Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Top Chern class equals Euler class of the underlying real bundle

Statement

Assume AC. Let EB be a numerable complex rank-n bundle over a path-connected CW complex, regarded as an oriented real rank-2n bundle through the complex orientation of The complex orientation of the underlying real bundle. Then cn(E)=e(ER)in H2n(B;Z).

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed, exactly as inherited from the splitting and Euler-class suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

The flag projection splits qE=L1Ln into complex lines and q is injective on cohomology with Z coefficients (Complex splitting principle with integral injective pullback).

[F2]

Chern classes are natural and multiplicative over Whitney sums, with ck(L)=0 for k2 and c1(L)=e(LR) on a line (Naturality, normalization, and Whitney sum for Chern classes, Chern classes from the projective-bundle relation).

[F3]

The complex orientation is natural under pullback and the complex orientation of a direct sum is the ordered direct-sum orientation (The complex orientation of the underlying real bundle).

[F4]

Euler classes are natural under orientation-preserving pullback and multiply over ordered direct sums (Naturality, orientation sign, and Whitney product for Euler classes).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: AC and a numerable complex rank-n bundle EB over a path-connected CW complex.

1.1

If n=0, both sides are 1 by the rank-zero conventions. Assume n1. Pulling back to the flag bundle, qE=L1Ln by [F1].

F1
2.1

On the flag bundle the top Chern class of the split bundle is the product of the line classes: qcn(E)=i=1nc1(Li), by multiplicativity in [F2] and the vanishing ck(Li)=0 for k2.

F2step 1.1
2.2

On the flag bundle the Euler class of the underlying real bundle is the product of the line Euler classes: qe(ER)=e((qE)R)=i=1ne(Li,R), using naturality of the Euler class and [F3] for the ordered sum.

F3F4step 1.1
3.1

By [F2] each line contributes c1(Li)=e(Li,R), so the right sides of steps 2.1 and 2.2 are equal; hence q(cn(E))=q(e(ER)).

F2step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

Injectivity of q on H2n(;Z) from [F1] gives cn(E)=e(ER), which is the assertion.

F1step 3.1
5.1

Boundary cases. The case n=0 was discharged in step 1.1. For n=1 the assertion is the line normalization c1(L)=e(LR) of [F2], and no splitting is needed. The empty base is excluded by the path-connected hypothesis, and the coefficient ring Z is nonzero. AC enters only through [A1] in the splitting and Thom/Euler suppliers.

A1F2step 1.1step 4.1

Source notes

Miller's Lecture 36 (printed pp. 134-137) states cn(τ)=χ(τ), the top Chern class equals the Euler class; the proof above is the splitting argument: after splitting, both sides are the product of the line Euler classes, and integral injectivity of the flag pullback descends the identity.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources