Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Projection CLT for a two-sample U-statistic

Statement

Assume AC and the setup of Two-sample order-r U-statistic and first projections, r is fixed, m/N→p∈(0,1), θ(P,Q;h)=0, and 0<EP[gX2]=σX2<∞ and 0<EQ[gY2]=σY2<∞. If the fixed-order kernel has finite second moments under all mixed assignments, then

m Um,n⇒N ⁣(0, r2(σX2+p1−pσY2)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Independent IID samples from P and Q, fixed r, m/N→p∈(0,1), a zero parameter, and positive finite first-projection variances.

[F1]

Two-sample order-r U-statistic and first projections defines Um,n and its centered projections gX,gY.

[F2]

Second-moment order of the degenerate remainder gives NRm,n→0 in L2 under the mixed second-moment premises.

[F3]

Lindeberg-Levy iid central limit theorem: under AC, each IID centered real sample mean with positive finite variance has its normalized normal limit.

[F5]

Slutsky's theorem for real random variables transfers a weak limit after adding a term converging to zero in probability.

[A1]

AC is assumed exactly for the CLT and characteristic-function suppliers in [F3]–[F4]. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

Given: The assumptions in the Statement. Prove the centered normal limit at scale m.

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

By [F1] and [F2], m Um,n=r1m∑i=1mgX(Xi)+rmn(1n∑j=1ngY(Yj))+mRm,n, and the final term tends to zero in probability because m/N is bounded and E[(NRm,n)2]→0.

1.2F1F3A1given

The summands gX(Xi) are IID, centered, and have variance σX2; [F3] gives m−1/2∑igX(Xi)⇒N(0,σX2). The gY(Yj) are IID, centered, and have variance σY2, so the same result gives n−1/2∑jgY(Yj)⇒N(0,σY2). The two sums are independent because the two samples are independent.

2.1F1F4step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Since m/n→p/(1−p), the characteristic function of the sum of the first two terms in step 1.1 is the product of the two independent characteristic functions. By [F4] this product converges to the characteristic function of a centered normal with variance r2(σX2+(p/(1−p))σY2); the positivity assumptions make that variance nonzero.

3.1F5step 1.1step 2.1∎

The first two terms in step 1.1 therefore have the stated weak limit. The last term converges to zero in probability by step 1.1, so [F5] gives the claimed limit for m Um,n. All divisions are by positive finite variances, and no claim is made when either first-projection variance is zero.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources