Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

All Hom spaces between complex Temperley–Lieb standards

Statement

Let q∈C×, δ=q+q−1 and Vn,p=Wn,n−2p(C,δ). For allowed arc labels p,p′, the space Hom⁡TLn(Vn,p,Vn,p′) has dimension one exactly in the following cases:

  • p=p′;
  • p<p′ and (n,p),(n,p′) form an adjacent reflected pair: κ=ord⁡(q2)≥2, 1≤r<κ, n−2p′+1=kκ+r, and p=p′+r−κ;
  • n=2, δ=0, p=1, p′=0.

In every other case the dimension is zero. In the second case a nonzero map has kernel Rn,p and image Rn,p′≅Ln,p, using the ordinary form-radical notation even when the target is the zero-loop perfect-matching module. In the third case the map is an isomorphism between two one-dimensional modules. These assertions include κ=1,2,3,∞, rank zero, and absent reflected labels.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The complex standards, their arc labels, and ordinary form radicals Rn,p.

[F1]

Each nonexceptional standard has unique simple head Ln,p and zero or simple radical; a nonzero radical is the head at its adjacent reflected label. These nonzero heads are pairwise distinct. At δ=0,n=2m>0, V2m,m=R2m,m≅L2m,m−1 is simple and L2m,m=0 (Complex-root standard radicals, simple heads and reflection linkage).

[F2]

Adjacent-reflection maps exist, and the central element is scalar on each standard (The annular central element constructs Temperley–Lieb reflection maps).

[F3]

The form is computed by capping, with lower-propagating terms zero in the standard quotient (The link-state Gram form is symmetric and invariant).

[F4]

Every nonzero endomorphism of a simple module is invertible (Schur's lemma for simple modules); the link-state dimension is the ballot number (Link states are counted by a ballot-number difference).

Proof

technique · Use the complete submodule lists and the rank-one operators
1.1F1F3F4givenchoosealgebra

Stacking a state z against the diagram with halves y,x caps z with y, giving z⋅Cy,x=ϕ(y,z)x; when propagation drops, both sides vanish in the standard quotient. If the form of Vn,p is nonzero, choose y,z with ϕ(y,z)=1. For an endomorphism h, [F3] gives h(x)=h(z⋅Cy,x)=h(z)⋅Cy,x=ϕ(y,h(z))x for every x. Thus h is scalar. In the exceptional zero-form case the module itself is simple by [F1], so every endomorphism is scalar: it has a complex eigenvalue λ, and the endomorphism h−λ1 has a nonzero kernel and must therefore be zero by [F4]. This proves every diagonal dimension is one.

1.2F1F2F4algebra

It remains to include Z=V2m,m at δ=0. Here Z≅L2m,m−1 is simple by [F1]. For a nonexceptional source V2m,p, a map to Z has simple image; if nonzero it is a simple quotient of the source, hence its head L2m,p. Distinctness of the labels forces p=m−1, in which case [F2] supplies a map and [F4] gives uniqueness. This is exactly the adjacent-reflection case.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

Suppose both source and target have nonzero forms and p>p′. The rank-one operators for the source have n−2p<n−2p′ propagating strands and kill the target. Choosing y,z as in step 1.1, a proposed homomorphism h therefore satisfies h(x)=h(z⋅Cy,x)=h(z)⋅Cy,x=0. Hence the Hom space is zero.

3.1F1F2F4step 2.1algebra

Suppose both forms are nonzero and p<p′. A nonzero map cannot be surjective: its inverse quotient isomorphism would contradict step 2.1, whose proof also applies to quotients of the target. Thus its image lies in the simple radical Rn,p′. The kernel is a proper submodule of the source and hence is 0 or Rn,p. If it is zero, the source is simple because it embeds into the simple radical. In either case the image is isomorphic to the source head Ln,p. By [F1] and distinction of simple labels this is possible exactly when p is the adjacent reflected label of p′. Such a map exists by [F2]; it factors as the head quotient followed by an isomorphism Ln,p≅Rn,p′ and the radical inclusion. Schur's lemma makes this factorization unique up to scalar, so its Hom space has dimension one and the stated kernel and image. If the target radical is zero there is no such map.

4.1F1F4step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 1.2algebra∎

A nonzero map from Z to V2m,p′, p′<m, is injective. If its image is the radical, [F1] makes it L2m,p′−1; this cannot equal L2m,m−1 because p′−1<m−1. Otherwise its image is the entire target by the submodule list in [F1], so the target is simple. At κ=2 every 1≤p′<m has a present reflected label p′−1 with a nonzero head, hence is reducible; thus p′=0. That standard is one-dimensional. The exceptional module has dimension 1m+1(2mm) by [F4], which is greater than one for m≥2: there are at least the distinct matchings with initial arcs (1,2) and (1,2m). Equality therefore occurs only at m=1. In that case both V2,1 and V2,0 are one-dimensional, and d1 acts by zero on each, giving the stated isomorphism and one-dimensional Hom. These cases exhaust all labels, including rank zero.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources