Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact-support short-range scattering closure

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. Let V∈L∞(R3;R) and suppose there is a compact set K⊂R3 such that V=0 almost everywhere outside K. Let H=L2(R3;C), and set H0=−Δ and H=H0+MV on D(H0)=D(H)=H2(R3;C). Use

f^(p)=(2π)−3/2∫R3e−ip⋅xf(x) dx,Ω±=s-lim⁡t→±∞eitHe−itH0,S=Ω+∗Ω−.

Here MVf=Vf, and the strong limits act on every f∈H. Then:

(a) The wave operators exist, are isometries, and satisfy

ran⁡Ω+=ran⁡Ω−=Hac(H)=Hc(H),Hsc(H)={0}.

For u∈H, write μu(B)=∥EH(B)u∥2. The subspace Hac(H) consists of vectors with μu≪dE; Hsc(H) is the subspace with atomless scalar spectral measures singular with respect to Lebesgue measure; Hpp(H) is the closed span of eigenspaces, and Hc(H)=Hpp(H)⊥. These are the canonical spectral-type subspaces of the PVM.

(b) The scattering operator S is unitary on H and commutes with e−itH0 for every t∈R.

Use time in the corresponding ℏ=1 evolution convention and the standard scaled Schrödinger normalization in which the kinetic coefficient ℏ2/(2m) is set to 1. When length is dimensional, E and V then have units L−2 and k=E has units L−1; the proof is an operator deduction in this normalization.

(c) Put h=L2(S2,dσ), where dσ(S2)=4π, and define the normalized free energy transform

(F0f)(E,ω)=E1/42f^(E ω),F0:H→L2((0,∞),dE;h).

Fix a bounded ball B containing K. For E>0, k=E, define bounded maps Z0(E):L2(B)→h and Z0(E)∗:h→L2(B) by

(Z0(E)f)(ω)=k4π3/2∫Be−ikω⋅xf(x) dx,(Z0(E)∗a)(x)=k4π3/2∫S2eikω⋅xa(ω) dσ(ω).

Let RH(E+i0):L2(B)→L2(B) be the operator-norm limit lim⁡ϵ↓01B(H−(E+iϵ)I)−11B; existence and continuity for E>0 are part of the stated supplier input. The products below are these bounded maps on B. Then F0 is unitary and there is a measurable unitary field Sstat(E)∈B(h) such that

F0SF0∗=MSstat(E),Sstat(E)=Ih−2πi Z0(E)[V−VRH(E+i0)V]Z0(E)∗,E>0.

The formula uses only positive energies; it makes no claim at the threshold E=0, and no long-range Coulomb potential is included.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and CC; a real bounded compactly supported V; the free Fourier convention, operators and wave limits in the Statement.

[A1]

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

The real multiplier and bounded-potential theorem gives H0=−Δ self-adjoint on H2, H0≥0, and H=H0+MV self-adjoint on the same domain (Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators).

[F2]

For the exact hypotheses V∈L∞(R3;R), compact support, H0=−Δ, and H=H0+MV on H2, the compact-support completeness supplier proves that Ω± exist by Cook's construction, their individual ranges equal Hac(H)=Hc(H), the singular-continuous subspace is zero, and S=Ω+∗Ω− is unitary and commutes with the free group (Compact-support asymptotic completeness).

[F3]

For the same real bounded compactly supported V, the stationary/dynamical supplier uses f^(p)=(2π)−3/2∫e−ip⋅xf(x) dx, F0f(E,ω)=E1/4f^(E ω)/2, and proves that F0 is unitary, that Z±=F0Ω±∗, and that the positive-energy stationary matrix is

I−2πi Z0(E)[V−VRH(E+i0)V]Z0(E)∗.

It proves this matrix is unitary for every E>0, with the local resolvent and compact-region adjoint conventions in the Statement (Stationary and dynamical scattering in the full energy-angular representation).

[F4]

The definitions of Ω±, completeness, and S=Ω+∗Ω− are those of Wave, scattering and channel operators.

[F5]

The canonical spectral-type decomposition defines the absolutely continuous, singular-continuous, and pure-point subspaces from the spectral PVM and scalar measures μu(B)=∥EH(B)u∥2 (Canonical decomposition into pure point, absolutely continuous and singular continuous parts).

Proof

Given: [A1], [A2], [F1]–[F5], and the operators and conventions stated above.

1.1A1A2F1F2algebra

The Fourier convention in [F1] is f^2π(ξ)=∫e−2πix⋅ξf(x) dx; with p=2πξ, its multiplier 4π2∣ξ∣2 is exactly ∣p∣2, and the unitary momentum transform is (2π)−3/2∫e−ip⋅xf(x) dx. Thus the H0 and domain H2 in [F2] agree with those in the Statement. Since the potential is the same real bounded compactly supported multiplication operator, [F1] also gives the self-adjoint realization required by [F2].

1.2F2F4F5algebra

By [F2], the two stated pointwise strong limits exist with the exact sign convention eitHe−itH0, are isometries, and have the stated individual ranges. That same supplier proves the absent singular-continuous subspace; [F5] fixes the PVM meaning of these spectral subspaces. In the degenerate case V=0, the approximants are eitH0e−itH0=I, so Ω±=I and S=I. By [F4], the supplier's scattering operator is exactly the S defined in the Statement, so its unitarity and free-group commutation give (b).

1.3F3algebra

The Fourier scaling and energy change of variables in [F3] use the same momentum transform and dσ(S2)=4π as in the Statement. Hence the local F0, Z0(E), resolvent boundary value, and compact-region generalized adjoint agree term-for-term with [F3]; no independent normalization or sign change is introduced.

2.1A1A2F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

Applying [F3] with the identical H0,H,V now proves that F0 is unitary, that F0SF0∗ is multiplication by Sstat(E), and that the displayed stationary formula is unitary for every E>0. The result is conditional on AC, CC and the compact-support model and makes no threshold or Coulomb assertion. This proves (a)–(c).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources