How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (), The Axiom of Choice), let and work on the complex Hilbert space , whose completeness follows from Riesz-Fischer completeness of for and whose Hilbert-space structure is defined in Hilbert space.
(a) For a real measurable finite-valued function define on . Then is a densely defined self-adjoint operator on (Adjoint of a densely defined operator, Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators).
(b) Let , , and let be the unitary Plancherel transform with the convention on (Fourier transform on complex L1 classes, Plancherel theorem). Define
Then is self-adjoint, coincides with the Sobolev space as a set (with equivalent norms, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms), in the quadratic-form sense, and for every Schwartz function , .
(c) If is measurable with and with domain , then is self-adjoint on , is bounded below, and the assignment is a strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group whose generator is : the limit exists exactly for and equals (A self-adjoint operator generates a strongly continuous unitary group).
(d) Scope: the argument uses only boundedness and measurability of ; it proves nothing for , or the delta interaction, does not identify with any measured free-particle Hamiltonian, and asserts no physical interpretation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: ; ; a real measurable finite-valued ; constants , ; a real bounded measurable .
If measurable pointwise and with , then (Dominated convergence).
For a densely defined operator , consists of those for which is bounded on ; is symmetric when for , and self-adjoint when including domains (Adjoint of a densely defined operator, Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators).
is a surjective linear isometry extending the transform , and it preserves the inner product (Plancherel theorem, Fourier transform on complex L1 classes).
For the Plancherel transforms of and of its distributional Laplacian satisfy for a.e. (Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers, Schwartz space and its seminorms).
equals the set and the two norms are equivalent; consequently as sets (Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).
Let be self-adjoint and symmetric with and -bound less than one; then on is self-adjoint and, when with admissible pair for , (Kato-Rellich theorem, Relative boundedness with respect to an operator).
If is self-adjoint with spectral PVM and , then is a strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group, , and exists exactly for , where it equals (A self-adjoint operator generates a strongly continuous unitary group).
For Lebesgue measure and , the quotient space is complete, so with its usual first-variable-linear inner product it is a complex Hilbert space (Riesz-Fischer completeness of for , Hilbert space).
Proof
[Density and symmetry of the multiplier] By [F8], the defined space is a complex Hilbert space. For and put . Then is bounded by , so , and in by [F1] applied to ; hence is dense. For the integral is defined and equals because is real-valued, so : is symmetric.
[Adjoint domain of the multiplier] Let with representing vector , so for all . Fix and restrict to vanishing off ; every such lies in , and the identity reads for all , so a.e. on ; as , a.e., and since , and . Conversely every satisfies the adjoint identity with . Hence and : is self-adjoint, giving (a).
[Unitary conjugation] Let , self-adjoint on by step 2.1 applied to the real finite-valued function . Define on . For , by unitarity of [F3]. If , the functional is bounded on ; conjugating by the unitary shows that is bounded on , so and hence with ; the reverse inclusion is immediate from the symmetry identity. Thus is self-adjoint.
[Domain, lower bound and free action] By [F5], as a set with equivalent norms. For the pairing with is computed in the -variable, where multiplication by gives , so in the quadratic-form sense. For a Schwartz function , [F4] gives a.e.; both sides are continuous representatives, and Plancherel inversion identifies them as elements of , so . This is (b).
[Bounded perturbation by Kato-Rellich] Let be real with and let be the bounded multiplication operator on . Then , is symmetric because is real, and for every , so the -bound of is with admissible pair (Relative boundedness with respect to an operator). By [F6] the operator on is self-adjoint and, since , satisfies , hence is bounded below.
[Unitary dynamics] Applying [F7] to the self-adjoint of step 5.1 yields that is a strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group, , and the difference quotients converge exactly on ; the physical convention is the same group at negative time. No claim in this item extends to unbounded or singular , which are excluded by the boundedness and measurability hypotheses recorded in [F6].
Depends on
Adjoint of a densely defined operator
Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators
Hilbert space
The space as the quotient by null functions
Lebesgue measurable sets, the family , and the restricted set function
Riesz-Fischer completeness of for
Dominated convergence
Plancherel theorem
Fourier transform on complex L1 classes
Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers
Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms
Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
Kato-Rellich theorem
Relative boundedness with respect to an operator
A self-adjoint operator generates a strongly continuous unitary group
Schwartz space and its seminorms
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The Axiom of Choice