Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two-body reduced mass

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let m1,m2>0, put M:=m1+m2, μ:=m1m2/M, let κ>0, ℏ>0, and define the linear coordinate map Φ:R6→R6,Φ(x1,x2):=(R,r),R:=m1x1+m2x2M,r:=x1−x2, with inverse x1=R+m2Mr, x2=R−m1Mr. Write L2=L2(R6;C) and for f∈L2 put (UΦf)(R,r):=f(x1,x2) with xi expressed through (R,r). Then:

(a) Φ is a linear isomorphism with ∣det⁡Φ∣=1, and UΦ is a unitary operator on L2;

(b) for every Schwartz function f, UΦ(−(ℏ2/2m1)Δx1−(ℏ2/2m2)Δx2)UΦ−1f=(−(ℏ2/2M)ΔR−(ℏ2/2μ)Δr)f; moreover both sides define the same self-adjoint operator on the common domain H2(R6;C);

(c) the operator H2:=−(ℏ2/2m1)Δx1−(ℏ2/2m2)Δx2−κ/∣x1−x2∣ with D(H2):=H2(R6;C) is self-adjoint, and UΦH2UΦ−1=TR⊗I+I⊗Cμ under the identification L2(R6)≅L2(RR3)⊗^L2(Rr3) of Euclidean L² product unitary: L²(R^a)⊗̂L²(R^b) ≅ L²(R^{a+b}), where TR:=−(ℏ2/2M)ΔR and Cμ:=−(ℏ2/2μ)Δr−κ/∣⋅∣;

(d) σ(H2)=[−μκ22ℏ2,∞), and H2 has no eigenvalues at all: the negative part of its spectrum is the interval [−μκ22ℏ2,0), consisting entirely of continuous spectrum, and each relative bound-state energy −μκ22ℏ2n2 of Cμ is a threshold of the continuous spectrum of H2 rather than an eigenvalue; in particular a relative bound state tensored with any centre-of-mass state is not an eigenvector of H2;

(e) On L2(RR3;C) define the centre-of-mass momentum component

PR,jcm:=ℏi∂Rj,D(PR,jcm):={g∈L2(RR3;C):∂Rjg∈L2 as a weak derivative}.

On the full two-body space define its lift

P~R,j:=UΦ−1(PR,jcm⊗I)UΦ,D(P~R,j):=UΦ−1{F∈L2(RR3×Rr3;C):∂RjF∈L2 as a weak derivative}.

Each P~R,j is self-adjoint and has no nonzero eigenvectors in L2(R6;C); hence there is no normalisable state of definite total momentum (a simultaneous eigenvector of the three lifted components).

All statements are mathematical statements about the operators on L2(R6) and the coordinate map; no physical interpretation, no identification of m1,m2,κ,ℏ with measured constants, and no claim about nature is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: m1,m2,κ,ℏ>0 and the derived constants M,μ; the map Φ and pullback UΦ; Schwartz functions.

[F1]

Linear change of variables: for an invertible linear map Φ with ∣det⁡Φ∣=1 the pullback UΦf:=f∘Φ−1 is unitary on L2(R6;C) (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Schwartz convolution and product laws, A bounded linear map from a dense normed subspace into a Banach space extends uniquely with the same norm).

[F2]

For c>0, b∈R the operator H0=F2∗Mc∣ξ∣2+bF2 with domain W2,2(Rd;C) is self-adjoint and equals −c4π2Δ+b on Schwartz functions; in particular free kinetic operators with positive coefficients are self-adjoint on W2,2 (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators, Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[F3]

Kato-Rellich: if A is self-adjoint and B is symmetric with D(A)⊆D(B) and A-bound less than one, then A+B on D(A) is self-adjoint (Kato-Rellich theorem, Relative boundedness with respect to an operator).

[F4]

Hardy bound and its infinitesimal form: for g∈W1,2(R3;C), ∥g/∣⋅∣∥2≤2∥∇g∥2, and for g∈W2,2(R3) and every η>0, ∥g/∣⋅∣∥2≤η∥Δg∥2+η−1∥g∥2 (Coulomb infinitesimal kinetic bound, Three-dimensional Hardy bound).

[F5]

The negative eigenvalues of Cμ are −μκ22ℏ2n2 (n≥1), with eigenspaces spanned by the corresponding regular solutions, and each nonzero radial component of every negative eigenfunction is a multiple of its corresponding regular solution (Laguerre bound energy exhaustion, Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy).

[F7]

Cμ has no eigenvalue in [0,∞): with γ:=2μκ/ℏ2 one has Cμ=ℏ22μCγ for Cγ:=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣, whose block identity makes the eigenvalues of Cγ the union of those of the radial operators Al, and no Al has eigenvalue 0 or eigenvalue k2>0 (Coulomb continuum spectral density (d), Coulomb Jost Volterra solution (d), Transported radial endpoint realization (d)).

[F8]

Tonelli applies to the nonnegative squared norms of sections on the sigma-finite product RR3×Rr3; smooth compactly supported functions are dense in W2,2(R6) (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)). Real measurable multiplication is closed on its maximal L2 domain (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators).

[F9]

For γ>0, Cγ:=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ has an onto unitary spectral representation Vγ as the countable sum over spherical channels (l,m) of bound copies with energies −γ2/(4n2), n≥l+1, and continuum copies L2((0,∞),dλ) with maximal multiplier Mλ, with no zero eigenvector (Onto radial continuum transform (d), Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy). For a self-adjoint A and c>0, its scaled PVM satisfies EcA(B)=EA(c−1B) for every Borel B (Positive scaling of a self-adjoint operator: the spectral projection-valued measure transforms by the preimage of the scaling map (b), (c)). The change-of-variables formula applies to the positive linear dilation of the continuum variable (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

[F10]

The partial Plancherel transform FR⊗I is unitary on L2(RR3×Rr3;C); it maps the maximal weak-derivative domain {F:∂RjF∈L2} onto {F^:ξjF^∈L2} and sends ℏi∂Rj to multiplication by 2πℏξj. This follows from Plancherel theorem, Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers, and Euclidean L² product unitary: L²(R^a)⊗̂L²(R^b) ≅ L²(R^{a+b}). A real finite-valued multiplier on its maximal L2 domain is self-adjoint (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators (a)); Tonelli applies to the product variables (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

Proof

1.1F1F6givenalgebra

[The coordinate map] In the three coordinates the matrix of Φ relative to the splitting (x1,x2)↦(R,r) is block diagonal with the 2×2 block (m1/Mm2/M1−1) repeated three times; its determinant is −m2/M−m1/M=−1, so ∣det⁡Φ∣=1 and Φ is invertible with the displayed inverse. By the linear change-of-variables theorem the pullback UΦf=f∘Φ−1 is unitary on L2(R6;C), since it preserves the integral of ∣f∣2; this is (a).

1.2F6F8F10algebra

[Lifted total momentum and no eigenvector] By [F10], the partial Plancherel transform conjugates each lifted operator P~R,j to multiplication by the real function (ξ,r)↦2πℏξj on its maximal domain {G:ξjG∈L2(R6)}. The real-multiplier theorem therefore makes P~R,j self-adjoint on exactly the weak-derivative domain in (e). If P~R,jΨ=pΨ, its partial Fourier transform satisfies (2πℏξj−p)F^(ξ,r)=0 for a.e. (ξ,r), so it is supported on the hyperplane ξj=p/(2πℏ). This hyperplane has Lebesgue measure zero in Rξ3; Tonelli over the remaining momentum coordinates and r shows F^=0 and hence Ψ=0. Thus no lifted component, and consequently no triple of lifted components, has a nonzero eigenvector.

2.1step 1.1F6givenalgebra

[Kinetic separation on Schwartz functions] Let f be Schwartz. The chain rule gives ∂x1,j=m1M∂Rj+∂rj and ∂x2,j=m2M∂Rj−∂rj, hence Δx1=m12M2ΔR+2m1M∂R⋅∂r+Δr and Δx2=m22M2ΔR−2m2M∂R⋅∂r+Δr. Multiplying by ℏ22mi and summing, the mixed terms cancel because m1M⋅1m1−m2M⋅1m2=0, while the ΔR coefficient is −ℏ22M and the Δr coefficient is −ℏ22(1m1+1m2)=−ℏ22μ; this is the displayed identity of (b) at the level of Schwartz functions.

3.1step 2.1F2givenalgebra

[The kinetic operators agree as self-adjoint operators] Let K denote the self-adjoint operator on W2,2(R6) given by −ℏ22m1Δx1−ℏ22m2Δx2 (existence by [F2], applied to the Fourier multiplier 4π2(ℏ22m1∣ξ1∣2+ℏ22m2∣ξ2∣2), which is comparable to ∣ξ∣2), and let K′ be the self-adjoint operator on W2,2(R6) given by −ℏ22MΔR−ℏ22μΔr. Both act on Schwartz functions, a common core of W2,2-type Fourier-multiplier operators, and step 2.1 shows UΦKUΦ−1f=K′f for Schwartz f; since UΦKUΦ−1 and K′ are self-adjoint operators agreeing on a common core, they are equal, and UΦ(D(K))=D(K′)=H2(R6;C). This completes (b).

4.1step 3.1F2F3F4F6F8algebra

[Norm lift and two-body self-adjointness] Under UΦ, the original multiplier −κ/∣x1−x2∣ becomes −κ/∣r∣. First let w∈Cc∞(RR3×Rr3). For each R, [F4] gives ∥w(R,⋅)/∣r∣∥Lr2≤η∥Δrw(R,⋅)∥Lr2+η−1∥w(R,⋅)∥Lr2. Taking LR2 norms and the triangle inequality, with [F8], yields ∥w/∣r∣∥2≤η∥Δrw∥2+η−1∥w∥2. Approximate arbitrary w∈H2(R6) in its Sobolev norm by [F8]. Applying this estimate to differences makes the quotients Cauchy in L2; closedness of multiplication identifies their limit with w/∣r∣, so the estimate holds on all of H2. The Fourier symbols of −Δr and K′=−(ℏ2/(2M))ΔR−(ℏ2/(2μ))Δr are simultaneous nonnegative multipliers 4π2∣ξr∣2 and 4π2(ℏ2∣ξR∣2/(2M)+ℏ2∣ξr∣2/(2μ)); their pointwise domination gives ∥Δrw∥2≤(2μ/ℏ2)∥K′w∥2 by Plancherel. Therefore ∥κw/∣r∣∥2≤(2κμη/ℏ2)∥K′w∥2+(κ/η)∥w∥2, an arbitrarily small operator relative bound. Kato–Rellich [F3] makes K′−κ/∣r∣ self-adjoint on H2. Conjugating back gives exactly H2=UΦ−1(K′−κ/∣r∣)UΦ, self-adjoint on H2; the separated differential expression, under [F6], is TR⊗I+I⊗Cμ. This denotes the self-adjoint commuting spectral sum: choose c with Cμ+c≥0. In its joint product representation the nonnegative sum has domain equal to the intersection of the two factor domains, because each nonnegative summand is bounded pointwise by their sum. The relative norm bound just proved makes the Cμ graph norm equivalent to the relative Laplacian graph norm; Fourier comparison of the two nonnegative kinetic weights identifies that intersection with H2(R6). Thus its graph closure is the same Kato–Rellich operator. This proves (c) with an actual fiber-norm lift and no form-to-norm inference.

5.1step 4.1F2F5F6F7F8F9algebra

[Full spectrum and no eigenvalue by the product representation] By step 4.1 the transformed operator is TR⊗I+I⊗Cμ. Put γ:=2μκ/ℏ2>0 and c:=ℏ2/(2μ)>0, so Cμ=cCγ on their common domain H2(R3). Under Vγ of [F9], this is the diagonal operator with scaled bound values c(−γ2/(4n2))=−μκ2/(2ℏ2n2) and continuum multiplier cλ. The PVM transfer in [F9] gives, on a continuum copy, ECμ(B)=M1c−1B(λ) in this representation. Define (Dch)(E):=c−1/2h(E/c) on each continuum copy, with inverse (Dc−1g)(λ)=c1/2g(cλ). Changing variables E=cλ gives ∫0∞∣Dch(E)∣2dE=∫0∞∣h(λ)∣2dλ, so Dc is onto unitary. The same substitution gives ∫0∞E2∣Dch(E)∣2dE=c2∫0∞λ2∣h(λ)∣2dλ; hence it maps the exact maximal domain of cMλ onto that of ME and satisfies Dc(cMλ)Dc−1=ME. On indicators it gives DcM1c−1B(λ)Dc−1=M1B(E), explicitly transporting the continuum PVM. The direct sum of the identity on every bound copy and Dc on every continuum copy is onto unitary: its norm identity and inverse hold in each coordinate and therefore in the countable square sum. Composing it with Vγ gives the full relative spectral resolution of Cμ, including its diagonal domain and no zero eigenchannel. Apply this unitary and the 2π-normalized center Fourier transform to the tensor decomposition, using [F6] and Plancherel. The absence of nonnegative relative eigenvalues in [F7] agrees with that resolution. The operator becomes the countable sum of real multiplication operators: on each relative bound copy its multiplier is cR(ξ)+En, where cR(ξ)=4π2ℏ2∣ξ∣2/(2M) and En=−μκ2/(2ℏ2n2); on each continuum copy it is cR(ξ)+E′ for E′>0. These multipliers are all at least E1, so the operator is bounded below by E1. For every E≥E1 choose ξ0 with cR(ξ0)=E−E1 and normalized smooth Fourier profiles supported in shrinking balls around ξ0. Their inverse transforms φδ are Schwartz, and ∥(TR−(E−E1))φδ∥→0 by continuity of cR. The correctly ordered vectors φδ⊗u1 have norm one and belong to the operator domain, with residual (TR−(E−E1))φδ⊗u1 tending to zero; a bounded resolvent at E would contradict this, so E∈σ(H2). Hence σ(H2)=[E1,∞). For an eigenvalue equation at any real E, each bound-component Fourier class must be supported on {ξ:cR(ξ)=E−En}, a sphere, a point or the empty set, all Lebesgue-null; each continuum component must be supported on {(ξ,E′):E′=E−cR(ξ)}, which has zero product measure by Tonelli since every E′ section is a singleton. The countable spectral sum therefore has no nonzero eigenvector. All spectral points, including the negative interval, are continuous spectrum because the operator is self-adjoint. Every En is the lower edge of its relative bound-channel band [En,∞), a threshold without a total eigenvector. This proves (d) with all masses and couplings retained.

6.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

[Conclusion] Steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1 and 5.1 establish (a)–(d), and step 1.2 establishes (e).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources