How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Stieltjes interval set function is a premeasure
Statement
Let be nondecreasing and right-continuous, and let be the set function of The interval set function attached to a nondecreasing right-continuous function. Then is a premeasure on the half-open interval algebra in the sense of Premeasures on algebras of sets.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nondecreasing right-continuous function , the associated interval set function , a pairwise disjoint sequence in the half-open interval algebra, and a set that also lies in the half-open interval algebra.
The set function is well defined and finitely additive on the half-open interval algebra. (The Stieltjes interval set function is finitely additive on the half-open interval algebra)
Every closed bounded interval is compact. (Heine-Borel by bisection: every closed bounded interval is compact)
Proof
By [L1], it is enough to prove countable additivity when is a single h-interval.
Indeed, if is a finite disjoint union of h-intervals, then each is again a finite disjoint union of h-intervals, the families are pairwise disjoint, and . Applying the single-interval case to each and summing finitely gives the general case.
Let be a disjoint union of h-intervals, with itself an h-interval.
For every ,
because is the disjoint union of and the remainder , whose -value is nonnegative. Hence . [step 1.1, L1, given, algebra]
Assume first that , where the are pairwise disjoint h-intervals.
Let . Right continuity at gives with . For each , if meets then its right endpoint is finite; write that endpoint as , let be its left endpoint, and choose with . Then the open intervals cover : every in that compact interval belongs to , hence lies in some that must have finite right endpoint and therefore satisfies . [given, L2, choose]
By compactness from [L2], finitely many of those open intervals cover .
Write them as . Since , monotonicity and finite additivity give
Adding yields
[step 2.1, step 3.1, L1, algebra]
Because was arbitrary, step 4.1 gives .
Together with step 2.1, this proves countable additivity for bounded intervals. [step 2.1, step 4.1]
If , then for every real the bounded interval is the disjoint union of the h-intervals .
By step 5.1,
Taking the supremum over gives . Combined with step 2.1, this proves countable additivity for left rays. The same argument with proves the right-ray case . [step 2.1, step 5.1, algebra]
If , then for every real the bounded interval is the disjoint union of the h-intervals .
So step 5.1 gives
Taking the supremum over yields . Together with step 2.1 and step 6.1, this proves countable additivity for every h-interval. [step 2.1, step 5.1, step 6.1, algebra]
By step 1.1, the single-interval cases of steps 5.1 through 7.1 imply the general countable additivity clause whenever a disjoint union in the algebra stays in the algebra.
Therefore is a premeasure. [step 1.1, step 5.1, step 6.1, step 7.1] ∎
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Proposition 1.15 (standard reference, not scraped)