Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ>0 and let C=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ on D(C)=H2(R3;C) be the self-adjoint operator of Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound with essential spectrum [0,∞). For n≥1, 0≤l≤n−1 and −l≤m≤l let unl be the regular solution of Kummer recurrence and termination at k=γ/(2n) (the polynomial-exponential solution, unique up to a nonzero scalar), and put ψnlm(x):=unl(r)rYlm(Ω)(x=rΩ). Then:

(a) each ψnlm lies in D(C) and Cψnlm=−γ24n2ψnlm; the vectors ψnlm with distinct labels are pairwise orthogonal, and for fixed n the eigenspace of C at −γ2/(4n2) is exactly their span; it has dimension ∑l=0n−1(2l+1)=n2;

(b) after normalization, the family (ψnlm/∥unl∥2)n≥1,0≤l≤n−1,−l≤m≤l is a complete orthonormal family of the negative spectral subspace EC((−∞,0))L2(R3);

(c) the family is not complete in L2(R3): the nonnegative spectral subspace EC([0,∞))L2(R3) is nonzero (indeed infinite dimensional), so the bound states alone do not span L2.

All claims concern the mathematical spectral decomposition of C; no physical interpretation is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: γ>0, the operator C with essential spectrum [0,∞) and spectral measure E; the labels n,l,m; the functions ψnlm.

[F1]

The negative eigenvalues of C are exactly −γ2/(4n2) (n≥1), and every eigenfunction of C with negative eigenvalue E=−γ2/(4n2) has, in each block (l,m) with l≤n−1, a scalar multiple of unl, while every block with l≥n vanishes (because −γ2/(4n2) is not a negative eigenvalue of Al when l≥n) (Laguerre bound energy exhaustion).

[F2]

U is unitary and ∥ψ∥L22=∑l,m∥ulm∥22 for Uψ=(ulm); in particular the inverse image of a vector supported in one block (l,m) with entry u has norm ∥u∥2 (Angular radial unitary reduction (a), (b)). If u∈D(Al) and Alu=Eu, that one-block vector belongs to the direct-sum operator domain since ∥u∥22+∥Eu∥22<∞, so its inverse image ψ(x)=u(r)Ylm(Ω)/r lies in D(C) and Cψ=Eψ for every allowed m (Transported radial endpoint realization (d)).

[F3]

The negative spectral subspace EC((−∞,0))L2 is the closed linear span of the eigenspaces of C for its negative eigenvalues (Coulomb essential spectrum (c)).

[F4]

For the self-adjoint (possibly unbounded) C, if Cu=Eu and Cv=E′v with u,v∈D(C) and distinct real E,E′, then E⟨u,v⟩=⟨Cu,v⟩=⟨u,Cv⟩=E′⟨u,v⟩, hence ⟨u,v⟩=0 by symmetry on its domain; E({λ}) is the orthogonal projection onto ker⁡(C−λ); and λ∈σess(C) iff rank⁡E((λ−ε,λ+ε))=∞ for every ε>0 (Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators, Discrete and essential spectrum of a self-adjoint operator, Projection valued measure).

[F5]

For a complete orthonormal family (ei) of a closed subspace S of a Hilbert space one has x=∑i⟨x,ei⟩ei and ∥x∥2=∑i∣⟨x,ei⟩∣2 for x∈S (Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family, Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases, Hilbert space).

Proof

1.1F1F2F4givenalgebra

[Eigenvectors, exact norms and orthogonality] For each label put En=−γ2/(4n2). The Kummer termination and Laguerre exhaustion suppliers give a nonzero unl∈D(Al) with Alunl=Enunl; [F2] transports the vector supported in block (l,m) to ψnlm∈D(C) with Cψnlm=Enψnlm and ∥ψnlm∥2=∥unl∥2>0. For different n, the numbers En are distinct and self-adjointness gives orthogonality by [F4]. For equal n and different (l,m), the direct-sum vectors have disjoint supports, hence their inner product is zero; unitarity transfers that orthogonality to L2(R3). Thus enlm:=ψnlm/∥unl∥2 is an orthonormal family.

2.1step 1.1F1F2algebra

[The entire eigenspace and its dimension] Let Cψ=Enψ. The block-domain identity in [F2] and exhaustion in [F1] give Uψ=(almunl)0≤l≤n−1,−l≤m≤l with all other blocks zero. There are only ∑l=0n−1(2l+1) such blocks, so inversion gives the finite sum ψ=∑l=0n−1∑m=−llalmψnlm; conversely each such sum belongs to the eigenspace by step 1.1. Its squared norm is ∑l=0n−1∑m=−ll∣alm∣2∥unl∥22 by [F2]. If the sum is zero, every coefficient vanishes because each radial norm is positive; thus these vectors form a basis. Their number is 2∑l=0n−1l+n=n(n−1)+n=n2, proving (a), including full C degeneracy rather than only radial simplicity.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F3F5algebra

[The bound orthonormal basis of the negative subspace] Let S=EC((−∞,0))L2. By [F3], S is the closed span of all negative eigenspaces, and by [F1] and step 2.1 these are exactly the finite-dimensional spaces spanned by ψnlm for n≥1. Each normalization scalar in step 1.1 is finite and nonzero, so the normalized and unnormalized families have exactly the same finite linear span, and therefore the same closed span S. The orthonormal family (enlm) is consequently complete in S. For f∈S, [F5] gives f=∑n,l,m⟨f,enlm⟩enlm in L2 and ∥f∥22=∑n,l,m∣⟨f,enlm⟩∣2, with the declared first-entry-linear convention. This proves (b).

4.1step 3.1F4givenalgebra

[An infinite-dimensional complementary subspace] Since 1/4∈σess(C)=[0,∞), [F4] with radius 1/4 gives infinite rank for EC((0,1/2)). Its range is contained in EC([0,∞))L2, because (0,1/2)⊆[0,∞) and nested spectral projections satisfy EC([0,∞))EC((0,1/2))=EC((0,1/2)). Thus the nonnegative subspace is infinite dimensional. Spectral projections for disjoint sets satisfy EC((−∞,0))EC([0,∞))=0, so this nonzero subspace is orthogonal to S. Step 3.1 identifies the closed span of the bound states with S, proving that family cannot be complete in all of L2 and establishing (c).

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

[Conclusion] Step 1.1 proves domain membership and orthogonality; step 2.1 proves the full eigenspace and n2 degeneracy in (a); step 3.1 proves (b); step 4.1 proves (c).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources