Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Explicit Gaussian continuation of a free resolvent matrix element

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. On H=L2(R3,dp;C) with ⟨f,h⟩=∫R3f(p)h(p)‾ dp, let H0=M∣p∣2 on its maximal domain {f:∣p∣2f∈L2}, let g(p)=π−3/4e−∣p∣2/2, and put

m(z):=⟨(H0−zI)−1g,g⟩,Im⁡z>0.

This is a dimensionless model; no physical units are assigned to p or z.

For w∈C, define the entire function

E(w):=2π∫Γwe−ζ2 dζ,Γw={w+t:t≥0},

where Γw is the horizontal ray oriented from w toward +∞+w. For any E0>0, take a disk D centered at E0 with 0∉D, and the holomorphic square root k:D→C with k(E0)=E0>0. Then m has the local analytic continuation through E0

mcont(z)=2+2iπ k(z)e−zE(−ik(z)),z∈D.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Hilbert space, multiplication operator, vector g, scalar resolvent matrix element, and local continuation definition in the Statement.

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice as required by the self-adjoint multiplication and integration suppliers (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Real multiplication by a measurable finite real function on its maximal domain is self-adjoint; in particular H0=M∣p∣2≥0 on the domain stated above (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators).

[F3]

For a radial integrand in R3, dp=4πr2 dr after angular integration (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

[F4]

Nonnegative iterated integrals may be interchanged by Tonelli's theorem on sigma-finite product measure spaces (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F5]

Dominated convergence applies to the finite integrals and locally uniform parameter bounds used below (Dominated convergence).

[F6]

Holomorphic functions agreeing on a set with an accumulation point in a connected domain agree throughout that domain (Identity theorem for holomorphic functions).

Proof

Given: [A1], the Hilbert space, multiplication operator, normalized vector g, scalar resolvent element, and the disk and branch data in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2F3F4F5

By [F1], H0 is self-adjoint and nonnegative. The Gaussian integral in [F2], applied in each coordinate and combined with Tonelli [F4], gives ∫R3e−∣p∣2 dp=π3/2, so ∥g∥=1. Polar coordinates [F3] and the resolvent multiplier therefore give m(z)=4π∫0∞r2e−r2r2−z dr for Im⁡z>0. The denominator is nonzero on the integration ray, and the integral is locally uniformly dominated on the upper half-plane, so it defines the stated resolvent matrix element.

1.2F2F4algebra

For Re⁡a>0, put I(a)=∫0∞e−r2(r2+a2)−1 dr. When a>0 is real, the Laplace representation of (r2+a2)−1 and Tonelli [F4] give I(a)=∫0∞e−a2s∫0∞e−(1+s)r2 dr ds=π2∫0∞e−a2s1+s ds by [F2]. The substitutions u=1+s and v=au then give I(a)=πea2∫1∞e−a2u2 du=πea2a∫a∞e−v2 dv=π2aea2E(a), using the horizontal-ray definition of E for real a>0.

2.1step 1.2F2F5F6algebra

Fix a0 with Re⁡a0>0 and a closed disk K about a0 contained in that half-plane. Choose η>0 and A<∞ so that Re⁡a≥η and ∣a∣≤A on K. For r≥0, ∣r2+a2∣=∣a+ir∣∣a−ir∣≥η2. For nonzero complex δ small enough that a0+δ∈K, the exact difference quotient of the integrand of I is e−r2δ(1r2+(a0+δ)2−1r2+a02)=−(2a0+δ)e−r2(r2+(a0+δ)2)(r2+a02). For ∣δ∣≤1, its modulus is at most (2A+1)η−4e−r2, an integrable majorant by [F2]. The quotients are measurable in r, and tend pointwise to −2a0e−r2/(r2+a02)2. Applying [F5] along every sequence of nonzero complex increments tending to zero proves that I is complex differentiable at a0, with derivative the integral of this limit. Thus I is holomorphic on the right half-plane; this conclusion uses the actual difference quotients, not an assumption that dominated convergence is itself a differentiation theorem. For E, put F(w,t)=e−(w+t)2. Its exact segment identity is F(w+δ,t)−F(w,t)δ=∫01−2(w+sδ+t)e−(w+sδ+t)2 ds. For completeness this identity follows by expanding the exponential series on the finite segment, differentiating each polynomial in s, and integrating it: the series and its derivative converge uniformly there, since for ∣w+sδ+t∣≤B they are dominated respectively by ∑B2n/n! and ∣δ∣∑n≥12nB2n−1/n!, both finite. Hence passage through the finite segment integral is justified by the uniform remainder bound. For ∣w∣≤R, ∣δ∣≤1 and 0≤s≤1, write w+sδ=u+iv; then ∣u∣,∣v∣≤R+1 and (t+u)2≥t2/2−u2. Consequently the segment derivative is bounded in modulus by CR(1+t)e−t2/2, independently of w,δ,s. This majorant is integrable: (1+t)e−t2/4 is bounded, and the remaining scaled Gaussian is integrable by [F2]. The original integrand is bounded the same way without the factor 1+t. The measurable difference quotients therefore have one integrable majorant and tend pointwise, as complex δ→0, to −2(w+t)e−(w+t)2. Apply [F5] to every such sequence to obtain the complex derivative of E at every w. It is entire. Both sides of step 1.2 are therefore holomorphic on the connected half-plane Re⁡a>0; their agreement on the positive real axis has an accumulation point inside this domain, so [F6] extends the identity throughout the half-plane.

3.1step 2.1F2F5algebra∎

For Im⁡z>0, choose the square root a=−z with Re⁡a>0. Since r2/(r2−z)=1+z/(r2−z), m(z)=2+4zπI(a); substituting the identity from step 2.1 and z=−a2 gives m(z)=2−2π ae−zE(a). On D∩{Im⁡z>0}, the root a equals −ik(z): both square to −z, and Re⁡(−ik(z))>0. Substitution gives m(z)=2+2iπ k(z)e−zE(−ik(z)) there. The right hand side is holomorphic throughout D, so it is the required local continuation through E0.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources