Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Atomic dipole matrix-element domain

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The Axiom of Choice). Let γ>0, let C=−Δ−γ/∣⋅∣ on H2(R3;C) be as above, let (ψnlm) be the bound eigenfunctions of Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy, and for i=1,2,3 define the coordinate multiplication operator Qiψ:=(ξ↦ξi ψ(ξ)),D(Qi):={ψ∈L2(R3;C):ξiψ∈L2}. Write also Q0:=x3 and Q±:=(x1±ix2)/2. Then:

(a) each Qi is self-adjoint on D(Qi), the domain is a proper dense subspace of L2, and every bound state satisfies ψnlm∈D(Qi), with ∥Qiψnlm∥22=∫0∞r2∣unl(r)∣2dr⋅∫S2∣ΩiYlm(Ω)∣2dσ(Ω)<∞;

(b) for all labels and each q∈{−1,0,1} the matrix element ⟨ψn′l′m′,Qqψnlm⟩ is absolutely convergent and factors as ⟨ψn′l′m′,Qqψnlm⟩=(∫0∞r un′l′(r)unl(r)‾ dr)(∫S2Yl′m′(Ω)Qq(Ω) Ylm(Ω)‾ dσ(Ω)), where Qq(Ω) denotes the restriction of the polynomial Qq to S2;

(c) the angular factor vanishes unless l′=l+1, m′=m+q or l≥1, l′=l−1, m′=m+q; these are necessary conditions only: no assertion is made that an allowed pair has nonzero radial integral, and no transition probability is asserted or computed;

(d) for the oscillator: fix real parameters m>0, ω>0, ℏ>0 and put ℓ:=ℏ/(mω)>0. For the complete orthonormal family (ψnosc) of Oscillator scaling and exact realization and the position operator Xf(x)=xf(x) on D(X)={f∈L2(R,dx):xf∈L2} (multiplication by ℓy after x=ℓy), one has Xψnosc=ℓ2(n ψn−1osc+n+1 ψn+1osc), so ⟨ψn′osc,Xψnosc⟩ vanishes unless n′=n±1, with the displayed coefficients; in particular the oscillator position matrix elements are supported on a single step ∣Δn∣=1, while the Coulomb selection rules constrain only Δl and Δm and leave the radial integral free.

This item concerns matrix elements of multiplication operators on L2 and their finiteness and selection rules; it asserts no absorption, emission or transition rate and no physical interpretation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: γ>0; the integer bound/angular labels of the stated family; maximal domains D(Qq)={f:Qqf∈L2}, so D(Q0)=D(Q3) and D(Q±)=D(Q1)∩D(Q2) because ∣Q±∣2=(x12+x22)/2; the bound states ψnlm=unl(r)Ylm(Ω)/r of the previous items; the coordinate multipliers Qi,Qq; the oscillator parameters m,ω,ℏ>0 and ℓ=ℏ/(mω)>0.

[F1]

For a real finite-valued measurable a the multiplier Maf=af with D(Ma)={f:af∈L2} is self-adjoint (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators (a), Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators); the coordinate functions ξi are real finite-valued.

[F2]

Every bound state has unl∈L2(0,∞), unl(r)=c rl+1e−krLn−l−1(2l+1)(2kr) up to a nonzero scalar with k=γ/(2n), and ∥ψnlm∥2=∥unl∥2 (Negative-subspace completeness and degeneracy, Kummer recurrence and termination, Angular radial unitary reduction).

[F3]

Dipole angular selection rules: for the spherical components Q0=x3, Q±=(x1±ix2)/2 and the family (Ylm), the angular matrix element ⟨Yl′m′,Qq∣S2Ylm⟩ can be nonzero only if l′=l+1, m′=m+q or l≥1, l′=l−1, m′=m+q; the rule is a necessary condition on the angular integrals only (degree and weight clauses (b), (c) of Dipole angular selection rules, Associated Legendre function normalization).

[F4]

Oscillator: for real m,ω,ℏ>0 and ℓ=ℏ/(mω)>0, the scaled Hermite functions ψnosc=ℓ−1/2gn(x/ℓ) form a complete orthonormal family of L2(R,dx) with x=ℓy, and the Hermite recurrence gives 2 y gn=n gn−1+n+1 gn+1 with the lowering term omitted at n=0 (equivalently define g−1=0 and ψ−1osc=0) (Oscillator scaling and exact realization, Hermite recurrence (d), (g), Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases, Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family).

[F5]

Polar volume integration is dx=r2dr dσ (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma); nonnegative product integrals use Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, and absolutely convergent product integrals use Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability. For a>0 and integer p≥0, integration by parts starting with p=0 gives ∫0∞rpe−ardr=p!/ap+1; the boundary terms vanish since a sufficiently high exponential-series term bounds every fixed polynomial power (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a), The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0). Cauchy-Schwarz for the L2 and L2(S2,σ) pairings (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2, Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions).

Proof

1.1F1F5givenalgebra

[Coordinate domains] Each real Qi is self-adjoint by [F1]. For f∈L2, fN=1∣xi∣≤Nf lies in D(Qi) and converges in L2, proving density. Put φ(t)=(1+∣t∣)−1; it belongs to L2(R) whereas t2∣φ(t)∣2≥1/4 for ∣t∣≥1. For each i, fi(x)=φ(xi)∏j≠ie−∣xj∣ belongs to L2 but xifi∉L2 by nonnegative product integration. Thus every domain is proper, including i=2,3, not just the first-coordinate example.

2.1step 1.1F2F5algebra

[Bound-state domain membership] By [F2], unl is polynomial-exponential with positive decay rate and is O(rl+1) at zero. Hence ∫0∞r2∣unl∣2dr<∞: near zero the integrand is O(r2l+4), and all polynomial-exponential moments at infinity are finite by [F5]. Polar coordinates give exactly ∥Qiψnlm∥2=∫r2∣unl∣2dr∫∣ΩiYlm∣2dσ, whose angular factor is at most one. Each bound state therefore lies in every D(Qi) and in the stated complex component domains. This proves (a).

3.1step 2.1F2F5algebra

[Absolute convergence and factorization] Put v=un′l′, u=unl, Y′=Yl′m′ and Y=Ylm. Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∫0∞r∣vu‾∣dr≤∥v∥2∥ru∥2<∞ and ∫S2∣Y′QqY‾∣dσ≤∥Y′∥2∥QqY∥2≤1. Tonelli and Fubini in [F5] justify absolute integration of the polar product and its factorization into (∫0∞rvu‾ dr)(∫S2Y′QqY‾ dσ), exactly (b) for the linear-first pairing. Coordinate multiplication generally produces two angular blocks; no false single-block claim is used.

4.1step 3.1F3algebra

[All necessary angular branches] By [F3], Qqhlm=Rq+r2Gq has harmonic degrees l+1,l−1, with Gq=(∑cq,i∂ihlm)/(2l+1). At l=1 its derivative term can be a nonzero constant in V0, so the downward branch l′=0 is retained. At l=0 the derivatives vanish and only the upward branch remains. Degree orthogonality and the Lz eigenvalue calculation give exactly l′=l+1,m′=m+q, or l≥1,l′=l−1,m′=m+q. These are necessary only; the radial factor is ∫0∞r un′l′unl‾dr and may vanish for an allowed angular pair. No transition probability is defined. This proves (c).

5.1step 4.1F4F5algebra

[The oscillator comparison] In the scaled variable x=ℓy multiplication by x is ℓ times multiplication by y; by [F4] the Hermite recurrence gives, on the complete orthonormal family (ψnosc), Xψnosc=ℓ y ψnosc=ℓ2(nψn−1osc+n+1ψn+1osc); the lowering term being absent at n=0. The recurrence puts Xψnosc in L2, proving membership in the maximal position domain; taking pairings with ψn′osc and using orthonormality [F4] and Cauchy-Schwarz [F5] gives ⟨ψn′osc,Xψnosc⟩=ℓ2(nδn′,n−1+n+1δn′,n+1), so exactly the transitions ∣Δn∣=1 occur, with the displayed coefficients. This is (d).

6.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

[Conclusion] Clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) are steps 1.1 and 2.1, 3.1, 4.1, and 5.1.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources