Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Assuming countable choice, a real family is summable as a finite-subset net if and only if it has at most countable support and its nonzero terms are absolutely summable; its sum is independent of the enumeration

Statement

Assume countable choice. Let a:I→R and S={i:ai≠0}. Then the finite-subset net of a is convergent if and only if S is at most countable and its finite enumeration, or any bijective enumeration e:N→S when S is infinite, gives an absolutely convergent series of nonzero terms. Its net limit equals that finite sum or series sum and is independent of the enumeration.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real family a:I→R and its finite-subset net.

[L1]

Under countable choice, a countable union of at most countable sets is at most countable (Countable unions of at most countable sets, assuming ACω, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[L2]
[L4]

For every positive real t there is n≥1 with 1/n<t (For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε).

[L5]

A real series is absolutely convergent exactly when the series of absolute values converges; sums over finite index sets are invariant under their enumerations (Absolutely convergent and conditionally convergent series, and the general starting index, The sum ∑i∈Sai over a finite index set, and its product form).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose the finite-subset net converges to L. There are a finite F0⊆I and C>0 such that ∣∑i∈Fai∣≤C for every finite F⊇F0. If P⊆I∖F0 is finite and all ai for i∈P are positive, then ∑i∈Pai=∑i∈F0∪Pai−∑i∈F0ai≤C+∣∑i∈F0ai∣. The same argument applied to finite sets of negative terms bounds their absolute-value sums.

L3L5
1.2

Conversely, let an enumeration of S have absolutely convergent series sum s. Given ε>0, choose a finite initial segment F0 whose remaining absolute series sum is below ε. For every finite F⊇F0, ∣∑i∈Fai−s∣≤∑i∈S∖F∣ai∣<ε. Indices outside S contribute zero, so the finite-subset net converges to s.

L2L5
2.1

For each n≥1, the sets {i∉F0:ai+≥1/n} and {i∉F0:ai−≥1/n} are finite, since a finite subset with more than nC′ members would have sum exceeding the bound C′. Every nonzero real lies in one of these level sets for some n by [L4], so [L1] makes S at most countable.

step 1.1L1L3L4
2.2

With any enumeration of S, the positive and negative partial sums are bounded by step 1.1, hence converge by [L2]. Thus the series of absolute values converges by [L3], so the enumerated nonzero terms form an absolutely convergent series.

step 1.1L2L3
3.1

Any two infinite enumerations differ by a bijective rearrangement, so [L2] gives the same sum; finite enumerations give the same finite-set sum by [L5]. This proves both directions and enumeration independence.

step 2.2step 1.2L2L5∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources