Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Transported radial endpoint realization

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ≥0, let C:=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ on D(C)=W2,2(R3;C) be the self-adjoint operator of Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound (c) when γ>0, and the free Fourier multiplier when γ=0, and let U be the unitary of Angular radial unitary reduction from L2(R3) onto K=⨁(l,m)L2((0,∞),dr), with coefficients ulm=r clm. For l≥0 let Vl be the closure of Cc∞((0,∞);C) in L2(0,∞;C) for the norm ∥u∥Vl2:=∫0∞(∣u′(r)−u(r)r∣2+l(l+1)r2∣u(r)∣2+∣u(r)∣2)dr, realized as the space of u∈L2 with u′−ur∈L2 and ∫∣u∣2/r2<∞ in the distributional sense (Densely defined, closed and closable operators, and cores, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions), and define al(u,v):=∫0∞[(v′(r)−v(r)r)‾(u′(r)−u(r)r)+l(l+1)r2u(r)v(r)‾−γru(r)v(r)‾]dr. Then:

(a) Vl is a dense linear subspace of L2(0,∞) that is a Hilbert space for ∥⋅∥Vl, the inclusion Vl↪L2(0,∞) is continuous, and al is a bounded symmetric sesquilinear form on Vl that is closed and semibounded below;

(b) the operator Al defined by D(Al):={u∈Vl:∃ f∈L2(0,∞) with al(u,v)=⟨f,v⟩ ∀v∈Vl},Alu:=f, is well defined, self-adjoint and bounded below; D(Al) is dense in Vl in the norm ∥⋅∥Vl and al(u,u)=⟨Alu,u⟩ for u∈D(Al);

(c) for every u∈D(Al) the distributional identity −u′′+(l(l+1)/r2−γ/r)u=Alu holds on (0,∞); consequently u∈Hloc2(0,∞), u is of class C1 with u′ locally absolutely continuous, and the identity holds pointwise almost everywhere on (0,∞); if moreover Alu=Eu for some constant E∈C (in particular if u is an eigenfunction of Al), then u is of class C2 on (0,∞) and the differential equation holds pointwise there;

(d) block identity. For ψ∈L2(R3) with Uψ=(ulm) one has ψ∈D(C) if and only if ulm∈D(Al) for every (l,m) and ∑l,m(∥ulm∥2+∥Alulm∥2)<∞; then U(Cψ)=(Alulm)l,m. Equivalently UCU∗=⨁(l,m)Al on K;

(e) eigenfunction transport. If u∈D(Al) and Alu=Eu for some E∈R, then the function ψ(x):=u(r)Yl0(Ω)/r (with x=rΩ) lies in H2(R3;C), satisfies Cψ=Eψ, and r↦u(r)/r is bounded on (0,1]; moreover ψ is bounded and continuous on R3.

No endpoint boundary condition is imposed by hand: the domain D(Al) is the form-domain realization transported from D(C)=H2(R3), and no physical interpretation of Al, C, U or γ is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the constants and operators γ,C,U; the form domain Vl and form al; a parameter μ chosen below; function spaces as in the statement.

[F1]

U is unitary and its inverse is the finite-subset-net sum ψ=∑l,mulm(r)Ylm(Ω)/r; for ψ∈Cc∞(R3∖{0}) the coefficients are ulm=r∫ψ(rΩ)Ylm‾dσ (Angular radial unitary reduction).

[F2]

C is self-adjoint on D(C)=H2(R3;C), C≥−M0 for a finite M0, and ⟨Cψ,ψ⟩=∫R3∣∇ψ∣2dx−γ∫R3∣ψ∣2∣x∣−1dx for ψ∈D(C) (Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound, Plancherel theorem, Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers).

[F3]

∣u(r)∣≤r1/2∥u/r∥L2(r,∞)+r1/2(∫r∞∣u′−ur∣2)1/2-type endpoint bounds are not assumed; instead the following elementary inequalities are used: 2∣ab∣≤εa2+ε−1b2, ∣∫fg‾∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2, and Cc∞((0,∞)) is dense in L2(0,∞) (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2, Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)).

[F4]

Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace is available under CC (Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace). Riesz representation in a Hilbert space: every bounded conjugate-linear functional on (Vl,∥⋅∥Vl) is represented uniquely by an element of Vl (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces).

[F5]

Range criterion: a densely defined symmetric operator T is self-adjoint if and only if it is closed and ran⁡(T−z)=H for every nonreal z; if additionally T is symmetric and ran⁡(T+μ)=H for one real μ and ker⁡(T∗+μ)={0}, then T is self-adjoint (Range criterion for self-adjointness, Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators).

[F7]

On Cc∞(R3∖{0}) one has ∫∣∇ψ∣2=∫(−Δψ)ψ‾ by the divergence theorem applied to the compactly supported field ψ‾∇ψ, and Cc∞(R3∖{0}) is dense in H1(R3;C): for u∈H1 and the radial cutoffs ηε with ηε=1 off B(0,ε), 0 on B(0,ε) and ∣∇ηε∣≤c/(rlog⁡(1/ε)), the Hardy bound of Three-dimensional Hardy bound gives ∥u∇ηε∥22≤4c2∥∇u∥22/log⁡(1/ε)2→0 and dominated convergence gives ∥ηεu−u∥H1→0 (Divergence for finite piecewise C1 presentations, Vector forms: the boundary integrals of fn and of n×F, Dominated convergence, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[F8]

For every Borel function φ with ∣φ∣≤1 and every ψ∈H2, the identity F2(−Δψ)(ξ)=4π2∣ξ∣2F2ψ(ξ) and Cauchy-Schwarz give ∣ψ(x)∣≤∥(1+∣ξ∣2)F2ψ∥2 ∥(1+∣ξ∣2)−1∥2, so H2(R3)⊆Cb(R3) with a continuous representative (Plancherel theorem, Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2).

[F9]

One-dimensional Sobolev regularity: for −∞<a<b<∞ every class in W1,2(a,b;C) has exactly one continuous representative that is absolutely continuous on [a,b], with u(x)−u(y)=∫yxDu(t) dt; applied to u and then to u′, a class with weak derivatives u′,u′′∈L2(a,b) therefore has a C1 representative with u′ absolutely continuous and u′(x)−u′(y)=∫yxu′′(t) dt (One-dimensional W1,p functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[F10]

Polar coordinates: ∫R3g dx=∫0∞r2∫S2g(rΩ) dσ(Ω) dr for every Borel g≥0; in particular for ψ(x)=u(r)Ylm(Ω)/r with u∈Cc∞((0,∞)) one has ∫R3∣ψ∣2∣x∣−1dx=∫0∞∣u(r)∣2r−1dr (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, Sphere ONB).

Proof

1.1givenF3algebra

Put D0u=u′−u/r on Cc∞(0,∞). This operator is closable: if un→0 and D0un→g in L2, then on every compact subinterval un/r→0 in L2 and un′→0 distributionally, so g=0 distributionally and almost everywhere. Integration of (∣u∣2/r)′ on the core gives ∥D0u∥22=∥u′∥22 and ∥u/r∥22=−2Re⁡∫(u/r)D0u‾; consequently ∥u/r∥2≤2∥D0u∥2. Applied to differences, these identities make the defining Vl norm equivalent to the H1 norm for each fixed l, and identify its completion in L2 with H01(0,∞). In particular the graph completion has injective first projection, its derivative is distributional, and it is a Hilbert space densely and continuously embedded in L2. No fixed-l equivalence constant will be used in an infinite channel sum.

1.2F1F2F7F10algebra

Let W be the Hilbert direct sum of Vl over (l,m), with squared norm ∑∥ulm∥Vl2. On finite compact smooth radial sums, the corrected angular-radial block identity and Euclidean integration by parts give ∥ψ∥H12=∑∥ulm∥Vl2 and q(ψ,φ)=∑al(ulm,vlm), where q=∫∇ψ⋅∇φ‾−γ∫ψφ‾/∣x∣. Polar integration gives the actual r−1 potential weight. To establish the necessary full H1 density, first use smooth density and the origin-removing cutoffs of [F7], followed by compact support and mollification, to reduce to ψ∈Cc∞(R3∖{0}).

2.1step 1.1F3F9algebra

The trace at zero of an H1(0,1) function exists by ∣u(t)−u(s)∣≤∣t−s∣1/2∥u′∥2, and is continuous in its H1 norm: choose a point where ∣u∣≤∥u∥L2(0,1) and use this estimate to bound ∣u(0)∣ by ∥u∥2+∥u′∥2. Thus the completion in step 1.1 has zero trace. Conversely u,u′−u/r,u/r∈L2 gives u′∈L2 and a trace; its trace must be zero since otherwise ∫∣u∣2/r2 diverges. Take a smooth cutoff χε vanishing below ε, one beyond 2ε, with ∣χε′∣≤c/ε; then ∥χε′u∥22≤4c2∫02ε∣u∣2/r2→0, and all omitted function, derivative and weighted tails tend to zero. A cutoff between R and 2R adds a derivative bounded by (c/R)∥u∥L2(R,2R). Mollify the resulting compactly supported functions on intervals away from zero; H1 convergence and boundedness of 1/r there give core convergence in Vl. This proves exactly the stated distributional realization, including l=0, and the first part of (a).

2.2step 1.2F1F7F10algebra

For such an annular smooth ψ, let ψN=PNψ be the angular truncation l≤N. All its radial coefficients are smooth with the same annular support. The polar formula gives ΔψN=PNΔψ: radial differentiation commutes with the finite projection, and angular integration by parts gives ⟨−ΔS2ψ(r⋅),Ylm⟩=λl⟨ψ(r⋅),Ylm⟩. This latter identity uses only the supplied finite-span eigenidentity, with a local Green argument for the other smooth function: excise caps of angular radius δ, integrate the chart expression, cancel periodic azimuth boundaries, and let δ↓0; smooth intrinsic gradients are bounded and cap boundaries have length O(δ), so their terms vanish. Angular completeness and polar integration give ψN→ψ and ΔψN→Δψ in L2. For the smooth annular residual RN, integration by parts gives ∥∇RN∥2=⟨−ΔRN,RN⟩≤∥ΔRN∥∥RN∥→0. Thus finite compact smooth radial sums are H1-dense with the gradient tail actually controlled.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F3F4algebra

Write Du=u′−u/r and λl=l(l+1). Hardy and Cauchy–Schwarz give ∣∫uv‾/r∣≤2∥Du∥2∥v∥2; the derivative and angular terms are bounded by their corresponding Vl norms. Hence al is bounded and symmetric. The inequality 2γxy≤x2/2+2γ2y2 gives the uniform bound al[u]≥12∥Du∥22+λl∥u/r∥22−2γ2∥u∥22. With μ=2γ2+1, the shifted form bl=al+μ⟨⋅,⋅⟩ is a complete inner product with 12∥u∥Vl2≤bl[u]≤cγ∥u∥Vl2, uniformly in l. Riesz representation on (Vl,bl) solves bl(u,v)=⟨f,v⟩ for every f∈L2, so the actual domain definition gives u∈D(Al) and (Al+μ)u=f. Testing v=u gives uniqueness. This proves closedness and semiboundedness of the form and surjectivity of its associated shifted operator.

4.1step 3.1step 2.1F5algebra

For u∈Cc∞(0,∞), integration by parts gives al(u,v)=⟨Llu,v⟩ first for core v, where Llu=−u′′+(λl/r2−γ/r)u∈L2. Both sides are continuous in Vl, so the identity extends to every v∈Vl. Thus the core is contained in D(Al) and this operator domain is L2-dense before any adjoint is taken. The representing f is unique by Vl density. Symmetry of the form gives symmetry of Al. For y∈D(Al∗), solve (Al+μ)x=(Al∗+μ)y by step 3.1; then y−x∈ker⁡(Al∗+μ)=ran⁡(Al+μ)⊥=0. Hence Al=Al∗ on exactly its defined domain, and ⟨Alu,u⟩=al[u]≥−2γ2∥u∥2.

4.2step 1.1step 3.1step 1.2step 2.2F3algebra

Finite-support families with core coordinates are dense in W, since each Vl is the core completion. Step 2.2 therefore extends the finite-core isometry onto W, with its L2 extension agreeing with U: U(H1)=W. The full polarized form identity extends by continuity. In particular the infinite Coulomb sum is uniformly bounded by ∑∣∫ulmvlm‾/r∣≤2(∑∥Dulm∥2)1/2(∑∥vlm∥2)1/2; kinetic and angular sums have their corresponding Cauchy–Schwarz bounds. This uses no equivalence constant growing with l.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1F4algebra

If w∈Vl is bl-orthogonal to D(Al), the solution uf=(Al+μ)−1f from step 3.1 gives 0=bl(uf,w)=⟨f,w⟩ for every f∈L2; therefore w=0. Orthogonal decomposition in the Hilbert space (Vl,bl) implies that the closure of D(Al) is all Vl. Norm equivalence makes this the required density in ∥⋅∥Vl and completes (a),(b). This proves form density directly, without a spectral-form assertion.

5.2step 4.1step 2.1F9algebra

For u∈D(Al), test its form identity against core v. Distributional integration by parts gives −u′′+(λl/r2−γ/r)u=Alu; the cross terms in (u′−u/r)(v′−v/r)‾ cancel by integrating (uv‾/r)′. On a compact interval away from zero the potential coefficient is bounded, so u′′∈L2 there and step 2.1 gives u,u′∈L2. Thus u∈Hloc2, and [F9] gives its C1 representative and locally absolutely continuous derivative. If Alu=Eu, the right side for u′′ is continuous, so integration makes u′ of class C1 and the equation holds everywhere with u∈C2. This proves (c) without regularity at the origin.

5.3step 4.1F5algebra

Define A^=⨁Al on exactly the square-summable graph domain in (d). Finite-support domain vectors are dense and coordinate symmetry gives symmetry. Self-adjointness of each Al gives ∥(Al±i)−1∥≤1, by ∥(Al±i)u∥2=∥Alu∥2+∥u∥2. For f∈K, take ulm=(Al±i)−1flm; the coordinate norm sum is bounded by ∥f∥2, and Alulm=flm∓iulm has square-summable norms. Thus both ranges of A^±i are all K, proving self-adjointness by the symmetric range criterion. Coordinate closedness also directly proves the graph is closed.

6.1step 4.2step 5.3F1F2F7algebra

For ψ∈H2=D(C) and φ∈H1, weak Fourier integration by parts and three-dimensional Hardy give q(ψ,φ)=⟨Cψ,φ⟩: prove it first for core φ and extend by H1 continuity, using ψ/∣x∣∈L2. By step 4.2, u=Uψ∈W. Fix one coordinate j=(l,m) and v∈Vl; then φ=U−1(vδj)∈H1 and the full form identity gives al(uj,v)=⟨(UCψ)j,v⟩. Hence uj∈D(Al) and Aluj=(UCψ)j. The latter coordinates are square summable, so C⊆U∗A^U. Both operators are self-adjoint; taking adjoints reverses the inclusion, giving equality. This proves the full iff graph-domain statement and action formula (d), also for γ=0 using its explicit free operator.

7.1step 5.2step 6.1F1F8F9algebra∎

If Alu=Eu, the one-block family uδ(l,0) belongs to D(A^); step 6.1 gives ψ=U−1(uδ(l,0))∈H2, Cψ=Eψ, and ψ=u(r)Yl0(Ω)/r almost everywhere. Its H2 Fourier transform lies in L1 by Cauchy–Schwarz with (1+∣ξ∣2)−1∈L2, so the absolutely convergent inverse defines a bounded continuous representative by dominated convergence, agreeing with the L2 inverse by truncation. Step 5.2 and continuity of Yl0 make the polar expression continuous away from zero; two continuous functions agreeing almost everywhere on that open set agree everywhere, since any nonzero difference persists on a positive-measure neighborhood. Choose Ω0 with Yl0(Ω0)≠0; then ∣u(r)/r∣≤∥ψ∥∞/∣Yl0(Ω0)∣ for 0<r≤1. This proves (e) with genuine operator-domain transport and justifies evaluation on a fixed ray. All clauses (a)–(e) follow.

Remarks

Form-domain lemma: for a self-adjoint operator A≥c with quadratic form qA[x]=∫λ dEx, the domain D(A) is dense in the form domain Q(A)=D((A−cI)1/2) in the norm ∥x∥Q2=∥x∥2+∥(A−cI)1/2x∥2, and qA[x]=⟨Ax,x⟩ for x∈D(A) (Spectral form domain and core of a semibounded operator, Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form)).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources