How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact harmonic-oscillator transport of a Gaussian Wigner density
Example
Assume Countable Choice, let , and use the one-dimensional oscillator with its self-adjoint oscillator realization. For real , the normalized Gaussian has Wigner density Write . For a measurable density with and , define its mean and covariance by This Wigner density has mean and covariance . On let and . For a normalized , define , , , and . These standard deviations satisfy , and the displayed Gaussian attains equality with both deviations . Let , and define the evolved state's distributional Wigner functional on by Then it is represented by the exact density Thus this quadratic model transports the Gaussian Wigner density exactly along its classical Hamiltonian flow; its phase-space mean follows and its covariance remains . This is a mathematical model calculation, not an experimental observation.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , real , and the one-dimensional oscillator convention in the Statement.
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
For , , the scaled oscillator has a self-adjoint realization with complete Hermite eigenbasis; its finite Hermite span is a graph core, and on that core it equals (Oscillator scaling and exact realization, Hermite recurrence).
The Wigner integral and Weyl pairing use the exact signs, factors, and inner-product convention of Schwartz Weyl quantization and Wigner distributions; for Schwartz states, (Wigner pairing and marginals).
The Gaussian Fourier integral is (Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization).
The exact quadratic Egorov identity holds for this self-adjoint realization when Schwartz space is a core (Fixed-time Weyl Egorov estimate for subquadratic potentials).
The chain rule and integration by parts apply to Schwartz functions, and the scaled Gaussian integral gives (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines, Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization).
In a real or complex inner-product space, (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs).
The first-variable-linear pairing makes complex a Hilbert space ( with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).
A diffeomorphism between open Euclidean sets changes integrals of complex functions by its absolute Jacobian. The positive Gaussian scalings and the phase-space rotation below satisfy these hypotheses; their integrands are absolutely integrable (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).
Verification
Given: The data and [A1], [F1]–[F8].
The scaled oscillator eigenfunctions are polynomial multiples of . To verify the core hypothesis of Fixed-time Weyl Egorov estimate for subquadratic potentials, take and set . Integration by parts against each Hermite eigenfunction , whose polynomial-Gaussian tails make the endpoint products vanish, gives Parseval for the complete basis [F1] yields Thus . The coefficients of in the Hermite basis are , the same coefficients as ; completeness of that basis gives . The finite Hermite span is contained in and is a graph core by [F1]; since , is also a core. This checks every operator hypothesis of [F4].
The Gaussian integral [F5] and the positive scaling in [F8] give . In its Wigner integral, the product of the two Gaussian factors is Multiplying by and applying [F3] with gives which is the stated nonnegative density. Its integral is by [F5] and [F8]. For its phase-space moments, apply [F8] to and . The centered first moments vanish because and are odd; the cross-moment vanishes for the same reason. Integration by parts [F5] gives , so each centered variance is . This verifies the mean and covariance definitions in the Statement. For the operator uncertainties, direct differentiation gives , while . Thus , , and the two squared standard deviations are both by the same Gaussian integration by parts. To prove the lower bound for every normalized , first note that and are symmetric on : for this is [F5] applied to decaying Schwartz factors, and for it follows from real multiplication. Hence . Put and . Cauchy–Schwarz [F6], the commutator from [F2], and symmetry give Indeed, under the first-variable-linear convention, and its conjugate is . Thus the Gaussian attains the lower bound.
The classical Hamilton equations for solve to This matrix is orthogonal with determinant , and . For , [F4] gives where the last equality is [F2]. The integrand is in because is compactly supported and the Gaussian is integrable. Apply [F8] to the rotation ; its determinant is , so the resulting density is . Orthogonality gives so this density is exactly the displayed . The same change of variables sends its mean to and transforms covariance as , since is orthogonal. This proves the asserted exact transport and covariance for every compactly supported smooth test symbol and hence for the distributional Wigner functional defined in the Statement.
Depends on
Schwartz Weyl quantization and Wigner distributions
Wigner pairing and marginals
Fixed-time Weyl Egorov estimate for subquadratic potentials
Oscillator scaling and exact realization
Hermite recurrence
Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with
Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines
A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions
Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs
with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()