Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Scattering channels, stationary resolvents and time delay — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Elastic phase derivative

Example

Let I be an open energy interval and let δ:I→R be C1. The one-channel unitary matrix S(E)=e2iδ(E)∈U(1) has Wigner–Smith matrix Q(E)=2ℏ δ′(E), which is real and has units of seconds when E is measured in joules and ℏ in joule-seconds. This algebraic quantity is not, without further model assumptions, an operational arrival-time measurement.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: E∈I, δ∈C1(I;R), S(E)=e2iδ(E), and ℏ>0.

[F1]

For a C1 unitary channel matrix, Q=−iℏS∗S′ (Wigner–Smith matrix for differentiable finite channels).

Verification

Given: [F1] and the interval, differentiable phase, unitary matrix, and ℏ>0 in the Example.

1.1givenalgebra

Since δ(E) is real, S(E)∗S(E)=e−2iδ(E)e2iδ(E)=1; thus this is a one-channel unitary matrix on all of I. Differentiation gives S′(E)=2iδ′(E)e2iδ(E).

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra∎

Substitution into [F1] gives Q(E)=−iℏe−2iδ(E)2iδ′(E)e2iδ(E)=2ℏδ′(E), which is real. Since δ is dimensionless and dδ/dE has units J−1, Q has units s. No pointwise value of Q is interpreted as a measured time.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Cook existence is not completeness

Statement refuted

Every isometric wave operator has range equal to the full absolutely continuous subspace of the interacting Hamiltonian.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: H0=L2((0,1),B((0,1)),β;C), B((0,1)) is the Borel sigma-algebra and β(B)=λ1(B) for every Borel B⊆(0,1), ⟨f,g⟩=∫01f(x)g(x)‾ dβ(x) is linear in its first variable, H0f(x)=xf(x) on D(H0)=H0, H=H0⊕H0, H=H0⊕H0 on D(H)=H, and Jf=(f,0). Use U0(t)f=eitxf and U(t)(f,g)=(eitxf,eitxg).

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

[A2]
[F1]

Completeness means ran⁡Ω=Hac(H), not merely that Ω is an isometry (Wave, scattering and channel operators).

[F2]

Self-adjointness means equality with the adjoint, including its domain (Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators).

[F3]

The spectral PVM of H0=Mx is E0(B)=M1B∩(0,1); its scalar measures are B↦∫B∩(0,1)∣f(x)∣2 dx. On the direct sum, E(B)=E0(B)⊕E0(B) is a PVM whose spectral integral is H0⊕H0, so uniqueness in the spectral theorem identifies it as the PVM of H (Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form), Unbounded Borel functional calculus: domains, products, spectral mapping, Projection valued measure, Integral of a measurable function against a projection-valued measure).

[F4]

For self-adjoint T, eitT is a strongly continuous unitary group with generator iT (A self-adjoint operator generates a strongly continuous unitary group).

[F5]

The wave-operator definition inserts Pac(H0) in its approximants and defines completeness by equality with the interacting absolutely continuous subspace (Wave, scattering and channel operators).

[F6]

The Borel sigma-algebra of (0,1) is generated by the countable basis of open intervals with rational endpoints intersected with (0,1); the rationals are countable and dense (The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space, Q is countably infinite, Both Q and R∖Q are dense in R, and every nonempty open subset of R is uncountable).

[F8]

A sigma-finite measure on a countably generated sigma-algebra has separable L2 under Countable Choice (If μ is sigma-finite and A is countably generated, then Lp(μ) is separable for 1≤p<∞).

Counterexample

Given: [A1], [A2], [F6]–[F8], the Hilbert spaces, operators, identification J, and unitary groups specified above.

1.1A1A2F2F3F4F6F7F8givenalgebra

By [F6], the Borel sigma-algebra on (0,1) is countably generated, and by [F7] its measure is finite, hence sigma-finite. [F8] gives separability of H0; a direct sum of two separable spaces is separable because pairs from the product of countable dense subsets are countable and dense, so H is separable. Since 0<x<1, ∥H0f∥2=∫01x2∣f∣2 dβ≤∥f∥2, and ⟨H0f,h⟩=⟨f,H0h⟩ for every f,h∈H0. Thus every h belongs to D(H0∗), with H0∗h=H0h, proving self-adjointness by [F2]. The same componentwise pairing on the full domain H proves H∗=H. Its PVM is the multiplication family in [F3], so bounded Borel functional calculus gives eitH0=Meitx=U0(t) and eitH=U(t), consistently with [F4].

1.2F2F3F4F5givenalgebra

By [F3], every scalar spectral measure of H0 is absolutely continuous, so Pac(H0)=I. Thus the projection in [F5] drops out. Using Jf=(f,0), the two-space wave-operator approximants are exactly U(t)JU0(−t)f=(eitxe−itxf,0)=(f,0) for every f∈H0 and every real t. Since HJ=JH0 and both generators are bounded, direct differentiation gives ddt(eitHJe−itH0)=ieitH(HJ−JH0)e−itH0=0. Thus the approximants are constant and both strong limits exist with Ω±f=(f,0). Their norm equals ∥f∥, so they are isometries.

1.3F3givenalgebra

By [F3], every vector f⊕g∈H has scalar spectral measure B⟼∫B∩(0,1)(∣f(x)∣2+∣g(x)∣2) dx, which is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure. Therefore Hac(H)=H.

2.1F1step 1.2step 1.3∎

The wave-operator range is H0⊕{0}, which is a proper subspace of H because the constant function 1∈L2((0,1)) has norm one, so 0⊕1 is a nonzero vector outside the range. Hence the wave operators are isometric but not complete, refuting the statement.

Sources