How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Explicit Gaussian continuation of a free resolvent matrix element
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. On with , let on its maximal domain , let , and put
This is a dimensionless model; no physical units are assigned to or .
For , define the entire function
where is the horizontal ray oriented from toward . For any , take a disk centered at with , and the holomorphic square root with . Then has the local analytic continuation through
Statement references
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Continued resolvent matrix elements and resonance poles
Identity theorem for holomorphic functions
Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators
Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Hilbert space, multiplication operator, vector , scalar resolvent matrix element, and local continuation definition in the Statement.
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice as required by the self-adjoint multiplication and integration suppliers (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Real multiplication by a measurable finite real function on its maximal domain is self-adjoint; in particular on the domain stated above (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators).
For a radial integrand in , after angular integration (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
Nonnegative iterated integrals may be interchanged by Tonelli's theorem on sigma-finite product measure spaces (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).
Dominated convergence applies to the finite integrals and locally uniform parameter bounds used below (Dominated convergence).
Holomorphic functions agreeing on a set with an accumulation point in a connected domain agree throughout that domain (Identity theorem for holomorphic functions).
Proof
Given: [A1], the Hilbert space, multiplication operator, normalized vector , scalar resolvent element, and the disk and branch data in the Statement.
By [F1], is self-adjoint and nonnegative. The Gaussian integral in [F2], applied in each coordinate and combined with Tonelli [F4], gives , so . Polar coordinates [F3] and the resolvent multiplier therefore give for . The denominator is nonzero on the integration ray, and the integral is locally uniformly dominated on the upper half-plane, so it defines the stated resolvent matrix element.
For , put . When is real, the Laplace representation of and Tonelli [F4] give by [F2]. The substitutions and then give , using the horizontal-ray definition of for real .
Fix with and a closed disk about contained in that half-plane. Choose and so that and on . For , . For nonzero complex small enough that , the exact difference quotient of the integrand of is For , its modulus is at most , an integrable majorant by [F2]. The quotients are measurable in , and tend pointwise to . Applying [F5] along every sequence of nonzero complex increments tending to zero proves that is complex differentiable at , with derivative the integral of this limit. Thus is holomorphic on the right half-plane; this conclusion uses the actual difference quotients, not an assumption that dominated convergence is itself a differentiation theorem. For , put . Its exact segment identity is For completeness this identity follows by expanding the exponential series on the finite segment, differentiating each polynomial in , and integrating it: the series and its derivative converge uniformly there, since for they are dominated respectively by and , both finite. Hence passage through the finite segment integral is justified by the uniform remainder bound. For , and , write ; then and . Consequently the segment derivative is bounded in modulus by , independently of . This majorant is integrable: is bounded, and the remaining scaled Gaussian is integrable by [F2]. The original integrand is bounded the same way without the factor . The measurable difference quotients therefore have one integrable majorant and tend pointwise, as complex , to . Apply [F5] to every such sequence to obtain the complex derivative of at every . It is entire. Both sides of step 1.2 are therefore holomorphic on the connected half-plane ; their agreement on the positive real axis has an accumulation point inside this domain, so [F6] extends the identity throughout the half-plane.
For , choose the square root with . Since , ; substituting the identity from step 2.1 and gives . On , the root equals : both square to , and . Substitution gives there. The right hand side is holomorphic throughout , so it is the required local continuation through .
Depends on
Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions
Continued resolvent matrix elements and resonance poles
The Axiom of Choice
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Dominated convergence
The Gaussian integral
Identity theorem for holomorphic functions
Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators
Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product