Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Angular radial unitary reduction

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let S2={x∈R3:∣x∣=1}, let σ be the polar surface measure on S2 (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere), and let (Ylm)l≥0, −l≤m≤l be the complete orthonormal family of L2(S2,σ) of Sphere ONB. For pointwise formulas use the representatives Y~lm of Associated Legendre function normalization, and write Ylm(Ω) for their values. Explicitly, with Pl and blm as in that supplier, for 0≤m≤l, Y~lm(Ω)=(−1)mblm2π(Ω1+iΩ2)mPl(m)(Ω3),Y~l,−m=(−1)mY~lm‾(1≤m≤l). These are restrictions of polynomials in the Cartesian coordinates, hence smooth on the entire sphere, and represent the stated L2 classes. Write L2=L2(R3;C) with Lebesgue measure and inner product linear in the first argument (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Hilbert space), and let K:=⨁(l,m)L2((0,∞),dr;C) be the Hilbert direct sum over l≥0, −l≤m≤l. For ψ∈L2 and each (l,m) define the coefficient function and the reduced function clm(r):=∫S2ψ(rΩ)Ylm(Ω)‾ dσ(Ω)(r>0, a.e.),ulm(r):=r clm(r). Then:

(a) for every ψ∈L2 and every (l,m) the function ulm is a well-defined element of L2((0,∞),dr) depending only on the class of ψ, and Uψ:=(ulm)l,m is a linear isometry of L2 into (indeed onto) K with ∥Uψ∥K2=∑l≥0∑m=−ll∫0∞∣ulm(r)∣2 dr=∥ψ∥L22;

(b) U is unitary, and for every (ulm)∈K the finite-subset sums ∑l≤N, ∣m∣≤lulm(r)Ylm(Ω)/r converge in L2 to a function ψ with Uψ=(ulm);

(c) on R3∖{0} every f∈C2 satisfies the following identity. Here radial derivatives differentiate F(r,Ω)=f(rΩ) with Ω fixed, and in angle coordinates ΔS2F:=∂θ2F+cot⁡θ ∂θF+sin⁡−2θ ∂φ2F, extended continuously to the poles by the Cartesian identity proved below. For the smooth representatives of Ylm this agrees with the negative of the diagonal sphere operator in Sphere Laplacian diagonal domain:

Δf=∂r2f+2r∂rf+1r2ΔS2f;

(d) for every l≥0, m, and u∈Cc∞((0,∞);C), the function ψ:=u(r)Ylm(Ω)/r lies in Cc∞(R3∖{0})⊆H2(R3;C), its image under U is the finite-support vector with (l,m)-entry u, and −Δψ=1r(−u′′(r)+l(l+1)r2u(r))Ylm(Ω),∫R3∣∇ψ∣2 dx=∫0∞(∣u′(r)−u(r)r∣2+l(l+1)r2∣u(r)∣2)dr.

All statements are purely mathematical assertions about L2 spaces, the surface measure and the Laplacian; no physical interpretation and no statement about operators with unbounded potentials is included.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the sphere S2 with polar measure σ and the complete orthonormal family (Ylm); a function ψ∈L2(R3); a function f∈C2(R3∖{0}); indices l,m and u∈Cc∞((0,∞)).

[F1]

Angle coordinates: ∫S2G dσ=∫(0,π)×(0,2π)G(Φ(θ,φ))sin⁡θ d(θ,φ) for Borel G≥0, and σ(S2)=4π (Sphere integrals in angle coordinates, The polar surface set function on the unit sphere).

[F2]

(Ylm) is a complete orthonormal family of L2(S2,σ): for every F∈L2(S2,σ), F=∑l,m⟨F,Ylm⟩Ylm in the finite-subset net and ∥F∥2=∑l,m∣⟨F,Ylm⟩∣2 (Sphere ONB, Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family, Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases).

[F3]

Polar coordinates: ∫R3g dx=∫0∞r2∫S2g(rΩ) dσ(Ω) dr for every Borel g≥0 (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma); iterated integrals of nonnegative completed-product-measurable functions may be interchanged (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability).

[F4]

The sphere Laplacian: for F in the finite span of the Ylm and each chart point with sin⁡θ≠0 one has SF(θ,φ)=(AF)(θ,φ), where S=−1sin⁡θ∂θ(sin⁡θ ∂θ)−1sin⁡2θ∂φ2 and A is the diagonal operator with AYlm=l(l+1)Ylm; in particular the chart expression of the spherical Laplacian acts on Ylm by multiplication by −l(l+1) (Sphere Laplacian diagonal domain, Associated Legendre function normalization, The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field).

[F5]

Cc∞(R3;C) is dense in L2(R3;C) (Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)).

[F6]

Cauchy-Schwarz and dominated convergence (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2, Dominated convergence).

[F7]

Chain rule and partial derivatives: the total derivative computes directional derivatives, and Ck maps are closed under sums, products and compositions, so the formal polar-coordinate differentiation below is legitimate for C2 functions (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a), A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian, Ck Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn).

[F8]

The Lebesgue sigma-algebra on Rn is the completion of Borel Lebesgue measure, and any real-valued Lebesgue-measurable function agrees almost everywhere with a Borel-measurable function; for a complex-valued function apply this to its real and imaginary parts (L(Rn) is exactly the completion of the restriction of λn to the Borel sets, A function measurable for a completion is almost everywhere equal to one measurable for the original sigma-algebra).

[F9]

Under CC, the divergence theorem for a bounded piecewise C1 domain evaluates the integral of a C1 vector field's divergence by its boundary flux (Divergence for finite piecewise C1 presentations). The fundamental theorem of calculus integrates a differentiable real function's integrable derivative to its endpoint difference; apply it to real and imaginary components for complex functions (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a)).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F8givenalgebra

[Polar measurability and the angular expansion] For continuous compactly supported ψ, (r,Ω)↦ψ(rΩ) is continuous on (0,∞)×S2, and the polar formula [F3] gives ∫R3∣ψ∣2dx=∫0∞r2∫S2∣ψ(rΩ)∣2dσdr. For a general L2 class, take a finite Lebesgue-measurable representative and use [F8] on its real and imaginary parts to obtain Borel representatives, setting them to zero on the Borel null sets where they are not finite; their combination is a finite Borel representative ψ0. If ψ0 and ψ~0 are two such representatives, their Borel disagreement set is Lebesgue-null; applying [F3] to its indicator shows that their polar pullbacks agree for r2dr dσ-almost every (r,Ω), so the angular coefficient functions agree for almost every r. Thus the coefficients depend only on the L2 class. Since (r,Ω)↦ψ0(rΩ) is Borel, completed-product Fubini [F3] gives measurable sections and Parseval [F2] gives ∫S2∣ψ0(rΩ)∣2dσ=∑l,m∣clm(r)∣2 for almost every r. The polar formula [F3] then yields ∫R3∣ψ∣2dx=∫0∞r2∑l,m∣clm(r)∣2dr.

1.2F4F7algebra

[Polar form of the Laplacian] Let f∈C2(R3∖{0}), put F(r,Ω):=f(rΩ), and use the chart Ω(θ,φ)=(sin⁡θcos⁡φ,sin⁡θsin⁡φ,cos⁡θ) for 0<θ<π. Write D2f for the Hessian matrix. The chain rule gives ∂rF=∇f(rΩ)⋅Ω and ∂r2F=D2f(rΩ)[Ω,Ω]. For a∈{θ,φ} one has ∂aF=r∇f(rΩ)⋅∂aΩ and ∂a2F=r2D2f(rΩ)[∂aΩ,∂aΩ]+r∇f(rΩ)⋅∂a2Ω. Using ΔS2=∂θ2+cot⁡θ ∂θ+sin⁡−2θ ∂φ2, the identities ∂θΩ⊗∂θΩ+sin⁡−2θ ∂φΩ⊗∂φΩ=I−Ω⊗Ω and ∂θ2Ω+cot⁡θ ∂θΩ+sin⁡−2θ ∂φ2Ω=−2Ω give ΔS2F=r2(Δf−D2f[Ω,Ω])−2r∂rF. Substitution of ∂r2F=D2f[Ω,Ω] yields ∂r2F+2r−1∂rF+r−2ΔS2F=Δf(rΩ), proving (c) on this chart. Both sides are continuous on R3∖{0}, so the identity also holds on the polar axis by continuity.

2.1step 1.1F3F5F6algebra

[The isometry] By step 1.1 and Tonelli [F3] applied to the nonnegative function r2∑l,m∣clm(r)∣2 one has ∫R3∣ψ∣2dx=∫0∞r2∑l,m∣clm(r)∣2dr=∑l,m∫0∞∣ulm(r)∣2dr for continuous compactly supported ψ, and both sides are finite; the linear map U is thus isometric on the dense subspace Cc(R3) (density [F5] applies to Cc∞⊆Cc), and for ψ∈L2 the a.e. definition of ulm gives the same isometry by continuity and [F6].

2.2step 1.2F4algebra

[Reduction of the free Laplacian on one block] Let u∈Cc∞((0,∞)) and ψ(x):=f(r)Ylm(Ω) with f(r):=u(r)/r and x=rΩ. The polynomial restriction formula in the statement follows from (sin⁡θ)meimφ=(Ω1+iΩ2)m and [F4], including the cut and poles by continuity. Then ψ∈Cc∞(R3∖{0}), because supp⁡u is a compact subset of (0,∞) and Ylm is smooth on S2. Since Ylm lies in the finite span, [F4] gives ΔS2ψ(r ⋅)=−l(l+1)ψ(r ⋅) on the chart; by step 1.2, −Δψ=−∂r2ψ−2r−1∂rψ−r−2ΔS2ψ=(−f′′(r)−2f′(r)/r+l(l+1)f(r)/r2)Ylm, and substituting f=u/r gives −f′′−2f′/r+l(l+1)f/r2=(−u′′+l(l+1)u/r2)/r, which is the first identity of (d).

3.1step 2.1F2F3F8algebra

[Surjectivity and inverse] For a finite-support vector (ulm)∈K, extend each radial entry by zero to R, apply [F8] with n=1 to its real and imaginary parts, set any Borel null set of nonfinite values to zero, and restrict the resulting finite-valued Borel representatives to (0,∞). Define V(ulm):=∑l,mulm(r)Ylm(Ω)/r for r>0 (assign any value at the origin). This is Borel; using [F3] and [F2], ∥V(ulm)∥L22=∫0∞r2∫S2∣∑ulm(r)Ylm(Ω)/r∣2dσdr=∑l,m∫∣ulm∣2dr, the cross terms vanishing because ∫YlmYl′m′‾dσ=δll′δmm′ by [F2]; hence V is isometric on the dense finite-support subspace of K and extends to a linear isometry K→L2. On finite sums the definitions give U(V(ulm))=(ulm), and on Cc(R3) the angular expansion shows V(Uψ)=ψ; by density and continuity these identities extend, so V=U−1 and U is unitary.

3.2step 2.2F9algebra

[The free form on one block] With u,ψ as in step 2.2, ∫R3∣∇ψ∣2dx=⟨−Δψ,ψ⟩ since [F9] applied componentwise on a ball containing the support to the compactly supported C1 field ψ‾∇ψ gives ∫∣∇ψ∣2=∫(−Δψ)ψ‾ with zero boundary flux; substituting step 2.2 and using ∥Ylm∥L2(S2)=1 yields ∫R3∣∇ψ∣2dx=∫0∞(−u′′(r)u(r)‾+l(l+1)∣u(r)∣2/r2)dr. Integration by parts from [F9] in the compact support of u gives ∫0∞−u′′u‾ dr=∫0∞∣u′∣2dr, and the elementary identity −2Re⁡(u′u‾)/r+∣u∣2/r2=−(∣u∣2/r)′ integrates to zero over the compact support, so ∫∣u′∣2=∫∣u′−u/r∣2; combining, the right-hand side equals ∫0∞(∣u′−u/r∣2+l(l+1)∣u∣2/r2)dr, which is the second identity of (d).

4.1step 2.1step 3.1step 1.2step 2.2step 3.2∎

[Conclusion] On the dense subspace of finite sums of one-block functions the map U is given by the displayed coefficient formula, so clause (a) follows from step 2.1 for all ψ∈L2; clause (b) is step 3.1; clauses (c) and (d) are steps 1.2, 2.2 and 3.2.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources