Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A closed model force field on an annular domain without a global potential energy: force-generating potentials exist only locally

Physical scope

A counterexample in the force branch using the potential terminology: on a declared open annular configuration domain a smooth time- and velocity-independent force field is closed and yet has no global potential energy, so the model is not a global potential model, no global zero-residual potential presentation exists, and the energy-conservation hypothesis of the balance theorem cannot be replaced by closedness; on every star-shaped subdomain a local potential and a locally conserved mechanical energy do exist. The item asserts no measured value and no global conservation.

Statement refuted

In the force branch of Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance, use the notion of a potential presentation from Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets clause (a), but do not assume that such a presentation exists. Consider the assertion that if the model's force map is time- and velocity-independent, so it has the form F(t,x,v)=φ(x) for a C1 field φ:Q→R3N, and that field is closed in the sense of clause (d) of Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, namely ∂jφk=∂kφj for all coordinate indices j,k∈{0,…,3N−1} on Q, then the model is a global potential model; in particular there is a global potential energy U on the domain with F=−∇U, the mechanical energy K+U exists for every motion, and it is conserved.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The force branch, the definitions and criteria for potential presentations and energy in Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets clauses (a)-(e), and the notation of Total mass, total momentum, centre of mass, angular momentum, torque, kinetic energy, power and work of a particle model in an inertial frame. The counterexample assumes no potential presentation for its force map.

[L1]

Framework notions: a motion of the model satisfies mx¨=F(t,x,x˙) (The associated first-order system, motions, maximal motions and the Newtonian flow of a force model); a field φ:Q→R3N is closed when ∂kφj=∂jφk and exact with potential energy U when φ=−∇U; on a star-shaped open domain every closed C1 field is exact with the radial potential of the Poincaré lemma (Exact and closed C1 vector fields, Poincare's lemma on a star-shaped domain: every closed C1 field is exact, Star-shaped open subsets of Euclidean space, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case); dimensions are Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework.

[L2]

Line integrals and potentials (Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals): for a piecewise-C1 path γ:[a,b]→Rn and a continuous field F on a set containing its trace, the vector line integral is the sum of the parameter integrals ∫titi+1⟨F(γ(t)),vi(t)⟩ dt over an admissible partition with continuous derivative extensions vi. The gradient theorem (The gradient theorem: the line integral of a gradient is the endpoint increment) states that for C1 ϕ on an open U and piecewise-C1 γ in U, ∫γ∇ϕ⋅dr=ϕ(γ(b))−ϕ(γ(a)). Consequently a field with a potential has zero circulation around every closed path: for F=−∇U on an open domain and a closed piecewise-C1 γ, ∫γF⋅dr=−(U(γ(b))−U(γ(a)))=0 (the notion of conservative field is Piecewise-C1 path-connected domains, potential functions, conservative fields, and path independence).

[L3]

Calculus: the product and quotient rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0), the derivatives (sin⁡t)′=cos⁡t and (cos⁡t)′=−sin⁡t (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine), the identity sin⁡2t+cos⁡2t=1 (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine), the chain rule (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c)) g′(c)), the fundamental theorem on [0,2π] (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative), a curve with bounded derivative is Lipschitz with that bound (If f:[a,b]→Rm is differentiable with integrable f′ then ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz clause 2), the Euclidean inner product (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn) and the componentwise derivative (The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral); the interval [0,2π] has nonempty interior (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).

Counterexample

technique · direct; define the annular model, verify the standing hypotheses, check its coordinate-derivative closedness condition and compute its circulation, use the gradient theorem to exclude a global potential, and recover the local statement on star-shaped pieces
1.1givenL1

The model. Take N=1, a mass m:=1 kg, time window R, write x=(x1,x2,x3) in metres, with xi=x(i−1), Φi=Φ(i−1) and ∂i denoting differentiation in native coordinate i−1 for i=1,2,3, and let the open annular configuration domain be Q:={x∈R3: 12 m<x12+x22<2 m}. Set β:=1 J and define the time- and velocity-independent force map F(t,x,v)=β Φ(x),Φ(x):=(−x2, x1, 0)x12+x22. Since Φ has dimension ℓ−1, F has force dimension μℓτ−2 (Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework). This one-label field is the external single-label force of the potential definition's clause (d), and it is smooth on Q, which does not meet the axis.

2.1step 1.1L3algebra

Standing regularity. Put r(x):=x12+x22 and let A(x1,x2,x3)=(−x2,x1,0); then ∥A∥=1, ∥Ax∥2=r(x) and Φ(x)=Ax/r(x)2, so ∥Φ(x)∥2=1/r(x). Differentiating this formula gives ∥DΦ(x)∥≤3/r(x)2. For x,y∈Q with ∥x−y∥2≤14 m, every point of the segment from x to y has radial coordinate at least r(x)−∥x−y∥2>14 m; hence along g(u)=Φ(x+u(y−x)) one has ∥g′(u)∥2≤48 m−2∥x−y∥2, and [L3] gives ∥Φ(x)−Φ(y)∥2≤48 m−2∥x−y∥2. For ∥x−y∥2>14 m, ∥Φ(x)−Φ(y)∥2≤1/r(x)+1/r(y)<4 m−1≤16 m−2∥x−y∥2. Thus F is globally Lipschitz in its position argument with constant 48 N m−1; because it is independent of v, it is locally Lipschitz in the state variable on compact state cylinders in the numerical SI coordinates, as required by the force branch (Local Lipschitz continuity in the state variable, locally uniform in time and parameters).

2.2step 1.1L1L3algebra

Closedness. Write s:=x12+x22, so that Φ=(−x2s−1, x1s−1, 0). The quotient rule [L3] gives ∂1Φ2=∂1(x1s−1)=s−x1⋅2x1s2=x22−x12s2,∂2Φ1=∂2(−x2s−1)=−s−x2⋅2x2s2=x22−x12s2, so ∂1Φ2=∂2Φ1; the remaining pairs vanish because Φ3=0 and Φ1,Φ2 do not depend on x3 (the partial derivatives are those of The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case). Multiplying all components by the constant β preserves these identities, so F is closed on Q.

2.3step 1.1L1L2L3algebra

Circulation. Let L0:=1 m and γ(θ):=L0(cos⁡θ,sin⁡θ,0) for the dimensionless angle θ∈[0,2π]. This is a C1 path in Q with γ′(θ)=L0(−sin⁡θ,cos⁡θ,0). Along it, F(γ(θ))=(β/L0)(−sin⁡θ,cos⁡θ,0), so ⟨F(γ(θ)),γ′(θ)⟩=β(sin⁡2θ+cos⁡2θ)=β by bilinearity of the inner product and the Pythagorean identity [L3]. By the definition of the vector line integral [L2], the single piece [0,2π] with derivative extension γ′ gives ∫γF⋅dr=∫02π⟨F(γ(θ)),γ′(θ)⟩ dθ=∫02πβ dθ=2πβ=2π J≠0, the middle integral by [L3].

3.1step 2.3L1L2algebra

No global potential. Suppose there were a C2 function U on Q with F=−∇U. The line integral of [L2] is linear in the field by its definition as a sum of parameter integrals, so ∫γF⋅dr=−∫γ∇U⋅dr; the gradient theorem of [L2] applied to the C1 function U gives ∫γ∇U⋅dr=U(γ(2π))−U(γ(0))=U(L0,0,0)−U(L0,0,0)=0 because γ is closed. Hence ∫γF⋅dr=0, contradicting the value 2πβ≠0 of step 2.3. Therefore no such global potential exists, the model is not a global potential model in the sense of clause (a) of Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, and no global potential presentation with zero residual force is available. A global presentation with U=0 and d=F is nevertheless admitted by the same definition and has mechanical energy E=K; it asserts no conservation.

4.1step 3.1L1L4algebra

Local potentials and local energy. Let p∈Q and let ε:=12min⁡{r(p)−12 m, 2 m−r(p)}>0,B:={z:∣z−p∣<ε}; here ε has units of length. For z∈B one has r(z)<r(p)+ε<2 m and r(z)>r(p)−ε>12 m, so B⊆Q. B is open and star-shaped with respect to its centre (Star-shaped open subsets of Euclidean space). Since −F∣B is also a closed C1 field, the Poincaré lemma of [L1] applied to −F∣B gives a C2 function UB:B→R with ∇UB=−F∣B, that is, F∣B=−∇UB. The restriction of the model's force map to the configuration domain B is then a global potential model with a time-independent potential and no residual forces, so clause 2 of Mechanical energy balance for a potential presentation: E′=∂tU plus the residual power, conservation for a static potential with no residual forces, and the integrated work form gives that K+UB is constant along every motion of the restricted model, hence along every subinterval of a motion of the annular model on which the position remains in B.

5.1step 2.3step 3.1step 4.1L1L2L4∎

Conclusion. The force field of the model is closed and not exact on Q; the refuted statement is false. The time-independent zero-residual presentations constructed in step 4.1 provide conserved mechanical energy on those star-shaped subdomains. Globally no such presentation exists by step 3.1, so that conservation clause cannot be invoked for it; the global presentation U=0,d=F remains available with E=K.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources