subset is for a unique prime , which is its unique generic point (A Zariski-closed subset is irreducible exactly when its radical defining ideal is prime, and then it has a unique generic point).
Proof
The irreducible closed subset is nonempty, so [F1] gives a prime generic for .
Any other generic point has the same closure and is equal to by the uniqueness in [F1].
Therefore every irreducible closed subset has a unique generic point.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 10.26 (standard reference, not scraped)