Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complex-root standard radicals, simple heads and reflection linkage

Statement

Let q∈C×, δ=q+q−1, κ=ord⁡(q2), and abbreviate Vn,p=Wn,n−2p(C,δ), Rn,p=rad⁡ϕn,n−2p and Ln,p=Vn,p/Rn,p. At every label except δ=0,n=2p>0, Ln,p is the simple head, and all proper submodules of Vn,p are 0 or Rn,p. The nonzero Ln,p give all pairwise nonisomorphic simple modules. For κ=1 every standard is simple; for κ=∞ every standard is simple. At finite κ≥2, critical labels give Rn,p=0. At a noncritical label put n−2p+1=kκ+r, 1≤r<κ, and a=p+r−κ. Then Rn,p≅{Ln,a,a≥0,0,a<0. Thus, except for the zero-loop perfect-matching exception, a present reflected label gives the nonsplit exact sequence 0⟶Ln,a⟶Vn,p⟶Ln,p⟶0, and these are the two composition factors, each once. An absent reflected label gives a simple standard. Each critical label is a singleton linkage class; the other linkage classes are the chains of allowed labels obtained by successive adjacent reflection. Here linkage means the equivalence generated by sharing a simple composition factor among standard modules.

If δ=0 and n=2p>0, the ordinary form on V2p,p is zero, so R2p,p=V2p,p and L2p,p=0. The actual module is simple and isomorphic to L2p,p−1. The simple labels in this case are 0≤j<p. In particular this branch does not identify the actual simple head with the zero form quotient.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The complex standards and the above arc-label notation; an allowed label has 0≤p≤⌊n/2⌋.

[F1]

Nonzero cell-form quotients are absolutely simple, pairwise distinct, exhaustive, and their form radicals are unique maximal submodules (Nonzero Temperley–Lieb cell forms give all simple heads).

[F2]

There is a nonzero map Vn,a→Vn,p for every adjacent reflected pair a<p (The annular central element constructs Temperley–Lieb reflection maps).

[F3]

The corresponding dimensions satisfy dim⁡Rn,p=dim⁡Ln,a, or zero if a is absent (Root Gram ranks give the reflected simple-head dimensions).

[F4]

Critical standards are simple with nondegenerate form; at δ=0 the positive-rank perfect-matching standard is simple despite its zero ordinary form (Critical complex Temperley–Lieb standard modules are simple, The zero-loop perfect-matching standard module is simple).

[F5]

Capping is the invariant Gram pairing, and a composite with fewer than the required propagating strands is zero in the standard module (The link-state Gram form is symmetric and invariant).

[F6]

The Gram determinant is a product of nonvanishing quantum-integer quotients when κ=∞ (The Temperley–Lieb link-state Gram determinant).

Proof

technique · Compare the kernel and image of a reflection map with the exact Gram-radical dimensions
1.1F1F5givenconstruct

The form is nonzero unless δ=0 and the positive-rank defect number is zero. Indeed, when δ≠0 a state's pairing with itself is δp≠0. When δ=0 and t=n−2p>0, take x with arcs (1,2),(3,4),…,(2p−1,2p) and y with arcs (2,3),(4,5),…,(2p,2p+1); all other sites are defects. Their overlay on sites 1,…,2p+1 is one open alternating path, with no cycle, and all remaining defect paths match. Thus ϕ(x,y)=1. If p=0 the form is (1). For t=0,n>0, every overlay has a closed component and hence value zero at δ=0. Consequently [F1] applies to exactly the stated nonexceptional labels.

2.1F5step 1.1constructalgebra

First observe the rank-one identity: form the algebra diagram whose two halves are x,y. Stacking z against its y half gives ϕ(y,z) times the identity on the defect strands; if fewer strands propagate, it is zero in the standard quotient. Therefore this diagram sends z to ϕ(y,z)x, by exactly the matching rule in [F5]. More strongly, any submodule not contained in the form radical is the entire standard. If z lies outside the radical, choose y with ϕ(y,z)=1. For any vector x, the diagram with halves x,y sends z to x by [F5]; hence z generates the standard. Also, if p>p′ and the source form is nonzero, every map between any quotients of Vn,p and Vn,p′ is zero. Choose y,z in the source with ϕ(y,z)=1. A diagram with halves x,y has n−2p<n−2p′ propagating strands and therefore acts as zero on the target and its quotients. Applying a proposed homomorphism to its action on the class of z gives zero on the class of every x, hence the map is zero.

3.1F2F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Consider an adjacent reflected pair a<p and a nonzero f:Vn,a→Vn,p from [F2]. Its kernel is proper and therefore lies in Rn,a by step 2.1. Its image also lies in Rn,p: otherwise step 2.1 makes f surjective, and its inverse isomorphism Vn,p→Vn,a/ker⁡f contradicts the quotient-vanishing assertion in step 2.1. The source is never the zero-form exceptional label, since a<p. If the target is the exceptional label, its simplicity in [F4] instead gives im⁡f=Vn,p=Rn,p directly. Thus in every case ker⁡f⊆Rn,a and im⁡f⊆Rn,p.

4.1F1F3step 3.1algebra

Rank-nullity and [F3] now force equality in both inclusions: dim⁡Vn,a=dim⁡ker⁡f+dim⁡im⁡f≤dim⁡Rn,a+dim⁡Rn,p=dim⁡Rn,a+dim⁡Ln,a=dim⁡Vn,a. Therefore ker⁡f=Rn,a and im⁡f=Rn,p≅Ln,a, which is simple by [F1]. For an absent reflected label [F3] gives Rn,p=0. At a critical label [F4] gives the same.

5.1F1F3F4F6step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1algebra

For a nonexceptional standard, steps 2.1 and 4.1 show every proper submodule is contained in a radical which is zero or simple. Thus its only submodules are 0,R,V and every quotient is indecomposable. When the radical is nonzero, the exact radical/head sequence cannot split: a complementary submodule would be proper and not contained in the radical, contradicting step 2.1. It has exactly the two displayed simple factors. The critical κ=1 branch is [F4]. If κ=∞, no quantum integer in the determinant vanishes, so the determinant and hence the form are nondegenerate; this is [F6]. Exhaustion and distinction of the nonzero heads are [F1].

6.1F1F3F4step 1.1step 4.1step 5.1algebra∎

At δ=0 and n=2p>0, κ=2 and the reflected arc label is p−1. Step 1.1 identifies the form radical as all of V2p,p, while step 4.1 identifies it with L2p,p−1. This agrees with the separately proved actual simplicity [F4]; its zero form quotient introduces no extra simple label. The remaining standards have nonzero forms and hence the complete simple labels are 0,…,p−1. Finally, each noncritical standard shares factors only with its adjacent reflection neighbors by step 4.1, and every present neighbor occurs. Taking the equivalence generated by these edges gives precisely the stated reflection chains. A critical head occurs only in its own simple standard, giving singleton classes.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources