Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Universal property of localisation for modules

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring, let SR be multiplicative, let M be a left R-module, and let N be an S1R-module. Every R-linear map f:MN factors uniquely through the localisation map λM:MS1M by an S1R-linear map

f~:S1MN,f~(m/s)=(1/s)f(m).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R, a multiplicative subset SR, a left R-module M, an S1R-module N, and an R-linear map f:MN.

[L1]

In S1M, the localisation map is λM(m)=m/1, addition is (m/s)+(n/t)=(tm+sn)/(st), and the scalar action is (a/u)(m/s)=am/(us) (Localisation of a module at a multiplicative subset).

[L2]

The addition formula of S1M is independent of representatives (Addition of localised module fractions is independent of representatives).

[L3]

The scalar action of S1R on S1M is independent of representatives (The localised scalar action is independent of representatives).

[L4]

In S1R, every s/1 with sS is a unit with inverse 1/s (The localisation relation is an equivalence relation and fraction arithmetic is well defined).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Define f~(m/s):=(1/s)f(m). If m/s=m/s, choose uS with u(smsm)=0; applying f gives (u/1)((s/1)f(m)(s/1)f(m))=0, and multiplying by the units (u/1)1(s/1)1(s/1)1 from [L4] gives (1/s)f(m)=(1/s)f(m).

L1L4givenalgebra
2.1

For m/s,n/tS1M, f~((m/s)+(n/t))=(1/st)f(tm+sn)=(1/s)f(m)+(1/t)f(n)=f~(m/s)+f~(n/t), and for a/uS1R one has f~((a/u)(m/s))=(1/us)f(am)=(a/u)f~(m/s).

step 1.1L1L2L3algebra
2.2

For every mM, f~(λM(m))=f~(m/1)=f(m).

step 1.1L1
3.1

If g:S1MN is S1R-linear and gλM=f, then for every m/s one has g(m/s)=g((1/s)(m/1))=(1/s)g(m/1)=(1/s)f(m)=f~(m/s), so g=f~.

L1L4step 2.2
4.1

Steps 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, and 3.1 prove the stated unique S1R-linear factorisation.

step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources