How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A normalized square-integrable vector can have infinite kinetic form energy
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. For the free Hamiltonian on with form domain , it is false that every normalized vector is an admissible finite-energy Rayleigh–Ritz trial vector. In the Fourier convention, the normalized vector with lies in but not in , so it is outside the form domain and has no finite free kinetic form value.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Choice and Countable Choice, the Fourier convention, and the free operator on .
The form domain of is exactly and its form is (Free Laplacian form domain and realization).
Plancherel is unitary, so an Fourier function is the transform of a unique vector with the same norm (Plancherel theorem).
The min-max infimum ranges only over finite-dimensional subspaces of the form domain; vectors outside that domain are not admissible form trial vectors (Form min-max below the essential spectrum).
Countable Choice is assumed by the cited Fourier and form suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The Axiom of Choice is assumed by the cited free-form and min-max suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).
Polar coordinates give the radial integration formula on (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
Proof
Given: [A1], [A2], [F1]–[F4], and the Fourier function in the Statement.
In spherical coordinates [F4], The integrand is bounded by near zero and by for ; thus and is defined. By [F2], is the Fourier transform of an vector and its norm is .
Its formal kinetic form integral equals because the radial integrand tends to as . By [F1], finite form energy is equivalent to this weighted integral being finite, so .
The vector is normalized in by step 1.1 but outside the exact form domain by step 2.1. Thus it cannot be inserted into the min-max variational family described in [F3], which requires its subspaces to lie in ; the universal trial-vector claim is false. This counterexample concerns domain admissibility and assigns no finite value to the divergent integral.