Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cook existence is not completeness

Statement refuted

Every isometric wave operator has range equal to the full absolutely continuous subspace of the interacting Hamiltonian.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: H0=L2((0,1),B((0,1)),β;C), B((0,1)) is the Borel sigma-algebra and β(B)=λ1(B) for every Borel B⊆(0,1), ⟨f,g⟩=∫01f(x)g(x)‾ dβ(x) is linear in its first variable, H0f(x)=xf(x) on D(H0)=H0, H=H0⊕H0, H=H0⊕H0 on D(H)=H, and Jf=(f,0). Use U0(t)f=eitxf and U(t)(f,g)=(eitxf,eitxg).

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

[A2]
[F1]

Completeness means ran⁡Ω=Hac(H), not merely that Ω is an isometry (Wave, scattering and channel operators).

[F2]

Self-adjointness means equality with the adjoint, including its domain (Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators).

[F3]

The spectral PVM of H0=Mx is E0(B)=M1B∩(0,1); its scalar measures are B↦∫B∩(0,1)∣f(x)∣2 dx. On the direct sum, E(B)=E0(B)⊕E0(B) is a PVM whose spectral integral is H0⊕H0, so uniqueness in the spectral theorem identifies it as the PVM of H (Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form), Unbounded Borel functional calculus: domains, products, spectral mapping, Projection valued measure, Integral of a measurable function against a projection-valued measure).

[F4]

For self-adjoint T, eitT is a strongly continuous unitary group with generator iT (A self-adjoint operator generates a strongly continuous unitary group).

[F5]

The wave-operator definition inserts Pac(H0) in its approximants and defines completeness by equality with the interacting absolutely continuous subspace (Wave, scattering and channel operators).

[F6]

The Borel sigma-algebra of (0,1) is generated by the countable basis of open intervals with rational endpoints intersected with (0,1); the rationals are countable and dense (The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space, Q is countably infinite, Both Q and R∖Q are dense in R, and every nonempty open subset of R is uncountable).

[F8]

A sigma-finite measure on a countably generated sigma-algebra has separable L2 under Countable Choice (If μ is sigma-finite and A is countably generated, then Lp(μ) is separable for 1≤p<∞).

Counterexample

Given: [A1], [A2], [F6]–[F8], the Hilbert spaces, operators, identification J, and unitary groups specified above.

1.1A1A2F2F3F4F6F7F8givenalgebra

By [F6], the Borel sigma-algebra on (0,1) is countably generated, and by [F7] its measure is finite, hence sigma-finite. [F8] gives separability of H0; a direct sum of two separable spaces is separable because pairs from the product of countable dense subsets are countable and dense, so H is separable. Since 0<x<1, ∥H0f∥2=∫01x2∣f∣2 dβ≤∥f∥2, and ⟨H0f,h⟩=⟨f,H0h⟩ for every f,h∈H0. Thus every h belongs to D(H0∗), with H0∗h=H0h, proving self-adjointness by [F2]. The same componentwise pairing on the full domain H proves H∗=H. Its PVM is the multiplication family in [F3], so bounded Borel functional calculus gives eitH0=Meitx=U0(t) and eitH=U(t), consistently with [F4].

1.2F2F3F4F5givenalgebra

By [F3], every scalar spectral measure of H0 is absolutely continuous, so Pac(H0)=I. Thus the projection in [F5] drops out. Using Jf=(f,0), the two-space wave-operator approximants are exactly U(t)JU0(−t)f=(eitxe−itxf,0)=(f,0) for every f∈H0 and every real t. Since HJ=JH0 and both generators are bounded, direct differentiation gives ddt(eitHJe−itH0)=ieitH(HJ−JH0)e−itH0=0. Thus the approximants are constant and both strong limits exist with Ω±f=(f,0). Their norm equals ∥f∥, so they are isometries.

1.3F3givenalgebra

By [F3], every vector f⊕g∈H has scalar spectral measure B⟼∫B∩(0,1)(∣f(x)∣2+∣g(x)∣2) dx, which is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure. Therefore Hac(H)=H.

2.1F1step 1.2step 1.3∎

The wave-operator range is H0⊕{0}, which is a proper subspace of H because the constant function 1∈L2((0,1)) has norm one, so 0⊕1 is a nonzero vector outside the range. Hence the wave operators are isometric but not complete, refuting the statement.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources