How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Subextremal RN surface gravity has no uniform positive lower bound
Statement refuted
Fix a mass length . For each length parameter with , take the electric RN family with mass parameter and magnetic parameter , and define , , and . The false claim is that there exists a constant , with units of inverse length, such that for every such .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A fixed and the subextremal electric RN family with and .
Dyonic Reissner-Nordström metric and field domains: and the static RN metric uses .
RN roots, Killing horizons and surface gravity: when and , the outer surface gravity is with .
Explicit rational and real power regimes: for , is the unique positive real solution of .
Dedekind-complete ordered real field: is a complete ordered field.
For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with : in any complete ordered field, for every there is a natural with .
The fixed mass parameter satisfies ; all mass and charge parameters have length units and has inverse-length units.
Counterexample
For each integer , choose and . By [F3], , so and . Applying [F2] gives , , and
Let be any proposed inverse-length lower bound. Since , [F4]–[F5] allow a natural with . For every integer , , so step 1.1 gives . Thus the sequence tends to zero through subextremal RN data, contradicting any positive uniform lower bound. Every member of the sequence remains subextremal; only its limit reaches .
Remarks
The counterexample concerns the unscaled outer surface gravity as the charge approaches extremality at fixed mass. It makes no claim about the scaled throat coordinates or about uniform estimates for waves.