Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Coulomb essential spectrum

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ>0, let H0=−Δ with D(H0)=W2,2(R3;C) be the free operator of Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators, let M be the multiplier Mu=u/∣⋅∣ of Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound, and let C:=H0−γM,D(C)=W2,2(R3;C), be the self-adjoint operator of Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound (c). Write σd, σess, E for the discrete spectrum, essential spectrum and spectral projection valued measure of Discrete and essential spectrum of a self-adjoint operator and Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form). Then:

(a) C is bounded below and σess(C)=[0,+∞);

(b) every point of σ(C)∩(−∞,0) lies in σd(C): it is an eigenvalue of C of finite multiplicity isolated in σ(C), and the set of such eigenvalues is at most countable;

(c) the negative spectral subspace E((−∞,0))L2(R3;C) is the closed linear span of the eigenspaces of C for its negative eigenvalues.

No claim is made about the multiplicity or the number of the negative eigenvalues, about the nonnegative part of the spectrum beyond σess(C)=[0,∞), or about any physical interpretation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the operators H0, M, C; a nonreal number is used only inside the proof; γ>0.

[F1]

H0=F2∗M4π2∣ξ∣2F2 is self-adjoint with D(H0)=W2,2(R3;C) and H0≥0; for u∈D(H0) one has F2(H0u)(ξ)=4π2∣ξ∣2F2u(ξ) a.e. (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators, Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers).

[F2]

C=H0−γM is self-adjoint on D(C)=D(H0) and bounded below; M is H0-bounded with bound zero and MR0(z) is compact for every nonreal z, where R0(z)=(z−H0)−1 (Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound, Coulomb relative compactness, Relative compactness with respect to an operator, Resolvent of a self-adjoint operator: nonreal resolvents and the estimate).

[F3]

Weyl's theorem: if A,C are self-adjoint and RA(z)−RC(z) is compact for one nonreal z, then σess(A)=σess(C) (Weyl's theorem: invariance of the essential spectrum).

[F4]

For a self-adjoint operator A with PVM E: λ∈σess(A) if and only if rank⁡E((λ−ε,λ+ε))=∞ for every ε>0; for every Borel set B and vector f the scalar set function Ef(B):=⟨E(B)f,f⟩ is a finite positive measure of mass ∥f∥2; and E({λ}) is the orthogonal projection onto ker⁡(A−λ) (Discrete and essential spectrum of a self-adjoint operator, Projection valued measure, Unbounded Borel functional calculus: domains, products, spectral mapping).

[F5]

If T is compact and B is bounded, then BT and TB are compact (Compositions with a compact operator are compact, Compact linear operator).

[F6]

Normalized indicator functions of pairwise disjoint measurable sets of finite positive measure form an orthonormal family; a nonempty open ball in R3 has positive measure and contains infinitely many pairwise disjoint nonempty open balls (Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

Proof

1.1F1F4F6algebra

[Essential spectrum of the free operator] Fix λ≥0 and ε>0 and put Sε:={ξ∈R3:4π2∣ξ∣2∈(λ−ε,λ+ε)}. If λ>0 choose ξ0 with 4π2∣ξ0∣2=λ; continuity of ξ↦4π2∣ξ∣2 gives a nonempty open ball around ξ0 contained in Sε. If λ=0 take the ball {∣ξ∣<ε/(2π)}. In either case Sε contains a nonempty open ball, hence by [F6] contains infinitely many pairwise disjoint nonempty open balls and has infinite-dimensional L2 space; by [F1] the projection EH0((λ−ε,λ+ε))=F2∗M1SεF2 has range F2∗M1SεL2, which is infinite dimensional. By [F4] applied to H0 we get λ∈σess(H0). Conversely, if λ<0 and 0<ε<∣λ∣, then (λ−ε,λ+ε)∩[0,∞)=∅, so Sε=∅ and EH0((λ−ε,λ+ε))=0; since the projection vanishes on an open interval around λ, [F4] shows λ∉σ(H0). Hence σess(H0)=[0,∞).

2.1step 1.1F2F5algebra

[The resolvent difference is compact] Fix a nonreal z and use the convention RA(z)=(z−A)−1 of Resolvent and spectrum of an unbounded operator. Both resolvents are bounded by [F2] and have range D(C)=D(H0). For f∈L2 put g=RH0(z)f; then (z−H0)g=f and (z−C)g=f+γMg. Applying RC(z) gives g=RC(z)f+γRC(z)Mg, hence RC(z)−RH0(z)=−γRC(z)MRH0(z). The factor MRH0(z) is compact by [F2] (changing the sign of the free resolvent preserves compactness), and RC(z) is bounded; therefore this difference is compact by [F5].

3.1step 2.1step 1.1F2F3

[Weyl's theorem and the essential spectrum] By step 2.1 the resolvent difference of C and H0 is compact at every nonreal z, so [F3] gives σess(C)=σess(H0)=[0,∞) by step 1.1. The boundedness below of C is [F2]. This is (a).

4.1step 3.1F4algebra

[Negative spectrum is discrete] The spectrum of the self-adjoint operator C is the disjoint union of σd(C) and σess(C)=[0,∞) by [F4]; hence every λ∈σ(C)∩(−∞,0) lies in σd(C), which by definition means that λ is an eigenvalue of C, is isolated in σ(C) and has finite-dimensional eigenspace. Each such λ admits a rational open interval (p,q) containing λ whose intersection with the spectrum is exactly {λ}. Fix an enumeration of {(p,q)∈Q2:p<q} and assign to λ its least eligible pair. Two different spectral points cannot receive the same pair, because that interval has exactly one spectral point. This is an injection into a countable set, so the negative eigenvalue set is at most countable; no arbitrary choices of overlapping right endpoints are used. This is (b).

5.1step 4.1F4algebra∎

[Completeness of the negative eigenspaces] Let S be the closed linear span of the eigenspaces of C for negative eigenvalues and let P−:=E((−∞,0)). Every eigenvector of C with negative eigenvalue λ satisfies E({λ})u=u by [F4], hence lies in P−L2 because {λ}⊆(−∞,0); therefore S⊆P−L2. For the reverse inclusion let f∈P−L2 be orthogonal to S and put μ:=Ef. Since f=P−f and Ef(B)=∥E(B)f∥2, the measure μ is concentrated on (−∞,0), i.e. μ(R)=μ((−∞,0)), and by step 4.1 the set {λ1,λ2,… }=σ(C)∩(−∞,0) is at most countable and consists of eigenvalues. By [F4] the support of μ is contained in σ(C): if B∩σ(C)=∅ then E(B)=0. Hence μ(R)=μ({λn})=∑nμ({λn})=∑n∥E({λn})f∥2, and each term vanishes because E({λn})f is an eigenvector with negative eigenvalue and f⊥S. Therefore μ=0, so ∥f∥2=0 and f=0; thus P−L2⊆S and (c) holds.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources