How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projection CLT for a two-sample U-statistic
Statement
Assume AC and the setup of Two-sample order-r U-statistic and first projections, is fixed, , , and and . If the fixed-order kernel has finite second moments under all mixed assignments, then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Independent IID samples from and , fixed , , a zero parameter, and positive finite first-projection variances.
Two-sample order-r U-statistic and first projections defines and its centered projections .
Second-moment order of the degenerate remainder gives in under the mixed second-moment premises.
Lindeberg-Levy iid central limit theorem: under AC, each IID centered real sample mean with positive finite variance has its normalized normal limit.
Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums, Characteristic function of a normal law, and Characteristic function criterion for weak convergence give the independent-sum normal limit.
Slutsky's theorem for real random variables transfers a weak limit after adding a term converging to zero in probability.
AC is assumed exactly for the CLT and characteristic-function suppliers in [F3]–[F4]. The Axiom of Choice
Proof
Given: The assumptions in the Statement. Prove the centered normal limit at scale .
By [F1] and [F2], and the final term tends to zero in probability because is bounded and .
The summands are IID, centered, and have variance ; [F3] gives . The are IID, centered, and have variance , so the same result gives . The two sums are independent because the two samples are independent.
Since , the characteristic function of the sum of the first two terms in step 1.1 is the product of the two independent characteristic functions. By [F4] this product converges to the characteristic function of a centered normal with variance ; the positivity assumptions make that variance nonzero.
The first two terms in step 1.1 therefore have the stated weak limit. The last term converges to zero in probability by step 1.1, so [F5] gives the claimed limit for . All divisions are by positive finite variances, and no claim is made when either first-projection variance is zero.
Depends on
- Two-sample order-r U-statistic and first projections
- Second-moment order of the degenerate remainder
- Lindeberg-Levy iid central limit theorem
- Slutsky's theorem for real random variables
- Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
- The Axiom of Choice
- Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums
- Characteristic function of a normal law
- Characteristic function criterion for weak convergence
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Y. Chung and J. P. Romano, Asymptotically Valid and Exact Permutation Tests Based on Two-Sample U-Statistics, Stanford Technical Report 2011-09, Remark 3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Péter Major, Some Results About U-statistics, in On the Estimation of Multiple Random Integrals and U-Statistics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2079, Theorem 9.1 (standard reference, not scraped)