Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Three-dimensional Hardy bound

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let W1,2(R3;C) be the Sobolev space of Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms with the weak gradient ∇u of Weak derivative of a locally integrable function, write r(x):=∣x∣, and write ∥u∥22=∫R3∣u(x)∣2 dx for the L2 norm of The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions and Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions. Then:

(a) for every u∈Cc∞(R3∖{0};C),

∫R3∣u(x)∣2∣x∣2 dx≤4∫R3∣∇u(x)∣2 dx;

(b) the same inequality holds for every u∈Cc∞(R3;C);

(c) for every u∈W1,2(R3;C) the a.e.-defined function x↦u(x)/∣x∣ lies in L2(R3;C) and satisfies ∥u/∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥∇u∥2.

No constant smaller than 4 is claimed, and no statement is made about ∥u/∣⋅∣∥2 for u outside W1,2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Sobolev space W1,2(R3;C) with weak gradient ∇u; the function r(x)=∣x∣; a function u of one of the stated regularity classes.

[F1]

Divergence theorem and its vector forms: for a bounded domain with a finite piecewise C1 presentation and a C1 vector field F on a neighbourhood of its closure, the integral of div⁡F equals the outward flux; in particular, if F is C1 on R3∖{0} and compactly supported there, then ∫R3div⁡F=0 (Divergence for finite piecewise C1 presentations, Vector forms: the boundary integrals of fn and of n×F).

[F2]

Cauchy-Schwarz for L2: ∫∣fg∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2 (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2).

[F3]

Cc∞(R3;C) is dense in W1,2(R3;C) in the Sobolev norm (Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n), Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[F4]

If fn→f in L2, then some subsequence converges to f pointwise a.e. (Complex Lp completeness and almost-everywhere subsequences).

[F5]

If fn→f a.e. and ∣fn∣≤g with g∈L1, then ∫fn→∫f (Dominated convergence).

[F6]

For u∈Cc∞(R3;C) the function x↦∣u(x)∣2/∣x∣2 is integrable: choosing R>0 with supp⁡u⊆B(0,R) and bounding ∣u∣≤∥u∥∞, its integral is at most ∥u∥∞2∫∣x∣≤R∣x∣−2dx=4πR∥u∥∞2<∞ (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

[F7]

The explicit radial cutoff χ0∈Cc∞(R3) of Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs equals one on ∣x∣≤1, zero on ∣x∣≥2, and satisfies 0≤χ0≤1. Thus χ:=1−χ0 is smooth and bounded, vanishes near zero, equals one outside radius two, and has compactly supported bounded gradient.

Proof

1.1algebra

[The divergence of the radial weight] On R3∖{0} one has div⁡(x/∣x∣2)=∑i=13∂i(xi∣x∣−2)=3∣x∣−2−2∣x∣−2=∣x∣−2, because the derivative of ∣x∣−2 in the direction x is −2∣x∣−4∑ixi2=−2∣x∣−2.

2.1step 1.1F1algebra

[Integration by parts on the punctured space] Let u∈Cc∞(R3∖{0};C) and put W(x):=∣u(x)∣2x/∣x∣2. Then W is C1 on R3∖{0} and compactly supported there, and step 1.1 gives div⁡W=∇(∣u∣2)⋅x/∣x∣2+∣u∣2/∣x∣2. Since ∫R3div⁡W=0 by [F1], and ∇(∣u∣2)=2Re⁡(u‾ ∇u), we obtain ∫R3∣u∣2/∣x∣2 dx=−2Re⁡∫R3u‾(x) x⋅∇u(x) ∣x∣−2 dx.

3.1step 2.1F2F6algebra

[Hardy bound away from the origin] With u as in step 2.1, the absolute value of the right-hand integral is at most ∫(∣u∣/∣x∣)∣∇u∣≤∥u/∣⋅∣∥2∥∇u∥2 by [F2], while the left-hand side is ∥u/∣⋅∣∥22; both quantities are finite by [F6]. Hence ∥u/∣⋅∣∥22≤2∥u/∣⋅∣∥2∥∇u∥2, and if the factor is zero the conclusion is immediate, and otherwise division by its positive value yields ∥u/∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥∇u∥2, which is (a).

4.1step 3.1F5F6F7algebra

[Removing the puncture] Let u∈Cc∞(R3;C) and use the radial χ=1−χ0∈C∞(R3;[0,1]) of [F7], with χ=0 for ∣x∣≤1, χ=1 for ∣x∣≥2 and ∣∇χ∣≤C; put χε(x):=χ(x/ε). Then uε:=χεu∈Cc∞(R3∖{0};C), because its support is contained in the closed set {∣x∣≥ε}∩supp⁡u and hence stays a positive distance from the origin, so step 3.1 applies: ∥uε/∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥∇uε∥2. As ε↓0 the functions uε/∣x∣ converge to u/∣x∣ pointwise on {∣x∣>0} and are dominated by ∣u∣/∣x∣∈L2 by [F6], so ∥uε/∣⋅∣∥2→∥u/∣⋅∣∥2 by [F5] applied to the squared moduli. Moreover ∇uε=χε∇u+u∇χε with ∥χε∇u−∇u∥22≤∫∣x∣<2ε∣∇u∣2→0 and, with M:=∥u∥∞, ∥u∇χε∥22≤C2ε−2∫∣x∣≤2εM2 dx≤C2M24π(2ε)33ε2=O(ε)→0; hence ∥∇uε∥2→∥∇u∥2, and passing to the limit in the display gives (b).

5.1step 4.1F3F4algebra∎

[Density extension to W1,2] Let u∈W1,2(R3;C) and choose un∈Cc∞(R3;C) with ∥un−u∥W1,2→0 by [F3]. Step 4.1 applied to un−um gives ∥un/∣⋅∣−um/∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥∇(un−um)∥2, so (un/∣⋅∣) is Cauchy in L2; let w∈L2 be its limit, so ∥w∥2≤2∥∇u∥2 because ∥∇un∥2→∥∇u∥2. By [F4] some subsequence satisfies unk→u and unk/∣⋅∣→w pointwise a.e.; on the conull set where unk→u and ∣x∣>0 we have unk(x)/∣x∣→u(x)/∣x∣, so w=u/∣⋅∣ a.e. and (c) follows.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources