How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A holomorphic function with zero derivative on a domain is constant
Statement
Let be a domain. If is holomorphic and for every , then is constant on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex domain and a holomorphic function with throughout .
A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of (A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of ).
For an open subset of , connectedness, path-connectedness, and polygonal connectedness are equivalent (For an open subset of , connectedness, path-connectedness and polygonal connectedness are equivalent).
A polygonal path is a finite concatenation of affine line segments with consecutive vertices (Polygonal paths and polygonally connected subsets of ).
If is complex differentiable at a point, then its real total derivative is multiplication by (Complex differentiability is equivalent to real total differentiability together with a complex-linear derivative, with , or with the Cauchy–Riemann equations).
The total derivative of a composite is the composite of the total derivatives (The chain rule for total derivatives: ).
A complex-differentiable function is continuous at the point of differentiability (Complex differentiability at a point implies continuity there).
A real function continuous on an order-convex interval and differentiable at every interior point, with derivative zero there, is constant on that interval (A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant).
Proof
Let . By [F1] and [L1], choose a polygonal path in from to , with vertices as in [F2].
For each segment put for . The composite is continuous on by [L4], including at the endpoints.
At every , [L2] makes multiplication by , and [L3] therefore gives . Hence the real and imaginary components of have derivative zero on .
By [L5], both components are constant on , so for each segment, including a zero-length segment if one occurs.
Chaining the finitely many equalities from step 3.1 gives . Since were arbitrary, is constant on the nonempty domain .
Depends on
- A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of $\mathbb C$
- Complex differentiability is equivalent to real total differentiability together with a complex-linear derivative, with $\partial_{\bar z}f=0$, or with the Cauchy–Riemann equations
- The chain rule for total derivatives: $D(g\circ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))\circ Df(a)$
- A function continuous on an interval $I$ whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of $I$ is constant on $I$; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant
- Polygonal paths and polygonally connected subsets of $\mathbb{R}^n$
- For an open subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$, connectedness, path-connectedness and polygonal connectedness are equivalent
- Complex differentiability at a point implies continuity there
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 110 results over 20 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Proposition 2.2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- R. Howell and J. Mathews, Complex Analysis, Theorem 3.2.13 (standard reference, not scraped)