Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Root Gram ranks give the reflected simple-head dimensions

Statement

Put Vn,p=Wn,n−2p(C,q+q−1), Rn,p=rad⁡ϕn,n−2p and Ln,p=Vn,p/Rn,p, allowing L2p,p=0 when δ=0. Let κ=ord⁡(q2) be finite with κ≥2. For a noncritical label write n−2p+1=kκ+r with 1≤r<κ. Then dim⁡Rn,p={dim⁡Ln,p+r−κ,p+r−κ≥0,0,p+r−κ<0. More explicitly, set the dimensions of out-of-range modules to zero. At critical labels dim⁡Rn,p=0. At noncritical labels, dim⁡Rn,p={dim⁡Rn−1,p+dim⁡Vn−1,p−1,r=κ−1,dim⁡Rn−1,p+dim⁡Rn−1,p−1,r≠κ−1. The initial condition is dim⁡Rn,0=0. These formulas include κ=2 and the zero-form perfect-matching module.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: q≠0 and finite κ≥2, the standard modules, their capping forms and the label convention.

[F1]

The central spectral projections give the split restriction for noncritical labels (The annular central element constructs Temperley–Lieb reflection maps).

[F2]

At generic q all smaller-rank Gram determinants are nonzero (The Temperley–Lieb link-state Gram determinant).

[F3]

Critical forms are nondegenerate (Critical complex Temperley–Lieb standard modules are simple). The form is symmetric and invariant (The link-state Gram form is symmetric and invariant).

[F4]

dim⁡Vn,p=dim⁡Vn−1,p+dim⁡Vn−1,p−1 (Link states are counted by a ballot-number difference). Reflection is as in Complex Temperley–Lieb critical labels and reflection.

[F5]

The quantum integers satisfy [a+1]q=δ[a]q−[a−1]q and vanish, for q≠±1, precisely when q2a=1 (Temperley–Lieb quantum integers and quantum characteristic).

Proof

technique · Specialize a regular orthogonal splitting, then compare the two dimension recursions
1.1F1F2F3F5givenalgebra

First work at generic q. The rightmost-defect submodule has nondegenerate form by [F2], so its orthogonal complement is invariant and maps isomorphically to the restriction quotient. The smaller standards are simple by their rank-one diagram operators; an invariant form on such a standard is a scalar multiple of its nondegenerate standard form, because their associated maps into the dual differ by an endomorphism, and an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex simple module is scalar (take any eigenvalue). Subtracting the submodule projection from quotient basis lifts gives a unitriangular Gram splitting Gn,p=UT(Gn−1,p⊕αn,pGn−1,p−1)U. Compute its scalar as follows. Group the link states into the four types: n,n−1 both defects; n a defect and n−1 on an earlier arc; (n−1,n) an arc; and n on an arc ending earlier than n−1. Put A=Gn−2,p, B=Gn−2,p−1 and write the smaller-rank matrix as Gn−1,p=(AAV0V0TAV0TAV0+αn−1,pB). In the current off-diagonal Gram block the first column block is (0,B)T: types one and three have unmatched defects, while cutting the terminal arc in types two and three removes no closed component. The type-three diagonal block is δB, since the shared terminal arc closes one loop. If (X,Y)T is the first column block of the projection coefficient matrix, multiplication by Gn−1,p gives AX+AV0Y=0 and V0TAX+(V0TAV0+αn−1,pB)Y=B. Thus X=−V0Y and Y=αn−1,p−1I. Its quadratic contribution is αn−1,p−1B after the four V0TAV0 terms cancel with coefficients 1−1−1+1. Comparing the type-three block gives αn,p=δ−αn−1,p−1. At n=2p, deleting the terminal site closes exactly one additional component, so G2p,p=δG2p−1,p−1 and α2p,p=δ. The recurrence solves to αn,p=[n−2p+2]q/[n−2p+1]q by the quantum-integer recurrence. If the A block is empty it is omitted; the same cancellation still holds. Now at a noncritical root, the two eigenvalues used for [F1] differ by −(q−q−1)(qn−2p+1−q−(n−2p+1))≠0. The spectral projector onto the rightmost-defect summand is (Fn−1−fn−1,p−1)/(fn−1,p−fn−1,p−1). Its entries are rational functions regular at the root; subtracting this projection from each standard quotient lift gives a unitriangular splitting matrix U, also regular there. Since Fn−1∗=Fn−1 and the eigenvalues differ, the two summands are orthogonal. For generic q this is exactly the orthogonal splitting just computed, since the submodule form is nondegenerate and its orthogonal complement is unique. Thus this Gram matrix identity is an identity of rational matrices regular at every noncritical root, and specializes there. This continuity argument applies to the entire matrix identity, rather than inferring a rank from a specialized determinant. If n=2p, there is only the quotient summand and direct capping gives G2p,p=δG2p−1,p−1, the same formula with α=[2]/[1]=δ.

