How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Weak convergence does not pass quadratic products
Statement refuted
Assume Countable Choice. Fix and , and let be the real periodic solenoidal space on , with normalized Lebesgue measure . The false statement is: if in , then weakly in . Each tensor belongs to because its Frobenius norm is ; weak convergence means for every essentially bounded measurable real matrix field , where . Thus the claim concerns arbitrary weakly convergent fields, without an additional assumption.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, the normalized torus , an integer , and the Fourier and solenoidal conventions of Periodic solenoidal Fourier spaces.
Periodic solenoidal Fourier spaces: a vector field with Fourier support at and coefficients perpendicular to is in ; its norm is the Parseval norm.
The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus: under Countable Choice, trigonometric polynomials are dense in and Fourier coefficients give its complete orthonormal expansion.
Counterexample
For integers , fix the second coordinate vector and set Each has only the Fourier modes and its vector coefficient is perpendicular to , so . For a finite trigonometric polynomial , for all sufficiently large because its Fourier support is finite. Approximate an arbitrary by such polynomials using [F2]; the error is at most times the approximation error. Hence in .
The only nonzero entry of is its entry, equal to The oscillatory cosine has zero pairing eventually with every finite trigonometric polynomial and its norm is uniformly bounded; density and Cauchy–Schwarz therefore show it converges weakly to zero in . Thus in . Since the torus measure is one, every essentially bounded matrix test satisfies , so this convergence also holds against every weak test. In particular the constant test gives for every , whereas . Hence the tensors do not converge weakly in to ; the same smooth constant test also rules out convergence to zero as periodic distributions. This refutes the false statement. These fields are only a functional-analytic witness and are not claimed to solve Navier–Stokes.