How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Expansion shock fails entropy selection
Statement refuted
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (). The assertion that every weak jump satisfying Rankine–Hugoniot is entropy-admissible is false. For , let , , , and set for and for on , with arbitrary value on the shock line. Give it Riemann initial data for and for , with arbitrary value at zero. This expansion shock is a weak solution but violates the entropy inequality for the convex entropy and compatible entropy flux . The strictly convex scalar Riemann theorem supplies an entropy-admissible centered fan for the same flux and initial data; no general uniqueness conclusion is asserted.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the Burgers flux, the states , the expansion-shock profile, and its initial data in the Statement.
Vector Rankine–Hugoniot condition: on a piecewise scalar profile satisfying the classical equation on each side, the distributional residual is on the interface, and it vanishes exactly under Rankine–Hugoniot.
Entropy jump residual: for a compatible convex entropy pair, the residual coefficient is , and the entropy inequality holds exactly when this coefficient is nonpositive at every interface point.
Strictly convex scalar Riemann construction: if between increasing initial states, its centered rarefaction profile satisfies the initial weak identity and every stated compatible convex entropy inequality.
Distributional systems and entropy flux pairs: the initial weak identity is the test integral with the initial datum term for smooth tests compactly supported up to ; entropy admissibility is the nonpositive distributional residual, equivalently a nonnegative-test weak integral inequality with the initial entropy term.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): Countable Choice is the explicit hypothesis for [F1]–[F3].
.
Proof
The two constant states solve the equation on their open sides. Their jump speed satisfies , so [F1] under [F5] makes the interior distributional residual zero. For a test in the class fixed by [F4], choose smooth temporal cutoffs that vanish on , equal on , satisfy , and have . Apply the interior distributional identity to . The term with tends to : on the compact spatial support, differs from only between and , so , while uniformly. The omitted integrals over tend to zero because and the test derivatives are bounded on that compact set. The limit is the initial weak identity.
For and , compatibility holds because , and is convex. The jump residual is By [F2] and [F4], a positive residual violates the entropy inequality. Thus this weak expansion shock is not entropy-admissible.
Since on , [F3] under [F5] gives the centered rarefaction profile as an entropy-admissible solution for the same initial data. It differs from the step profile on a set of positive spatial measure for every because the fan interval has width .