How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Weyl quantization, Wigner functions and finite-time classical limits — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Approximation and Compactness in C(K)
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach Valued Integration and the Radon Nikodym Property
- Banach-Space Differential Calculus and Banach Manifolds
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Codimension One Foliations, Secondary Classes and Characteristic Disk Foundations
- Compact Operators and Riesz Schauder Theory
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Convergence: Nets and Filters
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Direct Matrix Factorisations: LU, Cholesky and QR
- Distributions Test Functions and Differentiation
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Probability and the Probabilistic Method
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fourier Transform Convolution and Approximate Identities
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and leapfrog correction
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper and Parameter-Dependent Multiple Integrals
- Improper Integrals
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Matrix Differentiation and First-order Spectral Perturbation
- Matrix Norms, Condition Numbers and Numerical Stability
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Qm Math Controlled Dynamics
- Qm Math Oscillator
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schwartz Space and the Plancherel Theorem
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Strongly Continuous Semigroups and Hille Yosida
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Analytic Hahn Banach Theorem
- The Baire Principles of Functional Analysis
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Unbounded Self Adjoint Operators and Stones Theorem
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Weyl quantization, Wigner functions and finite-time classical limits
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
Exact harmonic-oscillator transport of a Gaussian Wigner density
Example
Assume Countable Choice, let , and use the one-dimensional oscillator with its self-adjoint oscillator realization. For real , the normalized Gaussian has Wigner density Write . For a measurable density with and , define its mean and covariance by This Wigner density has mean and covariance . On let and . For a normalized , define , , , and . These standard deviations satisfy , and the displayed Gaussian attains equality with both deviations . Let , and define the evolved state's distributional Wigner functional on by Then it is represented by the exact density Thus this quadratic model transports the Gaussian Wigner density exactly along its classical Hamiltonian flow; its phase-space mean follows and its covariance remains . This is a mathematical model calculation, not an experimental observation.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , real , and the one-dimensional oscillator convention in the Statement.
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
For , , the scaled oscillator has a self-adjoint realization with complete Hermite eigenbasis; its finite Hermite span is a graph core, and on that core it equals (Oscillator scaling and exact realization, Hermite recurrence).
The Wigner integral and Weyl pairing use the exact signs, factors, and inner-product convention of Schwartz Weyl quantization and Wigner distributions; for Schwartz states, (Wigner pairing and marginals).
The Gaussian Fourier integral is (Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization).
The exact quadratic Egorov identity holds for this self-adjoint realization when Schwartz space is a core (Fixed-time Weyl Egorov estimate for subquadratic potentials).
The chain rule and integration by parts apply to Schwartz functions, and the scaled Gaussian integral gives (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines, Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization).
In a real or complex inner-product space, (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs).
The first-variable-linear pairing makes complex a Hilbert space ( with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).
A diffeomorphism between open Euclidean sets changes integrals of complex functions by its absolute Jacobian. The positive Gaussian scalings and the phase-space rotation below satisfy these hypotheses; their integrands are absolutely integrable (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).
Verification
Given: The data and [A1], [F1]–[F8].
The scaled oscillator eigenfunctions are polynomial multiples of . To verify the core hypothesis of Fixed-time Weyl Egorov estimate for subquadratic potentials, take and set . Integration by parts against each Hermite eigenfunction , whose polynomial-Gaussian tails make the endpoint products vanish, gives Parseval for the complete basis [F1] yields Thus . The coefficients of in the Hermite basis are , the same coefficients as ; completeness of that basis gives . The finite Hermite span is contained in and is a graph core by [F1]; since , is also a core. This checks every operator hypothesis of [F4].
The Gaussian integral [F5] and the positive scaling in [F8] give . In its Wigner integral, the product of the two Gaussian factors is Multiplying by and applying [F3] with gives which is the stated nonnegative density. Its integral is by [F5] and [F8]. For its phase-space moments, apply [F8] to and . The centered first moments vanish because and are odd; the cross-moment vanishes for the same reason. Integration by parts [F5] gives , so each centered variance is . This verifies the mean and covariance definitions in the Statement. For the operator uncertainties, direct differentiation gives , while . Thus , , and the two squared standard deviations are both by the same Gaussian integration by parts. To prove the lower bound for every normalized , first note that and are symmetric on : for this is [F5] applied to decaying Schwartz factors, and for it follows from real multiplication. Hence . Put and . Cauchy–Schwarz [F6], the commutator from [F2], and symmetry give Indeed, under the first-variable-linear convention, and its conjugate is . Thus the Gaussian attains the lower bound.
The classical Hamilton equations for solve to This matrix is orthogonal with determinant , and . For , [F4] gives where the last equality is [F2]. The integrand is in because is compactly supported and the Gaussian is integrable. Apply [F8] to the rotation ; its determinant is , so the resulting density is . Orthogonality gives so this density is exactly the displayed . The same change of variables sends its mean to and transforms covariance as , since is orthogonal. This proves the asserted exact transport and covariance for every compactly supported smooth test symbol and hence for the distributional Wigner functional defined in the Statement.
A first excited oscillator state has negative Wigner values
Statement refuted
The assertion to be refuted is: for every and every normalized , for all .
Assume Countable Choice and . In the one-dimensional oscillator with , , the normalized first excited state is Its Wigner function is It is strictly negative on the disk . Consequently the assertion that every normalized Schwartz vector has a nonnegative Wigner function is false.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , and the one-dimensional oscillator conventions of the Statement.
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
, , and ; scaling by gives the displayed normalized oscillator state (Hermite recurrence, Oscillator scaling and exact realization).
The Wigner integral uses the normalization and Fourier sign in Schwartz Weyl quantization and Wigner distributions; for it is real and integrable (Wigner pairing and marginals).
Differentiation under this Gaussian integral is valid because the first two differentiated integrands are dominated by integrable polynomial multiples of ; dominated convergence justifies the limit (Dominated convergence).
Counterexample
Given: The data of the Statement and [A1], [F1]–[F4].
By [F1] and the oscillator scaling , the first excited state is The oscillator realization makes it a normalized Schwartz vector.
Write . The product in the Wigner integrand is By [F4], . Differentiating the explicit Gaussian in [F3] gives Substitution in the Wigner definition [F2] therefore yields Every factor and sign follows from the displayed negative-sign Fourier convention.
The exponential and the prefactor are strictly positive. Thus exactly when , which is the disk . This normalized Schwartz vector refutes universal Wigner nonnegativity.