How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nonflat base change of a blowup can fail
Statement refuted
False claim: the flatness hypothesis in Flat base change for blowups, and failure without flatness can be dropped, i.e. for every morphism and every quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of finite type the canonical comparison morphism is an isomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The polynomial ring over a field , the maximal ideal , the quotient , the ideal , the Rees algebras and , the blowups and (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf, Rees algebra sheaf of a finite type ideal), and the base change (Base change of objects, morphisms and properties).
The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme: With homogeneous coordinates on , the blowup of at the origin is , and its two charts are with , , and with , , glued by .
Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps and Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains: The standard charts of a blowup along a principal ideal generated by a nonzerodivisor are the spectra of the affine blowup algebras ; they cover the blowup.
Relative Proj commutes with arbitrary base change: The relative Proj base changes canonically along arbitrary morphisms, so , and a morphism of graded algebras induces the canonical comparison morphism of the Proj schemes.
Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms: A ring map is flat when the target is flat as a module over the source, i.e. when tensoring by it preserves exact sequences.
Counterexample
The quotient is not flat: the sequence is exact because is a nonzerodivisor of the polynomial ring , so if were flat over the sequence would be exact by [F4]; but in , so the first map is the zero map with kernel , and injectivity of the first map would force , a contradiction.
The comparison of Rees algebras is not an isomorphism. Its degree-two source is . The class of is nonzero: if with , cancellation of in would give , a contradiction. It maps to zero in and is killed by , since . Thus it is a nonzero torsion kernel class. The generators are not an -basis; no freeness of is used.
The source is : the pullback ideal is principal generated by the nonzerodivisor , and by [F2] its single standard chart is ; since that chart covers the blowup, the blowup is the identity on .
By relative Proj base change the target is . The incidence presentation identifies it with . Its two components are the section and the closed fiber over the origin. On the ring is , with component ideals and and their intersection point . The other chart is with , extending the latter affine-line piece to and adding no further component. Thus the target has two irreducible components.
The canonical comparison sends the ratio to zero on the first chart, so its image is the section . Its source is by step 1.3. The source fiber over is , while the target fiber is by step 1.4; hence this morphism over is not an isomorphism. This proves the failure without flatness, independently of any assertion that the degree-two generators form a basis.
Remarks
- The failure is visible already in degree two of the Rees algebras, where the relation in cuts the quotient down to ; the lost degree is exactly the torsion of the base change of the Rees algebra.
- Geometrically, the source keeps only the strict transform of the axis, whereas the base-changed target retains the whole exceptional curve over the origin as an additional irreducible component.
Depends on
Flat base change for blowups, and failure without flatness
Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf
Rees algebra sheaf of a finite type ideal
Base change of objects, morphisms and properties
Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms
The blowup of the plane at the origin as an incidence scheme
Relative Proj commutes with arbitrary base change
Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps
Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains
The Axiom of Choice
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Divisors, Sections 31.33-31.36 (Blowing up; Strict transform; Admissible blowups; Blowing up and flatness)
- The Stacks Project, Commutative Algebra, Section 10.70 (Blow up algebras)
- Ravi Vakil, Foundations of Algebraic Geometry, June 27, 2011 draft (author-hosted 'Early (out-of-date) version of The Rising Sea')