2.1F2F3F4F5step 1.1algebra

Since κ≥2, q≠±1; hence [a]q=0 precisely when κ∣a. At a noncritical label the denominator of α is nonzero and its numerator vanishes precisely when r=κ−1. The kernel dimension of the specialized block form in step 1.1 is therefore dim⁡Rn−1,p+dim⁡Vn−1,p−1 in that case, and dim⁡Rn−1,p+dim⁡Rn−1,p−1 otherwise. Critical labels give zero by [F3]; the all-defect form is (1), giving Rn,0=0. For n≥1, subtraction from [F4] gives the companion recursion, with initial dim⁡L0,0=1: dim⁡Ln,p=dim⁡Vn,p at critical labels; at noncritical labels it is dim⁡Ln−1,p if r=κ−1, and dim⁡Ln−1,p+dim⁡Ln−1,p−1 otherwise.

3.1F4step 2.1algebra

Prove the reflected-dimension formula by induction on n, with out-of-range labels assigned dimension zero. Write a=p+r−κ. If r∉{1,κ−1}, neither predecessor is critical. Their reflection indices are respectively a−1 and a, so induction and step 2.1 give dim⁡Rn,p=dim⁡Ln−1,a−1+dim⁡Ln−1,a. The reflected label a has remainder κ−r, which is also neither 1 nor κ−1; its companion recursion gives exactly dim⁡Ln,a.

3.2F3F4step 2.1algebra

When κ=2, every noncritical label has r=1=κ−1 and both predecessors are critical. The radical recursion gives dim⁡Rn,p=dim⁡Vn−1,p−1=dim⁡Ln−1,p−1. Since a=p−1 and the companion recursion at (n,a) also has remainder 1, this is dim⁡Ln,a. The same formula holds for n=2p: it gives dim⁡R2p,p=dim⁡V2p−1,p−1=dim⁡V2p,p, as required by the identically zero form.

4.1F3F4step 2.1step 3.1algebra

If r=κ−1 and κ>2, the predecessor (n−1,p−1) is critical, while (n−1,p) has reflected index a−1. Consequently dim⁡Rn,p=dim⁡Ln−1,a−1+dim⁡Vn−1,p−1. Here a=p−1, and criticality gives Vn−1,p−1=Ln−1,a. The companion recursion at (n,a) has remainder 1≠κ−1, so this sum is dim⁡Ln,a. If r=1 and κ>2, (n−1,p) is critical and its radical is zero; the reflection of (n−1,p−1) has index a. Thus dim⁡Rn,p=dim⁡Ln−1,a. The reflected label at rank n has remainder κ−1, whose companion recursion is precisely dim⁡Ln,a=dim⁡Ln−1,a.

5.1F4step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 3.2algebra∎

The initial p=0 case has a<0 and zero radical. All predecessor terms whose indices leave the allowed range are zero. In particular the recursions in the preceding cases give zero when a<0; when a=0 they use the initial all-defect dimension 1. These boundary rules also cover n=0,1. The induction establishes the stated formula for present reflected labels and the zero radical for absent labels.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources