How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Angular radial unitary reduction
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , let be the polar surface measure on (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere), and let be the complete orthonormal family of of Sphere ONB. For pointwise formulas use the representatives of Associated Legendre function normalization, and write for their values. Explicitly, with and as in that supplier, for , These are restrictions of polynomials in the Cartesian coordinates, hence smooth on the entire sphere, and represent the stated classes. Write with Lebesgue measure and inner product linear in the first argument (The space as the quotient by null functions, Hilbert space), and let be the Hilbert direct sum over , . For and each define the coefficient function and the reduced function Then:
(a) for every and every the function is a well-defined element of depending only on the class of , and is a linear isometry of into (indeed onto) with
(b) is unitary, and for every the finite-subset sums converge in to a function with ;
(c) on every satisfies the following identity. Here radial derivatives differentiate with fixed, and in angle coordinates , extended continuously to the poles by the Cartesian identity proved below. For the smooth representatives of this agrees with the negative of the diagonal sphere operator in Sphere Laplacian diagonal domain:
(d) for every , , and , the function lies in , its image under is the finite-support vector with -entry , and
All statements are purely mathematical assertions about spaces, the surface measure and the Laplacian; no physical interpretation and no statement about operators with unbounded potentials is included.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the sphere with polar measure and the complete orthonormal family ; a function ; a function ; indices and .
Angle coordinates: for Borel , and (Sphere integrals in angle coordinates, The polar surface set function on the unit sphere).
is a complete orthonormal family of : for every , in the finite-subset net and (Sphere ONB, Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family, Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases).
Polar coordinates: for every Borel (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma); iterated integrals of nonnegative completed-product-measurable functions may be interchanged (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability).
The sphere Laplacian: for in the finite span of the and each chart point with one has , where and is the diagonal operator with ; in particular the chart expression of the spherical Laplacian acts on by multiplication by (Sphere Laplacian diagonal domain, Associated Legendre function normalization, The Laplacian of a function and of a vector field).
Cauchy-Schwarz and dominated convergence (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for , Dominated convergence).
Chain rule and partial derivatives: the total derivative computes directional derivatives, and maps are closed under sums, products and compositions, so the formal polar-coordinate differentiation below is legitimate for functions (The chain rule for total derivatives: , A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian, Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition, Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map ).
The Lebesgue sigma-algebra on is the completion of Borel Lebesgue measure, and any real-valued Lebesgue-measurable function agrees almost everywhere with a Borel-measurable function; for a complex-valued function apply this to its real and imaginary parts ( is exactly the completion of the restriction of to the Borel sets, A function measurable for a completion is almost everywhere equal to one measurable for the original sigma-algebra).
Under CC, the divergence theorem for a bounded piecewise domain evaluates the integral of a vector field's divergence by its boundary flux (Divergence for finite piecewise C1 presentations). The fundamental theorem of calculus integrates a differentiable real function's integrable derivative to its endpoint difference; apply it to real and imaginary components for complex functions (The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then ).
Proof
[Polar measurability and the angular expansion] For continuous compactly supported , is continuous on , and the polar formula [F3] gives . For a general class, take a finite Lebesgue-measurable representative and use [F8] on its real and imaginary parts to obtain Borel representatives, setting them to zero on the Borel null sets where they are not finite; their combination is a finite Borel representative . If and are two such representatives, their Borel disagreement set is Lebesgue-null; applying [F3] to its indicator shows that their polar pullbacks agree for -almost every , so the angular coefficient functions agree for almost every . Thus the coefficients depend only on the class. Since is Borel, completed-product Fubini [F3] gives measurable sections and Parseval [F2] gives for almost every . The polar formula [F3] then yields .
[Polar form of the Laplacian] Let , put , and use the chart for . Write for the Hessian matrix. The chain rule gives and . For one has and . Using , the identities and give . Substitution of yields , proving (c) on this chart. Both sides are continuous on , so the identity also holds on the polar axis by continuity.
[The isometry] By step 1.1 and Tonelli [F3] applied to the nonnegative function one has for continuous compactly supported , and both sides are finite; the linear map is thus isometric on the dense subspace (density [F5] applies to ), and for the a.e. definition of gives the same isometry by continuity and [F6].
[Reduction of the free Laplacian on one block] Let and with and . The polynomial restriction formula in the statement follows from and [F4], including the cut and poles by continuity. Then , because is a compact subset of and is smooth on . Since lies in the finite span, [F4] gives on the chart; by step 1.2, , and substituting gives , which is the first identity of (d).
[Surjectivity and inverse] For a finite-support vector , extend each radial entry by zero to , apply [F8] with to its real and imaginary parts, set any Borel null set of nonfinite values to zero, and restrict the resulting finite-valued Borel representatives to . Define for (assign any value at the origin). This is Borel; using [F3] and [F2], , the cross terms vanishing because by [F2]; hence is isometric on the dense finite-support subspace of and extends to a linear isometry . On finite sums the definitions give , and on the angular expansion shows ; by density and continuity these identities extend, so and is unitary.
[The free form on one block] With as in step 2.2, since [F9] applied componentwise on a ball containing the support to the compactly supported field gives with zero boundary flux; substituting step 2.2 and using yields . Integration by parts from [F9] in the compact support of gives , and the elementary identity integrates to zero over the compact support, so ; combining, the right-hand side equals , which is the second identity of (d).
[Conclusion] On the dense subspace of finite sums of one-block functions the map is given by the displayed coefficient formula, so clause (a) follows from step 2.1 for all ; clause (b) is step 3.1; clauses (c) and (d) are steps 1.2, 2.2 and 3.2.
Depends on
Sphere ONB
Associated Legendre function normalization
Sphere Laplacian diagonal domain
Sphere integrals in angle coordinates
The polar surface set function on the unit sphere
Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
is exactly the completion of the restriction of to the Borel sets
A function measurable for a completion is almost everywhere equal to one measurable for the original sigma-algebra
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability
Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family
Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases
Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)
Dominated convergence
The Laplacian of a function and of a vector field
Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map
The chain rule for total derivatives:
A total derivative computes every directional derivative, and its matrix is the Jacobian
Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition
Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms
Hilbert space
The space as the quotient by null functions
Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for
Divergence for finite piecewise C1 presentations
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- G. Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, 1st edition 2009, Section 10.2 pp. 222-225 (spherical coordinates (10.16)-(10.21) and separation of the Coulomb eigenvalue equation) and Section 10.3 pp. 225-229 (Theorems 10.6-10.7: associated Legendre functions and the spherical harmonics Y_l^m as an orthonormal basis)
- S. Axler, P. Bourdon, W. Ramey, Harmonic Function Theory, 2nd edition, author-hosted full text, Chapter 5 'Harmonic Polynomials' pp. 73-105, in particular 'Spherical Harmonic Decomposition of L^2(S)' p. 78 and 'Explicit Bases of H_m(R^n) and H_m(S)' p. 92