How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hermite recurrence
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be the complex Lebesgue space with inner product linear in the first argument (The space as the quotient by null functions, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions); this pairing makes a complex Hilbert space by with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space. For complex-valued functions, smoothness and derivatives use the componentwise convention of Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions. Write for the function and also for its class in . Put
the set of classes of polynomial multiples of . Each class in has a unique representative of the form : if almost everywhere, the continuous function vanishes almost everywhere and therefore everywhere, and for every , so . Let be multiplication by and the derivative, acting on this unique smooth representative. Set for use in the recurrence formulas at . Define
Then:
(a) with ; more generally for every , so is a linear subspace of all of whose members are represented by functions;
(b) map into , and for every polynomial ;
(c) for all , and ;
(d) on , i.e. on , and ;
(e) for every : (with ), , and ;
(f) the polynomials
are polynomials of degree with leading coefficient , , , , and they satisfy
moreover
(g) consequently
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the space with its inner product; the function ; the space of polynomial multiples of ; the operators and the vectors .
is a complex Hilbert space for , with ; the pairing is well defined on a.e. classes, positive definite, and satisfies (The space as the quotient by null functions, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions, with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for ).
For , the Lebesgue Gaussian transform at dimension , frequency and parameter gives ; every polynomial times a positive real Gaussian is absolutely integrable (Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization). In particular and .
For and one has : by The complex exponential by its power series and The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument the exponential is the sum of the absolutely convergent series with nonnegative terms, so .
The real exponential is with (The exponential function is smooth and ); the chain rule (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with ) and product rule (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ) hold for real-valued functions. For complex-valued functions apply those rules separately to the real and imaginary parts, as in the componentwise convention of Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions. Consequently and, for any complex polynomial , on .
For every real , and (The exponential is positive and satisfies ); the real exponential is strictly increasing (The exponential function is strictly increasing). The complex exponential extends the real one and satisfies for all (, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential).
If is differentiable at every point of and is integrable there, then (The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then ); complex integration by parts on is valid when both derivative products are in and the product vanishes at both ends (Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines). For one has as , because its modulus is bounded by for some and ; [F3] bounds this by , which tends to zero since by the same nonnegative series and [F5].
Proof
[The Gaussian moments and polynomial classes] If as classes, is a continuous function that vanishes almost everywhere, hence vanishes everywhere; since , . Thus the representative used to define and is unique, so these operators are well defined on . By [F2], , so and . For and , by [F3]; hence by [F2], so . Every with is a finite linear combination of , so : is a linear subspace.
[Invariance of and ] For a complex polynomial with real polynomials , the real product and chain rules [F4] applied to and give ; has polynomial factor . Thus both and , hence and , map into . Since by [F4], , i.e. . All members of are represented by componentwise functions by [F4].
[Adjoint pairing] Let . They are componentwise by [F4], and and are polynomial multiples of , hence absolutely integrable by [F2]. Their product tends to zero at both ends by [F6]. Apply the whole-line complex integration-by-parts identity in [F6] to and to obtain . Therefore , since is real and is the derivative of ; the second identity follows by exchanging and and conjugating.
[Rodrigues polynomials] Define ; each is a polynomial because differentiating produces times a polynomial, and , . Put , so . By the product rule, , hence . We prove for all by strong induction: for this is , and gives . For , if it holds for all , then differentiating the displayed relation at gives , while the induction hypothesis gives and , and the same relation at reads , so ; substituting, , which is the claim for . Hence for all , and the displayed relation becomes the three-term recurrence for . Induction on this recurrence gives that has degree with leading coefficient (the term contributes to and only degree ) and that , true for and inherited.
[Commutator] On any function , , and expanding with the product rule [F4] gives and ; subtracting gives because . Hence on by step 1.2.
[Identification of ] We prove by induction on . For this is . Assume it holds for ; by step 1.2 and [F4], by step 1.4, so , which completes the induction.
[Ladder relations] From on we prove on for every : for this is step 2.1, and if it holds for then , all evaluated on , which and preserve by step 1.2. Since , for we get , while ; by definition for every , hence and, using from step 2.1, .
[The and actions] In the formulas containing at , set ; this is the zero vector, so both formulas at are exactly the two ladder identities with . Since and on by the definitions, applying step 3.1 gives and . All identities are in , where equalities mean equality of classes, and the underlying functions agree pointwise because both sides are represented by continuous functions; the polynomial identities of step 1.4 are pointwise identities of polynomials.
Depends on
The space as the quotient by null functions
Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space
Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for
Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization
A nonnegative improper Riemann integral on a half-line agrees with the Lebesgue integral
The complex exponential by its power series
The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument
The exponential function is smooth and
The exponential function is strictly increasing
The exponential is positive and satisfies
, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then
Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
For a nonzero real , dilation by multiplies Lebesgue outer measure by , and reflection in the origin preserves it