Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact harmonic-oscillator transport of a Gaussian Wigner density

Example

Assume Countable Choice, let 0<ϵ≤1, and use the one-dimensional oscillator Hϵ=−ϵ22d2dx2+x22 with its self-adjoint oscillator realization. For real q,p, the normalized Gaussian ψq,pϵ(x)=(πϵ)−1/4exp⁡ ⁣(−(x−q)22ϵ)exp⁡ ⁣(ip(x−q/2)ϵ) has Wigner density Wϵ[ψq,pϵ](x,ξ)=1πϵexp⁡ ⁣(−(x−q)2+(ξ−p)2ϵ). Write z=(z1,z2)=(x,ξ). For a measurable density ρ:R2→[0,∞) with ∫ρ=1 and ∫(∣z∣+∣z∣2)ρ(z) dz<∞, define its mean and covariance by μj(ρ):=∫R2zjρ(z) dz,Σjk(ρ):=∫R2(zj−μj(ρ))(zk−μk(ρ))ρ(z) dz. This Wigner density has mean (q,p) and covariance (ϵ/2)I2. On S(R) let Qf(x)=xf(x) and Pf(x)=−iϵf′(x). For a normalized φ∈S(R), define Qˉφ=⟨Qφ,φ⟩, Pˉφ=⟨Pφ,φ⟩, ΔφQ=∥(Q−Qˉφ)φ∥2, and ΔφP=∥(P−Pˉφ)φ∥2. These standard deviations satisfy ΔφQ ΔφP≥ϵ/2, and the displayed Gaussian attains equality with both deviations ϵ/2. Let Uϵ(t)=e−itHϵ/ϵ, and define the evolved state's distributional Wigner functional on a∈Cc∞(R2) by ⟨Wt,a⟩:=⟨Op⁡ϵW(a)Uϵ(t)ψq,pϵ,Uϵ(t)ψq,pϵ⟩. Then it is represented by the exact density Wt(x,ξ)=1πϵexp⁡ ⁣(−(x−qt)2+(ξ−pt)2ϵ),qt=qcos⁡t+psin⁡t,pt=pcos⁡t−qsin⁡t. Thus this quadratic model transports the Gaussian Wigner density exactly along its classical Hamiltonian flow; its phase-space mean follows (qt,pt) and its covariance remains (ϵ/2)I2. This is a mathematical model calculation, not an experimental observation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, 0<ϵ≤1, real q,p,t, and the one-dimensional oscillator convention in the Statement.

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

For m=ω=1, ℏ=ϵ, the scaled oscillator has a self-adjoint realization with complete Hermite eigenbasis; its finite Hermite span is a graph core, and on that core it equals −ϵ2∂x2/2+x2/2 (Oscillator scaling and exact realization, Hermite recurrence).

[F2]

The Wigner integral and Weyl pairing use the exact signs, factors, and inner-product convention of Schwartz Weyl quantization and Wigner distributions; for Schwartz states, ⟨Op⁡ϵW(a)u,u⟩=∫aWϵ[u] (Wigner pairing and marginals).

[F3]

The Gaussian Fourier integral is ∫Re−y2/(4ϵ)e−iyη/ϵdy=2πϵ e−η2/ϵ (Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization).

[F4]

The exact quadratic Egorov identity holds for this self-adjoint realization when Schwartz space is a core (Fixed-time Weyl Egorov estimate for subquadratic potentials).

[F6]

In a real or complex inner-product space, ∣⟨f,g⟩∣≤∥f∥∥g∥ (Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥, with equality exactly for dependent pairs).

[F7]

The first-variable-linear pairing ⟨f,g⟩=∫fg‾ makes complex L2(R) a Hilbert space (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).

[F8]

A C1 diffeomorphism between open Euclidean sets changes integrals of complex L1 functions by its absolute Jacobian. The positive Gaussian scalings and the phase-space rotation below satisfy these hypotheses; their integrands are absolutely integrable (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

Verification

Given: The data and [A1], [F1]–[F8].

1.1A1F1F5algebra

The scaled oscillator eigenfunctions are polynomial multiples of e−x2/(2ϵ). To verify the core hypothesis of Fixed-time Weyl Egorov estimate for subquadratic potentials, take f∈S(R) and set Lf=−ϵ2f′′/2+x2f/2∈L2. Integration by parts against each Hermite eigenfunction ψnϵ, whose polynomial-Gaussian tails make the endpoint products vanish, gives ⟨Lf,ψnϵ⟩=⟨f,Lψnϵ⟩=ϵ(n+12)⟨f,ψnϵ⟩. Parseval for the complete basis [F1] yields ∑n≥0ϵ2(n+12)2∣⟨f,ψnϵ⟩∣2=∥Lf∥22<∞. Thus f∈D(Hϵ). The coefficients of Hϵf in the Hermite basis are ϵ(n+12)⟨f,ψnϵ⟩, the same coefficients as Lf; completeness of that basis gives Hϵf=Lf. The finite Hermite span is contained in S and is a graph core by [F1]; since S⊂D(Hϵ), S is also a core. This checks every operator hypothesis of [F4].

1.2A1F1F2F5F6F7F8algebra

The Gaussian integral [F5] and the positive scaling in [F8] give ∥ψq,pϵ∥22=(πϵ)−1/2∫e−(x−q)2/ϵdx=1. In its Wigner integral, the product of the two Gaussian factors is (πϵ)−1/2exp⁡ ⁣(−(x−q)2ϵ−y24ϵ)exp⁡ ⁣(ipyϵ). Multiplying by e−iyξ/ϵ and applying [F3] with η=ξ−p gives Wϵ[ψq,pϵ](x,ξ)=(2πϵ)−1(πϵ)−1/2e−(x−q)2/ϵ2πϵ e−(ξ−p)2/ϵ, which is the stated nonnegative density. Its integral is 1 by [F5] and [F8]. For its phase-space moments, apply [F8] to x=q+ϵs and ξ=p+ϵr. The centered first moments vanish because se−s2 and re−r2 are odd; the cross-moment vanishes for the same reason. Integration by parts [F5] gives ∫s2e−s2ds=12∫e−s2ds, so each centered variance is ϵ/2. This verifies the mean and covariance definitions in the Statement. For the operator uncertainties, direct differentiation gives Pψq,pϵ=(p+i(x−q))ψq,pϵ, while Qψq,pϵ=xψq,pϵ. Thus Qˉψ=q, Pˉψ=p, and the two squared standard deviations are both ∫(x−q)2∣ψ∣2dx=ϵ/2 by the same Gaussian integration by parts. To prove the lower bound for every normalized φ∈S, first note that Q and P are symmetric on S: for P this is [F5] applied to decaying Schwartz factors, and for Q it follows from real multiplication. Hence Qˉφ,Pˉφ∈R. Put A=Q−QˉφI and B=P−PˉφI. Cauchy–Schwarz [F6], the commutator [A,B]=[Q,P]=iϵI from [F2], and symmetry give ΔφQ ΔφP≥∣⟨Aφ,Bφ⟩∣≥∣Im⁡⟨Aφ,Bφ⟩∣=12∣⟨[A,B]φ,φ⟩∣=ϵ2. Indeed, under the first-variable-linear convention, ⟨Aφ,Bφ⟩=⟨BAφ,φ⟩ and its conjugate is ⟨ABφ,φ⟩. Thus the Gaussian attains the lower bound.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F2F4F8algebra∎

The classical Hamilton equations for h(x,ξ)=(x2+ξ2)/2 solve to Φt(x,ξ)=(xcos⁡t+ξsin⁡t, ξcos⁡t−xsin⁡t). This matrix is orthogonal with determinant 1, and Φt(q,p)=(qt,pt). For a∈Cc∞(R2), [F4] gives ⟨Wt,a⟩=⟨Op⁡ϵW(a∘Φt)ψq,pϵ,ψq,pϵ⟩=∫R2a(Φtz)Wϵ[ψq,pϵ](z) dz, where the last equality is [F2]. The integrand is in L1 because a is compactly supported and the Gaussian is integrable. Apply [F8] to the rotation z′=Φtz; its determinant is 1, so the resulting density is Wϵ[ψq,pϵ](Φ−tz′). Orthogonality gives ∣Φ−t(x,ξ)−(q,p)∣2=∣(x,ξ)−Φt(q,p)∣2, so this density is exactly the displayed Wt. The same change of variables sends its mean (q,p) to (qt,pt) and transforms covariance as Rt(ϵI2/2)RtT=ϵI2/2, since Rt is orthogonal. This proves the asserted exact transport and covariance for every compactly supported smooth test symbol and hence for the distributional Wigner functional defined in the Statement.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources