How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Poincare semidirect group, dual pairing and moment components — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Banach-Space Differential Calculus and Banach Manifolds
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Cm Math Variations
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Connections And Free Fall
- Connections Levi Civita and Parallel Transport
- Constant Rank, Submersions, Immersions and Regular Level Sets
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Cotangent phase data, observables and action dimensions
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Distributions Integral Manifolds and the Frobenius Theorem
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Framework And Geometry
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Geodesics, the Exponential Map, Completeness, and Hopf–Rinow
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hamiltonian Mechanics and Completely Integrable Systems
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lie Groups, Invariant Fields, and the Exponential Map
- Lie Subgroups, Actions, and Homogeneous Spaces
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Lorentz Transformations
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Moment Maps and Symplectic Reduction
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Observer Measurements
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Particle spacetime, observers and worldlines
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Poincare semidirect group, dual pairing and moment components
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Riemann Curvature and Riemannian Submanifolds
- Riemannian Metrics Length Distance and Volume
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Spacetime Primitives
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Symplectic Manifolds, Moser Stability, and Darboux–Weinstein Theory
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- Tensors And Observers
- The De Rham Complex Homotopy and Mayer Vietoris
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Exterior Derivative and Cartan Calculus
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Whitney Embedding Tubular Neighbourhoods and Approximation
- Worldlines And Clocks
2 · Summary
These examples verify the charge-algebra obstruction for one specific instantaneous pair potential, show a nonclosing two-shell constraint pair at explicit joint-shell data, locate the first caustic of smooth free relativistic Hamilton-Jacobi data, and check a massive or nonzero-null free complete integral. Each conclusion is a conditional mathematical calculation; none is an experiment or a universal no-interaction result.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
Free boost plus instantaneous relativistic pair potential violates the charge algebra
Statement refuted
Let have coordinates , symplectic form , and canonical bracket . Let be one-dimensional positions in metres, momenta in kg m/s, an external equal-time parameter in seconds, in kg, and in m/s. For in kg/s define , with , , , and . The proposed assertion that this Hamiltonian and unchanged free boost satisfy at every configuration is false.
Example
Assume for the cited Poincare algebra input. Use the phase space, bracket, masses, and functions defined in the Statement, with having units kg/s, so has energy units. The retained free total boost is
With canonical brackets, , while the Poincaré charge algebra requires . They disagree at every configuration with . The construction is therefore a counterexample to combining this instantaneous potential with the unchanged free boost. It is not a universal no-interaction theorem.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Independent canonical pairs , masses , , , and the functions specified above.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): assume countable choice only; no full axiom of choice is used.
Poincare cotangent moment map and full generator algebra: the current assigned A draft states the Poincare generator algebra; setting K=-J^{01}/c and P=P^1 in its bracket gives the required free identity {K,P}=P^0/c=H/c^2. The carrier exists as a batch-26 draft, but its proof remains conditional on H0/H8 and has no independent approval.
Poincare semidirect group, dual pairing and moment components: and on the positive-energy inertial shell, fixing the free boost sign.
Counterexample
Given: The free shell energies, translation-invariant potential, unchanged free boost, and [L1] target identity.
By the canonical product bracket, for each , since is independent of position; also . Hence .
The Hamiltonian is , so whenever . The required algebra relation in [L1] fails there. Since has units , is energy and the compared charges have matching units. This refutes this proposed free-boost construction only.
A linear two-shell potential fails first-class closure
Example
Assume for the cotangent/constraint supplier. Use the product cotangent domain with coordinates for , Minkowski metric , canonical form , and induced bracket . Take in metres, in kg m/s, , , , and . Use constraints
Here in kg, in m/s, and is smooth with units of momentum squared. Their canonical bracket is
For , with in momentum squared per square metre, this bracket is nonzero at explicit points on the joint surface where are independent. Thus, by First-class closure for a regular constraint family, the pair fails first-class closure on the local regular surface around each such point, and arbitrary independent multipliers need not preserve both constraints there. Additional consistency conditions are required; no universal obstruction for all interacting relativistic models is claimed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Two canonical spacetime cotangent factors, the stated constraints, smooth , and the canonical bracket convention.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): assume countable choice only for the referenced cotangent/constraint supplier; no full axiom of choice is used.
First-class closure for a regular constraint family: on a regular common zero surface, “first-class” means every pairwise Poisson bracket vanishes at every point of that surface. This is the exact local definition used by the conclusion.
Canonical Poisson brackets and local Hamiltonian flow: in induced cotangent coordinates, and . The H25 Step 1 record is ready/hash-current, but the carrier remains draft/unbound and its ai-altered proof is not independently approved.
Constraint consistency for a regular first-order model: the current H2 draft assumes an open parameter interval, a symplectic manifold, smooth moving constraints with independent differentials on each , a smooth ambient , paths in a Darboux chart on a compact subinterval, and smooth multipliers. It states on as the tangency condition; for autonomous constraints the first term vanishes. Its H25 Step 1 record is ready/hash-current, but the carrier remains draft/unbound with ai-altered proof provenance and no independent proof approval. The autonomous specialization used here matches its current Statement.
Verification
Given: Canonical coordinates, , the bracket convention [F2], the local first-class definition [F1], and the autonomous tangency condition [L1].
The potential derivatives are and . The kinetic terms have . In , the first particle contributes and the second contributes ; all other cross terms vanish. Their sum is the displayed bracket.
Choose with , , and . Let , other spatial components zero, and . Then , so both , while . Each constraint differential has nonzero momentum component in its own cotangent factor, so are independent at this witness. Independence persists on a sufficiently small neighborhood, making the local joint level regular. The bracket is there, so [F1] says the pair is not first-class on that local regular surface. With autonomous constraints and , [L1] gives and ; hence preserving both constraints at this point forces . Thus arbitrary independent nonzero multipliers need not preserve the joint surface.
One smooth free relativistic Hamilton-Jacobi datum loses graph regularity in finite time
Statement refuted
Let have position coordinate in metres, momentum coordinate in kg m/s, and symplectic form . For fixed mass in kg and speed in m/s, take the free Hamiltonian , in joules, on ; time is measured in seconds. The proposed assertion that every smooth initial action produces a characteristic family extending as a smooth single-valued graph with finite through every finite future time is false.
Example
Assume for the cotangent-shell supplier. With the phase space and Hamiltonian from the Statement, let be the initial position in metres and seconds. Choose the smooth initial action , in kg/s. Its characteristics have and
For this characteristic family, call a caustic point when the projection is not locally invertible there.
The projection derivative is . It stays positive for and first vanishes at , where . Therefore this characteristic family cannot extend there as a smooth single-valued graph with finite . The initial data and Hamiltonian are smooth; the failure is the projection singularity, not an initial-data defect.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the free Hamiltonian and the stated smooth initial graph.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): assume countable choice only for the cotangent-shell supplier; no full axiom of choice is used.
Local Hamilton-Jacobi solution by invertible characteristics: its local existence result assumes the initial exact-graph point lies in the open Hamiltonian domain and proves existence only while the characteristic projection is invertible. Here is smooth on the full one-dimensional cotangent domain and the chosen initial graph lies there; the result makes no continuation claim beyond loss of projection invertibility. The canonical-flow supplier is a current draft, not an independently approved result.
Free shell in inertial time has the square-root Hamiltonian: the current H8 draft states , , and . The supplier is a mathematical deduction within its stated chart, positive-root and nonzero-null hypotheses; it introduces no physical action adoption.
Counterexample
Given: The free Hamiltonian and initial action above, plus [L1]–[L2].
Hamilton's equations from [L2] give , so . Also , hence integration with gives the displayed formula.
Differentiate: . Since , . Thus . Because , this is at least , positive for . At , and , so it equals zero at ; this is the first singular point.
At that point . If a smooth graph extended through it, the chain rule would give , contradicting . Hence no such smooth single-valued graph extension exists through that projection singularity.
Explicit massive and nonzero-null free complete integral
Example
Assume for the cotangent-shell supplier. Work with spatial position in metres and momentum parameter in kg m/s, with the Euclidean dot product and norm ; at fixed time the spatial phase space has canonical form . Here is measured in seconds, is in kg, and is in m/s. The parameter domain is all when , and when . For a free massive particle with , or a nonzero massless particle with and , define
Then , , and its integration coordinates satisfy , equivalently . The mixed Hessian is everywhere nonsingular on the stated domain, so this is a complete integral there. , , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Flat inertial coordinates, , , and for the open parameter domain .
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): assume countable choice only for the cotangent-shell supplier; no full axiom of choice is used.
Complete integrals and covariant versus time Hamilton-Jacobi: a smooth HJ family with invertible mixed Hessian defines a local canonical map with new position , new momentum , and ; is constant along characteristics, and the construction is local to the nonsingular domain. For each fixed here, the initial graph at lies in the full massive Hamiltonian domain when and in the open nonzero-momentum domain when and .
Free shell in inertial time has the square-root Hamiltonian: the current H8 draft states the positive-energy Hamiltonian on the fixed inertial-time branch. The supplier is a mathematical deduction within its stated chart, positive-root and nonzero-null hypotheses; it introduces no physical action adoption.
Verification
Given: The formulas and domain in the statement, together with [L1]–[L2].
Differentiation gives , , and hence . Also , so its determinant is one. By [L1] this nonsingular family supplies local canonical integration coordinates on the stated domain.
Differentiating gives wherever . Thus and rearranging yields the stated trajectory formula. For , and differentiability requires , which is exactly the given domain.
The products and have action units, while is momentum and is length. Hence the generating function and canonical coordinates have the claimed physical dimensions.
Sources
- Jerrold E. Marsden and Tudor S. Ratiu, Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry, 2nd ed., complete book PDF; §12.1 Theorem 12.1.4 pp. 393–395; §12.4 Theorem 12.4.1 pp. 412–413; §§14.2–14.3 pp. 466–473; §7.9 pp. 208–211.
- Nesta van der Schaaf, Classical and Quantum Particles in Galilean and Poincaré Spacetime, complete 2017 monograph PDF; §9.3 PDF pp. 77–79; §10.2.2 PDF pp. 81–82.
- MIT OpenCourseWare 8.09 Classical Mechanics III, Fall 2014, complete Chapter 4 lecture notes PDF; §4.4 Hamilton–Jacobi equation and complete integrals, all 33 PDF pages inspected.