How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Root Gram ranks give the reflected simple-head dimensions
Statement
Put , and , allowing when . Let be finite with . For a noncritical label write with . Then More explicitly, set the dimensions of out-of-range modules to zero. At critical labels . At noncritical labels, The initial condition is . These formulas include and the zero-form perfect-matching module.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and finite , the standard modules, their capping forms and the label convention.
The central spectral projections give the split restriction for noncritical labels (The annular central element constructs Temperley–Lieb reflection maps).
At generic all smaller-rank Gram determinants are nonzero (The Temperley–Lieb link-state Gram determinant).
Critical forms are nondegenerate (Critical complex Temperley–Lieb standard modules are simple). The form is symmetric and invariant (The link-state Gram form is symmetric and invariant).
The quantum integers satisfy and vanish, for , precisely when (Temperley–Lieb quantum integers and quantum characteristic).
Proof
First work at generic . The rightmost-defect submodule has nondegenerate form by [F2], so its orthogonal complement is invariant and maps isomorphically to the restriction quotient. The smaller standards are simple by their rank-one diagram operators; an invariant form on such a standard is a scalar multiple of its nondegenerate standard form, because their associated maps into the dual differ by an endomorphism, and an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex simple module is scalar (take any eigenvalue). Subtracting the submodule projection from quotient basis lifts gives a unitriangular Gram splitting . Compute its scalar as follows. Group the link states into the four types: both defects; a defect and on an earlier arc; an arc; and on an arc ending earlier than . Put , and write the smaller-rank matrix as . In the current off-diagonal Gram block the first column block is : types one and three have unmatched defects, while cutting the terminal arc in types two and three removes no closed component. The type-three diagonal block is , since the shared terminal arc closes one loop. If is the first column block of the projection coefficient matrix, multiplication by gives and . Thus and . Its quadratic contribution is after the four terms cancel with coefficients . Comparing the type-three block gives . At , deleting the terminal site closes exactly one additional component, so and . The recurrence solves to by the quantum-integer recurrence. If the block is empty it is omitted; the same cancellation still holds. Now at a noncritical root, the two eigenvalues used for [F1] differ by . The spectral projector onto the rightmost-defect summand is . Its entries are rational functions regular at the root; subtracting this projection from each standard quotient lift gives a unitriangular splitting matrix , also regular there. Since and the eigenvalues differ, the two summands are orthogonal. For generic this is exactly the orthogonal splitting just computed, since the submodule form is nondegenerate and its orthogonal complement is unique. Thus this Gram matrix identity is an identity of rational matrices regular at every noncritical root, and specializes there. This continuity argument applies to the entire matrix identity, rather than inferring a rank from a specialized determinant. If , there is only the quotient summand and direct capping gives , the same formula with .
Since , ; hence precisely when . At a noncritical label the denominator of is nonzero and its numerator vanishes precisely when . The kernel dimension of the specialized block form in step 1.1 is therefore in that case, and otherwise. Critical labels give zero by [F3]; the all-defect form is , giving . For , subtraction from [F4] gives the companion recursion, with initial : at critical labels; at noncritical labels it is if , and otherwise.
Prove the reflected-dimension formula by induction on , with out-of-range labels assigned dimension zero. Write . If , neither predecessor is critical. Their reflection indices are respectively and , so induction and step 2.1 give . The reflected label has remainder , which is also neither nor ; its companion recursion gives exactly .
When , every noncritical label has and both predecessors are critical. The radical recursion gives . Since and the companion recursion at also has remainder , this is . The same formula holds for : it gives , as required by the identically zero form.
If and , the predecessor is critical, while has reflected index . Consequently . Here , and criticality gives . The companion recursion at has remainder , so this sum is . If and , is critical and its radical is zero; the reflection of has index . Thus . The reflected label at rank has remainder , whose companion recursion is precisely .
The initial case has and zero radical. All predecessor terms whose indices leave the allowed range are zero. In particular the recursions in the preceding cases give zero when ; when they use the initial all-defect dimension . These boundary rules also cover . The induction establishes the stated formula for present reflected labels and the zero radical for absent labels.
Depends on
- The annular central element constructs Temperley–Lieb reflection maps
- The Temperley–Lieb link-state Gram determinant
- Critical complex Temperley–Lieb standard modules are simple
- The link-state Gram form is symmetric and invariant
- Link states are counted by a ballot-number difference
- Complex Temperley–Lieb critical labels and reflection
- Temperley–Lieb quantum integers and quantum characteristic
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ridout–Saint-Aubin, Standard Modules, Induction and the Structure of the Temperley–Lieb Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)