How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
All Hom spaces between complex Temperley–Lieb standards
Statement
Let , and . For allowed arc labels , the space has dimension one exactly in the following cases:
- ;
- and form an adjacent reflected pair: , , , and ;
- , , , .
In every other case the dimension is zero. In the second case a nonzero map has kernel and image , using the ordinary form-radical notation even when the target is the zero-loop perfect-matching module. In the third case the map is an isomorphism between two one-dimensional modules. These assertions include , rank zero, and absent reflected labels.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The complex standards, their arc labels, and ordinary form radicals .
Each nonexceptional standard has unique simple head and zero or simple radical; a nonzero radical is the head at its adjacent reflected label. These nonzero heads are pairwise distinct. At , is simple and (Complex-root standard radicals, simple heads and reflection linkage).
Adjacent-reflection maps exist, and the central element is scalar on each standard (The annular central element constructs Temperley–Lieb reflection maps).
The form is computed by capping, with lower-propagating terms zero in the standard quotient (The link-state Gram form is symmetric and invariant).
Every nonzero endomorphism of a simple module is invertible (Schur's lemma for simple modules); the link-state dimension is the ballot number (Link states are counted by a ballot-number difference).
Proof
Stacking a state against the diagram with halves caps with , giving ; when propagation drops, both sides vanish in the standard quotient. If the form of is nonzero, choose with . For an endomorphism , [F3] gives for every . Thus is scalar. In the exceptional zero-form case the module itself is simple by [F1], so every endomorphism is scalar: it has a complex eigenvalue , and the endomorphism has a nonzero kernel and must therefore be zero by [F4]. This proves every diagonal dimension is one.
It remains to include at . Here is simple by [F1]. For a nonexceptional source , a map to has simple image; if nonzero it is a simple quotient of the source, hence its head . Distinctness of the labels forces , in which case [F2] supplies a map and [F4] gives uniqueness. This is exactly the adjacent-reflection case.
Suppose both source and target have nonzero forms and . The rank-one operators for the source have propagating strands and kill the target. Choosing as in step 1.1, a proposed homomorphism therefore satisfies . Hence the Hom space is zero.
Suppose both forms are nonzero and . A nonzero map cannot be surjective: its inverse quotient isomorphism would contradict step 2.1, whose proof also applies to quotients of the target. Thus its image lies in the simple radical . The kernel is a proper submodule of the source and hence is or . If it is zero, the source is simple because it embeds into the simple radical. In either case the image is isomorphic to the source head . By [F1] and distinction of simple labels this is possible exactly when is the adjacent reflected label of . Such a map exists by [F2]; it factors as the head quotient followed by an isomorphism and the radical inclusion. Schur's lemma makes this factorization unique up to scalar, so its Hom space has dimension one and the stated kernel and image. If the target radical is zero there is no such map.
A nonzero map from to , , is injective. If its image is the radical, [F1] makes it ; this cannot equal because . Otherwise its image is the entire target by the submodule list in [F1], so the target is simple. At every has a present reflected label with a nonzero head, hence is reducible; thus . That standard is one-dimensional. The exceptional module has dimension by [F4], which is greater than one for : there are at least the distinct matchings with initial arcs and . Equality therefore occurs only at . In that case both and are one-dimensional, and acts by zero on each, giving the stated isomorphism and one-dimensional Hom. These cases exhaust all labels, including rank zero.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ridout–Saint-Aubin, Standard Modules, Induction and the Structure of the Temperley–Lieb Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)