Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ground radial probability and units

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ>0, let C=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ on D(C)=H2(R3;C) be as above, and put a0:=2/γ>0. Define ψ100(x):=(γ38π)1/2e−r/a0(x=rΩ, r=∣x∣). Then:

(a) ψ100∈D(C), ∥ψ100∥L2=1, and Cψ100=−γ24ψ100;

(b) for every Borel set B⊆R3, writing dx for Lebesgue measure, ∫B∣ψ100(x)∣2dx=∫0∞γ38πr2e−2r/a0(∫S21B(rΩ)dσ(Ω))dr, so the radial probability density p(r):=γ32r2e−2r/a0=4r2a0−3e−2r/a0 is a probability density on (0,∞): p≥0 and ∫0∞p(r)dr=1;

(c) the mean of p is ∫0∞r p(r)dr=3a0/2, and the unique maximum (mode) of p is at r=a0;

(d) the spatial density ∣ψ100(x)∣2=γ38πe−2r/a0 is strictly decreasing in r and maximal at x=0. For every ε>0 there is a remainder Rε such that

∫∣x∣<ε∣ψ100(x)∣2 dx=16(2εa0)3+Rε,∣Rε∣≤18(2εa0)4.

Thus this probability is positive and tends to 0 as ε↓0, and the spatial probability measure has no point atoms, including at the density maximum x=0;

(e) parametrisation and dimensions. If ℏ,m,κ>0 and γ:=2mκ/ℏ2, then a0=ℏ2/(mκ) and the operator

Cℏ,m,κ:=−ℏ22mΔ−κ∣⋅∣,D(Cℏ,m,κ)=H2(R3;C),

has eigenvalues −mκ22ℏ2n2=ℏ22m(−γ24n2) (n≥1); under the dimensional conventions [ℏ]=J s, [m]=kg, [κ]=J m, the constants a02 and mκ2/(2ℏ2) have the dimensions of m2 and J respectively.

Clauses (a)–(d) are mathematical statements about the normalised ground vector and its distribution; clause (e) is a dimensional-consistency statement about the parametrisation and is not a physical claim, measurement or identification of any quantity with nature.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: γ>0, a0=2/γ, the operator C and its eigenfunctions as in the previous items of this page.

[F1]

The regular solution at k=γ/2, l=0 is, up to a nonzero scalar, u(r)=re−γr/2=re−r/a0, and A0u=−(γ2/4)u with transported function ψ=e−r/a0Y00; the eigenvalue site is exactly the ground level of A0; moreover the negative eigenvalues of C are exactly −γ2/(4n2), n≥1, with n2-dimensional eigenspaces spanned by the transported regular solutions (Kummer recurrence and termination (d), (e), Laguerre bound energy exhaustion (b), (c), Transported radial endpoint realization (e), Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy (a)). Nonnegative radial eigenvalues are excluded by Coulomb continuum spectral density (d); the exact block-domain identity then excludes nonnegative eigenvalues of C as well.

[F2]

Y00=1/4π and σ(S2)=4π; the polar decomposition of Lebesgue measure holds (Sphere ONB, Sphere integrals in angle coordinates, Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

[F4]

The L2 norm of a Borel function is computed by the polar decomposition, and ∣Y00∣2=1/(4π) (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions, Hilbert space).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4algebra

[The normalized ground vector] By [F1] the ground eigenfunction of A0 is u(r)=cre−r/a0 and the corresponding C-eigenvector is c e−r/a0Y00, up to the scalar c≠0. By [F4] and [F2], ∥e−r/a0Y00∥L22=14π∫0∞r2e−2r/a04π dr=∫0∞r2e−2r/a0dr=2/(2/a0)3=a03/4 by [F3]; hence the normalized ground vector is ψ100=(4/a03)1/2e−r/a0Y00=(γ3/(8π))1/2e−r/a0, since Y00=1/4π and a0=2/γ. By [F1] it lies in D(C) and Cψ100=−(γ2/4)ψ100. This is (a).

2.1step 1.1F2F3F4algebra

[The radial law] For a Borel set B, [F2] and [F4] give ∫B∣ψ100∣2dx=γ38π∫Be−2r/a0dx=γ38π∫0∞r2e−2r/a0∫S21B(rΩ)dσ(Ω)dr, which is the displayed identity of (b); the factor 4π enters only when the angular indicator is identically one, giving the radial marginal; the density p(r)=γ32r2e−2r/a0 is nonnegative and integrates to 1 by the value of the integral computed in step 1.1.

3.1step 2.1F3algebra

[Mean and mode] By [F3] together with [F2], ∫0∞r p(r)dr=γ32∫0∞r3e−2r/a0dr=γ32⋅6(2/a0)4=γ32⋅6a0416=3γ3a0416=3a02 because γa0=2. For the mode, differentiate q(r):=r2e−2r/a0 using [F3]'s ingredients: q′(r)=2re−2r/a0−(2/a0)r2e−2r/a0=(2/a0)r(a0−r)e−2r/a0, which is positive for 0<r<a0, zero at r=a0 and negative for r>a0; hence q, and with it p, has its unique maximum at r=a0. This is (c).

3.2step 2.1F3algebra

[Density versus point probability] Set t=2ε/a0. Step 2.1 gives P(∣x∣<ε)=12∫0ts2e−sds=1−e−t(1+t+t2/2) by differentiation and the fundamental theorem. Since 0≤1−e−s=∫0se−vdv≤s, the difference from t3/6 has absolute value at most t4/8. Taking Rε:=P(∣x∣<ε)−t3/6 gives the exact remainder bound in (d), with the dimensionless scale t=2ε/a0; the probability is strictly positive for every ε>0 and tends to zero. The density (πa03)−1e−2r/a0 is strictly decreasing in r, while every singleton has zero probability because its Lebesgue measure is zero. This proves (d), with no point atom at the density maximum.

4.1step 1.1step 3.2F1algebra

[Parametrisation and dimensions] Setting γ=2mκ/ℏ2 gives a0=2/γ=ℏ2/(mκ)>0, and the operator identity Cℏ,m,κ=ℏ22mC on H2 holds because ℏ22m⋅2mκℏ2=κ; hence the eigenvalues of Cℏ,m,κ are ℏ22m⋅(−γ24n2)=−mκ22ℏ2n2 by [F1], including exclusion of every nonnegative eigenvalue. For the dimensional statement, substituting the dimensional conventions and the dependent unit identity J=kg m2 s−2, one computes [ℏ2/(mκ)]=J2s2 kg−1J−1m−1=J s2 kg−1m−1=m, so a02 has dimension m2, and [mκ2/ℏ2]=kg J2m2J−2s−2=kg m2s−2=J. This is (e).

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1∎

[Conclusion] Clauses (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) are steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 3.2 and 4.1.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources