Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Forced quadratic system Mq′′+Kq=φ(t): decoupled forced modes and the convolution solution

Statement

Let n≥1, let M∈Mn(R) be symmetric positive definite, let K∈Mn(R) be symmetric and non-negative, let S:=M−1/2KM−1/2=OΛOT with O orthogonal and Λ=diag⁡(λ1,…,λn), λi≥0 (Decoupling of the constant-coefficient quadratic system Mq′′+Kq=0 into normal modes, with the zero-mode and energy identities), let I⊆R be an interval with nonempty interior (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), let φ:I→Rn be continuous and let t0∈I. Put

ψ(t):=OTM−1/2φ(t),ωi:=λi (λi>0),

and for a curve q:I→Rn whose first and second derivatives exist on I (relative to I at included endpoints) and whose second derivative is continuous on I, put z:=OTM1/2q. Then:

  1. q solves the forced quadratic system Mq′′+Kq=φ on I if and only if z solves the decoupled forced system zi′′+λizi=ψi(1≤i≤n) on I.
  2. For each i, the unique solution zi:I→R of the scalar equation in clause 1 with data zi(t0)=ξi, zi′(t0)=ηi is zi(t)=ξicos⁡(ωi(t−t0))+ηiωisin⁡(ωi(t−t0))+1ωi∫t0tsin⁡(ωi(t−s))ψi(s) ds(λi>0), zi(t)=ξi+ηi(t−t0)+∫t0t(t−s)ψi(s) ds(λi=0).
  3. Consequently, for every initial datum (q(t0),q′(t0))∈R2n there is exactly one solution q:I→Rn of Mq′′+Kq=φ with that datum, and it is q=M−1/2Oz for the z of clause 2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The symmetric positive definite M, symmetric non-negative K, the orthogonal diagonalisation S=OΛOT, the interval I, the continuous φ:I→Rn, the point t0∈I, and the transformed forcing ψ=OTM−1/2φ.

[F1]

The quadratic-mode theorem (Decoupling of the constant-coefficient quadratic system Mq′′+Kq=0 into normal modes, with the zero-mode and energy identities) supplies the positive-definite square-root factors and an orthogonal diagonalisation S=OΛOT with λi≥0. Its scalar solution classification is stated only for intervals containing 0; the present interval I is arbitrary, so the proof below uses only this algebraic diagonalisation and verifies the forced scalar responses at the prescribed t0.

[F2]

The forced oscillator theorem (The forced oscillator with k≥0: unique global solution and the convolution (Green's function) formula) applies on this arbitrary interval I at the specified t0: with m=1, c=0, k=λi≥0 and continuous ψi, it gives exactly one solution and its homogeneous-plus-convolution formula. The homogeneous classification (The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data) and degenerate proposition (The degenerate and repulsive oscillator: solutions for k=0 and the explicit growing solution for k<0) classify homogeneous solutions on every interval. For λi>0, translating an interval by −t0 gives one containing 0, where the classification determines the homogeneous member from its data; for λi=0 the proposition directly determines the affine member from its value and derivative at t0. Trigonometric derivatives and values at zero are (sin⁡)′=cos⁡, (cos⁡)′=−sin⁡, sin⁡0=0, and cos⁡0=1 (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine).

[F3]

M1/2, M−1/2, O and OT=O−1 are the matrices of the modal theorem; M−1/2MM−1/2=In and OTO=In. [given]

Proof

technique · direct; transport the forced system through the modal transformation and apply the scalar forced-oscillator theorem mode by mode
1.1F1F3algebra

Transport: differentiating q=M−1/2Oz twice gives q′′=M−1/2Oz′′, hence Mq′′+Kq=M1/2O(z′′+OTM−1/2KM−1/2Oz)=M1/2O(z′′+Λz) by the definition of S and [F1], and M1/2O is invertible. Therefore Mq′′+Kq=φ is equivalent to z′′+Λz=OTM−1/2φ=ψ, which is the decoupled system of clause 1.

2.1step 1.1F2F4

The i-th scalar equation is an oscillator equation with m=1, c=0, k=λi≥0 and continuous forcing ψi; by [F2] its unique solution on I with data (ξi,ηi) at t0 is the homogeneous solution with those data plus ∫t0tgi(t−s)ψi(s) ds. If λi>0, set hi(t)=ξicos⁡(ωi(t−t0))+ηiωisin⁡(ωi(t−t0)). By the chain rule and trigonometric derivatives in [F2], hi′′+λihi=0, hi(t0)=ξi, and hi′(t0)=ηi; translating any competing homogeneous solution to an interval containing 0 and applying the classification in [F2] proves uniqueness. If λi=0, hi(t)=ξi+ηi(t−t0) directly solves the homogeneous equation with the required data and is the unique affine family member. Likewise gi(u)=sin⁡(ωiu)/ωi for λi>0 and gi(u)=u for λi=0 solve the homogeneous equation and have gi(0)=0, gi′(0)=1; the classified families give uniqueness of the kernel. Substitution in the forced theorem's formula gives exactly the two expressions in clause 2.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F3∎

Clauses 1 and 2 exhibit z as the unique solution of the decoupled forced system with prescribed data; since q=M−1/2Oz is a bijection with (q(t0),q′(t0))↦(z(t0),z′(t0)) linear and invertible (q′(t0)=M−1/2Oz′(t0)), clause 3 follows.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources