How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One smooth free relativistic Hamilton-Jacobi datum loses graph regularity in finite time
Statement refuted
Let have position coordinate in metres, momentum coordinate in kg m/s, and symplectic form . For fixed mass in kg and speed in m/s, take the free Hamiltonian , in joules, on ; time is measured in seconds. The proposed assertion that every smooth initial action produces a characteristic family extending as a smooth single-valued graph with finite through every finite future time is false.
Example
Assume for the cotangent-shell supplier. With the phase space and Hamiltonian from the Statement, let be the initial position in metres and seconds. Choose the smooth initial action , in kg/s. Its characteristics have and
For this characteristic family, call a caustic point when the projection is not locally invertible there.
The projection derivative is . It stays positive for and first vanishes at , where . Therefore this characteristic family cannot extend there as a smooth single-valued graph with finite . The initial data and Hamiltonian are smooth; the failure is the projection singularity, not an initial-data defect.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the free Hamiltonian and the stated smooth initial graph.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): assume countable choice only for the cotangent-shell supplier; no full axiom of choice is used.
Local Hamilton-Jacobi solution by invertible characteristics: its local existence result assumes the initial exact-graph point lies in the open Hamiltonian domain and proves existence only while the characteristic projection is invertible. Here is smooth on the full one-dimensional cotangent domain and the chosen initial graph lies there; the result makes no continuation claim beyond loss of projection invertibility. The canonical-flow supplier is a current draft, not an independently approved result.
Free shell in inertial time has the square-root Hamiltonian: the current H8 draft states , , and . The supplier is a mathematical deduction within its stated chart, positive-root and nonzero-null hypotheses; it introduces no physical action adoption.
Counterexample
Given: The free Hamiltonian and initial action above, plus [L1]–[L2].
Hamilton's equations from [L2] give , so . Also , hence integration with gives the displayed formula.
Differentiate: . Since , . Thus . Because , this is at least , positive for . At , and , so it equals zero at ; this is the first singular point.
At that point . If a smooth graph extended through it, the chain rule would give , contradicting . Hence no such smooth single-valued graph extension exists through that projection singularity.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Jerrold E. Marsden and Tudor S. Ratiu, Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry, 2nd ed., complete book PDF; §12.1 Theorem 12.1.4 pp. 393–395; §12.4 Theorem 12.4.1 pp. 412–413; §§14.2–14.3 pp. 466–473; §7.9 pp. 208–211.
- MIT OpenCourseWare 8.09 Classical Mechanics III, Fall 2014, complete Chapter 4 lecture notes PDF; §4.4 Hamilton–Jacobi equation and complete integrals, all 33 PDF pages inspected.