How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Scattering channels, stationary resolvents and time delay
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Absolute Continuity and the Sharp Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions; Liouville and Morera
- Approximation and Compactness in C(K)
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach Alaoglu Goldstine and Krein Milman
- Banach Algebras Spectrum and Holomorphic Functional Calculus
- Banach Valued Integration and the Radon Nikodym Property
- Banach-Space Differential Calculus and Banach Manifolds
- Bessel-Potential Completions and Real-Order Sobolev Spaces
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Compact Operators and Riesz Schauder Theory
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Coordinate and Path Transport
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Complex Subspace Realification
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Continuous Functional Calculus for Self Adjoint and Normal Operators
- Contour Integration
- Convergence: Nets and Filters
- Convexity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Differentiation of Monotone Functions and the Vitali Covering Theorem
- Distributions Test Functions and Differentiation
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces Adjoint Operators and Annihilators
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Surface Measure, Divergence, and Green Identities
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Finite Probability and the Probabilistic Method
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fourier Multipliers and Sobolev Characterisations
- Fourier Transform Convolution and Approximate Identities
- Fredholm Elliptic Problems and the Elliptic Spectrum
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Gelfand Theory and Commutative C Star Algebras
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Harmonic Functions and Mean Values in Rn
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper and Parameter-Dependent Multiple Integrals
- Improper Integrals
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Interior and Boundary Sobolev Elliptic Regularity
- Lax--Milgram and Weak Elliptic Solutions
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Lebesgue-Stieltjes Measures and Distribution Functions
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Qm Math Composites
- Qm Math Controlled Dynamics
- Qm Math Coulomb
- Qm Math Orbital And Spin
- Qm Math Oscillator
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Reflexivity and Eberlein Smulian
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schwartz Space and the Plancherel Theorem
- Semibounded forms, variational spectra and Birman–Schwinger
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Smooth Approximation and Sobolev Extension
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Sobolev Traces and Zero Boundary Values
- Spectral Measures and Borel Functional Calculus
- Stone–Weierstrass in General
- Strongly Continuous Semigroups and Hille Yosida
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tempered Distributions and the Fourier Transform
- The Analytic Hahn Banach Theorem
- The Baire Principles of Functional Analysis
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Divergence Theorem and Classical Stokes
- The Duality of Lᵖ and L^q
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Radon Nikodym Theorem and Lebesgue Decomposition
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The Winding Number and the Global Cauchy Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Unbounded Self Adjoint Operators and Stones Theorem
- Urysohn's Lemma and the Tietze Extension Theorem
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Weak Derivatives and Sobolev Spaces
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
Wave, scattering and channel operators
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be separable complex Hilbert spaces, and self-adjoint operators on them, and a bounded linear map. Write and for their spectral projection valued measures. The absolutely continuous subspace consists of vectors for which the scalar measure is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure; is its orthogonal projection. Define the two-space wave operators, when the pointwise strong limits exist on , by
where a strong limit means that for every the vector-valued expression converges in . The two signs are separate limits. When and , write . A wave operator is complete when its range is all of . When both wave operators exist and are isometries on , the scattering operator on that subspace is
Whenever both wave operators exist, are isometries on , and are complete with range , the scattering operator is unitary. For a fixed integer and an open energy interval , finite-channel data consists of the standard space and a matrix field , where
Here is conjugate transpose, , and is the usual alternating determinant. This matrix field is separate specified data; the definition does not assert that it is obtained from the abstract wave operators above.
Channel diagram
The upper arrow is restricted to the free absolutely continuous subspace. The right arrow is the full adjoint ; its codomain restriction follows from the factor in the definition of . Whenever both limits exist, the diagonal arrow is their composite; if both are also isometries, this is the scattering operator defined above. The diagram records this composition only and asserts neither existence nor completeness.
Definition references
Continued resolvent matrix elements and resonance poles
Definition
Let be self-adjoint on a complex Hilbert space whose inner product is linear in the first variable, use the resolvent convention , and let be a specified vector subspace. For , the scalar resolvent matrix element is
Given an open real interval , a point , and a disk centered at , a local analytic continuation of these matrix elements through is a specified family of holomorphic functions agreeing with on , for the stated . A meromorphic continuation on is instead a specified family agreeing with on , holomorphic on except for isolated poles. At every crossing point where no pole occurs it is a regular analytic continuation on a smaller neighborhood. For such a meromorphic continuation, if is nonreal and for some the continued function satisfies
on a punctured neighborhood of , for an integer and a holomorphic with , then is a pole of order of that continued matrix element. Such a pole is called a resonance matrix-element pole for the specified pair and continuation. This definition asserts neither that a continuation exists nor that a pole is an eigenvalue of ; the continuation and the chosen test vectors are part of the data.
Definition references
Explicit Gaussian continuation of a free resolvent matrix element
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. On with , let on its maximal domain , let , and put
This is a dimensionless model; no physical units are assigned to or .
For , define the entire function
where is the horizontal ray oriented from toward . For any , take a disk centered at with , and the holomorphic square root with . Then has the local analytic continuation through
Statement references
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Continued resolvent matrix elements and resonance poles
Identity theorem for holomorphic functions
Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators
Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Hilbert space, multiplication operator, vector , scalar resolvent matrix element, and local continuation definition in the Statement.
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice as required by the self-adjoint multiplication and integration suppliers (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Real multiplication by a measurable finite real function on its maximal domain is self-adjoint; in particular on the domain stated above (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators).
For a radial integrand in , after angular integration (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
Nonnegative iterated integrals may be interchanged by Tonelli's theorem on sigma-finite product measure spaces (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).
Dominated convergence applies to the finite integrals and locally uniform parameter bounds used below (Dominated convergence).
Holomorphic functions agreeing on a set with an accumulation point in a connected domain agree throughout that domain (Identity theorem for holomorphic functions).
Proof
Given: [A1], the Hilbert space, multiplication operator, normalized vector , scalar resolvent element, and the disk and branch data in the Statement.
By [F1], is self-adjoint and nonnegative. The Gaussian integral in [F2], applied in each coordinate and combined with Tonelli [F4], gives , so . Polar coordinates [F3] and the resolvent multiplier therefore give for . The denominator is nonzero on the integration ray, and the integral is locally uniformly dominated on the upper half-plane, so it defines the stated resolvent matrix element.
For , put . When is real, the Laplace representation of and Tonelli [F4] give by [F2]. The substitutions and then give , using the horizontal-ray definition of for real .
Fix with and a closed disk about contained in that half-plane. Choose and so that and on . For , . For nonzero complex small enough that , the exact difference quotient of the integrand of is For , its modulus is at most , an integrable majorant by [F2]. The quotients are measurable in , and tend pointwise to . Applying [F5] along every sequence of nonzero complex increments tending to zero proves that is complex differentiable at , with derivative the integral of this limit. Thus is holomorphic on the right half-plane; this conclusion uses the actual difference quotients, not an assumption that dominated convergence is itself a differentiation theorem. For , put . Its exact segment identity is For completeness this identity follows by expanding the exponential series on the finite segment, differentiating each polynomial in , and integrating it: the series and its derivative converge uniformly there, since for they are dominated respectively by and , both finite. Hence passage through the finite segment integral is justified by the uniform remainder bound. For , and , write ; then and . Consequently the segment derivative is bounded in modulus by , independently of . This majorant is integrable: is bounded, and the remaining scaled Gaussian is integrable by [F2]. The original integrand is bounded the same way without the factor . The measurable difference quotients therefore have one integrable majorant and tend pointwise, as complex , to . Apply [F5] to every such sequence to obtain the complex derivative of at every . It is entire. Both sides of step 1.2 are therefore holomorphic on the connected half-plane ; their agreement on the positive real axis has an accumulation point inside this domain, so [F6] extends the identity throughout the half-plane.
For , choose the square root with . Since , ; substituting the identity from step 2.1 and gives . On , the root equals : both square to , and . Substitution gives there. The right hand side is holomorphic throughout , so it is the required local continuation through .
Compact-support short-range scattering closure
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. Let and suppose there is a compact set such that almost everywhere outside . Let , and set and on . Use
Here , and the strong limits act on every . Then:
(a) The wave operators exist, are isometries, and satisfy
For , write . The subspace consists of vectors with ; is the subspace with atomless scalar spectral measures singular with respect to Lebesgue measure; is the closed span of eigenspaces, and . These are the canonical spectral-type subspaces of the PVM.
(b) The scattering operator is unitary on and commutes with for every .
Use time in the corresponding evolution convention and the standard scaled Schrödinger normalization in which the kinetic coefficient is set to . When length is dimensional, and then have units and has units ; the proof is an operator deduction in this normalization.
(c) Put , where , and define the normalized free energy transform
Fix a bounded ball containing . For , , define bounded maps and by
Let be the operator-norm limit ; existence and continuity for are part of the stated supplier input. The products below are these bounded maps on . Then is unitary and there is a measurable unitary field such that
The formula uses only positive energies; it makes no claim at the threshold , and no long-range Coulomb potential is included.
Statement references
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Wave, scattering and channel operators
Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators
Compact-support asymptotic completeness
Stationary and dynamical scattering in the full energy-angular representation
Canonical decomposition into pure point, absolutely continuous and singular continuous parts
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and CC; a real bounded compactly supported ; the free Fourier convention, operators and wave limits in the Statement.
Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice).
Assume CC (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The real multiplier and bounded-potential theorem gives self-adjoint on , , and self-adjoint on the same domain (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators).
For the exact hypotheses , compact support, , and on , the compact-support completeness supplier proves that exist by Cook's construction, their individual ranges equal , the singular-continuous subspace is zero, and is unitary and commutes with the free group (Compact-support asymptotic completeness).
For the same real bounded compactly supported , the stationary/dynamical supplier uses , , and proves that is unitary, that , and that the positive-energy stationary matrix is
It proves this matrix is unitary for every , with the local resolvent and compact-region adjoint conventions in the Statement (Stationary and dynamical scattering in the full energy-angular representation).
The definitions of , completeness, and are those of Wave, scattering and channel operators.
The canonical spectral-type decomposition defines the absolutely continuous, singular-continuous, and pure-point subspaces from the spectral PVM and scalar measures (Canonical decomposition into pure point, absolutely continuous and singular continuous parts).
Proof
Given: [A1], [A2], [F1]–[F5], and the operators and conventions stated above.
The Fourier convention in [F1] is ; with , its multiplier is exactly , and the unitary momentum transform is . Thus the and domain in [F2] agree with those in the Statement. Since the potential is the same real bounded compactly supported multiplication operator, [F1] also gives the self-adjoint realization required by [F2].
By [F2], the two stated pointwise strong limits exist with the exact sign convention , are isometries, and have the stated individual ranges. That same supplier proves the absent singular-continuous subspace; [F5] fixes the PVM meaning of these spectral subspaces. In the degenerate case , the approximants are , so and . By [F4], the supplier's scattering operator is exactly the defined in the Statement, so its unitarity and free-group commutation give (b).
The Fourier scaling and energy change of variables in [F3] use the same momentum transform and as in the Statement. Hence the local , , resolvent boundary value, and compact-region generalized adjoint agree term-for-term with [F3]; no independent normalization or sign change is introduced.
Applying [F3] with the identical now proves that is unitary, that is multiplication by , and that the displayed stationary formula is unitary for every . The result is conditional on AC, CC and the compact-support model and makes no threshold or Coulomb assertion. This proves (a)–(c).
Wigner–Smith matrix for differentiable finite channels
Statement
Let be an open energy interval with fixed finite channel number , let be in the finite-channel convention of Wave, scattering and channel operators, and let . Define
Then is Hermitian and
where the last expression means the logarithmic derivative , independent of a choice of logarithm branch. If the incoming and outgoing bases are changed by energy-independent unitary matrices and , so that , then
If is measured in joules and in joule-seconds, has units of seconds. This is an algebraic scattering-matrix result; it does not by itself establish an operational arrival-time or dwell-time interpretation.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The open interval , fixed , unitary matrix field , and .
A finite-channel scattering matrix is a matrix field ; is conjugate transpose, while trace and determinant are the usual finite-dimensional trace and alternating determinant (Wave, scattering and channel operators).
The finite-dimensional derivative, product and trace operations are entrywise operations on scalar functions; determinant is the alternating multilinear polynomial in the matrix entries (Wave, scattering and channel operators).
Proof
Given: [F1], [F2] and the data in the Statement.
Differentiating entrywise gives . Thus satisfies , and .
Since is unitary, and . Multilinearity of the alternating determinant gives for : terms linear in are exactly the choices of one diagonal entry, while every nonidentity permutation or two off-diagonal factors contributes . Applying this to yields . Multiplication by proves the trace formula.
For constant unitary , differentiation gives , while . Therefore , proving the stated conjugation rule. Energy-dependent basis changes introduce derivatives of the basis matrices, so they are not covered by this claim.
Resonance poles in an analytic rank-one model
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. Let be a self-adjoint operator on a complex Hilbert space with inner product linear in its first variable, bounded below, let , let , and put
Adopt as an explicit conditional input the rank-one resolvent interface: is self-adjoint, and whenever and , where , one has
Spectral variables use the energy unit of . If is dimensionless, has inverse-energy units and has energy units; in general the coupling is chosen so that is dimensionless.
Let , take an open disk centered at , and let lie in an open interval on which the spectral PVM of is absolutely continuous: for every Lebesgue-null Borel set . Suppose and, for specified test vectors in a subspace , the free matrix elements
have holomorphic continuations through to . Suppose has a zero with of finite order , meaning that on some neighborhood of one has for a holomorphic function with , and suppose . Then the continued matrix element has a resonance pole of order . In the simple-zero case its residue is
In particular, for the Gaussian model , , and , take , an open disk centered at with , and the holomorphic square-root branch normalized by . (The subscript distinguishes this branch from the zero order .) The continuation in the Gaussian lemma with precisely these disk and branch data supplies ; every interval is absolutely continuous by the radial spectral measure formula. Every finite-order zero of in the lower half of such a disk gives a pole of the continued scalar element . These poles are not nonreal eigenvalues of the self-adjoint .
Statement references
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Continued resolvent matrix elements and resonance poles
Integral of a measurable function against a projection-valued measure
Explicit Gaussian continuation of a free resolvent matrix element
Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators
Resolvent of a self-adjoint operator: nonreal resolvents and the estimate
Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form)
Rank-one resolvent and bound-state equation
Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
is exactly the completion of the restriction of to the Borel sets
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and CC; the self-adjoint lower-semibounded , , real nonzero , and in the Statement; the specified test space and local continuations.
The rank-one resolvent theorem is used at its exact current interface: under AC, self-adjoint lower-semibounded , , real , , and on , it gives self-adjointness and the displayed resolvent identity when (Rank-one resolvent and bound-state equation). The complete current proof and hash-current Step 1 ready record were inspected; this use matches both exactly.
The continuation and pole terms have the precise matrix-element meaning of Continued resolvent matrix elements and resonance poles.
For the Gaussian model, , a disk centered at with , and the holomorphic branch on with , the explicit horizontal-contour formula supplies a holomorphic agreeing with on . These are the exact branch and disk hypotheses of Explicit Gaussian continuation of a free resolvent matrix element.
A self-adjoint has real spectrum; every nonreal is in its resolvent set (Resolvent of a self-adjoint operator: nonreal resolvents and the estimate).
The spectral PVM of acts by multiplication by , and its scalar measure for is (Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form), Projection valued measure, Integral of a measurable function against a projection-valued measure).
Polar integration on gives , with finite unit-sphere measure (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
Since Lebesgue measure on is the completion of its Borel restriction, every Lebesgue-measurable function agrees almost everywhere with a Borel-measurable function; apply this to ( is exactly the completion of the restriction of to the Borel sets, A function measurable for a completion is almost everywhere equal to one measurable for the original sigma-algebra).
Proof
Given: [A1], [F1]–[F6], and the free matrix-element continuations in the Statement.
Fix with . Self-adjointness of puts in ; self-adjointness of in [A1] puts it in . Also : if , then , , and , contradicting . Thus [A1] applies on the upper half-plane.
Pairing the rank-one identity [A1] against and using the first-variable-linear convention gives . Each numerator term has the holomorphic continuation assumed in the Statement, so the right side defines the corresponding meromorphic continuation on .
By the finite-order zero hypothesis, near , where is holomorphic and . The product is holomorphic and nonzero at , so its quotient by has a pole of order exactly . The first term is holomorphic and cannot cancel that pole. Thus the continued matrix element has the asserted resonance pole. If , its residue is .
In the Gaussian model take exactly the positive center , disk excluding zero, and normalized holomorphic branch specified in [F2]. Its formula therefore supplies the assumed holomorphic continuation on this , not a continuation across the threshold zero or a differently signed sheet. Choose a Borel representative of by [F6]. The PVM formula [F4] and polar integration [F5] then give, for every , . The substitution gives . Thus for every Lebesgue-null , so any open meets the Statement's absolute-continuity condition. For , one has . At a zero of , . Hence the noncancellation condition of step 2.1 holds at every finite-order zero, proving the stated Gaussian specialization.
If a nonzero vector satisfied with , self-adjointness in [A1] would make real, but it equals , which is nonreal. This contradiction proves that the continued pole is not a nonreal eigenvalue.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
None yet.
Sources
- D. R. Yafaev, Lectures on Scattering Theory, Lectures 1–2, especially Definitions 1.1–1.3 and equations (2.14)–(2.16)
- M. Gadella and G. Pronko, The Friedrichs Model and its Use in Resonance Phenomena, §1.1 and §2
- M. E. Taylor, Introduction to Analysis in Several Variables, §3.1
- M. Gadella and G. Pronko, The Friedrichs Model and its Use in Resonance Phenomena, §2
- D. R. Yafaev, Lectures on Scattering Theory, Lectures 1–2
- B. Zwiebach, Quantum Physics III, Chapter 7: Scattering, MIT OpenCourseWare (Spring 2018)
- Christophe Texier, Wigner Time Delay and Related Concepts: Application to Transport in Coherent Conductors, §2.2.4
- Helmut Haberzettl and Ron Workman, Time-Delay in a Multi-Channel Formalism, §§II–III
- M. Gadella and G. Pronko, The Friedrichs Model and its Use in Resonance Phenomena, §§1.1–2.1
- S. Albeverio and P. Kurasov, Singular Perturbations of Differential Operators: Solvable Schrödinger Type Operators, Chapter 1, §1.1.1