Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One smooth free relativistic Hamilton-Jacobi datum loses graph regularity in finite time

Statement refuted

Let P=T∗R have position coordinate q∈R in metres, momentum coordinate p∈R in kg m/s, and symplectic form ω=dq∧dp. For fixed mass m>0 in kg and speed c>0 in m/s, take the free Hamiltonian H(p)=E(p)=m2c4+c2p2, in joules, on P; time t is measured in seconds. The proposed assertion that every smooth initial action S0:R→R produces a characteristic family extending as a smooth single-valued graph p=Sq(t,q) with finite Sqq through every finite future time t≥0 is false.

Example

Assume ACω for the cotangent-shell supplier. With the phase space and Hamiltonian from the Statement, let a∈R be the initial position in metres and t seconds. Choose the smooth initial action S0(a)=−κa2/2, κ>0 in kg/s. Its characteristics have p(a)=−κa and

q(t,a)=a+tc2p(a)E(p(a)).

For this characteristic family, call (t,a) a caustic point when the projection (t,a)↦(t,q(t,a)) is not locally invertible there.

The projection derivative is ∂aq=1−tκm2c6/E(p)3. It stays positive for 0≤t<m/κ and first vanishes at (t,a)=(m/κ,0), where ∂ap=−κ≠0. Therefore this characteristic family cannot extend there as a smooth single-valued graph p=Sq(t,q) with finite Sqq. The initial data and Hamiltonian are smooth; the failure is the projection singularity, not an initial-data defect.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: m,c,κ>0, the free Hamiltonian E(p) and the stated smooth initial graph.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): assume countable choice ACω only for the cotangent-shell supplier; no full axiom of choice is used.

[L1]

Local Hamilton-Jacobi solution by invertible characteristics: its local existence result assumes the initial exact-graph point lies in the open Hamiltonian domain and proves existence only while the characteristic projection is invertible. Here H=E(p) is smooth on the full one-dimensional cotangent domain and the chosen initial graph lies there; the result makes no continuation claim beyond loss of projection invertibility. The canonical-flow supplier is a current draft, not an independently approved result.

[L2]

Free shell in inertial time has the square-root Hamiltonian: the current H8 draft states E=m2c4+c2p2, q˙=c2p/E, and p˙=0. The supplier is a mathematical deduction within its stated chart, positive-root and nonzero-null hypotheses; it introduces no physical action adoption.

Counterexample

technique · compute the characteristic projection and use the graph chain rule

Given: The free Hamiltonian and initial action above, plus [L1]–[L2].

1.1L2A1algebra

Hamilton's equations from [L2] give p˙=0, so p(t,a)=S0′(a)=−κa. Also q˙=Ep=c2p/E, hence integration with q(0,a)=a gives the displayed formula.

2.1L2A1step 1.1algebra

Differentiate: ∂aq=1−tκc2ddp(p/E). Since E2=m2c4+c2p2, ddp(p/E)=m2c4/E3. Thus ∂aq=1−tκm2c6/E3. Because E≥mc2, this is at least 1−tκ/m, positive for t<m/κ. At a=0, p=0 and E=mc2, so it equals zero at t=m/κ; this is the first singular point.

3.1L1step 2.1algebra∎

At that point ∂ap=−κ. If a smooth graph p=Sq(t,q(t,a)) extended through it, the chain rule would give ∂ap=Sqq∂aq=0, contradicting −κ≠0. Hence no such smooth single-valued graph extension exists through that projection singularity.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources