How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Top Chern class equals Euler class of the underlying real bundle
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a numerable complex rank- bundle over a path-connected CW complex, regarded as an oriented real rank- bundle through the complex orientation of The complex orientation of the underlying real bundle. Then
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice is assumed, exactly as inherited from the splitting and Euler-class suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).
The flag projection splits into complex lines and is injective on cohomology with coefficients (Complex splitting principle with integral injective pullback).
Chern classes are natural and multiplicative over Whitney sums, with for and on a line (Naturality, normalization, and Whitney sum for Chern classes, Chern classes from the projective-bundle relation).
The complex orientation is natural under pullback and the complex orientation of a direct sum is the ordered direct-sum orientation (The complex orientation of the underlying real bundle).
Euler classes are natural under orientation-preserving pullback and multiply over ordered direct sums (Naturality, orientation sign, and Whitney product for Euler classes).
Proof
Given: AC and a numerable complex rank- bundle over a path-connected CW complex.
If , both sides are by the rank-zero conventions. Assume . Pulling back to the flag bundle, by [F1].
On the flag bundle the top Chern class of the split bundle is the product of the line classes: , by multiplicativity in [F2] and the vanishing for .
On the flag bundle the Euler class of the underlying real bundle is the product of the line Euler classes: , using naturality of the Euler class and [F3] for the ordered sum.
By [F2] each line contributes , so the right sides of steps 2.1 and 2.2 are equal; hence .
Injectivity of on from [F1] gives , which is the assertion.
Boundary cases. The case was discharged in step 1.1. For the assertion is the line normalization of [F2], and no splitting is needed. The empty base is excluded by the path-connected hypothesis, and the coefficient ring is nonzero. AC enters only through [A1] in the splitting and Thom/Euler suppliers.
Source notes
Miller's Lecture 36 (printed pp. 134-137) states , the top Chern class equals the Euler class; the proof above is the splitting argument: after splitting, both sides are the product of the line Euler classes, and integral injectivity of the flag pullback descends the identity.
Depends on
- Chern classes from the projective-bundle relation
- Complex splitting principle with integral injective pullback
- Naturality, normalization, and Whitney sum for Chern classes
- The complex orientation of the underlying real bundle
- Naturality, orientation sign, and Whitney product for Euler classes
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Miller, MIT 18.906 Algebraic Topology II, Lecture 36 (standard reference, not scraped)