Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Stieltjes interval set function is a premeasure

Statement

Let F:RR be nondecreasing and right-continuous, and let μ0,F be the set function of The interval set function attached to a nondecreasing right-continuous function. Then μ0,F is a premeasure on the half-open interval algebra in the sense of Premeasures on algebras of sets.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nondecreasing right-continuous function F:RR, the associated interval set function μ0,F, a pairwise disjoint sequence (En)nN in the half-open interval algebra, and a set E=nNEn that also lies in the half-open interval algebra.

[L1]

The set function μ0,F is well defined and finitely additive on the half-open interval algebra. (The Stieltjes interval set function is finitely additive on the half-open interval algebra)

[L2]

Every closed bounded interval [a,b] is compact. (Heine-Borel by bisection: every closed bounded interval [a,b] is compact)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], it is enough to prove countable additivity when E is a single h-interval.

L1givenalgebra

Indeed, if E=r=1mIr is a finite disjoint union of h-intervals, then each EnIr is again a finite disjoint union of h-intervals, the families (EnIr)n are pairwise disjoint, and Ir=n(EnIr). Applying the single-interval case to each Ir and summing finitely gives the general case.

2.1

Let E=nIn be a disjoint union of h-intervals, with E itself an h-interval.

step 1.1L1givenalgebra

For every NN,

n=0Nμ0,F(In)=μ0,F ⁣(n=0NIn)μ0,F(E),

because E is the disjoint union of n=0NIn and the remainder En=0NIn, whose μ0,F-value is nonnegative. Hence nμ0,F(In)μ0,F(E). [step 1.1, L1, given, algebra]

3.1

Assume first that E=(a,b]=nNIn, where the In are pairwise disjoint h-intervals.

step 2.1L1givenalgebra

Let ε>0. Right continuity at a gives δ>0 with F(a+δ)F(a)<ε/2. For each n, if In meets [a+δ,b] then its right endpoint is finite; write that endpoint as vn, let un be its left endpoint, and choose wn>vn with F(wn)F(vn)<ε2n2. Then the open intervals (un,wn) cover [a+δ,b]: every x in that compact interval belongs to nIn=(a,b], hence lies in some In that must have finite right endpoint and therefore satisfies x(un,wn). [given, L2, choose]

4.1

By compactness from [L2], finitely many of those open intervals cover [a+δ,b].

step 3.1L1algebra

Write them as (un1,wn1),,(unm,wnm). Since (a+δ,b]j=1m(unj,wnj], monotonicity and finite additivity give

F(b)F(a+δ)j=1m(F(wnj)F(unj))<j=1mμ0,F(Inj)+ε2nμ0,F(In)+ε2.

Adding F(a+δ)F(a)<ε/2 yields

F(b)F(a)<nμ0,F(In)+ε.

[step 2.1, step 3.1, L1, algebra]

5.1

Because ε>0 was arbitrary, step 4.1 gives μ0,F((a,b])nμ0,F(In).

step 2.1step 4.1

Together with step 2.1, this proves countable additivity for bounded intervals. [step 2.1, step 4.1]

6.1

If E=(,b], then for every real M<b the bounded interval (M,b] is the disjoint union of the h-intervals In(M,b].

step 2.1step 5.1algebra

By step 5.1,

F(b)F(M)=nμ0,F(In(M,b])nμ0,F(In).

Taking the supremum over M<b gives μ0,F(E)nμ0,F(In). Combined with step 2.1, this proves countable additivity for left rays. The same argument with (a,M] proves the right-ray case E=(a,). [step 2.1, step 5.1, algebra]

7.1

If E=R, then for every real M<N the bounded interval (M,N] is the disjoint union of the h-intervals In(M,N].

step 2.1step 5.1step 6.1algebra

So step 5.1 gives

F(N)F(M)=nμ0,F(In(M,N])nμ0,F(In).

Taking the supremum over M<N yields μ0,F(R)nμ0,F(In). Together with step 2.1 and step 6.1, this proves countable additivity for every h-interval. [step 2.1, step 5.1, step 6.1, algebra]

8.1

By step 1.1, the single-interval cases of steps 5.1 through 7.1 imply the general countable additivity clause whenever a disjoint union in the algebra stays in the algebra.

step 1.1step 5.1step 6.1step 7.1

Therefore μ0,F is a premeasure. [step 1.1, step 5.1, step 6.1, step 7.1] ∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources