Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Qm Math Coulomb

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The Coulomb layer of the non-relativistic quantum mechanics mathematical prerequisites, entirely mathematical: the three-dimensional Hardy inequality and the resulting infinitesimal kinetic bound, the relative compactness and essential spectrum of the Coulomb operator, the polar-coordinate unitary reduction to radial operators with their transported endpoint domain, the Kummer and Laguerre solution theory of the negative spectrum, the two-body reduced-mass separation, the dipole matrix-element domain and selection rules, and the Jost-Volterra construction of the continuum with its spectral density and onto radial transform.

Two local prerequisites open the page: L^2 kernel operators and Hilbert-Schmidt operators on R^3 and L^2 kernel operators are bounded and compact supply the L2-kernel calculus used by the relative-compactness argument, and Closed semibounded symmetric forms and their associated operators fixes the closed semibounded form terminology used by the radial realisation. Every item carries domain: mathematics and depends only on mathematical suppliers from qm-math-composites, qm-math-oscillator, qm-math-intervals-and-contacts, qm-math-orbital-and-spin and published mathematics; nothing here asserts a physical interpretation, measurement model or empirical claim, and the companion page qm-math-coulomb-examples stays mathematics as well.

Three-dimensional Hardy bound proves ∥u/∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥∇u∥2 on W1,2(R3) by integration by parts with a cutoff and a density argument, and Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound converts it into the bound ∥u/∣⋅∣∥2≤η∥Δu∥2+η−1∥u∥2, so that C=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ on H2(R3) is self-adjoint and bounded below by Kato-Rellich. Coulomb relative compactness factors the free resolvent through an L2 convolution kernel and splits the Coulomb multiplier into a Hilbert-Schmidt annulus plus small short-range and tail pieces, giving H0-compactness; Coulomb essential spectrum applies Weyl's theorem to get σess(C)=[0,∞) and the discreteness of the negative spectrum.

Angular radial unitary reduction constructs the unitary polar decomposition ψ↦(ulm), ulm=r∫ψYlm‾ into ⨁L2((0,∞),dr), proves the polar form of the Laplacian and the single-block reduction −Δ↔−u′′+l(l+1)u/r2; Transported radial endpoint realization defines the radial operator Al through the closed form ∫(∣u′−u/r∣2+l(l+1)∣u∣2/r2−γ∣u∣2/r), proves that it is self-adjoint with UCU∗=⨁Al, that its domain is the transported H2 domain, and that its elements satisfy the differential equation distributionally almost everywhere, with classical C2 solutions for the eigenfunctions. Kummer recurrence and termination solves the radial equation in terms of the Kummer series and the Laguerre polynomials and identifies the terminating solutions; Laguerre bound energy exhaustion shows that non-terminating solutions grow exponentially and therefore excludes them, so that the negative spectrum of Al is exactly {−γ2/(4n2):n≥l+1}; Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy proves that these bound states form a complete orthonormal family of the negative spectral subspace with degeneracy n2 and do not span L2.

Ground radial probability and units computes the normalised ground vector (γ3/8π)1/2e−r/a0, the radial law 4r2a0−3e−2r/a0, its mean 3a0/2 and mode a0, and records the dimension convention a0=ℏ2/(mκ); Two-body reduced mass separates the two-body problem by the unit-determinant coordinate map (x1,x2)↦(R,r), proves UΦH2UΦ−1=TR⊗I+I⊗Cμ with reduced mass μ=m1m2/(m1+m2), and shows σ(H2)=[−μκ2/(2ℏ2),∞) with no eigenvalues; Atomic dipole matrix-element domain places the bound states in the domain of the coordinate multipliers, factors the dipole pairings into radial and angular parts, applies the angular selection rules Δl=±1, Δm=q, and records the oscillator comparison Xψn∝nψn−1+n+1ψn+1.

The continuum layer is Coulomb Jost Volterra solution, which constructs the regular solution by an entire power series and the Jost-type solution by a modified Volterra equation with controlled asymptotics ei(kr+alog⁡r)(1+O(1/r)), proves the Wronskian identities W(f‾,f)=2ik, Wl≠0 and excludes positive eigenvalues; Coulomb continuum spectral density derives the resolvent Green kernel −φ(min⁡)f(max⁡)/Wl, its boundary value Im⁡G(k2+i0)=kφφ/∣Wl∣2, the spectral density ρl(E)=E/(π∣Wl(E)∣2) and the absence of point and singular continuous spectrum on (0,∞), including the scaling argument excluding the zero eigenvalue; and Onto radial continuum transform defines the compact-source transform (Tlg)(E)=ρl(E)∫φl(E,r)g(r)dr, extends it to a contraction T on the full radial L2 space, and proves that its restriction T^l to the positive spectral subspace is unitary onto L2((0,∞),dE), with T=T^lEAl((0,∞)), diagonalises Al as multiplication by E, and assembles the complete spectral resolution of C as bound data plus continuum data in every angular channel.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

L^2 kernel operators and Hilbert-Schmidt operators on R^3

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Write L2=L2(R3;C) for the complex Hilbert space of Lebesgue (equivalence classes of) square-integrable functions with inner product ⟨f,g⟩=∫R3fg‾ linear in the first argument (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions, Hilbert space), and write L2(R3×R3;C) for the same construction over the product with Lebesgue measure; identify Lebesgue measure on R6 with the completion of the product of Lebesgue measures on the two R3 factors.

Kernel data and sections. Let k∈L2(R3×R3;C), an almost-everywhere equivalence class, and choose a finite-valued Lebesgue-measurable representative k0:R3×R3→C. When f∈L2 is used, choose likewise a finite-valued Lebesgue-measurable representative f0:R3→C. For almost every x∈R3, the section kx(y):=k0(x,y) is measurable, by applying the completed-product Fubini theorem to the positive and negative parts of the real and imaginary components of k0 (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability).

Domain and action. For f∈L2 say that the integral defining Tkf exists at x∈R3 if the section product y↦k0(x,y)f0(y) is measurable and lies in L1(R3;C), and at such points put (Tkf)(x):=∫R3k0(x,y)f0(y) dy. Define D(Tk):={f∈L2: x↦(Tkf)(x) exists for almost every x and agrees a.e. with a class in L2}, and for f∈D(Tk) let Tkf denote that class. The assignment f↦Tkf is called the L2-kernel operator with kernel k.

This definition is independent of both representative choices. If k1 is another representative of k, its disagreement set with k0 is null for the completed product Lebesgue measure. Fubini applied to the indicator of that set gives k0(x,⋅)=k1(x,⋅) almost everywhere for almost every x. For each such x and any representative of f, the two section products therefore have the same L1 status and, when integrable, the same integral. Replacing f0 by another representative changes the section product only on a null set of y, so it too preserves integrability and the integral. Consequently the almost-everywhere sections, the subset D(Tk)⊆L2, and the resulting output class are unchanged by either representative choice.

Hilbert-Schmidt operators. A linear operator T on L2 is called a Hilbert-Schmidt operator if there is k∈L2(R3×R3;C) with D(T)=D(Tk) and T=Tk; such a k is called an L2 kernel of T.

This definition asserts nothing about whether D(Tk) is all of L2, whether Tk is bounded, or whether Tk is compact; those properties are proved in L^2 kernel operators are bounded and compact. A finite product kernel ∑i=1nfi(x)gi(y)‾ with fi,gi∈L2 is also a class in L2(R3×R3;C), as the same lemma records, so Tk is defined for it whenever that membership is used.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

L^2 kernel operators are bounded and compact

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let L2=L2(R3;C) and let k∈L2(R3×R3;C), with Tk the L2-kernel operator of L^2 kernel operators and Hilbert-Schmidt operators on R^3. Then:

(a) D(Tk)=L2; Tk is linear and bounded with ∥Tkf∥2≤∥k∥L2(R3×R3)∥f∥2 for every f∈L2, so ∥Tk∥≤∥k∥L2(R3×R3);

(b) if n≥1, f1,…,fn,g1,…,gn∈L2 and k(x,y)=∑i=1nfi(x)gi(y)‾ a.e., then k is a class in L2(R3×R3;C), the range of Tk is contained in span⁡{f1,…,fn}, and Tk is compact;

(c) Tk is compact; and

(d) for every sequence (km) in L2(R3×R3;C) with ∥km−k∥L2(R3×R3)→0 one has Tkm−Tk=Tkm−k and ∥Tkm−Tk∥≤∥km−k∥L2(R3×R3)→0; in particular Tk is the operator-norm limit of finite-rank kernel operators.

No statement is made about the spectrum of Tk, about its singular values, or about L2 kernels of a given compact operator.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Hilbert space L2 and its product L2(R3×R3;C); a kernel k of the stated class; the operators Tk of L^2 kernel operators and Hilbert-Schmidt operators on R^3.

[F1]

Cauchy-Schwarz for L2: ∫∣hg∣≤∥h∥2∥g∥2 whenever h,g∈L2. Completed-product Tonelli gives measurable section integrals and ∫R3(∫R3∣k(x,y)∣2dy)dx=∥k∥L2(R3×R3)2; completed-product Fubini gives measurable integrals of integrable real and imaginary components (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2, Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability).

[F2]

Density of box step functions: for 1≤p<∞ the finite linear combinations of indicators of half-open boxes in Rn with rational endpoints and rational coefficients are dense in Lp(Rn) (Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of Lp(Rn) for 1≤p<∞).

[F3]

A bounded linear operator between normed spaces whose range has a basis of finite length is compact (Bounded finite rank operators are compact). Under Countable Choice, an operator-norm limit of compact operators from a normed space into a Banach space is compact, provided the limit is a bounded linear operator (Norm limit of compact operators is compact). Here the target L2 is a Banach space because it is a Hilbert space (Hilbert space), and step 1.1 supplies boundedness for each kernel operator to which these results are applied.

[F4]

L2 elements are almost-everywhere classes with the linear-first pairing ⟨f,g⟩=∫fg‾. The kernel definition proves that changes of kernel or input representative preserve the section integrals almost everywhere (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions, L^2 kernel operators and Hilbert-Schmidt operators on R^3).

Proof

1.1F1F4algebra

[Boundedness and full domain] Fix f∈L2. For a.e. x the function y↦k(x,y)f(y) is measurable, and by [F1] ∫∣k(x,y)f(y)∣dy≤∥f∥2(∫∣k(x,y)∣2dy)1/2<∞ for a.e. x, the last integral being finite for a.e. x with ∫(∫∣k(x,y)∣2dy)dx=∥k∥22<∞; hence (Tkf)(x) exists for a.e. x and ∣(Tkf)(x)∣≤∥f∥2(∫∣k(x,y)∣2dy)1/2. For each bounded box B⊂R3, integrating the preceding bound gives ∫B∫∣k(x,y)f(y)∣dy dx≤∣B∣1/2∥k∥2∥f∥2<∞. Applying [F1] to the real and imaginary components of 1B(x)k(x,y)f(y) shows that Tkf is measurable on B up to a null set; a countable box exhaustion proves measurability on R3. Integrating the square and using completed-product Tonelli gives ∥Tkf∥22≤∥f∥22∫∫∣k(x,y)∣2dx dy=∥k∥22∥f∥22, so D(Tk)=L2, Tkf∈L2 with the stated bound, and Tk is linear because the integral is linear in f for each x. This is (a).

2.1step 1.1F1F3F4algebra

[Finite product kernels] Let k(x,y)=∑i=1nfi(x)gi(y)‾ a.e. with fi,gi∈L2. By Tonelli and [F1], ∫∫∣k∣2≤(∑i∥fi∥2∥gi∥2)2<∞, so k is a class in L2(R3×R3;C); moreover for f∈L2 step 1.1 applies and, for a.e. x, (Tkf)(x)=∑ifi(x)∫gi(y)‾f(y)dy=∑i⟨f,gi⟩fi(x) by linearity of the integral and [F4]; hence the range of Tk lies in the finite-dimensional space span⁡{f1,…,fn}. By [F3] Tk is compact. This is (b).

3.1step 2.1F2F4algebra

[Box step functions are finite product kernels] A half-open box in R6 is a product B×B′ of half-open boxes B,B′⊆R3, and its indicator satisfies 1B×B′(x,y)=1B(x)1B′(y) for every (x,y); the indicators of bounded boxes lie in L2(R3;C). Hence every finite linear combination of indicators of half-open boxes in R6 with coefficients in Q+iQ is a finite product kernel as in step 2.1, and its kernel operator is compact by step 2.1.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1F2F3algebra

[Norm approximation and compactness] Let k∈L2(R3×R3;C). For each integer m≥0, apply [F2] with n=6, p=2 and tolerance 1/(m+1) separately to the real L2 functions Re⁡k and Im⁡k. By the assumed Countable Choice, select real rational box steps am,bm for all m≥0 with ∥am−Re⁡k∥2<1/(m+1) and ∥bm−Im⁡k∥2<1/(m+1). Then sm:=am+ibm is a finite box step with coefficients in Q+iQ, and ∥sm−k∥22=∥am−Re⁡k∥22+∥bm−Im⁡k∥22<2/(m+1)2. For each m, step 3.1 makes Tsm compact, and by linearity of the kernel operator Tk−Tsm=Tk−sm; step 1.1 applied to the kernel k−sm gives ∥Tk−Tsm∥≤∥k−sm∥L2(R3×R3)→0. By [F3] the operator-norm limit Tk is compact, which proves (c). For any sequence (km) as in (d), linearity gives Tkm−Tk=Tkm−k, and step 1.1 gives ∥Tkm−Tk∥≤∥km−k∥2→0, proving (d).

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1∎

[Conclusion] Part (a) is step 1.1, part (b) is step 2.1, and parts (c) and (d) are step 4.1.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Closed semibounded symmetric forms and their associated operators

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let (V,⟨⋅,⋅⟩V) and (H,⟨⋅,⋅⟩H) be complex Hilbert spaces (Hilbert space, Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument) and let i:V→H be a linear map with dense image.

Symmetric forms. A sesquilinear form on V is a map a:V×V→C that is linear in its first argument and conjugate-linear in its second; it is symmetric if a(u,v)=a(v,u)‾ for all u,v∈V, in which case a(u,u)∈R and Re⁡a(u,v)=Re⁡a(v,u)‾.

Bounded and semibounded. Such a form is bounded if there is C>0 with ∣a(u,v)∣≤C∥u∥V∥v∥V for all u,v∈V, and semibounded below with bound M≥0 if a(u,u)≥−M∥i(u)∥H2 for every u∈V.

Form seminorm and closedness. Let M≥0 be a bound as above and define the form seminorm ∥u∥a,M:=(Re⁡a(u,u)+(M+1)∥i(u)∥H2)1/2(u∈V). It is a seminorm because a(u,v)+(M+1)⟨i(u),i(v)⟩H is a positive semidefinite Hermitian form; its Cauchy–Schwarz inequality follows by expanding its value on u+tv and minimizing over the scalar t, and gives the triangle inequality. It need not separate points for a general dense-image map i. The form a is closed if there are such an M and constants c,C>0 with c∥u∥V≤∥u∥a,M≤C∥u∥V for every u∈V; then the form seminorm is a norm, and (V,∥⋅∥a,M) is complete because V is. If i is injective, it is already a norm before closedness, since its square is at least ∥i(u)∥H2.

Associated operator. With a and i as above, define D(A):={u∈V: there is f∈H with a(u,v)=⟨f,i(v)⟩H for every v∈V},Au:=f. The element f is unique when it exists, because two candidates differ by an element of H orthogonal to the dense subspace i(V), hence coincide; A is called the operator associated with a. This definition asserts neither that A is densely defined, nor that A is symmetric, nor that A is self-adjoint or bounded below; the specific closed semibounded form of Transported radial endpoint realization establishes those properties for its own associated operator by a direct computation. When V is a subspace of H and i is the inclusion, ∥i(u)∥H is written ∥u∥H and the pairing ⟨f,i(v)⟩H is written ⟨f,v⟩.

Remarks

For V=C2, H=C, i(u,v)=u and a=0, the map has dense image but the form seminorm vanishes on (0,1). Thus the general dense-image setting requires the seminorm qualification; the radial consumer uses the actual inclusion and proves closedness directly.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Three-dimensional Hardy bound

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let W1,2(R3;C) be the Sobolev space of Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms with the weak gradient ∇u of Weak derivative of a locally integrable function, write r(x):=∣x∣, and write ∥u∥22=∫R3∣u(x)∣2 dx for the L2 norm of The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions and Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions. Then:

(a) for every u∈Cc∞(R3∖{0};C),

∫R3∣u(x)∣2∣x∣2 dx≤4∫R3∣∇u(x)∣2 dx;

(b) the same inequality holds for every u∈Cc∞(R3;C);

(c) for every u∈W1,2(R3;C) the a.e.-defined function x↦u(x)/∣x∣ lies in L2(R3;C) and satisfies ∥u/∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥∇u∥2.

No constant smaller than 4 is claimed, and no statement is made about ∥u/∣⋅∣∥2 for u outside W1,2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Sobolev space W1,2(R3;C) with weak gradient ∇u; the function r(x)=∣x∣; a function u of one of the stated regularity classes.

[F1]

Divergence theorem and its vector forms: for a bounded domain with a finite piecewise C1 presentation and a C1 vector field F on a neighbourhood of its closure, the integral of div⁡F equals the outward flux; in particular, if F is C1 on R3∖{0} and compactly supported there, then ∫R3div⁡F=0 (Divergence for finite piecewise C1 presentations, Vector forms: the boundary integrals of fn and of n×F).

[F2]

Cauchy-Schwarz for L2: ∫∣fg∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2 (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2).

[F3]

Cc∞(R3;C) is dense in W1,2(R3;C) in the Sobolev norm (Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n), Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[F4]

If fn→f in L2, then some subsequence converges to f pointwise a.e. (Complex Lp completeness and almost-everywhere subsequences).

[F5]

If fn→f a.e. and ∣fn∣≤g with g∈L1, then ∫fn→∫f (Dominated convergence).

[F6]

For u∈Cc∞(R3;C) the function x↦∣u(x)∣2/∣x∣2 is integrable: choosing R>0 with supp⁡u⊆B(0,R) and bounding ∣u∣≤∥u∥∞, its integral is at most ∥u∥∞2∫∣x∣≤R∣x∣−2dx=4πR∥u∥∞2<∞ (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

[F7]

The explicit radial cutoff χ0∈Cc∞(R3) of Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs equals one on ∣x∣≤1, zero on ∣x∣≥2, and satisfies 0≤χ0≤1. Thus χ:=1−χ0 is smooth and bounded, vanishes near zero, equals one outside radius two, and has compactly supported bounded gradient.

Proof

1.1algebra

[The divergence of the radial weight] On R3∖{0} one has div⁡(x/∣x∣2)=∑i=13∂i(xi∣x∣−2)=3∣x∣−2−2∣x∣−2=∣x∣−2, because the derivative of ∣x∣−2 in the direction x is −2∣x∣−4∑ixi2=−2∣x∣−2.

2.1step 1.1F1algebra

[Integration by parts on the punctured space] Let u∈Cc∞(R3∖{0};C) and put W(x):=∣u(x)∣2x/∣x∣2. Then W is C1 on R3∖{0} and compactly supported there, and step 1.1 gives div⁡W=∇(∣u∣2)⋅x/∣x∣2+∣u∣2/∣x∣2. Since ∫R3div⁡W=0 by [F1], and ∇(∣u∣2)=2Re⁡(u‾ ∇u), we obtain ∫R3∣u∣2/∣x∣2 dx=−2Re⁡∫R3u‾(x) x⋅∇u(x) ∣x∣−2 dx.

3.1step 2.1F2F6algebra

[Hardy bound away from the origin] With u as in step 2.1, the absolute value of the right-hand integral is at most ∫(∣u∣/∣x∣)∣∇u∣≤∥u/∣⋅∣∥2∥∇u∥2 by [F2], while the left-hand side is ∥u/∣⋅∣∥22; both quantities are finite by [F6]. Hence ∥u/∣⋅∣∥22≤2∥u/∣⋅∣∥2∥∇u∥2, and if the factor is zero the conclusion is immediate, and otherwise division by its positive value yields ∥u/∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥∇u∥2, which is (a).

4.1step 3.1F5F6F7algebra

[Removing the puncture] Let u∈Cc∞(R3;C) and use the radial χ=1−χ0∈C∞(R3;[0,1]) of [F7], with χ=0 for ∣x∣≤1, χ=1 for ∣x∣≥2 and ∣∇χ∣≤C; put χε(x):=χ(x/ε). Then uε:=χεu∈Cc∞(R3∖{0};C), because its support is contained in the closed set {∣x∣≥ε}∩supp⁡u and hence stays a positive distance from the origin, so step 3.1 applies: ∥uε/∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥∇uε∥2. As ε↓0 the functions uε/∣x∣ converge to u/∣x∣ pointwise on {∣x∣>0} and are dominated by ∣u∣/∣x∣∈L2 by [F6], so ∥uε/∣⋅∣∥2→∥u/∣⋅∣∥2 by [F5] applied to the squared moduli. Moreover ∇uε=χε∇u+u∇χε with ∥χε∇u−∇u∥22≤∫∣x∣<2ε∣∇u∣2→0 and, with M:=∥u∥∞, ∥u∇χε∥22≤C2ε−2∫∣x∣≤2εM2 dx≤C2M24π(2ε)33ε2=O(ε)→0; hence ∥∇uε∥2→∥∇u∥2, and passing to the limit in the display gives (b).

5.1step 4.1F3F4algebra∎

[Density extension to W1,2] Let u∈W1,2(R3;C) and choose un∈Cc∞(R3;C) with ∥un−u∥W1,2→0 by [F3]. Step 4.1 applied to un−um gives ∥un/∣⋅∣−um/∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥∇(un−um)∥2, so (un/∣⋅∣) is Cauchy in L2; let w∈L2 be its limit, so ∥w∥2≤2∥∇u∥2 because ∥∇un∥2→∥∇u∥2. By [F4] some subsequence satisfies unk→u and unk/∣⋅∣→w pointwise a.e.; on the conull set where unk→u and ∣x∣>0 we have unk(x)/∣x∣→u(x)/∣x∣, so w=u/∣⋅∣ a.e. and (c) follows.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ>0, let H=L2(R3;C) (Hilbert space, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions), and let H0:=−Δ be the free operator of Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators with domain D(H0)=W2,2(R3;C) (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms): H0=F2∗M4π2∣ξ∣2F2 and H0u=−Δu for u∈D(H0), where Δu is the distributional Laplacian. Write M for the multiplication operator Mu:=u∣⋅∣,D(M):={u∈H:u∣⋅∣∈H}, and write ∥u∥2=∥u∥H. Then:

(a) for every u∈D(H0)=W2,2(R3;C) one has u/∣⋅∣∈L2 and

∥u∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥u∥2 ∥Δu∥2 ,∥u∣⋅∣∥2≤η∥Δu∥2+1η∥u∥2(η>0);

(b) M is a self-adjoint operator on H with D(H0)⊆D(M), symmetric on D(H0), with H0-bound zero in the sense that for every η>0 the pair (η,η−1) is admissible for M relative to H0;

(c) for every γ>0 the operator C:=H0−γM,D(C):=D(H0)=W2,2(R3;C), is self-adjoint on H, bounded below, and acts by Cu=−Δu−γu/∣⋅∣ for every u∈D(C); for every η∈(0,1/γ) one has C≥−γη−1/(1−γη) in the quadratic-form sense.

No sharp lower bound of C is claimed here, and no physical interpretation of C, H0, γ or Δ is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the free operator H0=−Δ with D(H0)=W2,2(R3;C); the multiplier M; the constant γ>0; a function u of the stated regularity.

[F1]

H0=F2∗M4π2∣ξ∣2F2 is self-adjoint on D(H0)={f:∣ξ∣2F2f∈L2}=W2,2(R3;C) as a set with equivalent norms, H0≥0 in the quadratic-form sense, and H0f=−Δf for Schwartz f (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators, Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[F2]

For every u∈W1,2(R3;C) one has u/∣⋅∣∈L2 and ∥u/∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥∇u∥2 (Three-dimensional Hardy bound).

[F3]

Plancherel: F2 is unitary and for the weak derivatives of u∈W2,2 the multipliers satisfy F2(∂iu)(ξ)=2πiξiF2u(ξ) and F2(Δu)(ξ)=−4π2∣ξ∣2F2u(ξ) a.e.; equivalently ∥∇u∥22=∫4π2∣ξ∣2∣F2u∣2 and ∥Δu∥22=∫16π4∣ξ∣4∣F2u∣2 (Plancherel theorem, Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers, Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms).

[F4]

Cauchy-Schwarz: ∫∣fg∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2 (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2).

[F5]

Kato-Rellich: if A is self-adjoint, B symmetric, D(A)⊆D(B) and the A-bound of B is less than one with admissible pair (a,b), then A+B on D(A) is self-adjoint and, when A≥γ0, satisfies A+B≥γ0−max⁡{a∣γ0∣+b,b/(1−a)} (Kato-Rellich theorem, Relative boundedness with respect to an operator).

[F6]

If a is a real finite-valued measurable function on R3, then Maf:=af on {f∈H:af∈H} is self-adjoint, and it is symmetric on every subspace on which both sides of the pairing are integrable, in particular on the set of f with af∈H (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators (a), Adjoint of a densely defined operator, Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators).

Proof

1.1F3F4algebra

[Kinetic inequality] Let u∈W2,2(R3;C) and put g:=F2u. By [F3], ∥∇u∥22=∫4π2∣ξ∣2∣g(ξ)∣2 dξ and ∥Δu∥22=∫(4π2∣ξ∣2)2∣g(ξ)∣2 dξ, while ∥u∥22=∫∣g∣2. Writing 4π2∣ξ∣2∣g∣2=(∣g∣)(4π2∣ξ∣2∣g∣) and applying [F4] to the two factors gives ∥∇u∥22≤∥u∥2∥Δu∥2.

2.1step 1.1F2algebra

[Infinitesimal Coulomb bound] Combining step 1.1 with [F2] yields ∥u/∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥∇u∥2≤2∥u∥2∥Δu∥2. For η>0 the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality 2ab≤ηa+η−1b applied to a=∥Δu∥2, b=∥u∥2 gives 2∥u∥2∥Δu∥2≤η∥Δu∥2+η−1∥u∥2. This proves (a).

3.1step 2.1F1F3F6algebra

[Relative bound of the multiplier] By [F6] applied to a(x)=1/∣x∣ (finite-valued on R3∖{0} and arbitrary, say 0, at the origin, a null set) the operator M is self-adjoint on D(M)={f:f/∣⋅∣∈H}, and M is symmetric on D(M). Step 2.1 shows D(H0)=W2,2⊆D(M) and ∥Mu∥2=∥u/∣⋅∣∥2≤η∥Δu∥2+η−1∥u∥2=η∥H0u∥2+η−1∥u∥2 for every u∈D(H0), since Δu=−H0u on D(H0) by [F1] and [F3]. Hence (η,η−1) is an admissible pair for M relative to H0, and the H0-bound of M is zero; this is (b).

4.1step 3.1F1F3F5algebra∎

[Self-adjointness of the Coulomb operator] Fix γ>0 and let η∈(0,1/γ). Then B:=−γM is symmetric with D(H0)⊆D(B) and admissible pair (a,b)=(γη,γη−1) with a<1; indeed ∥Bu∥2=γ∥Mu∥2≤γη∥H0u∥2+γη−1∥u∥2 by step 3.1. By [F5] with A=H0≥0 (so γ0=0) the operator C=H0+B on D(H0) is self-adjoint with C≥−max⁡{0, b/(1−a)}=−γη−1/(1−γη). Moreover Cu=H0u−γu/∣⋅∣=−Δu−γu/∣⋅∣ for u∈D(H0), by [F1] and [F3]; this is (c).

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Coulomb relative compactness

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ>0, let H0=−Δ with D(H0)=W2,2(R3;C) be the free operator of Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators, let Mu=u/∣⋅∣ be the multiplier of Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound with D(M)⊇D(H0), and let V:=−γM, so that Vf=−γf/∣⋅∣. For z∉R write R0(z):=(H0−z)−1 (Resolvent and spectrum of an unbounded operator, Resolvent of a self-adjoint operator: nonreal resolvents and the estimate). Then:

(a) for every z∉R there holds R0(z)=F2∗MmzF2 with mz(ξ):=(4π2∣ξ∣2−z)−1∈L2(R3), and ∥R0(z)f∥∞≤∥mz∥2∥f∥2 for every f∈L2(R3);

(b) for every z∉R there is gz∈L2(R3) with R0(z)f=gz∗f for every f∈L2;

(c) for every bounded measurable χ with compact support the operator MχR0(z) is Hilbert–Schmidt, hence compact;

(d) V is H0-compact (Relative compactness with respect to an operator): V is graph-norm bounded with respect to H0 and VR0(z) is a compact operator for one, equivalently every, z∉R; explicitly VR0(z)=−γMR0(z) is compact.

No statement is made about compactness of M itself, about point spectrum or about any other spectral property of H0+V; no physical interpretation is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the self-adjoint free operator H0=−Δ with D(H0)=W2,2(R3;C); the multiplier M; the number γ>0; a nonreal z; a bounded compactly supported χ.

[F1]

H0=F2∗M4π2∣ξ∣2F2 is self-adjoint with D(H0)={f:∣ξ∣2F2f∈L2}=W2,2(R3;C) (as a set, with equivalent norms), and H0≥0 (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators, Relative boundedness with respect to an operator, Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators).

[F2]

M is self-adjoint with D(H0)⊆D(M) and H0-bound zero: for every η>0, ∥Mf∥2≤η∥H0f∥2+η−1∥f∥2 (Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound (b), Relative boundedness with respect to an operator).

[F3]

F2 is unitary on L2 and extends the L1 transform f^(ξ)=∫f(x)e−2πix⋅ξdx (Plancherel theorem, Fourier transform on complex L1 classes).

[F4]

For Schwartz f,g the convolution f∗g is Schwartz and F2(f∗g)=f^g^ (Schwartz convolution and product laws, Schwartz space and its seminorms).

[F5]

If k∈L2(R3×R3;C) then the kernel operator Tk of L^2 kernel operators and Hilbert-Schmidt operators on R^3 is defined on all of L2, is bounded with ∥Tkf∥2≤∥k∥2∥f∥2, and is compact; in particular it is a Hilbert–Schmidt operator in the sense of that definition (L^2 kernel operators are bounded and compact).

[F6]

For nonnegative product-measurable functions the iterated and double integrals agree (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F7]

Cauchy-Schwarz and dominated convergence in their L2 and integral forms (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2, Dominated convergence).

[F8]

If T is compact and B is bounded then BT is compact (Compositions with a compact operator are compact, Compact linear operator).

[F9]

A uniform limit of compact operators is compact (Norm limit of compact operators is compact).

[F10]

The Schwartz classes are dense in L2(R3;C) (Schwartz space is dense in L2).

Proof

1.1F1F3givenalgebra

[The resolvent as a Fourier multiplier] Fix z∉R and define mz(ξ):=(4π2∣ξ∣2−z)−1. Since ∣4π2∣ξ∣2−z∣≥∣Im⁡z∣ one has ∣mz(ξ)∣≤∣Im⁡z∣−1 everywhere; and whenever 4π2∣ξ∣2≥2∣Re⁡z∣ one has ∣4π2∣ξ∣2−z∣≥4π2∣ξ∣2−∣Re⁡z∣≥12 4π2∣ξ∣2, so that ∣mz(ξ)∣≤12π2∣ξ∣2. With ρ:=max⁡{1,2∣Re⁡z∣/(2π)}>0, so that 4π2ρ2≥2∣Re⁡z∣ this yields ∫R3∣mz∣2≤∣Im⁡z∣−2 ∣B(0,ρ)∣+14π4∫∣ξ∣>ρ∣ξ∣−4dξ<∞, because ∫∣ξ∣>ρ∣ξ∣−4dξ=4π∫ρ∞r−2dr; so mz∈L2(R3); moreover mz(ξ)(4π2∣ξ∣2−z)=1 for a.e. ξ. Define R0(z):=F2∗MmzF2; then for f∈L2 the vector R0(z)f lies in D(H0), because ∣ξ∣2mz(ξ)F2f(ξ)=(F2f(ξ)+zmz(ξ)F2f(ξ))/(4π2) is a sum of two L2 functions, and (H0−z)R0(z)f=f since F2((H0−z)R0(z)f)=(4π2∣ξ∣2−z)mz(ξ)F2f=F2f; conversely for g∈D(H0) the function (4π2∣ξ∣2−z)F2g is in L2, so R0(z)(H0−z)g is defined and its transform is mz(ξ)(4π2∣ξ∣2−z)F2g=F2g. Hence R0(z)=(H0−z)−1 and ∥R0(z)∥≤∣Im⁡z∣−1.

2.1step 1.1F3F4F7algebra

[L∞ bound of the free resolvent] For Schwartz f the function mzF2f lies in L1∩L2, so R0(z)f has the everywhere-defined representative x↦∫mz(ξ)F2f(ξ)e2πix⋅ξdξ, whose modulus is at most ∥mz∥2∥F2f∥2=∥mz∥2∥f∥2 by [F7]. For general f∈L2 choose Schwartz fn→f in L2; then R0(z)fn→R0(z)f in L2 and ∥R0(z)fn−R0(z)fm∥∞≤∥mz∥2∥fn−fm∥2, so the representatives converge uniformly to a bounded function h with ∥h∥∞≤∥mz∥2∥f∥2; uniform convergence gives Lloc2 convergence and hence h=R0(z)f a.e., so ∥R0(z)f∥∞≤∥mz∥2∥f∥2.

2.2step 1.1F3F4F6F7F10algebra

[Convolution kernel] Put gz:=F2∗mz∈L2 by [F3]. We first prove R0(z)f=gz∗f for Schwartz f. Choose Schwartz functions φn with φn→gz in L2 ([F10]). For every n both φn and f are Schwartz, so [F4] gives F2(φn∗f)=φn^f^; here φn^→F2gz=mz in L2 by the isometry [F3], while ∣f^(ξ)∣≤∥f∥1<∞ for every ξ by the defining integral of the L1 transform [F3] and the integrability of the Schwartz function f; hence F2(φn∗f)=φn^f^→mzf^=F2(R0(z)f) in L2. Since F2 is an isometry, φn∗f→R0(z)f in L2. On the other hand φn∗f→gz∗f in L2: for h:=φn−gz and a.e. x, ∫∣h(x−y)∣∣f(y)∣dy=∫∣h(x−y)∣∣f(y)∣∣f(y)∣dy≤(∫∣h(x−y)∣2∣f(y)∣dy)1/2∥f∥11/2 by [F7], so Tonelli [F6] gives ∥h∗f∥22≤∥f∥1∬∣h(x−y)∣2∣f(y)∣dydx=∥f∥12∥h∥22→0. Therefore R0(z)f=gz∗f for Schwartz f. This identity also gives ∥gz∗f∥2=∥R0(z)f∥2=∥mzF2f∥2≤∥mz∥∞∥f∥2 for Schwartz f, so f↦gz∗f is bounded on the dense subspace of Schwartz classes and extends uniquely to a bounded operator on L2 by [F10], and this extension agrees with the bounded operator R0(z) on the dense subspace; hence the extension equals R0(z) on every f∈L2. It also equals the ordinary convolution representative: for fixed x, Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∫∣gz(x−y)f(y)∣dy≤∥gz∥2∥f∥2, and for Schwartz fn→f it gives sup⁡x∣gz∗(fn−f)(x)∣≤∥gz∥2∥fn−f∥2→0. This is uniform convergence, while R0(z)fn→R0(z)f in L2. On every bounded set both limits agree by L2 convergence and uniform convergence, proving R0(z)f=gz∗f almost everywhere for the ordinary convolution as well.

3.1step 2.2F5F6algebra

[Localized resolvent is Hilbert–Schmidt] Let χ be bounded with compact support. By step 2.2, MχR0(z)f=χ⋅(gz∗f), so the operator MχR0(z) has the kernel k(x,y):=χ(x)gz(x−y). The function k is product-measurable and ∫∫∣k(x,y)∣2dx dy=∫∣χ(x)∣2(∫∣gz(x−y)∣2dy)dx=∥χ∥22∥gz∥22<∞ by [F6]; hence MχR0(z)=Tk is Hilbert–Schmidt in the sense of L^2 kernel operators and Hilbert-Schmidt operators on R^3 and compact by [F5].

3.2step 2.1F2F3givenalgebra

[Short-range and tail estimates] For ε>0 let Bε:={x:∣x∣<ε}. By step 2.1, ∥Mγ∣⋅∣−11BεR0(z)f∥2≤γ(∫Bε∣x∣−2dx)1/2∥R0(z)f∥∞≤γ4πε ∥mz∥2∥f∥2, so the operator norm is at most γ4πε∥mz∥2. For R>0, ∥Mγ∣⋅∣−11{∣x∣>R}R0(z)∥≤γR−1∥R0(z)∥≤γR−1∣Im⁡z∣−1.

4.1step 3.1step 3.2F9algebra

[Compactness of MR0(z)] Fix R>ε>0 and choose a bounded measurable χ with 0≤χ≤1, χ=1 on {ε≤∣x∣≤R} and χ=0 off {ε/2≤∣x∣≤2R}; this is possible with compact support. Since χ=1 on the closed annulus {ε≤∣x∣≤R}, the function 1−χ vanishes there and satisfies the pointwise domination 0≤γ1−χ(x)∣x∣≤γ1Bε(x)∣x∣+γ1{∣x∣>R}(x)∣x∣. Hence γMR0(z)=Mγ∣⋅∣−1χR0(z)+Mγ∣⋅∣−1(1−χ)R0(z), where the first summand is compact by step 3.1 and the second has operator norm at most γ4πε∥mz∥2+γR−1∣Im⁡z∣−1 by step 3.2, because its multiplier is pointwise dominated by the sum of the two multipliers of step 3.2. Given δ>0 choose ε and R making this bound smaller than δ. Thus γMR0(z) lies within δ of a compact operator for every δ>0, hence is compact by [F9].

5.1step 4.1F2F8∎

[Conclusion] By step 4.1 and [F8], VR0(z)=−γMR0(z) is compact; the graph-norm boundedness of V with respect to H0 is [F2]. Hence V is H0-compact in the sense of Relative compactness with respect to an operator, and the equivalent formulations in (a)–(c) are steps 1.1, 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Coulomb essential spectrum

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ>0, let H0=−Δ with D(H0)=W2,2(R3;C) be the free operator of Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators, let M be the multiplier Mu=u/∣⋅∣ of Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound, and let C:=H0−γM,D(C)=W2,2(R3;C), be the self-adjoint operator of Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound (c). Write σd, σess, E for the discrete spectrum, essential spectrum and spectral projection valued measure of Discrete and essential spectrum of a self-adjoint operator and Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form). Then:

(a) C is bounded below and σess(C)=[0,+∞);

(b) every point of σ(C)∩(−∞,0) lies in σd(C): it is an eigenvalue of C of finite multiplicity isolated in σ(C), and the set of such eigenvalues is at most countable;

(c) the negative spectral subspace E((−∞,0))L2(R3;C) is the closed linear span of the eigenspaces of C for its negative eigenvalues.

No claim is made about the multiplicity or the number of the negative eigenvalues, about the nonnegative part of the spectrum beyond σess(C)=[0,∞), or about any physical interpretation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the operators H0, M, C; a nonreal number is used only inside the proof; γ>0.

[F1]

H0=F2∗M4π2∣ξ∣2F2 is self-adjoint with D(H0)=W2,2(R3;C) and H0≥0; for u∈D(H0) one has F2(H0u)(ξ)=4π2∣ξ∣2F2u(ξ) a.e. (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators, Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers).

[F2]

C=H0−γM is self-adjoint on D(C)=D(H0) and bounded below; M is H0-bounded with bound zero and MR0(z) is compact for every nonreal z, where R0(z)=(z−H0)−1 (Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound, Coulomb relative compactness, Relative compactness with respect to an operator, Resolvent of a self-adjoint operator: nonreal resolvents and the estimate).

[F3]

Weyl's theorem: if A,C are self-adjoint and RA(z)−RC(z) is compact for one nonreal z, then σess(A)=σess(C) (Weyl's theorem: invariance of the essential spectrum).

[F4]

For a self-adjoint operator A with PVM E: λ∈σess(A) if and only if rank⁡E((λ−ε,λ+ε))=∞ for every ε>0; for every Borel set B and vector f the scalar set function Ef(B):=⟨E(B)f,f⟩ is a finite positive measure of mass ∥f∥2; and E({λ}) is the orthogonal projection onto ker⁡(A−λ) (Discrete and essential spectrum of a self-adjoint operator, Projection valued measure, Unbounded Borel functional calculus: domains, products, spectral mapping).

[F5]

If T is compact and B is bounded, then BT and TB are compact (Compositions with a compact operator are compact, Compact linear operator).

[F6]

Normalized indicator functions of pairwise disjoint measurable sets of finite positive measure form an orthonormal family; a nonempty open ball in R3 has positive measure and contains infinitely many pairwise disjoint nonempty open balls (Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

Proof

1.1F1F4F6algebra

[Essential spectrum of the free operator] Fix λ≥0 and ε>0 and put Sε:={ξ∈R3:4π2∣ξ∣2∈(λ−ε,λ+ε)}. If λ>0 choose ξ0 with 4π2∣ξ0∣2=λ; continuity of ξ↦4π2∣ξ∣2 gives a nonempty open ball around ξ0 contained in Sε. If λ=0 take the ball {∣ξ∣<ε/(2π)}. In either case Sε contains a nonempty open ball, hence by [F6] contains infinitely many pairwise disjoint nonempty open balls and has infinite-dimensional L2 space; by [F1] the projection EH0((λ−ε,λ+ε))=F2∗M1SεF2 has range F2∗M1SεL2, which is infinite dimensional. By [F4] applied to H0 we get λ∈σess(H0). Conversely, if λ<0 and 0<ε<∣λ∣, then (λ−ε,λ+ε)∩[0,∞)=∅, so Sε=∅ and EH0((λ−ε,λ+ε))=0; since the projection vanishes on an open interval around λ, [F4] shows λ∉σ(H0). Hence σess(H0)=[0,∞).

2.1step 1.1F2F5algebra

[The resolvent difference is compact] Fix a nonreal z and use the convention RA(z)=(z−A)−1 of Resolvent and spectrum of an unbounded operator. Both resolvents are bounded by [F2] and have range D(C)=D(H0). For f∈L2 put g=RH0(z)f; then (z−H0)g=f and (z−C)g=f+γMg. Applying RC(z) gives g=RC(z)f+γRC(z)Mg, hence RC(z)−RH0(z)=−γRC(z)MRH0(z). The factor MRH0(z) is compact by [F2] (changing the sign of the free resolvent preserves compactness), and RC(z) is bounded; therefore this difference is compact by [F5].

3.1step 2.1step 1.1F2F3

[Weyl's theorem and the essential spectrum] By step 2.1 the resolvent difference of C and H0 is compact at every nonreal z, so [F3] gives σess(C)=σess(H0)=[0,∞) by step 1.1. The boundedness below of C is [F2]. This is (a).

4.1step 3.1F4algebra

[Negative spectrum is discrete] The spectrum of the self-adjoint operator C is the disjoint union of σd(C) and σess(C)=[0,∞) by [F4]; hence every λ∈σ(C)∩(−∞,0) lies in σd(C), which by definition means that λ is an eigenvalue of C, is isolated in σ(C) and has finite-dimensional eigenspace. Each such λ admits a rational open interval (p,q) containing λ whose intersection with the spectrum is exactly {λ}. Fix an enumeration of {(p,q)∈Q2:p<q} and assign to λ its least eligible pair. Two different spectral points cannot receive the same pair, because that interval has exactly one spectral point. This is an injection into a countable set, so the negative eigenvalue set is at most countable; no arbitrary choices of overlapping right endpoints are used. This is (b).

5.1step 4.1F4algebra∎

[Completeness of the negative eigenspaces] Let S be the closed linear span of the eigenspaces of C for negative eigenvalues and let P−:=E((−∞,0)). Every eigenvector of C with negative eigenvalue λ satisfies E({λ})u=u by [F4], hence lies in P−L2 because {λ}⊆(−∞,0); therefore S⊆P−L2. For the reverse inclusion let f∈P−L2 be orthogonal to S and put μ:=Ef. Since f=P−f and Ef(B)=∥E(B)f∥2, the measure μ is concentrated on (−∞,0), i.e. μ(R)=μ((−∞,0)), and by step 4.1 the set {λ1,λ2,… }=σ(C)∩(−∞,0) is at most countable and consists of eigenvalues. By [F4] the support of μ is contained in σ(C): if B∩σ(C)=∅ then E(B)=0. Hence μ(R)=μ({λn})=∑nμ({λn})=∑n∥E({λn})f∥2, and each term vanishes because E({λn})f is an eigenvector with negative eigenvalue and f⊥S. Therefore μ=0, so ∥f∥2=0 and f=0; thus P−L2⊆S and (c) holds.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Angular radial unitary reduction

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let S2={x∈R3:∣x∣=1}, let σ be the polar surface measure on S2 (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere), and let (Ylm)l≥0, −l≤m≤l be the complete orthonormal family of L2(S2,σ) of Sphere ONB. For pointwise formulas use the representatives Y~lm of Associated Legendre function normalization, and write Ylm(Ω) for their values. Explicitly, with Pl and blm as in that supplier, for 0≤m≤l, Y~lm(Ω)=(−1)mblm2π(Ω1+iΩ2)mPl(m)(Ω3),Y~l,−m=(−1)mY~lm‾(1≤m≤l). These are restrictions of polynomials in the Cartesian coordinates, hence smooth on the entire sphere, and represent the stated L2 classes. Write L2=L2(R3;C) with Lebesgue measure and inner product linear in the first argument (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Hilbert space), and let K:=⨁(l,m)L2((0,∞),dr;C) be the Hilbert direct sum over l≥0, −l≤m≤l. For ψ∈L2 and each (l,m) define the coefficient function and the reduced function clm(r):=∫S2ψ(rΩ)Ylm(Ω)‾ dσ(Ω)(r>0, a.e.),ulm(r):=r clm(r). Then:

(a) for every ψ∈L2 and every (l,m) the function ulm is a well-defined element of L2((0,∞),dr) depending only on the class of ψ, and Uψ:=(ulm)l,m is a linear isometry of L2 into (indeed onto) K with ∥Uψ∥K2=∑l≥0∑m=−ll∫0∞∣ulm(r)∣2 dr=∥ψ∥L22;

(b) U is unitary, and for every (ulm)∈K the finite-subset sums ∑l≤N, ∣m∣≤lulm(r)Ylm(Ω)/r converge in L2 to a function ψ with Uψ=(ulm);

(c) on R3∖{0} every f∈C2 satisfies the following identity. Here radial derivatives differentiate F(r,Ω)=f(rΩ) with Ω fixed, and in angle coordinates ΔS2F:=∂θ2F+cot⁡θ ∂θF+sin⁡−2θ ∂φ2F, extended continuously to the poles by the Cartesian identity proved below. For the smooth representatives of Ylm this agrees with the negative of the diagonal sphere operator in Sphere Laplacian diagonal domain:

Δf=∂r2f+2r∂rf+1r2ΔS2f;

(d) for every l≥0, m, and u∈Cc∞((0,∞);C), the function ψ:=u(r)Ylm(Ω)/r lies in Cc∞(R3∖{0})⊆H2(R3;C), its image under U is the finite-support vector with (l,m)-entry u, and −Δψ=1r(−u′′(r)+l(l+1)r2u(r))Ylm(Ω),∫R3∣∇ψ∣2 dx=∫0∞(∣u′(r)−u(r)r∣2+l(l+1)r2∣u(r)∣2)dr.

All statements are purely mathematical assertions about L2 spaces, the surface measure and the Laplacian; no physical interpretation and no statement about operators with unbounded potentials is included.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the sphere S2 with polar measure σ and the complete orthonormal family (Ylm); a function ψ∈L2(R3); a function f∈C2(R3∖{0}); indices l,m and u∈Cc∞((0,∞)).

[F1]

Angle coordinates: ∫S2G dσ=∫(0,π)×(0,2π)G(Φ(θ,φ))sin⁡θ d(θ,φ) for Borel G≥0, and σ(S2)=4π (Sphere integrals in angle coordinates, The polar surface set function on the unit sphere).

[F2]

(Ylm) is a complete orthonormal family of L2(S2,σ): for every F∈L2(S2,σ), F=∑l,m⟨F,Ylm⟩Ylm in the finite-subset net and ∥F∥2=∑l,m∣⟨F,Ylm⟩∣2 (Sphere ONB, Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family, Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases).

[F3]

Polar coordinates: ∫R3g dx=∫0∞r2∫S2g(rΩ) dσ(Ω) dr for every Borel g≥0 (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma); iterated integrals of nonnegative completed-product-measurable functions may be interchanged (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability).

[F4]

The sphere Laplacian: for F in the finite span of the Ylm and each chart point with sin⁡θ≠0 one has SF(θ,φ)=(AF)(θ,φ), where S=−1sin⁡θ∂θ(sin⁡θ ∂θ)−1sin⁡2θ∂φ2 and A is the diagonal operator with AYlm=l(l+1)Ylm; in particular the chart expression of the spherical Laplacian acts on Ylm by multiplication by −l(l+1) (Sphere Laplacian diagonal domain, Associated Legendre function normalization, The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field).

[F5]

Cc∞(R3;C) is dense in L2(R3;C) (Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)).

[F6]

Cauchy-Schwarz and dominated convergence (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2, Dominated convergence).

[F7]

Chain rule and partial derivatives: the total derivative computes directional derivatives, and Ck maps are closed under sums, products and compositions, so the formal polar-coordinate differentiation below is legitimate for C2 functions (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a), A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian, Ck Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn).

[F8]

The Lebesgue sigma-algebra on Rn is the completion of Borel Lebesgue measure, and any real-valued Lebesgue-measurable function agrees almost everywhere with a Borel-measurable function; for a complex-valued function apply this to its real and imaginary parts (L(Rn) is exactly the completion of the restriction of λn to the Borel sets, A function measurable for a completion is almost everywhere equal to one measurable for the original sigma-algebra).

[F9]

Under CC, the divergence theorem for a bounded piecewise C1 domain evaluates the integral of a C1 vector field's divergence by its boundary flux (Divergence for finite piecewise C1 presentations). The fundamental theorem of calculus integrates a differentiable real function's integrable derivative to its endpoint difference; apply it to real and imaginary components for complex functions (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a)).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F8givenalgebra

[Polar measurability and the angular expansion] For continuous compactly supported ψ, (r,Ω)↦ψ(rΩ) is continuous on (0,∞)×S2, and the polar formula [F3] gives ∫R3∣ψ∣2dx=∫0∞r2∫S2∣ψ(rΩ)∣2dσdr. For a general L2 class, take a finite Lebesgue-measurable representative and use [F8] on its real and imaginary parts to obtain Borel representatives, setting them to zero on the Borel null sets where they are not finite; their combination is a finite Borel representative ψ0. If ψ0 and ψ~0 are two such representatives, their Borel disagreement set is Lebesgue-null; applying [F3] to its indicator shows that their polar pullbacks agree for r2dr dσ-almost every (r,Ω), so the angular coefficient functions agree for almost every r. Thus the coefficients depend only on the L2 class. Since (r,Ω)↦ψ0(rΩ) is Borel, completed-product Fubini [F3] gives measurable sections and Parseval [F2] gives ∫S2∣ψ0(rΩ)∣2dσ=∑l,m∣clm(r)∣2 for almost every r. The polar formula [F3] then yields ∫R3∣ψ∣2dx=∫0∞r2∑l,m∣clm(r)∣2dr.

1.2F4F7algebra

[Polar form of the Laplacian] Let f∈C2(R3∖{0}), put F(r,Ω):=f(rΩ), and use the chart Ω(θ,φ)=(sin⁡θcos⁡φ,sin⁡θsin⁡φ,cos⁡θ) for 0<θ<π. Write D2f for the Hessian matrix. The chain rule gives ∂rF=∇f(rΩ)⋅Ω and ∂r2F=D2f(rΩ)[Ω,Ω]. For a∈{θ,φ} one has ∂aF=r∇f(rΩ)⋅∂aΩ and ∂a2F=r2D2f(rΩ)[∂aΩ,∂aΩ]+r∇f(rΩ)⋅∂a2Ω. Using ΔS2=∂θ2+cot⁡θ ∂θ+sin⁡−2θ ∂φ2, the identities ∂θΩ⊗∂θΩ+sin⁡−2θ ∂φΩ⊗∂φΩ=I−Ω⊗Ω and ∂θ2Ω+cot⁡θ ∂θΩ+sin⁡−2θ ∂φ2Ω=−2Ω give ΔS2F=r2(Δf−D2f[Ω,Ω])−2r∂rF. Substitution of ∂r2F=D2f[Ω,Ω] yields ∂r2F+2r−1∂rF+r−2ΔS2F=Δf(rΩ), proving (c) on this chart. Both sides are continuous on R3∖{0}, so the identity also holds on the polar axis by continuity.

2.1step 1.1F3F5F6algebra

[The isometry] By step 1.1 and Tonelli [F3] applied to the nonnegative function r2∑l,m∣clm(r)∣2 one has ∫R3∣ψ∣2dx=∫0∞r2∑l,m∣clm(r)∣2dr=∑l,m∫0∞∣ulm(r)∣2dr for continuous compactly supported ψ, and both sides are finite; the linear map U is thus isometric on the dense subspace Cc(R3) (density [F5] applies to Cc∞⊆Cc), and for ψ∈L2 the a.e. definition of ulm gives the same isometry by continuity and [F6].

2.2step 1.2F4algebra

[Reduction of the free Laplacian on one block] Let u∈Cc∞((0,∞)) and ψ(x):=f(r)Ylm(Ω) with f(r):=u(r)/r and x=rΩ. The polynomial restriction formula in the statement follows from (sin⁡θ)meimφ=(Ω1+iΩ2)m and [F4], including the cut and poles by continuity. Then ψ∈Cc∞(R3∖{0}), because supp⁡u is a compact subset of (0,∞) and Ylm is smooth on S2. Since Ylm lies in the finite span, [F4] gives ΔS2ψ(r ⋅)=−l(l+1)ψ(r ⋅) on the chart; by step 1.2, −Δψ=−∂r2ψ−2r−1∂rψ−r−2ΔS2ψ=(−f′′(r)−2f′(r)/r+l(l+1)f(r)/r2)Ylm, and substituting f=u/r gives −f′′−2f′/r+l(l+1)f/r2=(−u′′+l(l+1)u/r2)/r, which is the first identity of (d).

3.1step 2.1F2F3F8algebra

[Surjectivity and inverse] For a finite-support vector (ulm)∈K, extend each radial entry by zero to R, apply [F8] with n=1 to its real and imaginary parts, set any Borel null set of nonfinite values to zero, and restrict the resulting finite-valued Borel representatives to (0,∞). Define V(ulm):=∑l,mulm(r)Ylm(Ω)/r for r>0 (assign any value at the origin). This is Borel; using [F3] and [F2], ∥V(ulm)∥L22=∫0∞r2∫S2∣∑ulm(r)Ylm(Ω)/r∣2dσdr=∑l,m∫∣ulm∣2dr, the cross terms vanishing because ∫YlmYl′m′‾dσ=δll′δmm′ by [F2]; hence V is isometric on the dense finite-support subspace of K and extends to a linear isometry K→L2. On finite sums the definitions give U(V(ulm))=(ulm), and on Cc(R3) the angular expansion shows V(Uψ)=ψ; by density and continuity these identities extend, so V=U−1 and U is unitary.

3.2step 2.2F9algebra

[The free form on one block] With u,ψ as in step 2.2, ∫R3∣∇ψ∣2dx=⟨−Δψ,ψ⟩ since [F9] applied componentwise on a ball containing the support to the compactly supported C1 field ψ‾∇ψ gives ∫∣∇ψ∣2=∫(−Δψ)ψ‾ with zero boundary flux; substituting step 2.2 and using ∥Ylm∥L2(S2)=1 yields ∫R3∣∇ψ∣2dx=∫0∞(−u′′(r)u(r)‾+l(l+1)∣u(r)∣2/r2)dr. Integration by parts from [F9] in the compact support of u gives ∫0∞−u′′u‾ dr=∫0∞∣u′∣2dr, and the elementary identity −2Re⁡(u′u‾)/r+∣u∣2/r2=−(∣u∣2/r)′ integrates to zero over the compact support, so ∫∣u′∣2=∫∣u′−u/r∣2; combining, the right-hand side equals ∫0∞(∣u′−u/r∣2+l(l+1)∣u∣2/r2)dr, which is the second identity of (d).

4.1step 2.1step 3.1step 1.2step 2.2step 3.2∎

[Conclusion] On the dense subspace of finite sums of one-block functions the map U is given by the displayed coefficient formula, so clause (a) follows from step 2.1 for all ψ∈L2; clause (b) is step 3.1; clauses (c) and (d) are steps 1.2, 2.2 and 3.2.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Transported radial endpoint realization

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ≥0, let C:=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ on D(C)=W2,2(R3;C) be the self-adjoint operator of Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound (c) when γ>0, and the free Fourier multiplier when γ=0, and let U be the unitary of Angular radial unitary reduction from L2(R3) onto K=⨁(l,m)L2((0,∞),dr), with coefficients ulm=r clm. For l≥0 let Vl be the closure of Cc∞((0,∞);C) in L2(0,∞;C) for the norm ∥u∥Vl2:=∫0∞(∣u′(r)−u(r)r∣2+l(l+1)r2∣u(r)∣2+∣u(r)∣2)dr, realized as the space of u∈L2 with u′−ur∈L2 and ∫∣u∣2/r2<∞ in the distributional sense (Densely defined, closed and closable operators, and cores, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions), and define al(u,v):=∫0∞[(v′(r)−v(r)r)‾(u′(r)−u(r)r)+l(l+1)r2u(r)v(r)‾−γru(r)v(r)‾]dr. Then:

(a) Vl is a dense linear subspace of L2(0,∞) that is a Hilbert space for ∥⋅∥Vl, the inclusion Vl↪L2(0,∞) is continuous, and al is a bounded symmetric sesquilinear form on Vl that is closed and semibounded below;

(b) the operator Al defined by D(Al):={u∈Vl:∃ f∈L2(0,∞) with al(u,v)=⟨f,v⟩ ∀v∈Vl},Alu:=f, is well defined, self-adjoint and bounded below; D(Al) is dense in Vl in the norm ∥⋅∥Vl and al(u,u)=⟨Alu,u⟩ for u∈D(Al);

(c) for every u∈D(Al) the distributional identity −u′′+(l(l+1)/r2−γ/r)u=Alu holds on (0,∞); consequently u∈Hloc2(0,∞), u is of class C1 with u′ locally absolutely continuous, and the identity holds pointwise almost everywhere on (0,∞); if moreover Alu=Eu for some constant E∈C (in particular if u is an eigenfunction of Al), then u is of class C2 on (0,∞) and the differential equation holds pointwise there;

(d) block identity. For ψ∈L2(R3) with Uψ=(ulm) one has ψ∈D(C) if and only if ulm∈D(Al) for every (l,m) and ∑l,m(∥ulm∥2+∥Alulm∥2)<∞; then U(Cψ)=(Alulm)l,m. Equivalently UCU∗=⨁(l,m)Al on K;

(e) eigenfunction transport. If u∈D(Al) and Alu=Eu for some E∈R, then the function ψ(x):=u(r)Yl0(Ω)/r (with x=rΩ) lies in H2(R3;C), satisfies Cψ=Eψ, and r↦u(r)/r is bounded on (0,1]; moreover ψ is bounded and continuous on R3.

No endpoint boundary condition is imposed by hand: the domain D(Al) is the form-domain realization transported from D(C)=H2(R3), and no physical interpretation of Al, C, U or γ is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the constants and operators γ,C,U; the form domain Vl and form al; a parameter μ chosen below; function spaces as in the statement.

[F1]

U is unitary and its inverse is the finite-subset-net sum ψ=∑l,mulm(r)Ylm(Ω)/r; for ψ∈Cc∞(R3∖{0}) the coefficients are ulm=r∫ψ(rΩ)Ylm‾dσ (Angular radial unitary reduction).

[F2]

C is self-adjoint on D(C)=H2(R3;C), C≥−M0 for a finite M0, and ⟨Cψ,ψ⟩=∫R3∣∇ψ∣2dx−γ∫R3∣ψ∣2∣x∣−1dx for ψ∈D(C) (Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound, Plancherel theorem, Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers).

[F3]

∣u(r)∣≤r1/2∥u/r∥L2(r,∞)+r1/2(∫r∞∣u′−ur∣2)1/2-type endpoint bounds are not assumed; instead the following elementary inequalities are used: 2∣ab∣≤εa2+ε−1b2, ∣∫fg‾∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2, and Cc∞((0,∞)) is dense in L2(0,∞) (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2, Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)).

[F4]

Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace is available under CC (Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace). Riesz representation in a Hilbert space: every bounded conjugate-linear functional on (Vl,∥⋅∥Vl) is represented uniquely by an element of Vl (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces).

[F5]

Range criterion: a densely defined symmetric operator T is self-adjoint if and only if it is closed and ran⁡(T−z)=H for every nonreal z; if additionally T is symmetric and ran⁡(T+μ)=H for one real μ and ker⁡(T∗+μ)={0}, then T is self-adjoint (Range criterion for self-adjointness, Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators).

[F7]

On Cc∞(R3∖{0}) one has ∫∣∇ψ∣2=∫(−Δψ)ψ‾ by the divergence theorem applied to the compactly supported field ψ‾∇ψ, and Cc∞(R3∖{0}) is dense in H1(R3;C): for u∈H1 and the radial cutoffs ηε with ηε=1 off B(0,ε), 0 on B(0,ε) and ∣∇ηε∣≤c/(rlog⁡(1/ε)), the Hardy bound of Three-dimensional Hardy bound gives ∥u∇ηε∥22≤4c2∥∇u∥22/log⁡(1/ε)2→0 and dominated convergence gives ∥ηεu−u∥H1→0 (Divergence for finite piecewise C1 presentations, Vector forms: the boundary integrals of fn and of n×F, Dominated convergence, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[F8]

For every Borel function φ with ∣φ∣≤1 and every ψ∈H2, the identity F2(−Δψ)(ξ)=4π2∣ξ∣2F2ψ(ξ) and Cauchy-Schwarz give ∣ψ(x)∣≤∥(1+∣ξ∣2)F2ψ∥2 ∥(1+∣ξ∣2)−1∥2, so H2(R3)⊆Cb(R3) with a continuous representative (Plancherel theorem, Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2).

[F9]

One-dimensional Sobolev regularity: for −∞<a<b<∞ every class in W1,2(a,b;C) has exactly one continuous representative that is absolutely continuous on [a,b], with u(x)−u(y)=∫yxDu(t) dt; applied to u and then to u′, a class with weak derivatives u′,u′′∈L2(a,b) therefore has a C1 representative with u′ absolutely continuous and u′(x)−u′(y)=∫yxu′′(t) dt (One-dimensional W1,p functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[F10]

Polar coordinates: ∫R3g dx=∫0∞r2∫S2g(rΩ) dσ(Ω) dr for every Borel g≥0; in particular for ψ(x)=u(r)Ylm(Ω)/r with u∈Cc∞((0,∞)) one has ∫R3∣ψ∣2∣x∣−1dx=∫0∞∣u(r)∣2r−1dr (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, Sphere ONB).

Proof

1.1givenF3algebra

Put D0u=u′−u/r on Cc∞(0,∞). This operator is closable: if un→0 and D0un→g in L2, then on every compact subinterval un/r→0 in L2 and un′→0 distributionally, so g=0 distributionally and almost everywhere. Integration of (∣u∣2/r)′ on the core gives ∥D0u∥22=∥u′∥22 and ∥u/r∥22=−2Re⁡∫(u/r)D0u‾; consequently ∥u/r∥2≤2∥D0u∥2. Applied to differences, these identities make the defining Vl norm equivalent to the H1 norm for each fixed l, and identify its completion in L2 with H01(0,∞). In particular the graph completion has injective first projection, its derivative is distributional, and it is a Hilbert space densely and continuously embedded in L2. No fixed-l equivalence constant will be used in an infinite channel sum.

1.2F1F2F7F10algebra

Let W be the Hilbert direct sum of Vl over (l,m), with squared norm ∑∥ulm∥Vl2. On finite compact smooth radial sums, the corrected angular-radial block identity and Euclidean integration by parts give ∥ψ∥H12=∑∥ulm∥Vl2 and q(ψ,φ)=∑al(ulm,vlm), where q=∫∇ψ⋅∇φ‾−γ∫ψφ‾/∣x∣. Polar integration gives the actual r−1 potential weight. To establish the necessary full H1 density, first use smooth density and the origin-removing cutoffs of [F7], followed by compact support and mollification, to reduce to ψ∈Cc∞(R3∖{0}).

2.1step 1.1F3F9algebra

The trace at zero of an H1(0,1) function exists by ∣u(t)−u(s)∣≤∣t−s∣1/2∥u′∥2, and is continuous in its H1 norm: choose a point where ∣u∣≤∥u∥L2(0,1) and use this estimate to bound ∣u(0)∣ by ∥u∥2+∥u′∥2. Thus the completion in step 1.1 has zero trace. Conversely u,u′−u/r,u/r∈L2 gives u′∈L2 and a trace; its trace must be zero since otherwise ∫∣u∣2/r2 diverges. Take a smooth cutoff χε vanishing below ε, one beyond 2ε, with ∣χε′∣≤c/ε; then ∥χε′u∥22≤4c2∫02ε∣u∣2/r2→0, and all omitted function, derivative and weighted tails tend to zero. A cutoff between R and 2R adds a derivative bounded by (c/R)∥u∥L2(R,2R). Mollify the resulting compactly supported functions on intervals away from zero; H1 convergence and boundedness of 1/r there give core convergence in Vl. This proves exactly the stated distributional realization, including l=0, and the first part of (a).

2.2step 1.2F1F7F10algebra

For such an annular smooth ψ, let ψN=PNψ be the angular truncation l≤N. All its radial coefficients are smooth with the same annular support. The polar formula gives ΔψN=PNΔψ: radial differentiation commutes with the finite projection, and angular integration by parts gives ⟨−ΔS2ψ(r⋅),Ylm⟩=λl⟨ψ(r⋅),Ylm⟩. This latter identity uses only the supplied finite-span eigenidentity, with a local Green argument for the other smooth function: excise caps of angular radius δ, integrate the chart expression, cancel periodic azimuth boundaries, and let δ↓0; smooth intrinsic gradients are bounded and cap boundaries have length O(δ), so their terms vanish. Angular completeness and polar integration give ψN→ψ and ΔψN→Δψ in L2. For the smooth annular residual RN, integration by parts gives ∥∇RN∥2=⟨−ΔRN,RN⟩≤∥ΔRN∥∥RN∥→0. Thus finite compact smooth radial sums are H1-dense with the gradient tail actually controlled.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F3F4algebra

Write Du=u′−u/r and λl=l(l+1). Hardy and Cauchy–Schwarz give ∣∫uv‾/r∣≤2∥Du∥2∥v∥2; the derivative and angular terms are bounded by their corresponding Vl norms. Hence al is bounded and symmetric. The inequality 2γxy≤x2/2+2γ2y2 gives the uniform bound al[u]≥12∥Du∥22+λl∥u/r∥22−2γ2∥u∥22. With μ=2γ2+1, the shifted form bl=al+μ⟨⋅,⋅⟩ is a complete inner product with 12∥u∥Vl2≤bl[u]≤cγ∥u∥Vl2, uniformly in l. Riesz representation on (Vl,bl) solves bl(u,v)=⟨f,v⟩ for every f∈L2, so the actual domain definition gives u∈D(Al) and (Al+μ)u=f. Testing v=u gives uniqueness. This proves closedness and semiboundedness of the form and surjectivity of its associated shifted operator.

4.1step 3.1step 2.1F5algebra

For u∈Cc∞(0,∞), integration by parts gives al(u,v)=⟨Llu,v⟩ first for core v, where Llu=−u′′+(λl/r2−γ/r)u∈L2. Both sides are continuous in Vl, so the identity extends to every v∈Vl. Thus the core is contained in D(Al) and this operator domain is L2-dense before any adjoint is taken. The representing f is unique by Vl density. Symmetry of the form gives symmetry of Al. For y∈D(Al∗), solve (Al+μ)x=(Al∗+μ)y by step 3.1; then y−x∈ker⁡(Al∗+μ)=ran⁡(Al+μ)⊥=0. Hence Al=Al∗ on exactly its defined domain, and ⟨Alu,u⟩=al[u]≥−2γ2∥u∥2.

4.2step 1.1step 3.1step 1.2step 2.2F3algebra

Finite-support families with core coordinates are dense in W, since each Vl is the core completion. Step 2.2 therefore extends the finite-core isometry onto W, with its L2 extension agreeing with U: U(H1)=W. The full polarized form identity extends by continuity. In particular the infinite Coulomb sum is uniformly bounded by ∑∣∫ulmvlm‾/r∣≤2(∑∥Dulm∥2)1/2(∑∥vlm∥2)1/2; kinetic and angular sums have their corresponding Cauchy–Schwarz bounds. This uses no equivalence constant growing with l.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1F4algebra

If w∈Vl is bl-orthogonal to D(Al), the solution uf=(Al+μ)−1f from step 3.1 gives 0=bl(uf,w)=⟨f,w⟩ for every f∈L2; therefore w=0. Orthogonal decomposition in the Hilbert space (Vl,bl) implies that the closure of D(Al) is all Vl. Norm equivalence makes this the required density in ∥⋅∥Vl and completes (a),(b). This proves form density directly, without a spectral-form assertion.

5.2step 4.1step 2.1F9algebra

For u∈D(Al), test its form identity against core v. Distributional integration by parts gives −u′′+(λl/r2−γ/r)u=Alu; the cross terms in (u′−u/r)(v′−v/r)‾ cancel by integrating (uv‾/r)′. On a compact interval away from zero the potential coefficient is bounded, so u′′∈L2 there and step 2.1 gives u,u′∈L2. Thus u∈Hloc2, and [F9] gives its C1 representative and locally absolutely continuous derivative. If Alu=Eu, the right side for u′′ is continuous, so integration makes u′ of class C1 and the equation holds everywhere with u∈C2. This proves (c) without regularity at the origin.

5.3step 4.1F5algebra

Define A^=⨁Al on exactly the square-summable graph domain in (d). Finite-support domain vectors are dense and coordinate symmetry gives symmetry. Self-adjointness of each Al gives ∥(Al±i)−1∥≤1, by ∥(Al±i)u∥2=∥Alu∥2+∥u∥2. For f∈K, take ulm=(Al±i)−1flm; the coordinate norm sum is bounded by ∥f∥2, and Alulm=flm∓iulm has square-summable norms. Thus both ranges of A^±i are all K, proving self-adjointness by the symmetric range criterion. Coordinate closedness also directly proves the graph is closed.

6.1step 4.2step 5.3F1F2F7algebra

For ψ∈H2=D(C) and φ∈H1, weak Fourier integration by parts and three-dimensional Hardy give q(ψ,φ)=⟨Cψ,φ⟩: prove it first for core φ and extend by H1 continuity, using ψ/∣x∣∈L2. By step 4.2, u=Uψ∈W. Fix one coordinate j=(l,m) and v∈Vl; then φ=U−1(vδj)∈H1 and the full form identity gives al(uj,v)=⟨(UCψ)j,v⟩. Hence uj∈D(Al) and Aluj=(UCψ)j. The latter coordinates are square summable, so C⊆U∗A^U. Both operators are self-adjoint; taking adjoints reverses the inclusion, giving equality. This proves the full iff graph-domain statement and action formula (d), also for γ=0 using its explicit free operator.

7.1step 5.2step 6.1F1F8F9algebra∎

If Alu=Eu, the one-block family uδ(l,0) belongs to D(A^); step 6.1 gives ψ=U−1(uδ(l,0))∈H2, Cψ=Eψ, and ψ=u(r)Yl0(Ω)/r almost everywhere. Its H2 Fourier transform lies in L1 by Cauchy–Schwarz with (1+∣ξ∣2)−1∈L2, so the absolutely convergent inverse defines a bounded continuous representative by dominated convergence, agreeing with the L2 inverse by truncation. Step 5.2 and continuity of Yl0 make the polar expression continuous away from zero; two continuous functions agreeing almost everywhere on that open set agree everywhere, since any nonzero difference persists on a positive-measure neighborhood. Choose Ω0 with Yl0(Ω0)≠0; then ∣u(r)/r∣≤∥ψ∥∞/∣Yl0(Ω0)∣ for 0<r≤1. This proves (e) with genuine operator-domain transport and justifies evaluation on a fixed ray. All clauses (a)–(e) follow.

Remarks

Form-domain lemma: for a self-adjoint operator A≥c with quadratic form qA[x]=∫λ dEx, the domain D(A) is dense in the form domain Q(A)=D((A−cI)1/2) in the norm ∥x∥Q2=∥x∥2+∥(A−cI)1/2x∥2, and qA[x]=⟨Ax,x⟩ for x∈D(A) (Spectral form domain and core of a semibounded operator, Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form)).

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Kummer recurrence and termination

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ>0, l≥0, k>0, let Al be the radial operator of Transported radial endpoint realization, write j:=γ2k−l−1, and for a=2l+1 and n∈N0 let Ln(a)(x):=∑i=0n(−1)i(n+an−i)xii! be the n-th Laguerre polynomial of order a. Then:

(a) substitution. A C2 function u on (0,∞) satisfies −u′′+(l(l+1)/r2−γ/r)u=−k2u if and only if v(x):=ex/2x−(l+1)u(x/2k) is C2 and satisfies xv′′+(2l+2−x)v′+jv=0 on (0,∞);

(b) regular series. With v0:=1 and vi+1:=(i−j)vi(i+1)(i+2l+2)(i≥0), the power series v(x):=∑i≥0vixi converges for every x∈R and defines a solution of xv′′+(2l+2−x)v′+jv=0 on R;

(c) regular solution and general solution. The function ureg(r):=rl+1e−krv(2kr) is a C∞ solution of the radial equation on (0,∞) with ureg(r)/rl+1→1 as r↓0; it is, up to a nonzero scalar multiple, the only solution with u(r)/rl+1 bounded as r↓0; every solution of the radial equation on (0,∞) is c1ureg+c2u2 with u2 defined near zero by u2(r):=ureg(r)∫r∗rureg(s)−2ds, where 0<r∗<δ and ureg has no zero in (0,δ), and extended uniquely to (0,∞) by the regular initial-value equation, and every solution that is not a multiple of ureg has ∣u(r)∣/r unbounded as r↓0;

(d) termination. v is a polynomial if and only if j∈N0; in that case v is a nonzero constant multiple of Lj(2l+1), and ureg(r)=c rl+1e−krLj(2l+1)(2kr)(c≠0) lies in L2(0,∞;dr);

(e) eigenfunction. If j∈N0 then ureg∈D(Al) and Alureg=−k2ureg; equivalently, for every m the transported function ψ(rΩ):=ureg(r)Ylm(Ω)/r lies in H2(R3)∩D(C) and satisfies Cψ=−k2ψ.

The assertions are statements about the ordinary differential equation and the operators Al,C; no physical interpretation of γ,k or of any spectral level is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The constants, radial operator, angular labels and choice hypotheses of the Statement. Inner products are linear in the first argument. All ordinary solutions considered below are complex-valued C2 functions on (0,∞).

[F1]

The endpoint supplier Transported radial endpoint realization defines Vl as the completion of Cc∞(0,∞) for the norm ∥u∥22+∥u′−u/r∥22+l(l+1)∥u/r∥22, and defines al(u,w)=∫[(u′−u/r)(w′−w/r)‾+l(l+1)uw‾/r2−γuw‾/r]. This is a bounded form on Vl. Its actual domain is D(Al)={u∈Vl:∃f∈L2, al(u,w)=⟨f,w⟩ ∀w∈Vl}, with Alu=f. Its exact block identity transports a single (l,m) entry in D(Al) into D(C)=H2(R3), for every allowed m. These claims currently carry both CC and AC; neither hypothesis is removed here.

[F2]

For continuous coefficients on a compact real interval, the regular IVP supplier Regular interval IVP: existence, a priori bound and entire spectral-parameter dependence gives a unique C2 solution with each specified pair of initial data. Translating [a,b] to [0,b−a] applies its Statement to every [a,b]⊂(0,∞). The supplier assumes Countable Choice.

[F5]

For a continuous scalar integrand on a compact interval, its primitive is continuously differentiable with derivative the integrand, and integration of a continuous derivative gives its endpoint difference (Fundamental theorem of calculus for Banach-valued continuous curves, applied to the Banach space C). This supplier assumes CC. Uniform convergence permits passage through the integral because the integral of the absolute error is bounded by interval length times the supremum error.

Proof

1.1F3givenalgebra

[Substitution without dividing by a solution] Put h(r)=rl+1e−kr and u=hφ. The multiplier h is smooth and nonzero for every r>0, so u↔φ preserves C2. Its derivatives satisfy h′/h=(l+1)/r−k and h′′/h=l(l+1)/r2−2k(l+1)/r+k2. The product rule gives the identity −u′′+[l(l+1)/r2−γ/r+k2]u=−h[φ′′+(2(l+1)/r−2k)φ′+(γ−2k(l+1))φ/r]. Therefore the radial equation is equivalent to rφ′′+(2l+2−2kr)φ′+(γ−2k(l+1))φ=0. Write φ(r)=v~(2kr): then φ′=2kv~′ and φ′′=(2k)2v~′′, and division by the nonzero scalar 2k gives xv~′′+(2l+2−x)v~′+jv~=0. The Statement's v(x)=ex/2x−(l+1)u(x/(2k)) equals (2k)−(l+1)v~(x); multiplication by this constant preserves the homogeneous equation. All transformations are reversible, including at zeros of u, and establish (a).

1.2F3F4F5givenalgebra

[Convergence with every differentiated series] Let b=2l+2 and B=max⁡{1,∣j∣/b}. The recurrence gives ∣vi+1∣≤B∣vi∣/(i+1) because i+∣j∣≤B(i+b). Induction from v0=1 yields ∣vi∣≤Bi/i!. For any derivative order q≥0 and R>0, the q-th formal derivative on ∣x∣≤R has absolute sum bounded by ∑i≥qBiRi−q/(i−q)!=BqeBR. Every differentiated series therefore converges uniformly on that compact interval. To justify differentiation explicitly, integrate the uniformly convergent first derivative series from 0 to x; the integral of its finite partial sums is the corresponding original partial sum minus its value at zero, and uniform convergence allows passage to the limit. The fundamental theorem for a continuous integrand proves the derivative identity. Repeating this for successive derivative series proves v∈C∞(R) with all asserted derivatives.

2.1step 1.2F4givenalgebra

[Coefficient equation] By step 1.2, substitution and collection of coefficients are legitimate. The coefficient of xi in xv′′+bv′−xv′+jv is (i+1)(i+b)vi+1+(j−i)vi for each i≥0, including i=0 because the xv′′ contribution then vanishes. The recurrence makes every coefficient zero; the equation thus holds for all real x. Conversely this same coefficient comparison shows that an analytic solution with constant coefficient 1 must have exactly this recurrence. This proves (b).

3.1step 1.2step 2.1F4givenalgebra

[Exact termination and polynomial normalization] If j∉N0, every factor i−j is nonzero, so all vi are nonzero. Such a series cannot be a polynomial: its i-th derivative at zero is i!vi by step 1.2. If j=n∈N0, the coefficients through vn are nonzero, vn+1=0, and the recurrence forces all later coefficients to vanish. For the stated Laguerre polynomial, ci=(−1)i(n+an−i)/i! has c0≠0 and ci+1/ci=(i−n)/[(i+1)(a+i+1)] for 0≤i<n, by the factorial identities in [F4]. Since a+i+1=i+2l+2, it has precisely the same recurrence and v=Ln(2l+1)/(n+2l+1n). Its leading coefficient is nonzero. Thus the polynomial and nonzero normalization claims in (d) follow.

3.2step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1F3givenalgebra

[The regular branch and a zero-free initial interval] The function u1=ureg=rl+1e−krv(2kr) is smooth on (0,∞) and solves the radial equation by steps 1.1 and 2.1. Since v(0)=1 and v is smooth, u1=rl+1(1+O(r)) as r↓0. It is real valued because the recurrence has real coefficients. Choose δ>0 so that u1(r)/rl+1>1/2 throughout (0,δ). Hence u1 has no zero there and has the required normalized endpoint limit.

4.1step 3.2F3F5givenconstructalgebra

[Local second solution and its exact leading asymptotic] Fix r∗∈(0,δ), put I(r)=∫r∗ru1(s)−2ds, and define u2=u1I only on (0,δ). Here I′=u1−2, so u2′=u1′I+u1−1, u2′′=u1′′I, and W(u1,u2):=u1u2′−u1′u2=1. Thus u2 solves the same equation and is independent of u1. Set p=2l+1>0. Since u1(s)−2/s−p−1→1, comparison between (1−η)s−p−1 and (1+η)s−p−1 below any sufficiently small fixed endpoint shows rp∫rr∗u1(s)−2ds→1/p: the integral above that endpoint is finite and disappears after multiplication by rp, while rp∫rts−p−1ds=(1−(r/t)p)/p. Letting η↓0 gives I(r)∼−r−p/p, hence u2(r)∼−r−l/(2l+1). In particular ∣u2∣/r→∞ and ∣u2∣/rl+1→∞, also when l=0.

4.2step 3.1step 3.2F1F3givenconstructalgebra

[Integrability and actual form-domain approximation] Suppose j∈N0. By step 3.1, u=u1 is a polynomial times rl+1e−kr. Near zero u=O(rl+1), u′=O(rl), u/r=O(rl); at infinity each is bounded by an exponential times a polynomial. Their squared integrals are finite: on (0,1) compare with r2l, while at infinity a polynomial times e−2kr is integrable, as follows by bounding each power using the exponential series or repeated integration by parts. Thus u,u′,u/r∈L2, and u has zero trace at zero. To show membership in the actual completion Vl, take smooth cutoffs ηε vanishing below ε, equal to one above 2ε, with ∣ηε′∣≤K/ε, and χR equal to one below R, vanishing above 2R, with ∣χR′∣≤K/R. The products uε,R=ηεχRu lie in Cc∞(0,∞). The omitted L2, derivative and u/r tails tend to zero; the added derivative at zero obeys ∥ηε′u∥22≤4K2∫02ε∣u/r∣2dr→0, and the added derivative at infinity obeys ∥χR′u∥22≤K2R−2∫R2R∣u∣2dr→0. Hence uε,R→u in Vl, for instance along ε=1/n, R=n. This proves (d)'s L2 claim and establishes u∈Vl.

5.1step 4.1F2givenconstructalgebra

[Global continuation across every node] Put q(r)=l(l+1)/r2−γ/r+k2, continuous on (0,∞). For n≥1 let Jn=[r∗/(n+1),(n+1)r∗]. Apply [F2] on each Jn to u′′=qu with initial data u2(r∗)=0, u2′(r∗)=u1(r∗)−1. The unique solutions agree on nested overlaps and with step 4.1 wherever the latter is defined, so their union is a C2 solution on ⋃nJn=(0,∞). No blowup at a finite positive node is possible because every such node lies inside one regular compact IVP interval. Differentiating the Wronskian gives W′=u1u2′′−u1′′u2=0, and its value at r∗ is 1, so W=1 globally. If u1(t)=0, then −u1′(t)u2(t)=1; this also shows that every such node is simple and the continued u2 is finite and nonzero there. The reciprocal integral of step 4.1 is never used across a node.

5.2step 3.2step 4.2F1F4givenalgebra

[Form eigenidentity and the full operator domain] For w∈Cc∞(0,∞) expand the kinetic integrand: (u′−u/r)(w′−w/r)‾=u′w′‾−u′w‾/r−uw′‾/r+uw‾/r2. The last three terms are −(uw‾/r)′ and have zero integral because w is compactly supported away from the endpoints. Therefore al(u,w)=∫[u′w′‾+l(l+1)uw‾/r2−γuw‾/r]=∫[−u′′+(l(l+1)/r2−γ/r)u]w‾=−k2⟨u,w⟩. Compact tests are dense in Vl by its definition, al is bounded by [F1], and w↦⟨u,w⟩ is continuous in its norm. The identity extends to every w∈Vl. The defining condition in [F1] gives u∈D(Al) and Alu=−k2u. For every allowed m, the family with sole nonzero (l,m) entry u has finite graph norm; the exact block identity gives ψ=uYlm/r∈D(C)=H2(R3) and Cψ=−k2ψ. Conversely that single-block domain identity gives the stated equivalence. This establishes (e).

6.1step 3.2step 4.1step 5.1F2givenalgebra

[Arbitrary solutions and endpoint uniqueness] At r∗ the initial-data matrix with columns (u1,u1′) and (u2,u2′) has determinant 1 by step 5.1. For any solution u, solve the invertible two-by-two linear system for c1,c2∈C matching (u(r∗),u′(r∗)). The IVP uniqueness of [F2] on the nested Jn gives u=c1u1+c2u2 everywhere. If c2≠0, the asymptotics in steps 3.2 and 4.1 give u(r)∼−c2r−l/(2l+1), since u1/u2→0. Hence ∣u∣/r→∞ and ∣u∣/rl+1→∞. If c2=0, the latter ratio is bounded, and every nonzero such solution is a nonzero scalar multiple of u1. This proves all of (c); the zero solution is included in the general linear representation.

7.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1step 4.2step 5.2F1F2∎

[Conclusion and foundational use] Step 1.1 proves (a); steps 1.2 and 2.1 prove (b); steps 3.2, 4.1, 5.1 and 6.1 prove (c); steps 3.1 and 4.2 prove (d); and step 5.2 proves (e). CC is used through the regular IVP supplier in [F2]; the compact-interval extensions in step 5.1 themselves are uniquely determined, and the cutoff approximants in step 4.2 are explicit. The actual Coulomb operator premise in [F1] carries AC in its contract; that inherited assumption is retained, without relabeling it as CC-only.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Laguerre bound energy exhaustion

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ>0, and for every l≥0 let Al be the radial operator of Transported radial endpoint realization; let C=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ on D(C)=H2(R3;C) be the self-adjoint operator of Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound (c), with essential spectrum [0,∞) (Coulomb essential spectrum), and let U be the polar unitary of Transported radial endpoint realization (d). Then:

(a) if k>0 and j:=γ/(2k)−l−1∉N0, then the regular solution ureg of Kummer recurrence and termination is not square-integrable on (0,∞), and −k2 is not an eigenvalue of Al;

(b) the negative eigenvalues of Al are exactly the numbers −γ24n2,n≥l+1, each with one-dimensional eigenspace spanned by the corresponding regular solution ureg; in particular every negative eigenvalue of Al is simple;

(c) the negative eigenvalues of C are exactly the numbers −γ2/(4n2) with n≥1;

(d) every eigenfunction of C with negative eigenvalue lies in the closed span of the transported regular solutions: if Cψ=Eψ with E<0 and Uψ=(ulm), then E=−γ2/(4n2) for some n≥1, and each nonzero ulm is a scalar multiple of the regular solution of Al at that energy.

This exhausts the negative spectrum of Al and of C by the terminating Laguerre solutions; no claim is made here about completeness of these eigenfunctions in the negative spectral subspace, about the multiplicity of the levels of C, or about any physical interpretation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the exact hypotheses and operators of the Statement; l,m are the integer angular labels of U and n is an integer bound-family label; j=γ/(2k)−l−1 and the regular solution normalized by ureg(r)/rl+1→1.

[F1]

Kummer recurrence and termination supplies the convergent series v(x)=∑i≥0vixi, v0=1, vi+1=(i−j)vi/((i+1)(i+2l+2)), with ureg=rl+1e−krv(2kr). It terminates precisely for j∈N0 and is then proportional to Lj(2l+1). Its second solution is constructed only on a zero-free neighborhood of zero and continued across nodes by regular initial-value uniqueness. It has u2(r)∼−r−l/(2l+1), and every solution is c1ureg+c2u2.

[F2]

Transported radial endpoint realization gives the form al on Vl, the exact form-identity definition of D(Al), self-adjointness of Al, the block/domain identity UCU∗=⨁l,mAl, and boundedness of u(r)/r near zero for every radial eigenfunction. Compactly supported smooth tests are dense in Vl, and al is bounded there.

[F3]

Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound gives self-adjointness of C on exactly H2(R3). Coulomb essential spectrum gives that every negative spectral point of C is an isolated finite-multiplicity eigenvalue and that its negative spectral subspace is the closed span of its negative eigenspaces.

[F4]

The spectral PVM and exact-domain calculus of Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form), Unbounded Borel functional calculus: domains, products, spectral mapping, Projection valued measure give: a reducing block carries the restricted PVM; the projection at {λ} is the projection onto the λ-eigenspace; and a bounded Borel multiplier b with bounded λb(λ) maps into the operator domain and realizes the indicated inverse equations. These AC-bearing suppliers are used explicitly in step 5.1; the current public AC hypothesis is retained.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

[The nonterminating tail] Suppose j∉N0. Every vi is real and nonzero. Choose ε∈(0,1/2) and an integer I>max⁡(j,0) large enough that (i−j)/(i+2l+2)≥1−ε for all i≥I. All coefficients from I onward have one sign and ∣vi+1∣≥(1−ε)∣vi∣/(i+1); induction gives ∣vi∣≥c(1−ε)i/i! for i≥I, where c=∣vI∣I!(1−ε)−I>0. Since the series is absolutely convergent, on x≥0 the absolute value of its same-sign tail is its sum of absolute values. The reverse triangle inequality gives ∣v(x)∣≥ce(1−ε)x−P(x), where one may take the nonnegative polynomial P(x)=∑i<I∣vi∣xi+c∑i<I(1−ε)ixi/i!. Thus for sufficiently large r, ∣ureg(r)∣≥(c/2)rl+1ek(1−2ε)r. Its squared integral diverges, since the exponent is positive; hence ureg∉L2(0,∞).

1.2F1F2givenconstructalgebra

[Terminating solutions belong to the form domain] Suppose j∈N0 and write u=rl+1e−krv(2kr). Near zero, u=O(rl+1), u′=O(rl) and u/r=O(rl); at infinity each decays exponentially times a polynomial. Therefore u,u′,u/r∈L2, and the trace at zero is zero. To verify u∈Vl directly, choose a smooth cutoff χδ that vanishes below δ, equals one above 2δ and has ∣χδ′∣≤C/δ. The additional derivative term obeys ∥χδ′u∥22≤4C2∫δ2δ∣u/r∣2dr→0. The other omitted terms tend to zero by integrability; cutting off the exponential tail and then smoothing on compact subsets of (0,∞) gives compact smooth approximants in the Vl norm. This is membership in the specified endpoint realization, rather than membership inferred from L2 alone.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

[The actual origin condition excludes the second solution] If u∈D(Al) and Alu=−k2u, then u solves the classical radial equation by [F2]. By [F1] it is c1ureg+c2u2. The regular quotient ureg/r=O(rl) is bounded, whereas u2/r∼−r−l−1/(2l+1). If c2≠0, the reverse triangle inequality therefore makes ∣u(r)∣/r→∞, contrary to [F2]. Consequently u=c1ureg, and every negative eigenspace has dimension at most one. Together with step 1.1 this proves (a).

2.2step 1.2F1F2F3algebra

[The form identity gives the operator domain and H2 transport] The substitution of [F1] shows that u solves −u′′+(l(l+1)/r2−γ/r)u=−k2u on (0,∞). Against w∈Cc∞(0,∞), integration by parts gives al(u,w)=∫(u′w′‾+l(l+1)uw‾/r2−γuw‾/r)dr=−k2⟨u,w⟩. The equality between the kinetic forms follows by integrating (uw‾/r)′, with no boundary term because w is compactly supported away from zero. Boundedness of al and density in [F2] extend the identity to every w∈Vl. The actual definition of D(Al) now gives u∈D(Al) and Alu=−k2u. The vector with this one (l,m) component belongs to the direct-sum graph domain, so the exact block identity gives ψ=u(r)Ylm(Ω)/r∈D(C)=H2(R3) and Cψ=−k2ψ for every m. This argument uses no assertion that e−k∣x∣ is smooth at x=0.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2algebra

[All radial negative eigenvalues] Termination means j=n−l−1∈N0, so n≥l+1 and k=γ/(2n). Step 2.2 supplies a nonzero eigenvector at each En=−γ2/(4n2), and step 2.1 shows its eigenspace is exactly Cureg. All other negative energies are excluded by steps 1.1 and 2.1. This proves (b), including every integer n≥l+1, with no finite truncation of the bound family.

4.1F2step 2.2step 3.1algebra

[All negative eigenvalues and eigenvectors of C] By the exact block/domain identity, Cψ=Eψ is equivalent to Alulm=Eulm in every component, where Uψ=(ulm). If ψ≠0, at least one component is nonzero. Step 3.1 therefore forces E=En for some n≥1, and all components with l≥n vanish; the remaining finitely many components are scalar multiples of the regular solutions at k=γ/(2n). Conversely each En is a C eigenvalue by taking the l=m=0 vector from step 2.2. Thus (c) and (d) hold. In fact every such eigenfunction is a finite linear combination of the transported regular solutions, which implies the asserted closed-span membership.

5.1F2F3F4step 3.1step 4.1constructalgebra

[Entire negative spectrum, including radial blocks] By [F3], every negative spectral point of C is an eigenvalue, so step 4.1 proves σ(C)∩(−∞,0)={En:n≥1}. Fix l and realize Al as the reducing (l,0) block of UCU∗. If λ<0 is outside σ(C), the restricted inverse of C−λ supplies a bounded inverse for Al−λ. If λ=En with n<l+1, choose an open interval J=(λ−δ,λ+δ) whose intersection with σ(C) is just {λ}, as allowed by [F3]. The restricted projection on J equals the restricted projection on {λ} by [F4]; this is zero, since step 3.1 excludes a radial eigenvector at this energy. The restricted PVM is consequently supported outside J. Define b(t)=(t−λ)−1 outside J and b(t)=0 inside J. Both b and tb are bounded. By the exact-domain calculus [F4], its block multiplier maps into D(Al) and gives both (Al−λ)b(Al)=I and b(Al)(Al−λ)=I on the respective exact domains. Thus λ∉σ(Al). The remaining negative points are eigenvalues from step 3.1, proving σ(Al)∩(−∞,0)={En:n≥l+1}. This establishes the final exhaustion sentence for both operators, including absence of additional continuous negative radial spectrum.

6.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

[Conclusion] Step 2.1 proves (a), step 3.1 proves (b), step 4.1 proves (c) and (d), and step 5.1 proves the stated exhaustion of the entire negative spectra.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ>0 and let C=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ on D(C)=H2(R3;C) be the self-adjoint operator of Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound with essential spectrum [0,∞). For n≥1, 0≤l≤n−1 and −l≤m≤l let unl be the regular solution of Kummer recurrence and termination at k=γ/(2n) (the polynomial-exponential solution, unique up to a nonzero scalar), and put ψnlm(x):=unl(r)rYlm(Ω)(x=rΩ). Then:

(a) each ψnlm lies in D(C) and Cψnlm=−γ24n2ψnlm; the vectors ψnlm with distinct labels are pairwise orthogonal, and for fixed n the eigenspace of C at −γ2/(4n2) is exactly their span; it has dimension ∑l=0n−1(2l+1)=n2;

(b) after normalization, the family (ψnlm/∥unl∥2)n≥1,0≤l≤n−1,−l≤m≤l is a complete orthonormal family of the negative spectral subspace EC((−∞,0))L2(R3);

(c) the family is not complete in L2(R3): the nonnegative spectral subspace EC([0,∞))L2(R3) is nonzero (indeed infinite dimensional), so the bound states alone do not span L2.

All claims concern the mathematical spectral decomposition of C; no physical interpretation is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: γ>0, the operator C with essential spectrum [0,∞) and spectral measure E; the labels n,l,m; the functions ψnlm.

[F1]

The negative eigenvalues of C are exactly −γ2/(4n2) (n≥1), and every eigenfunction of C with negative eigenvalue E=−γ2/(4n2) has, in each block (l,m) with l≤n−1, a scalar multiple of unl, while every block with l≥n vanishes (because −γ2/(4n2) is not a negative eigenvalue of Al when l≥n) (Laguerre bound energy exhaustion).

[F2]

U is unitary and ∥ψ∥L22=∑l,m∥ulm∥22 for Uψ=(ulm); in particular the inverse image of a vector supported in one block (l,m) with entry u has norm ∥u∥2 (Angular radial unitary reduction (a), (b)). If u∈D(Al) and Alu=Eu, that one-block vector belongs to the direct-sum operator domain since ∥u∥22+∥Eu∥22<∞, so its inverse image ψ(x)=u(r)Ylm(Ω)/r lies in D(C) and Cψ=Eψ for every allowed m (Transported radial endpoint realization (d)).

[F3]

The negative spectral subspace EC((−∞,0))L2 is the closed linear span of the eigenspaces of C for its negative eigenvalues (Coulomb essential spectrum (c)).

[F4]

For the self-adjoint (possibly unbounded) C, if Cu=Eu and Cv=E′v with u,v∈D(C) and distinct real E,E′, then E⟨u,v⟩=⟨Cu,v⟩=⟨u,Cv⟩=E′⟨u,v⟩, hence ⟨u,v⟩=0 by symmetry on its domain; E({λ}) is the orthogonal projection onto ker⁡(C−λ); and λ∈σess(C) iff rank⁡E((λ−ε,λ+ε))=∞ for every ε>0 (Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators, Discrete and essential spectrum of a self-adjoint operator, Projection valued measure).

[F5]

For a complete orthonormal family (ei) of a closed subspace S of a Hilbert space one has x=∑i⟨x,ei⟩ei and ∥x∥2=∑i∣⟨x,ei⟩∣2 for x∈S (Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family, Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases, Hilbert space).

Proof

1.1F1F2F4givenalgebra

[Eigenvectors, exact norms and orthogonality] For each label put En=−γ2/(4n2). The Kummer termination and Laguerre exhaustion suppliers give a nonzero unl∈D(Al) with Alunl=Enunl; [F2] transports the vector supported in block (l,m) to ψnlm∈D(C) with Cψnlm=Enψnlm and ∥ψnlm∥2=∥unl∥2>0. For different n, the numbers En are distinct and self-adjointness gives orthogonality by [F4]. For equal n and different (l,m), the direct-sum vectors have disjoint supports, hence their inner product is zero; unitarity transfers that orthogonality to L2(R3). Thus enlm:=ψnlm/∥unl∥2 is an orthonormal family.

2.1step 1.1F1F2algebra

[The entire eigenspace and its dimension] Let Cψ=Enψ. The block-domain identity in [F2] and exhaustion in [F1] give Uψ=(almunl)0≤l≤n−1,−l≤m≤l with all other blocks zero. There are only ∑l=0n−1(2l+1) such blocks, so inversion gives the finite sum ψ=∑l=0n−1∑m=−llalmψnlm; conversely each such sum belongs to the eigenspace by step 1.1. Its squared norm is ∑l=0n−1∑m=−ll∣alm∣2∥unl∥22 by [F2]. If the sum is zero, every coefficient vanishes because each radial norm is positive; thus these vectors form a basis. Their number is 2∑l=0n−1l+n=n(n−1)+n=n2, proving (a), including full C degeneracy rather than only radial simplicity.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F3F5algebra

[The bound orthonormal basis of the negative subspace] Let S=EC((−∞,0))L2. By [F3], S is the closed span of all negative eigenspaces, and by [F1] and step 2.1 these are exactly the finite-dimensional spaces spanned by ψnlm for n≥1. Each normalization scalar in step 1.1 is finite and nonzero, so the normalized and unnormalized families have exactly the same finite linear span, and therefore the same closed span S. The orthonormal family (enlm) is consequently complete in S. For f∈S, [F5] gives f=∑n,l,m⟨f,enlm⟩enlm in L2 and ∥f∥22=∑n,l,m∣⟨f,enlm⟩∣2, with the declared first-entry-linear convention. This proves (b).

4.1step 3.1F4givenalgebra

[An infinite-dimensional complementary subspace] Since 1/4∈σess(C)=[0,∞), [F4] with radius 1/4 gives infinite rank for EC((0,1/2)). Its range is contained in EC([0,∞))L2, because (0,1/2)⊆[0,∞) and nested spectral projections satisfy EC([0,∞))EC((0,1/2))=EC((0,1/2)). Thus the nonnegative subspace is infinite dimensional. Spectral projections for disjoint sets satisfy EC((−∞,0))EC([0,∞))=0, so this nonzero subspace is orthogonal to S. Step 3.1 identifies the closed span of the bound states with S, proving that family cannot be complete in all of L2 and establishing (c).

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

[Conclusion] Step 1.1 proves domain membership and orthogonality; step 2.1 proves the full eigenspace and n2 degeneracy in (a); step 3.1 proves (b); step 4.1 proves (c).

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Ground radial probability and units

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ>0, let C=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ on D(C)=H2(R3;C) be as above, and put a0:=2/γ>0. Define ψ100(x):=(γ38π)1/2e−r/a0(x=rΩ, r=∣x∣). Then:

(a) ψ100∈D(C), ∥ψ100∥L2=1, and Cψ100=−γ24ψ100;

(b) for every Borel set B⊆R3, writing dx for Lebesgue measure, ∫B∣ψ100(x)∣2dx=∫0∞γ38πr2e−2r/a0(∫S21B(rΩ)dσ(Ω))dr, so the radial probability density p(r):=γ32r2e−2r/a0=4r2a0−3e−2r/a0 is a probability density on (0,∞): p≥0 and ∫0∞p(r)dr=1;

(c) the mean of p is ∫0∞r p(r)dr=3a0/2, and the unique maximum (mode) of p is at r=a0;

(d) the spatial density ∣ψ100(x)∣2=γ38πe−2r/a0 is strictly decreasing in r and maximal at x=0. For every ε>0 there is a remainder Rε such that

∫∣x∣<ε∣ψ100(x)∣2 dx=16(2εa0)3+Rε,∣Rε∣≤18(2εa0)4.

Thus this probability is positive and tends to 0 as ε↓0, and the spatial probability measure has no point atoms, including at the density maximum x=0;

(e) parametrisation and dimensions. If ℏ,m,κ>0 and γ:=2mκ/ℏ2, then a0=ℏ2/(mκ) and the operator

Cℏ,m,κ:=−ℏ22mΔ−κ∣⋅∣,D(Cℏ,m,κ)=H2(R3;C),

has eigenvalues −mκ22ℏ2n2=ℏ22m(−γ24n2) (n≥1); under the dimensional conventions [ℏ]=J s, [m]=kg, [κ]=J m, the constants a02 and mκ2/(2ℏ2) have the dimensions of m2 and J respectively.

Clauses (a)–(d) are mathematical statements about the normalised ground vector and its distribution; clause (e) is a dimensional-consistency statement about the parametrisation and is not a physical claim, measurement or identification of any quantity with nature.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: γ>0, a0=2/γ, the operator C and its eigenfunctions as in the previous items of this page.

[F1]

The regular solution at k=γ/2, l=0 is, up to a nonzero scalar, u(r)=re−γr/2=re−r/a0, and A0u=−(γ2/4)u with transported function ψ=e−r/a0Y00; the eigenvalue site is exactly the ground level of A0; moreover the negative eigenvalues of C are exactly −γ2/(4n2), n≥1, with n2-dimensional eigenspaces spanned by the transported regular solutions (Kummer recurrence and termination (d), (e), Laguerre bound energy exhaustion (b), (c), Transported radial endpoint realization (e), Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy (a)). Nonnegative radial eigenvalues are excluded by Coulomb continuum spectral density (d); the exact block-domain identity then excludes nonnegative eigenvalues of C as well.

[F2]

Y00=1/4π and σ(S2)=4π; the polar decomposition of Lebesgue measure holds (Sphere ONB, Sphere integrals in angle coordinates, Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

[F4]

The L2 norm of a Borel function is computed by the polar decomposition, and ∣Y00∣2=1/(4π) (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions, Hilbert space).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4algebra

[The normalized ground vector] By [F1] the ground eigenfunction of A0 is u(r)=cre−r/a0 and the corresponding C-eigenvector is c e−r/a0Y00, up to the scalar c≠0. By [F4] and [F2], ∥e−r/a0Y00∥L22=14π∫0∞r2e−2r/a04π dr=∫0∞r2e−2r/a0dr=2/(2/a0)3=a03/4 by [F3]; hence the normalized ground vector is ψ100=(4/a03)1/2e−r/a0Y00=(γ3/(8π))1/2e−r/a0, since Y00=1/4π and a0=2/γ. By [F1] it lies in D(C) and Cψ100=−(γ2/4)ψ100. This is (a).

2.1step 1.1F2F3F4algebra

[The radial law] For a Borel set B, [F2] and [F4] give ∫B∣ψ100∣2dx=γ38π∫Be−2r/a0dx=γ38π∫0∞r2e−2r/a0∫S21B(rΩ)dσ(Ω)dr, which is the displayed identity of (b); the factor 4π enters only when the angular indicator is identically one, giving the radial marginal; the density p(r)=γ32r2e−2r/a0 is nonnegative and integrates to 1 by the value of the integral computed in step 1.1.

3.1step 2.1F3algebra

[Mean and mode] By [F3] together with [F2], ∫0∞r p(r)dr=γ32∫0∞r3e−2r/a0dr=γ32⋅6(2/a0)4=γ32⋅6a0416=3γ3a0416=3a02 because γa0=2. For the mode, differentiate q(r):=r2e−2r/a0 using [F3]'s ingredients: q′(r)=2re−2r/a0−(2/a0)r2e−2r/a0=(2/a0)r(a0−r)e−2r/a0, which is positive for 0<r<a0, zero at r=a0 and negative for r>a0; hence q, and with it p, has its unique maximum at r=a0. This is (c).

3.2step 2.1F3algebra

[Density versus point probability] Set t=2ε/a0. Step 2.1 gives P(∣x∣<ε)=12∫0ts2e−sds=1−e−t(1+t+t2/2) by differentiation and the fundamental theorem. Since 0≤1−e−s=∫0se−vdv≤s, the difference from t3/6 has absolute value at most t4/8. Taking Rε:=P(∣x∣<ε)−t3/6 gives the exact remainder bound in (d), with the dimensionless scale t=2ε/a0; the probability is strictly positive for every ε>0 and tends to zero. The density (πa03)−1e−2r/a0 is strictly decreasing in r, while every singleton has zero probability because its Lebesgue measure is zero. This proves (d), with no point atom at the density maximum.

4.1step 1.1step 3.2F1algebra

[Parametrisation and dimensions] Setting γ=2mκ/ℏ2 gives a0=2/γ=ℏ2/(mκ)>0, and the operator identity Cℏ,m,κ=ℏ22mC on H2 holds because ℏ22m⋅2mκℏ2=κ; hence the eigenvalues of Cℏ,m,κ are ℏ22m⋅(−γ24n2)=−mκ22ℏ2n2 by [F1], including exclusion of every nonnegative eigenvalue. For the dimensional statement, substituting the dimensional conventions and the dependent unit identity J=kg m2 s−2, one computes [ℏ2/(mκ)]=J2s2 kg−1J−1m−1=J s2 kg−1m−1=m, so a02 has dimension m2, and [mκ2/ℏ2]=kg J2m2J−2s−2=kg m2s−2=J. This is (e).

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1∎

[Conclusion] Clauses (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) are steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 3.2 and 4.1.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Positive scaling of a self-adjoint operator: the spectral projection-valued measure transforms by the preimage of the scaling map

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let H≠{0} be a complex Hilbert space, let A:D(A)⊂H→H be a densely defined self-adjoint operator with spectral projection valued measure E on the Borel σ-algebra of R (Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form), Projection valued measure), and let c>0. Write cA for the operator with D(cA):=D(A) and (cA)x:=c (Ax), and for mc:R→R, mc(λ):=cλ, define F(B):=E(mc−1(B))=E(c−1B)(B⊆R Borel). Then:

(a) F is a regular projection valued measure on the Borel sets of R;

(b) for every bounded Borel f:R→C the bounded integrals satisfy ΦF(f)=ΦE(f∘mc), and the operator ∫Rλ dF(λ) of the spectral theorem equals cA with domain D(A);

(c) consequently F is the spectral projection valued measure EcA of cA: for every Borel B⊆R, EcA(B)=E(c−1B);in particular the negative spectral subspaces agree,EcA((−∞,0))H=E((−∞,0))H.

The assertion transfers the spectral measure along positive scaling of the operator. It asserts no spectral type of a particular operator, no multiplicity statement and no physical interpretation; c<0 is not covered, and no statement is made about unbounded Borel functions of cA beyond the identity functional calculus stated in (b).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonzero complex Hilbert space H; a densely defined self-adjoint operator A with spectral PVM E; a real c>0; the map mc(λ)=cλ and F(B)=E(c−1B); the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

Spectral theorem. There is a unique regular PVM E on the Borel sets of R with D(A)={x:∫Rλ2dEx(λ)<∞} and Ax=∫Rλ dE(λ)x for x∈D(A); conversely, for every regular PVM E′ on R the operator ∫λ dE′ with that domain is self-adjoint and its spectral PVM is E′ again (Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form)).

[F2]

Projection valued measures. A PVM E on a measurable space assigns orthogonal projections with E(∅)=0, E(X)=I, E(B∩C)=E(B)E(C), and strong countable additivity: for pairwise disjoint Bn with union B one has E(B)x=∑nE(Bn)x in norm for every x; E is regular when the underlying space is locally compact Hausdorff with its Borel σ-algebra and every Ex(B)=⟨E(B)x,x⟩ is a regular Borel measure (Projection valued measure).

[F3]

Scalar and complex measures from a PVM. Ex is a positive measure with Ex(X)=∥x∥2, and Ex,y(B)=⟨E(B)x,y⟩ is a finite complex measure, linear in x and conjugate-linear in y, with ∣Ex,y(B)∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥ (Scalar and complex measures from a pvm clauses 1-3).

[F4]

Bounded functional calculus. For bounded measurable f there is a unique ΦE(f)∈B(H) with ⟨ΦE(f)x,y⟩=∫f dEx,y; if (sn) are simple with ∥f−sn∥∞→0 then ΦE(sn)→ΦE(f) in operator norm; ∥ΦE(f)x∥2=∫∣f∣2dEx; and ΦE is linear, unital and multiplicative (Bounded borel pvm integral clauses 1, 2, Pvm integral is a star homomorphism clauses 1, 2).

[F5]

Unbounded functional calculus. For measurable f the operator f(E) has domain D(f(E))={x:∫∣f∣2dEx<∞} and is defined as the norm limit of ΦE(f1{∣f∣≤n})x; ∥f(E)x∥2=∫∣f∣2dEx; and if bounded measurable gn satisfy ∣gn∣≤C∣f∣ pointwise and gn→f pointwise, then gn(E)x→f(E)x for every x∈D(f(E)) (Integral of a measurable function against a projection-valued measure, The unbounded PVM integral is densely defined, closed and normal).

[F6]

Monotone convergence. For a measure μ and nonnegative measurable hn increasing pointwise to h one has ∫hn dμ→∫h dμ (Monotone convergence for the integral).

[F7]

Regularity in R. R is locally compact Hausdorff and σ-compact (Rn is locally compact and σ-compact); a regular Borel measure is a Radon measure that is also inner regular on Borel sets (Regular Borel measure on an LCH space, Radon measure on an LCH space).

Proof

technique · direct; show that the transported set function $F(B)=E(c^{-1}B)$ is a regular PVM computing the operator $cA$, then identify it with the spectral measure of $cA$ by the uniqueness clause of the spectral theorem

Given: The data of the statement and [F1]-[F8].

1.1F2F8

[F is a PVM] For Borel B the set c−1B is Borel because mc is Borel measurable [F8], so F(B)=E(c−1B) is an orthogonal projection; F(∅)=E(∅)=0 and F(R)=E(R)=I; c−1(B∩C)=c−1B∩c−1C gives F(B∩C)=F(B)F(C); and for pairwise disjoint Bn with union B the sets c−1Bn are pairwise disjoint with union c−1B, so strong countable additivity of E [F2] gives ∑nF(Bn)x=∑nE(c−1Bn)x=E(c−1B)x=F(B)x for every x∈H. Thus F is a PVM on the Borel sets of R.

2.1step 1.1F3F7F8

[F is regular] Fix x∈H and write ν:=Fx, so that ν(B)=Ex(c−1B). By [F3], Ex is a finite measure with Ex(R)=∥x∥2, so ν(R)=∥x∥2<+∞. For inner regularity let B be Borel and ε>0; by regularity of Ex [F7] there is compact K⊆c−1B with Ex(c−1B∖K)<ε. Then K′:=mc(K) is compact [F8], K′⊆B, and by c−1K′=K one has ν(K′)=Ex(K)>Ex(c−1B)−ε=ν(B)−ε. For outer regularity apply the same statement to the complement: choose open V⊇c−1B with Ex(V∖c−1B)<ε; then V′:=mc(V) is open [F8], V′⊇B, and ν(V′)−ν(B)=Ex(V∖c−1B)<ε. Hence every ν=Fx is a Radon measure that is inner regular on Borel sets, i.e. a regular Borel measure [F7], and F is a regular PVM. This proves (a).

2.2step 1.1F4

[Bounded functional identity] Let f be bounded Borel. The functional calculi of E and of F exist by [F4], since F is a PVM by step 1.1. For f=1B and all x,y∈H, ⟨ΦF(1B)x,y⟩=∫1B dFx,y=Fx,y(B)=⟨F(B)x,y⟩=⟨E(c−1B)x,y⟩=Ex,y(c−1B)=∫1c−1B dEx,y=∫(1B∘mc) dEx,y=⟨ΦE(1B∘mc)x,y⟩, so the uniqueness clause of [F4] gives ΦF(1B)=ΦE(1B∘mc). Both sides are linear in the bounded measurable function [F4], so the identity holds for every simple function. For bounded Borel f choose simple sn with ∥f−sn∥∞→0; then ∥f∘mc−sn∘mc∥∞=∥f−sn∥∞→0, and the norm-convergence clause of [F4] applied on both sides gives ΦF(f)=lim⁡ΦF(sn)=lim⁡ΦE(sn∘mc)=ΦE(f∘mc).

3.1step 2.2F1F4F5F6algebra

[Domain and operator identity] Put f(λ):=λ, so that f(E)=A and f(EF)=∫λ dF(λ) by [F1] and [F5], and put g:=f∘mc=mc, so that g(E)=cA. For n≥1 the truncations fn:=f1{∣f∣≤n} are bounded Borel and step 2.2 with fn gives ΦF(fn)=ΦE(fn∘mc)=ΦE(gn), where gn=fn∘mc=g1{∣g∣≤n}. For every x∈H the norm identities of [F4] and [F5] give ∫∣fn∣2dFx=∥ΦF(fn)x∥2=∥ΦE(gn)x∥2=∫∣gn∣2dEx; since ∣fn∣2↑λ2 and ∣gn∣2↑c2λ2 pointwise, monotone convergence [F6] gives ∫λ2dFx=c2∫λ2dEx for every x∈H. Hence D(f(EF))={x:∫λ2dFx<∞}=D(A) by [F1] and [F5]. For x∈D(A) the convergence clause of [F5] applied to gn→g with ∣gn∣≤∣g∣ gives f(EF)x=lim⁡ΦF(fn)x=lim⁡ΦE(gn)x=g(E)x; since gn/c→f pointwise with ∣gn/c∣≤∣f∣, [F5] gives ΦE(gn/c)x→f(E)x=Ax; linearity [F4] then makes the same limit equal to clim⁡ΦE(gn/c)x=cAx. Therefore f(EF)=cA with domain D(A).

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1F1∎

[Identification of the spectral measure] By steps 1.1 and 2.1, F is a regular PVM on the Borel sets of R, and by step 3.1 the operator ∫λ dF(λ)=f(EF) equals cA with domain D(A). The converse clause of the spectral theorem [F1] applied to the regular PVM F shows that ∫λ dF(λ) is self-adjoint with spectral PVM F; by the uniqueness clause of [F1] applied to the self-adjoint operator cA, its spectral PVM is EcA=F, that is, EcA(B)=E(c−1B) for every Borel B. This is (c) for general B; at B=(−∞,0) one has c−1(−∞,0)=(−∞,0), so the negative spectral subspaces agree.

Remarks

  • Why the preimage direction. The candidate set function must satisfy F(B)=E(c−1B) rather than E(cB): the condition mcX=mc in the spectral theorem forces F to assign to B the spectral mass that E assigns to the preimage, as step 3.1 verifies by computing the transported quadratic forms.
  • Use in this physics pair. The lemma is used only to transfer the spectral resolution of the unscaled Coulomb operator −Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ to the model's energy operator Hκ=(ℏ2/2m)Cγ; no further spectral geometry is claimed.
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Two-body reduced mass

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let m1,m2>0, put M:=m1+m2, μ:=m1m2/M, let κ>0, ℏ>0, and define the linear coordinate map Φ:R6→R6,Φ(x1,x2):=(R,r),R:=m1x1+m2x2M,r:=x1−x2, with inverse x1=R+m2Mr, x2=R−m1Mr. Write L2=L2(R6;C) and for f∈L2 put (UΦf)(R,r):=f(x1,x2) with xi expressed through (R,r). Then:

(a) Φ is a linear isomorphism with ∣det⁡Φ∣=1, and UΦ is a unitary operator on L2;

(b) for every Schwartz function f, UΦ(−(ℏ2/2m1)Δx1−(ℏ2/2m2)Δx2)UΦ−1f=(−(ℏ2/2M)ΔR−(ℏ2/2μ)Δr)f; moreover both sides define the same self-adjoint operator on the common domain H2(R6;C);

(c) the operator H2:=−(ℏ2/2m1)Δx1−(ℏ2/2m2)Δx2−κ/∣x1−x2∣ with D(H2):=H2(R6;C) is self-adjoint, and UΦH2UΦ−1=TR⊗I+I⊗Cμ under the identification L2(R6)≅L2(RR3)⊗^L2(Rr3) of Euclidean L² product unitary: L²(R^a)⊗̂L²(R^b) ≅ L²(R^{a+b}), where TR:=−(ℏ2/2M)ΔR and Cμ:=−(ℏ2/2μ)Δr−κ/∣⋅∣;

(d) σ(H2)=[−μκ22ℏ2,∞), and H2 has no eigenvalues at all: the negative part of its spectrum is the interval [−μκ22ℏ2,0), consisting entirely of continuous spectrum, and each relative bound-state energy −μκ22ℏ2n2 of Cμ is a threshold of the continuous spectrum of H2 rather than an eigenvalue; in particular a relative bound state tensored with any centre-of-mass state is not an eigenvector of H2;

(e) On L2(RR3;C) define the centre-of-mass momentum component

PR,jcm:=ℏi∂Rj,D(PR,jcm):={g∈L2(RR3;C):∂Rjg∈L2 as a weak derivative}.

On the full two-body space define its lift

P~R,j:=UΦ−1(PR,jcm⊗I)UΦ,D(P~R,j):=UΦ−1{F∈L2(RR3×Rr3;C):∂RjF∈L2 as a weak derivative}.

Each P~R,j is self-adjoint and has no nonzero eigenvectors in L2(R6;C); hence there is no normalisable state of definite total momentum (a simultaneous eigenvector of the three lifted components).

All statements are mathematical statements about the operators on L2(R6) and the coordinate map; no physical interpretation, no identification of m1,m2,κ,ℏ with measured constants, and no claim about nature is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: m1,m2,κ,ℏ>0 and the derived constants M,μ; the map Φ and pullback UΦ; Schwartz functions.

[F1]

Linear change of variables: for an invertible linear map Φ with ∣det⁡Φ∣=1 the pullback UΦf:=f∘Φ−1 is unitary on L2(R6;C) (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Schwartz convolution and product laws, A bounded linear map from a dense normed subspace into a Banach space extends uniquely with the same norm).

[F2]

For c>0, b∈R the operator H0=F2∗Mc∣ξ∣2+bF2 with domain W2,2(Rd;C) is self-adjoint and equals −c4π2Δ+b on Schwartz functions; in particular free kinetic operators with positive coefficients are self-adjoint on W2,2 (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators, Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[F3]

Kato-Rellich: if A is self-adjoint and B is symmetric with D(A)⊆D(B) and A-bound less than one, then A+B on D(A) is self-adjoint (Kato-Rellich theorem, Relative boundedness with respect to an operator).

[F4]

Hardy bound and its infinitesimal form: for g∈W1,2(R3;C), ∥g/∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥∇g∥2, and for g∈W2,2(R3) and every η>0, ∥g/∣⋅∣∥2≤η∥Δg∥2+η−1∥g∥2 (Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound, Three-dimensional Hardy bound).

[F5]

The negative eigenvalues of Cμ are −μκ22ℏ2n2 (n≥1), with eigenspaces spanned by the corresponding regular solutions, and each nonzero radial component of every negative eigenfunction is a multiple of its corresponding regular solution (Laguerre bound energy exhaustion, Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy).

[F7]

Cμ has no eigenvalue in [0,∞): with γ:=2μκ/ℏ2 one has Cμ=ℏ22μCγ for Cγ:=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣, whose block identity makes the eigenvalues of Cγ the union of those of the radial operators Al, and no Al has eigenvalue 0 or eigenvalue k2>0 (Coulomb continuum spectral density (d), Coulomb Jost Volterra solution (d), Transported radial endpoint realization (d)).

[F8]

Tonelli applies to the nonnegative squared norms of sections on the sigma-finite product RR3×Rr3; smooth compactly supported functions are dense in W2,2(R6) (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)). Real measurable multiplication is closed on its maximal L2 domain (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators).

[F9]

For γ>0, Cγ:=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ has an onto unitary spectral representation Vγ as the countable sum over spherical channels (l,m) of bound copies with energies −γ2/(4n2), n≥l+1, and continuum copies L2((0,∞),dλ) with maximal multiplier Mλ, with no zero eigenvector (Onto radial continuum transform (d), Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy). For a self-adjoint A and c>0, its scaled PVM satisfies EcA(B)=EA(c−1B) for every Borel B (Positive scaling of a self-adjoint operator: the spectral projection-valued measure transforms by the preimage of the scaling map (b), (c)). The change-of-variables formula applies to the positive linear dilation of the continuum variable (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

[F10]

The partial Plancherel transform FR⊗I is unitary on L2(RR3×Rr3;C); it maps the maximal weak-derivative domain {F:∂RjF∈L2} onto {F^:ξjF^∈L2} and sends ℏi∂Rj to multiplication by 2πℏξj. This follows from Plancherel theorem, Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers, and Euclidean L² product unitary: L²(R^a)⊗̂L²(R^b) ≅ L²(R^{a+b}). A real finite-valued multiplier on its maximal L2 domain is self-adjoint (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators (a)); Tonelli applies to the product variables (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

Proof

1.1F1F6givenalgebra

[The coordinate map] In the three coordinates the matrix of Φ relative to the splitting (x1,x2)↦(R,r) is block diagonal with the 2×2 block (m1/Mm2/M1−1) repeated three times; its determinant is −m2/M−m1/M=−1, so ∣det⁡Φ∣=1 and Φ is invertible with the displayed inverse. By the linear change-of-variables theorem the pullback UΦf=f∘Φ−1 is unitary on L2(R6;C), since it preserves the integral of ∣f∣2; this is (a).

1.2F6F8F10algebra

[Lifted total momentum and no eigenvector] By [F10], the partial Plancherel transform conjugates each lifted operator P~R,j to multiplication by the real function (ξ,r)↦2πℏξj on its maximal domain {G:ξjG∈L2(R6)}. The real-multiplier theorem therefore makes P~R,j self-adjoint on exactly the weak-derivative domain in (e). If P~R,jΨ=pΨ, its partial Fourier transform satisfies (2πℏξj−p)F^(ξ,r)=0 for a.e. (ξ,r), so it is supported on the hyperplane ξj=p/(2πℏ). This hyperplane has Lebesgue measure zero in Rξ3; Tonelli over the remaining momentum coordinates and r shows F^=0 and hence Ψ=0. Thus no lifted component, and consequently no triple of lifted components, has a nonzero eigenvector.

2.1step 1.1F6givenalgebra

[Kinetic separation on Schwartz functions] Let f be Schwartz. The chain rule gives ∂x1,j=m1M∂Rj+∂rj and ∂x2,j=m2M∂Rj−∂rj, hence Δx1=m12M2ΔR+2m1M∂R⋅∂r+Δr and Δx2=m22M2ΔR−2m2M∂R⋅∂r+Δr. Multiplying by ℏ22mi and summing, the mixed terms cancel because m1M⋅1m1−m2M⋅1m2=0, while the ΔR coefficient is −ℏ22M and the Δr coefficient is −ℏ22(1m1+1m2)=−ℏ22μ; this is the displayed identity of (b) at the level of Schwartz functions.

3.1step 2.1F2givenalgebra

[The kinetic operators agree as self-adjoint operators] Let K denote the self-adjoint operator on W2,2(R6) given by −ℏ22m1Δx1−ℏ22m2Δx2 (existence by [F2], applied to the Fourier multiplier 4π2(ℏ22m1∣ξ1∣2+ℏ22m2∣ξ2∣2), which is comparable to ∣ξ∣2), and let K′ be the self-adjoint operator on W2,2(R6) given by −ℏ22MΔR−ℏ22μΔr. Both act on Schwartz functions, a common core of W2,2-type Fourier-multiplier operators, and step 2.1 shows UΦKUΦ−1f=K′f for Schwartz f; since UΦKUΦ−1 and K′ are self-adjoint operators agreeing on a common core, they are equal, and UΦ(D(K))=D(K′)=H2(R6;C). This completes (b).

4.1step 3.1F2F3F4F6F8algebra

[Norm lift and two-body self-adjointness] Under UΦ, the original multiplier −κ/∣x1−x2∣ becomes −κ/∣r∣. First let w∈Cc∞(RR3×Rr3). For each R, [F4] gives ∥w(R,⋅)/∣r∣∥Lr2≤η∥Δrw(R,⋅)∥Lr2+η−1∥w(R,⋅)∥Lr2. Taking LR2 norms and the triangle inequality, with [F8], yields ∥w/∣r∣∥2≤η∥Δrw∥2+η−1∥w∥2. Approximate arbitrary w∈H2(R6) in its Sobolev norm by [F8]. Applying this estimate to differences makes the quotients Cauchy in L2; closedness of multiplication identifies their limit with w/∣r∣, so the estimate holds on all of H2. The Fourier symbols of −Δr and K′=−(ℏ2/(2M))ΔR−(ℏ2/(2μ))Δr are simultaneous nonnegative multipliers 4π2∣ξr∣2 and 4π2(ℏ2∣ξR∣2/(2M)+ℏ2∣ξr∣2/(2μ)); their pointwise domination gives ∥Δrw∥2≤(2μ/ℏ2)∥K′w∥2 by Plancherel. Therefore ∥κw/∣r∣∥2≤(2κμη/ℏ2)∥K′w∥2+(κ/η)∥w∥2, an arbitrarily small operator relative bound. Kato–Rellich [F3] makes K′−κ/∣r∣ self-adjoint on H2. Conjugating back gives exactly H2=UΦ−1(K′−κ/∣r∣)UΦ, self-adjoint on H2; the separated differential expression, under [F6], is TR⊗I+I⊗Cμ. This denotes the self-adjoint commuting spectral sum: choose c with Cμ+c≥0. In its joint product representation the nonnegative sum has domain equal to the intersection of the two factor domains, because each nonnegative summand is bounded pointwise by their sum. The relative norm bound just proved makes the Cμ graph norm equivalent to the relative Laplacian graph norm; Fourier comparison of the two nonnegative kinetic weights identifies that intersection with H2(R6). Thus its graph closure is the same Kato–Rellich operator. This proves (c) with an actual fiber-norm lift and no form-to-norm inference.

5.1step 4.1F2F5F6F7F8F9algebra

[Full spectrum and no eigenvalue by the product representation] By step 4.1 the transformed operator is TR⊗I+I⊗Cμ. Put γ:=2μκ/ℏ2>0 and c:=ℏ2/(2μ)>0, so Cμ=cCγ on their common domain H2(R3). Under Vγ of [F9], this is the diagonal operator with scaled bound values c(−γ2/(4n2))=−μκ2/(2ℏ2n2) and continuum multiplier cλ. The PVM transfer in [F9] gives, on a continuum copy, ECμ(B)=M1c−1B(λ) in this representation. Define (Dch)(E):=c−1/2h(E/c) on each continuum copy, with inverse (Dc−1g)(λ)=c1/2g(cλ). Changing variables E=cλ gives ∫0∞∣Dch(E)∣2dE=∫0∞∣h(λ)∣2dλ, so Dc is onto unitary. The same substitution gives ∫0∞E2∣Dch(E)∣2dE=c2∫0∞λ2∣h(λ)∣2dλ; hence it maps the exact maximal domain of cMλ onto that of ME and satisfies Dc(cMλ)Dc−1=ME. On indicators it gives DcM1c−1B(λ)Dc−1=M1B(E), explicitly transporting the continuum PVM. The direct sum of the identity on every bound copy and Dc on every continuum copy is onto unitary: its norm identity and inverse hold in each coordinate and therefore in the countable square sum. Composing it with Vγ gives the full relative spectral resolution of Cμ, including its diagonal domain and no zero eigenchannel. Apply this unitary and the 2π-normalized center Fourier transform to the tensor decomposition, using [F6] and Plancherel. The absence of nonnegative relative eigenvalues in [F7] agrees with that resolution. The operator becomes the countable sum of real multiplication operators: on each relative bound copy its multiplier is cR(ξ)+En, where cR(ξ)=4π2ℏ2∣ξ∣2/(2M) and En=−μκ2/(2ℏ2n2); on each continuum copy it is cR(ξ)+E′ for E′>0. These multipliers are all at least E1, so the operator is bounded below by E1. For every E≥E1 choose ξ0 with cR(ξ0)=E−E1 and normalized smooth Fourier profiles supported in shrinking balls around ξ0. Their inverse transforms φδ are Schwartz, and ∥(TR−(E−E1))φδ∥→0 by continuity of cR. The correctly ordered vectors φδ⊗u1 have norm one and belong to the operator domain, with residual (TR−(E−E1))φδ⊗u1 tending to zero; a bounded resolvent at E would contradict this, so E∈σ(H2). Hence σ(H2)=[E1,∞). For an eigenvalue equation at any real E, each bound-component Fourier class must be supported on {ξ:cR(ξ)=E−En}, a sphere, a point or the empty set, all Lebesgue-null; each continuum component must be supported on {(ξ,E′):E′=E−cR(ξ)}, which has zero product measure by Tonelli since every E′ section is a singleton. The countable spectral sum therefore has no nonzero eigenvector. All spectral points, including the negative interval, are continuous spectrum because the operator is self-adjoint. Every En is the lower edge of its relative bound-channel band [En,∞), a threshold without a total eigenvector. This proves (d) with all masses and couplings retained.

6.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

[Conclusion] Steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1 and 5.1 establish (a)–(d), and step 1.2 establishes (e).

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Atomic dipole matrix-element domain

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ>0, let C=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ on H2(R3;C) be as above, let (ψnlm) be the bound eigenfunctions of Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy, and for i=1,2,3 define the coordinate multiplication operator Qiψ:=(ξ↦ξi ψ(ξ)),D(Qi):={ψ∈L2(R3;C):ξiψ∈L2}. Write also Q0:=x3 and Q±:=(x1±ix2)/2. Then:

(a) each Qi is self-adjoint on D(Qi), the domain is a proper dense subspace of L2, and every bound state satisfies ψnlm∈D(Qi), with ∥Qiψnlm∥22=∫0∞r2∣unl(r)∣2dr⋅∫S2∣ΩiYlm(Ω)∣2dσ(Ω)<∞;

(b) for all labels and each q∈{−1,0,1} the matrix element ⟨ψn′l′m′,Qqψnlm⟩ is absolutely convergent and factors as ⟨ψn′l′m′,Qqψnlm⟩=(∫0∞r un′l′(r)unl(r)‾ dr)(∫S2Yl′m′(Ω)Qq(Ω) Ylm(Ω)‾ dσ(Ω)), where Qq(Ω) denotes the restriction of the polynomial Qq to S2;

(c) the angular factor vanishes unless l′=l+1, m′=m+q or l≥1, l′=l−1, m′=m+q; these are necessary conditions only: no assertion is made that an allowed pair has nonzero radial integral, and no transition probability is asserted or computed;

(d) for the oscillator: fix real parameters m>0, ω>0, ℏ>0 and put ℓ:=ℏ/(mω)>0. For the complete orthonormal family (ψnosc) of Oscillator scaling and exact realization and the position operator Xf(x)=xf(x) on D(X)={f∈L2(R,dx):xf∈L2} (multiplication by ℓy after x=ℓy), one has Xψnosc=ℓ2(n ψn−1osc+n+1 ψn+1osc), so ⟨ψn′osc,Xψnosc⟩ vanishes unless n′=n±1, with the displayed coefficients; in particular the oscillator position matrix elements are supported on a single step ∣Δn∣=1, while the Coulomb selection rules constrain only Δl and Δm and leave the radial integral free.

This item concerns matrix elements of multiplication operators on L2 and their finiteness and selection rules; it asserts no absorption, emission or transition rate and no physical interpretation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: γ>0; the integer bound/angular labels of the stated family; maximal domains D(Qq)={f:Qqf∈L2}, so D(Q0)=D(Q3) and D(Q±)=D(Q1)∩D(Q2) because ∣Q±∣2=(x12+x22)/2; the bound states ψnlm=unl(r)Ylm(Ω)/r of the previous items; the coordinate multipliers Qi,Qq; the oscillator parameters m,ω,ℏ>0 and ℓ=ℏ/(mω)>0.

[F1]

For a real finite-valued measurable a the multiplier Maf=af with D(Ma)={f:af∈L2} is self-adjoint (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators (a), Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators); the coordinate functions ξi are real finite-valued.

[F2]

Every bound state has unl∈L2(0,∞), unl(r)=c rl+1e−krLn−l−1(2l+1)(2kr) up to a nonzero scalar with k=γ/(2n), and ∥ψnlm∥2=∥unl∥2 (Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy, Kummer recurrence and termination, Angular radial unitary reduction).

[F3]

Dipole angular selection rules: for the spherical components Q0=x3, Q±=(x1±ix2)/2 and the family (Ylm), the angular matrix element ⟨Yl′m′,Qq∣S2Ylm⟩ can be nonzero only if l′=l+1, m′=m+q or l≥1, l′=l−1, m′=m+q; the rule is a necessary condition on the angular integrals only (degree and weight clauses (b), (c) of Dipole angular selection rules, Associated Legendre function normalization).

[F4]

Oscillator: for real m,ω,ℏ>0 and ℓ=ℏ/(mω)>0, the scaled Hermite functions ψnosc=ℓ−1/2gn(x/ℓ) form a complete orthonormal family of L2(R,dx) with x=ℓy, and the Hermite recurrence gives 2 y gn=n gn−1+n+1 gn+1 with the lowering term omitted at n=0 (equivalently define g−1=0 and ψ−1osc=0) (Oscillator scaling and exact realization, Hermite recurrence (d), (g), Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases, Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family).

[F5]

Polar volume integration is dx=r2dr dσ (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma); nonnegative product integrals use Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, and absolutely convergent product integrals use Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability. For a>0 and integer p≥0, integration by parts starting with p=0 gives ∫0∞rpe−ardr=p!/ap+1; the boundary terms vanish since a sufficiently high exponential-series term bounds every fixed polynomial power (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a), The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0). Cauchy-Schwarz for the L2 and L2(S2,σ) pairings (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2, Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions).

Proof

1.1F1F5givenalgebra

[Coordinate domains] Each real Qi is self-adjoint by [F1]. For f∈L2, fN=1∣xi∣≤Nf lies in D(Qi) and converges in L2, proving density. Put φ(t)=(1+∣t∣)−1; it belongs to L2(R) whereas t2∣φ(t)∣2≥1/4 for ∣t∣≥1. For each i, fi(x)=φ(xi)∏j≠ie−∣xj∣ belongs to L2 but xifi∉L2 by nonnegative product integration. Thus every domain is proper, including i=2,3, not just the first-coordinate example.

2.1step 1.1F2F5algebra

[Bound-state domain membership] By [F2], unl is polynomial-exponential with positive decay rate and is O(rl+1) at zero. Hence ∫0∞r2∣unl∣2dr<∞: near zero the integrand is O(r2l+4), and all polynomial-exponential moments at infinity are finite by [F5]. Polar coordinates give exactly ∥Qiψnlm∥2=∫r2∣unl∣2dr∫∣ΩiYlm∣2dσ, whose angular factor is at most one. Each bound state therefore lies in every D(Qi) and in the stated complex component domains. This proves (a).

3.1step 2.1F2F5algebra

[Absolute convergence and factorization] Put v=un′l′, u=unl, Y′=Yl′m′ and Y=Ylm. Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∫0∞r∣vu‾∣dr≤∥v∥2∥ru∥2<∞ and ∫S2∣Y′QqY‾∣dσ≤∥Y′∥2∥QqY∥2≤1. Tonelli and Fubini in [F5] justify absolute integration of the polar product and its factorization into (∫0∞rvu‾ dr)(∫S2Y′QqY‾ dσ), exactly (b) for the linear-first pairing. Coordinate multiplication generally produces two angular blocks; no false single-block claim is used.

4.1step 3.1F3algebra

[All necessary angular branches] By [F3], Qqhlm=Rq+r2Gq has harmonic degrees l+1,l−1, with Gq=(∑cq,i∂ihlm)/(2l+1). At l=1 its derivative term can be a nonzero constant in V0, so the downward branch l′=0 is retained. At l=0 the derivatives vanish and only the upward branch remains. Degree orthogonality and the Lz eigenvalue calculation give exactly l′=l+1,m′=m+q, or l≥1,l′=l−1,m′=m+q. These are necessary only; the radial factor is ∫0∞r un′l′unl‾dr and may vanish for an allowed angular pair. No transition probability is defined. This proves (c).

5.1step 4.1F4F5algebra

[The oscillator comparison] In the scaled variable x=ℓy multiplication by x is ℓ times multiplication by y; by [F4] the Hermite recurrence gives, on the complete orthonormal family (ψnosc), Xψnosc=ℓ y ψnosc=ℓ2(nψn−1osc+n+1ψn+1osc); the lowering term being absent at n=0. The recurrence puts Xψnosc in L2, proving membership in the maximal position domain; taking pairings with ψn′osc and using orthonormality [F4] and Cauchy-Schwarz [F5] gives ⟨ψn′osc,Xψnosc⟩=ℓ2(nδn′,n−1+n+1δn′,n+1), so exactly the transitions ∣Δn∣=1 occur, with the displayed coefficients. This is (d).

6.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

[Conclusion] Clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) are steps 1.1 and 2.1, 3.1, 4.1, and 5.1.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Coulomb Jost Volterra solution

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ≥0, l≥0, and let Al be the radial operator of Transported radial endpoint realization with form domain Vl. Let D:={k∈C:Re⁡k>0, Im⁡k≥0} be the parameter domain for the Jost solution. For each kmin⁡>0 also write K:={k∈D:Re⁡k≥kmin⁡} for its restriction. Then:

(a) regular solution. With c0:=1, c−1:=0 and cn:=−γcn−1+k2cn−2n(n+2l+1)(n≥1), the series φl(k,r):=rl+1∑n≥0cnrn converges for every r>0 and every k∈C, the function (k,r)↦φl(k,r) is holomorphic in k and C∞ in r>0, and φl solves −u′′+(l(l+1)/r2−γ/r)u=k2u with φl(k,r)/rl+1→1 as r↓0;

(b) Jost-type solution. Put a:=γ/(2k), θ(r):=kr+alog⁡r, w(r):=eiθ(r), b:=a2+l(l+1)+ia and consider the integral equation v(r)=1+∫r∞bs2 w(s)2(∫rsw(y)−2dy)v(s) ds. For every k∈D the equation has exactly one bounded solution v(⋅;k) on [r0,∞) for some r0>0 depending on k; extend fl uniquely by its regular initial data to every r>0 and put v=fl/w there. Constructions with different admissible tails agree by bounded-solution and initial-value uniqueness, so these functions are independent of the tail and of kmin⁡. One has v(r)=1+O(1/r), v′(r)=O(1/r); the functions fl(k,r):=w(r)v(r) and v are jointly continuous on D×(0,∞), holomorphic in k on {Re⁡k>0,Im⁡k>0}, satisfy the radial equation −∂r2fl+(l(l+1)/r2−γ/r)fl=k2fl exactly, and obey the asymptotics fl=ei(kr+alog⁡r)(1+O(1/r)),fl′=ei(kr+alog⁡r)[ik+O(1/r)](r→∞);

(c) Wronskians. For real k>0 one has W(fl‾,fl)=2ik and Wl(k):=W(φl,fl)≠0; consequently every solution of the radial equation on (0,∞) is Afl+Bfl‾ with A,B∈C, and φl is a nonzero complex multiple combination of fl,fl‾;

(d) no positive eigenvalue. For real k>0 and A,B∈C, if g=Afl+Bfl‾ then ∫RL∣g(r)∣2dr=(∣A∣2+∣B∣2)[L−R−γlog⁡(L/R)/(2k2)]+O(1) as L→∞ with R>r0 fixed; hence g∈L2(r0,∞) if and only if A=B=0, and k2>0 is not an eigenvalue of Al.

All assertions concern the ordinary differential equation and the operator Al; no scattering amplitude, cross-section or physical interpretation is asserted or computed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: γ≥0, l≥0, kmin⁡>0, K as above, and for k∈D the quantities a,θ,w,b; the radial equation Llu=k2u with Llu:=−u′′+(l(l+1)/r2−γ/r)u.

[F1]

On any compact interval [a,b]⊂(0,∞) the radial equation has a two-dimensional space of C2 solutions, and for real k complex conjugation preserves the solution space because both the potential and k2 are real (Regular interval IVP: existence, a priori bound and entire spectral-parameter dependence, Continuity of f:A→R at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with lim⁡x→cf(x)=f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point).

[F2]

The Wronskian W(u,v)=uv′−u′v of two solutions of −(u′′)+qu=0 with q continuous is constant (Regular interval IVP: existence, a priori bound and entire spectral-parameter dependence).

[F4]

Banach fixed point and Gronwall: the standard existence-uniqueness and a priori bound arguments for Volterra integral equations; integrals of continuous functions against continuous kernels may be interchanged (A contraction of a nonempty complete metric space into itself has exactly one fixed point, the limit of the iterates from any starting point, Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients, Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability).

[F6]

Every eigenfunction u∈D(Al) of Al with Alu=Eu, E constant, is a C2 solution of the radial equation on (0,∞) (Transported radial endpoint realization (c)).

[F7]

A continuous function with zero contour integral on every triangle is holomorphic, and a locally uniformly convergent series of holomorphic functions is holomorphic with termwise derivatives (Morera's theorem: vanishing triangle integrals characterize holomorphy among continuous functions, A locally uniformly convergent series of holomorphic functions may be differentiated term by term).

Proof

1.1F7givenalgebra

[Regular solution] On a compact k-set choose C≥max⁡(1,γ,sup⁡∣k∣). Induction gives ∣cn∣≤Cn/n!, since the recurrence majorant divided by Cn/n! is [γ/C+∣k∣2(n−1)/C2]/(n+2l+1)≤1; at n=1 the second term is absent. Each cn is a polynomial in k2. The exponential majorant also bounds every fixed r-derivative on compact subintervals of (0,∞), so the series is entire in k, smooth in r>0, and termwise substitution gives the stated radial equation. Its leading coefficient is one, and the remaining series tends to zero as r↓0, uniformly on compact k-sets. For real k all coefficients and φl are real.

1.2F3givenalgebra

[A common tail and the correct complex-power modulus] Perform the construction on D:={Re⁡k>0,Im⁡k≥0}, then restrict to K. Fix a compact Q⊂D, and put m:=min⁡Q∣k∣>0, A:=max⁡Q∣a∣, B:=max⁡Q∣b∣, H:=2/m+2A/m2, and D:=BH. Choose r0≥max⁡(1,γ/(2m2),2A/m,2D). For s≥y≥r0, the exact modulus is ∣w(s)2w(y)−2∣=exp⁡[−2Im⁡k(s−y)](s/y)−2Im⁡a. Here −2Im⁡a=γIm⁡k/∣k∣2, and log⁡(s/y)≤(s−y)/y makes this modulus at most one. Write p(y)=k+a/y and d(y)=1/(−2ip(y)). Then ∣p∣≥m/2, ∣d∣≤1/m and ∣d′∣≤2A/(m2y2). Integration by parts on the finite interval gives w(s)2∫rsw(y)−2dy=d(s)−d(r)w(s)2w(r)−2−∫rsd′(y)w(s)2w(y)−2dy, whose modulus is at most H. Thus the actual kernel R(k;r,s):=bs−2w(s)2∫rsw(y)−2dy satisfies ∣R∣≤D/s2, uniformly for k∈Q and s≥r≥r0.

2.1step 1.2F4algebra

[Contraction and bounded-solution uniqueness] On the complete space Cb([r0,∞);C) define (Vkh)(r)=∫r∞R(k;r,s)h(s)ds. The kernel estimate gives ∥Vk∥≤D/r0≤1/2; continuity follows by splitting the integral at a finite upper limit and using the uniformly small s−2 tail. Therefore v=∑n≥0Vkn1 is the unique fixed point of h↦1+Vkh, and ∥v∥∞≤2, ∣v(r)−1∣≤2D/r. Any bounded function for which the integral equation holds is continuous by the same kernel estimate and hence equals this fixed point. Constructions on different common tails agree on their overlap by uniqueness. This proves bounded-solution uniqueness on the chosen tail and the uniform O(r−1) estimate.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1F3algebra

[Differentiate the genuine double integral] In the integral equation the lower-limit term vanishes because R(k;r,r)=0, whereas ∂rR=−bs−2w(s)2w(r)−2. The ratio bound in step 1.2 dominates this derivative times v(s) by 2B/s2 on each compact r-interval in the tail. Truncated-integral differentiation followed by uniform convergence therefore gives v′(r)=−bw(r)−2I(r), where I(r):=∫r∞w(s)2v(s)s−2ds; this is a derivative identity, not a replacement of the original fixed-point equation by v=1+bI. The integral for I is absolutely convergent: for real k, ∣w∣=1, and for Im⁡k>0, ∣w(s)∣=e−Im⁡kss−Im⁡a decays exponentially times a power. Hence I′=−w(r)2v(r)/r2 and v′′=−2i(k+a/r)v′+bv/r2. The ratio estimate gives ∣v′∣≤2B/r, uniformly on Q. Using w′′=−[(k+a/r)2+ia/r2]w and 2ka=γ, the product rule for f=wv gives f′′=[−k2−γ/r+l(l+1)/r2]f. Consequently f=w[1+O(r−1)] and f′=w[ik+O(r−1)], with the factor w retained and all errors uniform on Q.

4.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1F3F4F7algebra

[Continuity and holomorphy on the common tail] Each Picard iterate is jointly continuous in (k,r) on Q×[r0,∞): on compact r-intervals the finite-integral kernel is continuous, and the D/s2 majorant makes the improper tail uniformly small. Induction on iterates followed by the uniform geometric bound ∥Vkn1∥∞≤2−n proves joint continuity of v; the derivative formula, dominated by 2B/s2, also proves joint continuity of v′. On each triangle in {Re⁡k>0,Im⁡k>0} with a compact neighborhood, the finite-integral kernel is holomorphic because 1/k and the complex exponential are holomorphic. If an iterate is holomorphic, interchange its s-integral with the triangle contour integral using the uniform s−2 bound; the contour integral vanishes, so Morera proves that the next iterate is holomorphic. Uniform convergence and [F7] prove holomorphy of v. Apply the same contour argument to v′=−∫r∞bs−2w(s)2w(r)−2v(s)ds to prove holomorphy of its initial data. Thus f,f′ are continuous to real k and holomorphic in the open first quadrant. The construction on D also supplies an open complex neighborhood for points with Re⁡k=kmin⁡ and Im⁡k>0, which makes the asserted holomorphy at that boundary precise.

4.2step 2.1step 3.1F3algebra

[First integration by parts improves the derivative] Fix real k>0 and write Q(r)=2iθ′(r)=2i(k+a/r) and h(r)=v(r)/r2. Since θ′≥k, Q−1 is bounded and its first two derivatives are O(r−2) and O(r−3). Initially v=O(1) and v′=O(r−1), so h=O(r−2), h′=O(r−3) and (h/Q)′=O(r−3). Integration by parts, whose boundary term vanishes at infinity, gives I(r)=−e2iθ(r)h(r)/Q(r)−∫r∞e2iθ(s)(h/Q)′(s)ds=O(r−2). The exact derivative identity then gives v′=O(r−2); the ODE from step 3.1 gives v′′=O(r−2).

5.1step 3.1step 4.1F1F3F7algebra

[Extend to every positive radius] Fix ε>0 smaller than the common r0. The regular-IVP result gives a unique extension of f from (f(r0),f′(r0)) across [ε,r0]. To establish complex parameter dependence rather than invoking that supplier's real-parameter differentiability clause, write Y=(f,f′)T and Y′=M(k,r)Y, with M=(01l(l+1)/r2−γ/r−k20). Its initial-value integral series on [ε,r0] has nth term bounded by C0[CM(r0−ε)]n/n!, uniformly on compact k-sets, since the nfold ordered integration simplex has volume at most (r0−ε)n/n!. Each term is continuous to real k and holomorphic in the open first quadrant by finite contour integration. Thus the sum has both properties by [F7], agrees with the unique IVP solution, and supplies the asserted parameter properties for every r>0. Set v=f/w on the extension; w never vanishes, so the same properties hold for v. Patching overlapping tails and intervals is unambiguous by IVP uniqueness. For fixed nonreal k∈D, f,f′ have the stated exponential-times-power decay.

5.2step 4.2step 2.1step 3.1F3algebra

[Second integration gives the amplitude coefficient] Now h′′=v′′/r2−4v′/r3+6v/r4=O(r−4). Put j=(h/Q)′. Then j=O(r−3), j′=O(r−4) and (j/Q)′=O(r−4). A second integration by parts gives ∫r∞e2iθj=−e2iθ(r)j(r)/Q(r)−∫r∞e2iθ(j/Q)′=O(r−3). Therefore I(r)=−e2iθ(r)v(r)/(2iθ′(r)r2)+O(r−3), v′=bv/(2iθ′r2)+O(r−3)=b/(2ikr2)+O(r−3), and integration to the known limit v(∞)=1 gives v=1−b/(2ikr)+O(r−2). Since −b/(2ik)=−a/(2k)+i[a2+l(l+1)]/(2k) and ∣w∣=1, the coefficient is ∣f∣2=∣v∣2=1−a/(kr)+O(r−2). These estimates are uniform when real k is restricted to a compact subset of (0,∞), because all preceding constants and the lower bound for θ′ can be chosen uniformly.

6.1step 1.1step 3.1step 5.1F1F2algebra

[Real-energy Wronskians] Any real k>0 belongs to the public domain D of the single patched family fl. By the asymptotic formulas, W(f‾,f)=2i(k+a/r)∣v∣2+2iIm⁡(v‾v′)=2ik+O(r−1). It is constant by [F2], hence equals 2ik. The pair f,f‾ is therefore a basis of the two-dimensional solution space. If W(φl,f)=0, their initial data are proportional at any positive radius, hence IVP uniqueness implies f=cφl; neither solution is identically zero, by their normalizations. Since φl is real, proportionality forces W(f‾,f)=0, a contradiction. Thus Wl(k)≠0, every solution is Af+Bf‾, and the nonzero φl has such a representation with coefficients not both zero.

7.1step 6.1step 5.2F3F6algebra

[The mixed term has a bounded integral] For fixed R>r0, integration by parts gives ∫RLf2=[e2iθv2/Q]RL−∫RLe2iθ(v2/Q)′. The endpoint term is uniformly bounded and (v2/Q)′=2vv′/Q+v2(Q−1)′=O(r−2) is integrable, hence the whole integral is bounded independently of L. Expanding ∣Af+Bf‾∣2=(∣A∣2+∣B∣2)∣f∣2+2Re⁡(AB‾f2) and integrating step 5.2 yields ∫RL∣Af+Bf‾∣2=(∣A∣2+∣B∣2)[L−R−(a/k)log⁡(L/R)]+O(1), with a/k=γ/(2k2). If at least one coefficient is nonzero the integral diverges, since its linear term dominates the logarithm; if both vanish it is zero. Every positive-energy eigenfunction in D(Al) is an L2 classical solution by [F6], hence step 6.1 and this divergence exclude such an eigenfunction.

8.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1step 4.2step 5.2step 7.1given∎

[Conclusion and choice accounting] Steps 1.1; 1.2, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1 and 5.1; 6.1; and 4.2, 5.2 and 7.1 prove (a), (b), (c), and (d), respectively, for precisely the stated radial operator and parameter range. The explicit regular series, prescribed Picard iteration and unique IVP patching require no new arbitrary choice of solutions. The public Countable Choice assumption is retained for the invoked IVP and Hilbert-space suppliers; the public Axiom of Choice assumption is retained for the existing transported radial-operator supplier contract. No reduction of that supplier's choice hypothesis is inferred from this local argument.

Remarks

Cauchy-Schwarz in the forms ∣∫fg‾∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2 and the finite-dimensional estimate on C2 (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2, Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨u,v⟩∣≤∥u∥∥v∥, with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Coulomb continuum spectral density

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ≥0, l≥0, let Al be the radial operator of Transported radial endpoint realization with spectral measure EAl, and for k>0 let φl(k,⋅) and fl(k,⋅) be the solutions of Coulomb Jost Volterra solution, with Wl(k):=W(φl(k,⋅),fl(k,⋅))≠0. Write ρl(E):=Eπ ∣Wl(E)∣2(E>0).

For g∈L2(0,∞) write μg(B):=⟨EAl(B)g,g⟩ for its finite positive scalar spectral measure, where B⊆R is Borel (Projection valued measure, Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form)). A finite positive Borel measure μ is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure dE if μ(N)=0 for every Borel set N of Lebesgue measure zero; it is singular continuous if it is carried by a Borel Lebesgue-null set and has no atoms, meaning μ({E})=0 for every E∈R. Define the absolutely continuous subspace Hac(Al):={g∈L2(0,∞):μg is absolutely continuous with respect to dE}. It is a closed linear subspace because it equals ⋂N: ∣N∣=0ker⁡EAl(N), where the intersection is over Borel Lebesgue-null sets and μg(N)=∥EAl(N)g∥2. For I=(0,∞), put Hsc(Al;I):={g∈EAl(I)L2(0,∞):μg is singular continuous}. The set Hsc(Al;I) is a closed linear subspace: linear combinations of such vectors have scalar measures supported on the union of their null carriers and have no atoms, and these two properties pass to limits of vectors by continuity of the PVM projections. Here EAl(I)L2 is purely absolutely continuous when it is contained in Hac(Al), and “Al has no singular-continuous spectrum on I” means Hsc(Al;I)={0}. Thus each operator spectral-type phrase in (d) is a statement about the scalar PVM measures, not an additional pointwise classification of energies.

Then:

(a) resolvent kernel. For z=k2 with Im⁡k>0 and k in the domain of the Jost construction, and for every g∈L2(0,∞) with compact support, the resolvent is given by ((Al−z)−1g)(r)=∫0∞Gl(r,s)g(s) ds,Gl(r,s):=−φl(k,min⁡(r,s)) fl(k,max⁡(r,s))Wl(k), and Gl solves (Al−z)Gl=δ in the sense that −G′′+(l(l+1)/r2−γ/r)G−zG=0 away from r=s and the derivative of G has the jump −1 at r=s; moreover ∥(Al−z)−1∥≤1/∣Im⁡z∣;

(b) boundary value. For real k>0 one has φl(k,⋅) real and, for all r,s>0, Im⁡Gl(k2+i0;r,s)=k φl(k,r)φl(k,s)∣Wl(k)∣2;

(c) spectral density. For every g∈L2(0,∞) and every 0<a<b, ⟨EAl((a,b))g,g⟩=lim⁡ε↓01π∫abIm⁡⟨(Al−E−iε)−1g,g⟩dE, and if g has compact support then ⟨EAl((a,b))g,g⟩=∫abρl(E)∣∫0∞φl(E,r)g(r) dr∣2dE; consequently for compactly supported g the measure EAl,g(B):=⟨EAl(B)g,g⟩ restricted to (0,∞) is absolutely continuous with density ρl(E)∣∫φlg∣2;

(d) absolutely continuous spectrum; no zero eigenvalue. For every g∈L2(0,∞) the measure EAl,g has no atom in (0,∞); the positive spectral subspace EAl((0,∞))L2(0,∞) is purely absolutely continuous and is the closed span of the positive spectral projections of compactly supported functions; it equals the absolutely continuous subspace of Al, and Al has no singular continuous spectrum on (0,∞); moreover 0 is not an eigenvalue of Al.

No scattering phase, normalization of the continuum functions as a unitary transform, or physical cross-section is asserted; the transform itself is the subject of the companion item Onto radial continuum transform.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the current AC+CC contract, γ≥0, l≥0, ql(r)=l(l+1)/r2−γ/r, the radial form realization Al, φl/rl+1→1, fl with the stated Coulomb logarithmic phase, W(u,v)=uv′−u′v, and ⟨u,v⟩=∫uv‾ (linear in the first slot). Compact support means containment in a compact subset of the open half-line.

[F1]

The endpoint realization supplies Vl=H01(0,∞) with equivalent norm, u/r∈L2 for u∈Vl, the continuous closed form al, and the exact operator-domain criterion: u∈D(Al) if and only if u∈Vl and al(u,v)=⟨h,v⟩ for every v∈Vl and some h∈L2. It also supplies self-adjointness and UCU∗=⨁Al (Transported radial endpoint realization). The nonreal resolvent bound is Resolvent of a self-adjoint operator: nonreal resolvents and the estimate.

[F2]

The regular series and its derivatives converge uniformly on compact parameter and radial sets and have φl=rl+1(1+O(r)), φl′=O(rl) at zero. The Jost solution and its radial derivative are jointly continuous up to the real positive k axis and decay exponentially times a power when Im⁡k>0 in its first-quadrant construction domain. For real k>0, φl is real, W(f‾l,fl)=2ik, and Wl(k)≠0 (Coulomb Jost Volterra solution, especially its actual compact-parameter Volterra/IVP proof).

[F3]

The self-adjoint spectral theorem gives the finite positive scalar measure μg(B)=∥EAl(B)g∥2, total mass ∥g∥2, and ⟨(Al−z)−1g,g⟩=∫(λ−z)−1dμg(λ). The projection at λ is the projection onto ker⁡(Al−λ) (Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form), Unbounded Borel functional calculus: domains, products, spectral mapping, Projection valued measure).

[F4]

Cauchy–Schwarz, Fubini, dominated convergence, and continuity from below for finite measures are used in their scalar forms (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2, Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability, Dominated convergence). No Stone interval formula, positive-energy absence of atoms, or onto continuum transform is an input.

[F5]

The form-core identity ∥u′−u/r∥2=∥u′∥2 and Hardy inequality ∥u/r∥2≤2∥u′∥2 extend to Vl. Young's inequality yields al(u,u)≥12∥u′∥22+l(l+1)∥u/r∥22−2γ2∥u∥22. This bound is uniform over l≥0 and follows from [F1]; no essential-spectrum theorem or negative bound-energy exhaustion is assumed below.

Proof

1.1F1F2F4givenalgebra

[Endpoint and form membership] Fix z=k2 with Im⁡k>0 in the Jost construction domain; its positive real part makes z nonreal. A function agreeing with a constant multiple of φl near zero and a constant multiple of fl near infinity and lying in H2 on intervening compact intervals has u,u′,u/r∈L2 and trace zero at zero by [F2]. It belongs to Vl: a cutoff vanishing below δ and equal to one above 2δ adds derivative squared norm at most C∫02δ∣u∣2/r2→0; a cutoff at infinity adds derivative squared norm at most CR−2∫R2R∣u∣2→0. The tails of all other norm terms vanish by integrability, and the resulting compact H1 functions can be smoothed within the open half-line. This verifies actual form membership including l=0 and γ=0.

1.2F1F3F4givenalgebra

[Radial form proof of zero exclusion] Define Ssu(r)=es/2u(esr) for real s. Change of variables gives unitarity on L2, preservation of Vl, and on the smooth form core the exact identity al(Ssu,v)=e2sal(u,S−sv)+γ(e2s−es)⟨Ss(u/r),v⟩. Kinetic and angular terms scale by e2s and the Coulomb term by es. Continuity extends the identity to all u,v∈Vl, since u/r∈L2. If u∈D(Al) and Alu=0, the form criterion gives Ssu∈D(Al) and AlSsu=γ(e2s−es)Ss(u/r). Self-adjointness yields 0=⟨AlSsu,u⟩=γ(e2s−es)⟨Ss(u/r),u⟩. For γ>0 and s≠0 divide by the nonzero coefficient. Strong continuity Ssh→h follows first for compact continuous h by dominated convergence and then by density and unitarity for all h∈L2. Letting s→0 gives ∫∣u∣2/r=0, hence u=0. For γ=0, 0=⟨Alu,u⟩=∥u′−u/r∥22+l(l+1)∥u/r∥22; the identity ∥u′−u/r∥2=∥u′∥2 extends from the form core to Vl, so u′=0 and its L2 constant representative is zero. No unbounded dilation generator is differentiated.

1.3F1F4F5givenalgebra

[Compact weighted form embedding] The map K:Vl→L2(0,∞), Ku=u/r, is compact on bounded H01 sets. To prove this directly, for ∥u∥2,∥u′∥2≤C use ∫0δ∣u∣2/r≤δ∥u/r∥22≤4δC2 and ∫R∞∣u∣2/r≤C2/R. On [δ,R], partition into finitely many equal cells of length at most h and replace u by its average on each cell. The absolute continuity formula and Cauchy–Schwarz give ∫I∣u−uI∣2≤h2∫I∣u′∣2 on each cell I, so multiplication by 1/r gives total middle error at most h2C2/δ. The resulting functions lie in a fixed finite-dimensional span of cell indicators divided by r, with bounded coefficients. Choosing δ,R,h makes the error arbitrarily small, so the image has finite nets of every radius and is relatively compact in complete L2. This explicit finite-rank approximation works for real l≥0 as well as the angular integer labels.

2.1step 1.1F1F2algebra

[Nonreal Wronskian] If Wl(k)=0, regular-IVP uniqueness makes φl and fl proportional, giving a nonzero common solution u. Step 1.1 puts u in Vl. Integration by parts against compact smooth v gives al(u,v)=z⟨u,v⟩, since the derivative form equals ∫u′v′‾ by cancellation of the derivative of uv‾/r. Form continuity extends this to every v∈Vl. The exact criterion [F1] gives u∈D(Al) and Alu=zu, contradicting self-adjointness. Thus the nonreal Wronskian is nonzero.

2.2step 1.3F1F3F5algebra

[Finite negative spectral bands] Assume γ>0, put M=2γ2+1, and fix ε>0. The range Hε=EAl([−M,−ε])L2 lies in D(Al) by bounded energy support; for u∈Hε the PVM gives al(u,u)≤−ε∥u∥2. The lower bound [F5] gives ∥u′∥22≤4γ2∥u∥22, so the unit ball of Hε is H01-bounded. If this spectral range were infinite-dimensional, AC allows choosing an orthonormal sequence uj in it (successively choose a unit vector orthogonal to the preceding finite span). For v=uj−ui, nonnegativity of the kinetic and angular terms and the negative-band bound give γ∥Kv∥22≥ε∥v∥22=2ε. Thus the images Kuj are separated by a fixed positive distance, contradicting the finite nets in step 1.3. Hence every negative band has finite-dimensional spectral range. This orthonormal-sequence selection uses the retained AC assumption; the proof does not claim a CC-only recursive choice argument.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F2F4algebra

[Green sign, derivative jump and actual inverse] Write φ=φl(k,⋅), f=fl(k,⋅), W=Wl(k). For g supported in [r1,r2]⊂(0,∞) let I(r)=∫0rφ(s)g(s)ds, J(r)=∫r∞f(s)g(s)ds, and u=−(fI+φJ)/W. The integrals are absolutely continuous; cross terms cancel in u′=−(f′I+φ′J)/W, and u′′=−(f′′I+φ′′J)/W−g. Therefore −u′′+(ql−z)u=g almost everywhere. Below r1 and above r2, u is respectively a constant multiple of φ and of f, so step 1.1 gives u∈Vl. Integration by parts against compact tests and form continuity give al(u,v)=⟨zu+g,v⟩ for every v∈Vl. Thus u∈D(Al) and u=(Al−z)−1g. The kernel G=−φ(r<)f(r>)/W is continuous and its derivative jump is −[φ(s)f′(s)−φ′(s)f(s)]/W=−1, giving (Ll−z)G=δs distributionally. The stated inverse norm estimate is [F1].

3.2step 2.2F1F3F5algebra

[Negative scalar measures are countably atomic] Each band projection in step 2.2 has finite rank N. Choose a finite orthonormal basis e1,…,eN for its range and define ν=∑jμej, supported in the band. Its support has at most N points: otherwise N+1 distinct support points admit disjoint open neighborhoods of positive ν mass, hence N+1 nonzero mutually orthogonal spectral projection ranges inside this N-dimensional space. The complement of this support is the union of the rational open intervals of zero ν mass, so it has zero ν mass by countable subadditivity. Every scalar measure of a vector in the band is likewise supported on this finite set, since ν(B)=0 makes E(B) annihilate the basis and hence the entire band range. Exhausting negative energies by [−M,−1/n] shows every radial negative scalar measure is supported on one countable union of finite sets. The lower bound [F5] excludes energies below −M. For γ=0, the form is nonnegative and the negative projection is zero. This proves the negative pure-point fact locally for the whole stated real l≥0 range.

4.1step 3.1F2F4algebra

[Boundary algebra for complex sources] For real k>0, Im⁡(f‾W)=φIm⁡(f‾f′)=kφ. Since −f/W=−fW‾/∣W∣2, conjugating f‾W gives Im⁡(−f/W)=kφ/∣W∣2, proving (b). For a complex source the kernel symmetry G(r,s)=G(s,r) matters: the adjoint kernel on the compact support is G(s,r)‾=G(r,s)‾, so (R−R∗)/(2i) has kernel Im⁡G. Consequently Fubini gives Im⁡⟨R(k2+i0)g,g⟩=k∣∫φl(k,r)g(r)dr∣2/∣Wl(k)∣2. This does not incorrectly distribute imaginary parts across complex source products.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1F2F4algebra

[Uniform compact-source limit] Fix 0<a<b and compact source support J⊂(0,∞). Choose kmin⁡<a. The set of first-quadrant roots {E+iε:E∈[a,b],0≤ε≤ε0} is compact inside the Jost parameter domain. The jointly continuous φ,f,φ′,f′ give continuous W computed at any fixed radial point. Its real-axis modulus has a positive minimum on [a,b], hence a common positive lower bound for sufficiently small ε0. Uniform continuity therefore gives uniform convergence of G(E+iε;r,s) to its boundary value for E∈[a,b] and r,s∈J. Since ∥g∥1≤∣J∣1/2∥g∥2, the paired error is at most the supremum kernel error times ∥g∥12. Pairings converge uniformly and step 4.1 gives their imaginary parts. No global limiting-absorption norm is assumed.

6.1step 5.1F3F4algebra

[Poisson approximation from the PVM] For continuous h compactly supported in (0,∞), extended by zero to R, [F3] and Fubini give π−1∫h(E)Im⁡⟨(Al−E−iε)−1g,g⟩dE=∫(Pε∗h)(λ)dμg(λ), where Pε(t)=ε/[π(t2+ε2)]. Absolute integrability follows from ∫Pε=1 and finite mass ∥g∥2. Uniform continuity bounds ∣h(x−t)−h(x)∣ by any prescribed η>0 for ∣t∣≤δ; the remainder is at most 2∥h∥∞∫∣t∣>δPε≤4∥h∥∞ε/(πδ). Hence Pε∗h→h uniformly. For compact-source g, step 5.1 computes the other limit, yielding ∫h dμg=∫0∞h(E)dg(E)dE, with continuous nonnegative dg(E)=ρl(E)∣∫φl(E,r)g(r)dr∣2.

7.1step 6.1F3F4algebra

[Borel density without a regularity prerequisite] For 0<a<b, continuous hn(E)=min⁡(1,n(E−a)+,n(b−E)+) increase to 1(a,b) and vanish outside [a,b]. Step 6.1 and dominated convergence give μg((a,b))=∫abdg(E)dE. Every positive singleton has zero mass by shrinking intervals around it and local boundedness of dg. On a fixed compact interval [c,d]⊂(0,∞), the two finite measures agree on all subintervals, including endpoints. Agreement on every relative Borel set follows by the elementary measure uniqueness argument: agreement sets form a Dynkin class (equal total mass, relative complements, disjoint countable unions), and intervals form an intersection-stable generator. For completeness, let D be the smallest Dynkin class containing these intervals and the full compact interval; for a fixed generating interval I, the sets B with I∩B∈D form a Dynkin class containing the generators, hence contain D. Repeating this with any fixed B∈D shows that D is closed under intersections of its members. A Dynkin class closed under intersections is a sigma algebra by disjointifying countable unions, so it contains the generated Borel sigma algebra. Exhaustion by [1/n,n] proves equality on every positive Borel set. The same exhaustion bounds the total density integral by ∥g∥2. This proves density before either Stone's interval formula or an onto transform, without a separate finite-measure regularity assumption.

8.1step 7.1F3F4algebra

[Arbitrary vectors] For arbitrary g∈L2, take explicit gn=1[1/n,n]g→g. Projection contraction gives ∣μg(B)−μgn(B)∣≤(∥g∥+∥gn∥)∥g−gn∥ uniformly over Borel B. Every positive Lebesgue-null Borel set has zero μgn mass by step 7.1 and hence zero μg mass. Thus every scalar spectral measure restricted to (0,∞) is absolutely continuous and every positive atom vanishes. These explicit cutoffs require no additional choice.

9.1step 8.1step 7.1F3F4algebra

[Exact interval Stone formula] PVM representation and Fubini give π−1∫abIm⁡⟨(Al−E−iε)−1g,g⟩dE=∫Fε(λ)dμg(λ), with Fε(λ)=π−1[arctan⁡((b−λ)/ε)−arctan⁡((a−λ)/ε)]. It lies in [0,1] and tends to 1(a,b)+121{a,b}. Dominated convergence and the already proved zero endpoint atoms yield the exact interval formula for every g. Step 7.1 gives its compact-source density integral.

9.2step 8.1F3algebra

[Positive subspace] Put P+=EAl((0,∞)). If g=P+g, its entire scalar measure is positive-energy supported and absolutely continuous by step 8.1. Thus this subspace has neither pure-point nor singular-continuous part. Also P+gn→P+g, so positive spectral projections of compact-source vectors span it densely. This permits unprojected compact-source vectors to have negative-energy components.

10.1step 3.1step 4.1step 7.1step 9.1step 9.2step 1.2step 3.2F3∎

[Full AC subspace and conclusion] An absolutely continuous scalar measure gives zero mass to the countable negative support from step 3.2 and to {0}. Hence its vector lies in P+L2. Step 9.2 proves the reverse inclusion, so the full absolutely continuous subspace equals the positive spectral subspace, establishing corrected clause (d), whose zero exclusion is step 1.2. Clauses (a), (b), (c) follow from the Green inverse, boundary algebra, and PVM Poisson arguments above. The regular normalization and density E/(π∣Wl(E)∣2) are unchanged, and neither the onto transform nor any angular transport at noninteger l was assumed.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Onto radial continuum transform

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ≥0, l≥0, let Al be the radial operator of Transported radial endpoint realization with spectral measure EAl and form domain Vl, and for E>0 let φl(E,⋅) and ρl(E)=Eπ∣Wl(E)∣2 be as in Coulomb continuum spectral density. Define, for g in the dense subspace Cc of compactly supported square-integrable functions, (Tlg)(E):=ρl(E)∫0∞φl(E,r)g(r) dr(E>0). Then:

(a) Tlg∈L2((0,∞),dE) and ∥Tlg∥2=⟨EAl((0,∞))g,g⟩; consequently Tl extends uniquely to a linear contraction T:H→L2((0,∞),dE), where H:=L2((0,∞),dr) and P+:=EAl((0,∞)), with ∥Tg∥=∥P+g∥ for every g∈H. Its restriction is a linear isometry T^l:EAl((0,∞))L2(0,∞)⟶L2((0,∞),dE) of the positive spectral subspace of Al into L2((0,∞),dE), satisfying T=T^lP+ and Tlg=T^l(P+g) for g∈Cc. Equivalently, P+g↦Tlg is a well-defined isometry on the dense projected core P+Cc⊆P+H and T^l is its unique isometric extension;

(b) T^l is onto, hence unitary; equivalently the range of T^l is all of L2((0,∞),dE) and the adjoint T^l∗ is an isometry inverse to T^l;

(c) T^lAlT^l∗ is multiplication by the independent variable on the domain {h∈L2((0,∞),dE):∫E2∣h(E)∣2dE<∞}, and T^lh(Al)T^l∗ is multiplication by h for every bounded Borel function h;

(d) complete Coulomb spectral resolution. If γ>0, the operator C=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ on H2(R3;C) is unitarily equivalent to the diagonal operator ⨁(l,m)[(⨁n≥l+1C)⊕L2((0,∞),dE)] with the constant −γ2/(4n2) on the (n,l,m)-copy of C and multiplication by E on each continuum copy; equivalently there is a unitary V from L2(R3;C) onto the displayed direct sum with VCV∗ equal to that diagonal operator, and the negative part of the spectrum is exhausted by the bound states of Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy while the positive part is purely absolutely continuous. If γ=0, the representation is ⨁(l,m)L2((0,∞),dE) with multiplication by E and no discrete copies, because the free Fourier multiplier has no nonpositive spectral projection.

The transform is a mathematical spectral representation of Al and C; no scattering amplitude, phase shift or physical interpretation is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: γ≥0, l≥0, the operator Al, its spectral measure EAl, the density ρl, the solutions φl, and the unitary U of Angular radial unitary reduction.

[F1]

For compactly supported g,h and every 0<a<b: ⟨EAl((a,b))g,h⟩=∫abρl(E)(∫φl(E,r)g(r)dr)(∫φl(E,r)h(r)dr)‾dE; the measures have no atoms in (0,∞), ρl(E)>0, and φl(E,⋅)≠0 in Lloc2 for every E>0 (Coulomb continuum spectral density, Coulomb Jost Volterra solution).

[F2]

Compactly supported functions are dense in L2(0,∞), and a bounded linear isometry defined on a dense subspace extends uniquely to the closure with the same norm (A bounded linear map from a dense normed subspace into a Banach space extends uniquely with the same norm, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Hilbert space).

[F3]

Under the retained public AC hypothesis, Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form) and Unbounded Borel functional calculus: domains, products, spectral mapping give the unique regular PVM, bounded Borel calculus, nonreal resolvent multiplier and exact operator-domain norm formula. Here H=L2((0,∞),dr), K=L2((0,∞),dE) and H+=P+H, P+=EAl((0,∞)). Projections on disjoint spectral sets are orthogonal, bounded Borel pairings integrate mixed measures, and the restricted A+=Al∣D(Al)∩H+ is self-adjoint with the exact restricted spectral domain: its nonreal resolvent is the restriction of the full multiplier resolvent, so both nonreal ranges are onto. The inner product is linear in the first argument. Resolvent of a self-adjoint operator: nonreal resolvents and the estimate supplies (A+−z)−1 with norm at most ∣Im⁡z∣−1. This is an honest AC-bearing prerequisite use, retaining the stated AC and CC hypotheses on the later source40 CC lemma.

[F4]

A projection on K commuting with all indicator multipliers is a scalar indicator multiplier, as proved locally in step 5.1. Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace supplies the required orthogonal projection under CC; dominated convergence and Cauchy-Schwarz are supplied by Dominated convergence and Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2.

[F5]

Fix the countable family gj of all finite rational-complex linear combinations of indicators 1(a,b), with 0<a<b<∞ rational. Each is a compact source, and on each (1/k,k), k≥2, the members supported there are dense in L2(1/k,k) by simple approximation and regularity. The regular solution is real for real k and has locally uniform parameter bounds, including φl(k,r)=rl+1[1+O(r)] near zero, by Coulomb Jost Volterra solution. Compact positive-energy intervals have bounded continuous ρl and bounded regular solutions on compact radial intervals. Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability justifies the compact double integrals below. The free Fourier multiplier and its zero-set property use Plancherel theorem and the transported endpoint realization.

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

[Projected norm identity on compact sources] For compactly supported g, [F1] with a↓0, b↑∞ (or the monotone convergence of the positive measures on the increasing intervals (1/k,k)) gives ∥Tlg∥L2((0,∞),dE)2=∫0∞ρl(E)∣∫φl(E,r)g(r)dr∣2dE=⟨EAl((0,∞))g,g⟩; the right side is finite because it is the mass of the finite measure EAl,g on (0,∞). This is the norm identity of (a) on the dense compact-source domain Cc.

2.1step 1.1F2F3algebra

[Extension through the positive projection] Step 1.1 gives ∥Tlg∥≤∥g∥ on compact sources, so extend Tl first to a contraction T on all L2. Passing to compact-source approximations yields ∥Tg∥2=⟨P+g,g⟩ for every g, where P+=EAl((0,∞)). Thus T(I−P+)=0 and T^=T∣P+H is an isometry, with T=T^P+. If P+g=P+h for compact sources, the norm identity gives Tl(g−h)=0, so the induced map P+g↦Tlg is well-defined and isometric. The projected core P+Cc is dense in P+H: project compact-source approximations to any vector in P+H and use ∥P+∥≤1. This proves the unique-extension and factorization assertions of (a). Its range is closed because Cauchy sequences in that range pull back to Cauchy sequences in the complete positive subspace. In particular compact-source images are dense in its range, without incorrectly calling Tl isometric on all compact sources.

3.1step 2.1F1F3F4algebra

[Compressed resolvents and the missing norm equality] Write W=T^:H+→K, M=ran⁡W and Q for the orthogonal projection onto this closed range. Define W∗=W−1Q: uniqueness of orthogonal decomposition gives directly ⟨Wu,v⟩=⟨u,W∗v⟩, W∗W=IH+ and WW∗=Q, without invoking another representation theorem. Polarize [F1] on compact sources; the mixed measures are finite, and equality on positive intervals extends to all positive Borel sets by the interval-generated finite-measure uniqueness argument. Integration of bounded simple functions and bounded approximation then gives ⟨MbTg,Th⟩=⟨b+(Al)g,h⟩, where b+ is b on the positive half-line and zero elsewhere. Boundedness extends this identity from compact sources to all g,h∈H. Thus W∗MbW=b(A+), initially only a compression. For z=x+iy, y≠0, put mz(E)=(E−z)−1 and Rz=(A+−z)−1. The identity gives QMmzWu=WRzu. Pointwise Im⁡mz=y∣mz∣2, so Im⁡⟨MmzWu,Wu⟩=y∥MmzWu∥2. Setting v=Rzu and u=(A+−z)v, self-adjointness and the linear-first convention give Im⁡⟨Rzu,u⟩=Im⁡⟨v,(A+−z)v⟩=y∥Rzu∥2. The compressed pairing identifies these imaginary parts. Dividing by the nonzero real y proves ∥MmzWu∥2=∥Rzu∥2=∥WRzu∥2=∥QMmzWu∥2. Pythagoras forces (I−Q)MmzWu=0. Apply this to both z and z‾, whose multipliers are adjoints: M and M⊥ reduce these multipliers, Q commutes with them, and MmzW=WRz. This is the required compression-to-reduction proof before any onto claim.

4.1step 3.1F4algebra

[Resolvent reduction implies indicator reduction] For 0<a<b and ε>0, define pε,a,b(E)=π−1∫abε/[(E−t)2+ε2]dt. Its multiplier commutes with Q: it is the operator-norm Riemann-integral limit of the imaginary parts of Mmt+iε, since ∥Mmt+iε−Mms+iε∥≤∣t−s∣/ε2. One has 0≤pε,a,b≤1, and these functions tend as ε=1/n↓0 to 1(a,b) except at the two Lebesgue-null endpoints. Dominated convergence against ∣h∣2 for each h∈K gives strong convergence of the multipliers, so Q commutes with M1(a,b). The Borel sets whose multipliers commute with Q form a sigma-algebra: complements use I−M1B, intersections use products, and disjoint countable unions use strongly convergent finite sums; disjointification gives arbitrary countable unions. Positive intervals generate the Borel sigma-algebra, so all Borel indicators commute with Q. Bounded simple approximation gives all bounded Borel multipliers; completed-measurable sets have the same multiplier as a Borel representative modulo null sets.

5.1step 4.1F4constructalgebra

[The reducing projection is a scalar indicator] Set q(E)=e−E>0 in K, ψ=Qq and a=ψ/q using measurable representatives. Commutation gives Q(bq)=bψ for bounded measurable b. For every measurable B, contractivity gives ∫B∣ψ∣2≤∫Bq2, hence ∣a∣≤1 a.e.; otherwise intersecting {∣a∣>1+1/n} with a bounded positive interval gives a contradiction to this inequality. Vectors bq are dense: for h∈K, hn=1{1/n<E<n, ∣h/q∣≤n}h have that form and converge in K by dominated convergence. Therefore Q=Ma on K. Self-adjointness and idempotence force a=a‾=a2 a.e., testing the multiplier identities on bounded-interval indicators. Thus Q=M1S for a measurable S, and M=L2(S).

6.1step 5.1F1F4F5algebra

[Countable compact tests eliminate the complement] For the explicit family gj of [F5], each Tlgj lies in M=L2(S) and vanishes a.e. on Sc. Remove the union of the countably many exceptional null sets. For every remaining E∈Sc, positivity of ρl(E) gives ∫φl(E,r)gj(r)dr=0 for every j. On each (1/k,k), k≥2, this is a continuous linear functional by Cauchy-Schwarz and local square integrability of φl. Its vanishing on the fixed dense family implies its vanishing on all of L2(1/k,k), including φl‾1(1/k,k). Hence ∫1/kk∣φl∣2=0. Exhausting (0,∞) contradicts the nonzero continuous regular solution of [F1]. The remaining part of Sc is therefore empty, so Sc is null, Q=IK, and W is unitary with isometric inverse W∗. Only countably many conull sets were intersected. This proves (b).

7.1step 3.1step 4.1step 6.1F3algebra

[Exact bounded and unbounded diagonalization] Steps 3.1, 4.1 and 6.1 give T^EAl(B)∣P+H=M1BT^ for every positive Borel set. Linear combinations and bounded pointwise simple approximation therefore give T^h(Al)∣P+HT^∗=Mh∣(0,∞) for every bounded Borel h. This uses the onto-ness of step 6.1 and does not incorrectly pair negative components through T. For unbounded energy, spectral truncation and the norm formula give ∫E2∣T^g(E)∣2dE=∫(0,∞)λ2dEg(λ), so the exact generator domain is {h:Eh∈L2(dE)} and T^Al∣P+HT^∗=ME there.

7.2step 2.1step 6.1F4F5algebra

[Inverse integral and exact scope of convergence] For h∈K put hn=1(1/n,n)h and vn(r)=∫1/nnρl(E)φl(E,r)h(E)dE. The compact parameter bounds of [F5] and Cauchy-Schwarz give vn∈Lloc2(0,∞). Fubini for compact-source g gives ⟨Tg,hn⟩=⟨g,vn⟩. Since T=WP+ and W∗hn∈H+, the left side also equals ⟨g,W∗hn⟩. All compact-source tests therefore identify vn locally a.e. with W∗hn, so vn represents a global L2 element of H+. Finally hn→h in K and W∗ is an isometry, giving W∗h=lim⁡n→∞vn in L2(dr). This explicitly realizes the inverse without asserting pointwise convergence at infinity. If compact source means bounded support that may approach zero, cutting it off below 1/n and using the regular rl+1 bound of [F5] extends all compact-energy integral identities by Cauchy-Schwarz and L2 continuity.

8.1step 7.1step 7.2F3F5givenalgebra

[Complete resolution of C] By the block identity of Transported radial endpoint realization and the angular unitary of Angular radial unitary reduction, C is unitarily equivalent to the direct sum over (l,m) of the operators Al, and by the previous items Al is unitarily equivalent to ME on L2((0,∞),dE) together with the discrete eigenvalues −γ2/(4n2), n≥l+1, each simple, whose eigenspaces are spanned by the transported regular solutions (Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy, Laguerre bound energy exhaustion); the essential spectrum is [0,∞) and the positive spectrum is purely absolutely continuous by Coulomb continuum spectral density. The absence of a zero eigenvector follows from Coulomb continuum spectral density. For γ>0, PVM transport from [F3] through the angular unitary and the exact block identity shows that the normalized global negative eigenfamily restricts to a complete radial negative family in each channel; otherwise placing a missing radial vector in one channel contradicts global completeness. Thus each radial unitary sends u to ((⟨u,unl/∥unl∥⟩)n≥l+1,WP+u), with inverse the L2 bound-family sum plus step 7.2. Assembling these unitaries in the fixed countable channel order gives the stated onto unitary V, since orthogonal norm sums give convergence and surjectivity. The exact block domain and step 7.1 identify its diagonal domain with square summability of all energy-multiplied discrete and continuum coordinates. For γ=0, use the transported free operator: its explicit Fourier multiplier ∣p∣2 has zero projection on (−∞,0], since {p=0} is null. PVM uniqueness and unitary transport in [F3] give ⨁l,mEAl((−∞,0])=0, so every individual nonpositive block projection is zero. Each free radial block is consequently wholly positive, and the same positive transforms assemble a continuum-only unitary. No zero-energy bound copies are introduced.

9.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1step 7.1step 7.2step 8.1∎

[Conclusion] Clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) are steps 1.1 and 2.1; 3.1 through 6.1; 7.1; and 8.1. Step 7.2 explicitly realizes the isometric adjoint inverse.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources