How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Addition of localised module fractions is independent of representatives
Statement
If and in , then
So the addition formula of Localisation of a module at a multiplicative subset is independent of the chosen representatives.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , a multiplicative subset , a left -module , and equalities and in .
In , the equality means that for some , and addition is defined by (Localisation of a module at a multiplicative subset).
The relation defining is an equivalence relation (The module-fraction relation is an equivalence relation).
Proof
By [L1], choose with and .
Multiplying the first equality by and the second by and then adding gives .
Step 2.1 is exactly the relation witnessing , so the addition formula is independent of representatives.
Depends on
Used by
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Localisation of a module at a multiplicative subset.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Section 12 (standard reference, not scraped)