How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A small residual does not label an eigenvalue
Statement refuted
Assume Choice and Countable Choice. The following assertion is false: for every lower-bounded self-adjoint operator with a lowest eigenvalue , every normalized , and every real , if , then and belongs to the ground eigenspace .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Choice and Countable Choice; the residual certificate of [F1]; and the finite-dimensional operator and vector in the counterexample.
Choice and Countable Choice are the assumptions of the cited residual-certificate supplier (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
For a normalized vector, the residual certificate bounds and, with an explicit spectral cluster and gap, its component outside that cluster; it does not assign an eigenvalue index without such cluster information (Residual distance and isolated-eigenspace certificate).
Proof
On with its standard inner product, set on all of , , and . Then is self-adjoint and bounded below, , , the lowest eigenvalue is , and .
The ground eigenspace is , while is orthogonal to it and . Thus the zero residual verifies a spectral point, as in [F1], but refutes the asserted ground-state label.