Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A closed rotation loop with no closed lift: the full turn about an axis lifts from 1 to −1

Statement refuted

In this item, a curve on [0,1] is called C1 when it is continuous on [0,1] and its restriction to (0,1) is C1; no endpoint derivatives are required.

For every closed C1 curve R:[0,1]→SO(3) with R(0)=R(1)=I3 and every q0∈S3 with ρ(q0)=I3, there exists a C1 lift q:[0,1]→S3 of R with q(0)=q(1)=q0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The curve q^(t):=cos⁡(πt)+φ(e3)sin⁡(πt) on [0,1], where φ is the identification of The quaternion rotation map ρ: conjugation on the imaginary quaternions, the unit sphere S3, and quaternion lifts and e3 is the third standard basis vector, and the curve R^(t):=ρ(q^(t)).

[L1]

S3={q:N(q)=1}, ρ(q)(x)=qxq−1, ρ(−q)=ρ(q), and ρ(1) is the identity of SO(3) (The quaternion rotation map ρ: conjugation on the imaginary quaternions, the unit sphere S3, and quaternion lifts Definition and Remark).

[L2]
[L4]

For a C1 rotation path on an open interval and a prescribed unit quaternion over its initial value the C1 lift is unique; moreover every lift of that path is ±q for any one of them (Existence, uniqueness and sign ambiguity of the quaternion lift of a C1 rotation path clauses 1-2).

Counterexample

technique · direct; exhibit the explicit full-turn loop and use the uniqueness of lifts with prescribed initial value
1.1L1L2

q^ is C1 with N(q^(t))=cos⁡2(πt)+sin⁡2(πt)=1, so q^(t)∈S3 for every t; also q^(0)=1 and q^(1)=−1 by [L2].

2.1step 1.1L1L3

The path R^=ρ∘q^ is C1 on [0,1] by [L3] (applied after extending q^ to an open interval around [0,1]); R^(0)=ρ(1) and R^(1)=ρ(−1) are both the identity of SO(3) by [L1].

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L1L4algebra∎

Take q0=1 and let q:[0,1]→S3 be a C1 lift of R^ with q(0)=q(1)=1. On the nondegenerate open interval (0,1) the hypothesis of [L4] is satisfied by the restriction of R^, and q∣(0,1) is a C1 lift with prescribed value q(1/2) at the interior time 1/2; hence it is the unique such lift, and every C1 lift of R^∣(0,1) is ±q∣(0,1) by [L4], in particular q^∣(0,1)=q∣(0,1) or q^∣(0,1)=−q∣(0,1). In the first case q(1)=lim⁡t↑1q(t)=lim⁡t↑1q^(t)=q^(1)=−1, contradicting q(1)=1; in the second case q(0)=lim⁡t↓0q(t)=−lim⁡t↓0q^(t)=−q^(0)=−1, contradicting q(0)=1. Hence R^ is a closed C1 loop with no closed C1 lift through 1; for q0=−1 the same argument applied to −q, using ρ(−q)=ρ(q) from [L1], gives the same contradiction, so the statement is refuted for both preimages of the identity.

Remarks

  • The loop R^∣[0,1] is the full turn about the axis e3; its lift q^ runs from 1 to −1, a half turn of the quaternion sphere. This is the standard local demonstration that the two-sheeted cover of SO(3) by S3 is nontrivial along loops; no claim about fundamental groups is made here, and no physical spin interpretation is asserted.

  • The counterexample refutes only the displayed closed-lift statement. It does not assert that every closed rotation loop fails to have a closed lift, nor that some lift with a different initial value could not be closed; the statement refuted is the universal closed-lift claim for the prescribed initial value, and it is false already at the full turn.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources