Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Constraint consistency for a regular first-order model

Physical scope

Conditional local result for a specified regular constraint surface and total-Hamiltonian ansatz; no universal termination or global quotient claim.

Statement

Let I⊂R be an open interval and (P,ω) a symplectic manifold. Let χa:I×P→R be smooth and suppose the covectors dzχa(λ,z) are linearly independent at every z∈Nλ:={z:χ1(λ,z)=⋯=χr(λ,z)=0}; this is the regular constraint condition of Regular primary constraints and total generator on each slice. Let Hc:I×P→R be a smooth ambient extension of a specified descended Hamiltonian. Work in a Darboux chart with coordinates (qi,pi) and local potential θ=pi dqi, so dθ=−ω under the convention ω=dqi∧dpi; paths stay in this chart. For any compact interval [a,b]⊂I with a<b, take paths z:[a,b]→P that extend smoothly to a neighborhood of [a,b] and stay in the chart, and multipliers ua that extend smoothly to a neighborhood of [a,b]. Their action is

I[z,u]=∫ab[θ(z˙)−Hc(λ,z)−ua(λ)χa(λ,z)]dλ.

Use C2 one-parameter variations of z with fixed endpoints, whose paths remain in the chart, and unrestricted C2 one-parameter variations of u, all defined on a common neighborhood of [a,b]. Assume (z,u) is stationary: ddϵ∣ϵ=0I[zϵ,uϵ]=0 for every such variation through (z,u). These classes satisfy the path and fixed-endpoint hypotheses of Stationarity of the time-dependent action is equivalent to the vanishing of the Euler-Lagrange expression. Stationarity implies z(λ)∈Nλ and z˙=XHc(λ,⋅)+ua(λ)Xχa(λ,⋅). Along this trajectory, preservation of the moving level set requires

∂λχa+{χa,Hc(λ,⋅)}+ub(λ){χa,χb}=0at (λ,z(λ)).

For constraints independent of λ, the first term is zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open interval, a symplectic P, a smooth constraint family with regular slices Nλ, a smooth ambient Hc, and a smooth pair (z,u) stationary for the displayed action under the stated variations.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Assume countable choice ACω, meaning every sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function; no full Axiom of Choice is assumed.

[F1]

Regular primary constraints and total generator: at each fixed parameter, the independent constraint differentials define the tangent space as the intersection of their kernels.

[F2]

Canonical Poisson brackets and local Hamiltonian flow: ιXHω=dH, dF(XH)={F,H}, and the stated bracket convention applies.

[F3]

Darboux theorem: locally a symplectic form has canonical coordinates ω=dqi∧dpi.

[F4]

Stationarity of the time-dependent action is equivalent to the vanishing of the Euler-Lagrange expression: fixed-endpoint first variation of a smooth first-order action vanishes exactly when its Euler–Lagrange equations hold.

Proof

1.1givenA1F3F4algebra

In a Darboux chart, the integrand is piq˙i−Hc−uaχa. Stationarity under independent variations of ua gives χa=0: apply [F4] to the combined coordinates (q,p,u), whose integrand has no u˙ term, using its fixed-endpoint subclass. Stationarity under fixed-endpoint variations of pi,qi gives q˙i=∂piHT and p˙i=−∂qiHT, where HT=Hc+uaχa. The equations hold on [a,b], including endpoints by continuity.

2.1givenF2step 1.1algebra

The multiplier functions depend on λ only, so dzHT=dHc+uadχa. By linearity of ιXHω=dH, XHT=XHc+uaXχa. If instead phase-dependent extensions ua(z,λ) are used, the extra term χaXua vanishes on N.

2.2givenF1step 1.1algebra

Differentiate χa(λ,z(λ))=0 along a solution; the chain rule yields 0=∂λχa+dzχa(z˙).

3.1givenF2step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

Substitute the vector field from step 2.1 and use [F2]: dzχa(XHc)={χa,Hc} and dzχa(Xχb)={χa,χb}, giving the displayed consistency equation at each point of the trajectory. Requiring the total vector field to preserve every initial point of the moving constraint surface requires this equation throughout Nλ. Its possible algebraic outcomes depend on its coefficient matrix and remaining constraints; no rank or termination premise was assumed.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources