Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The forced oscillator with k≥0: unique global solution and the convolution (Green's function) formula

Statement

Let m>0, c≥0, k≥0, let I⊆R be an interval with nonempty interior (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) and let f:I→R be continuous. Fix t0∈I and data (x0,v0)∈R2. Let g:R→R be the (unique) solution of the associated homogeneous model with time domain R and zero forcing, with g(0)=0 and g′(0)=1/m.

Then:

  1. There is exactly one solution x:I→R of the forced model m x′′+c x′+k x=f with x(t0)=x0 and x′(t0)=v0. It is twice differentiable on I, with derivatives at included endpoints taken relative to I, and x′′ is continuous on I in its relative topology.
  2. If xh:R→R is any homogeneous solution with xh(t0)=x0 and xh′(t0)=v0 (it exists and is unique by The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data and The degenerate and repulsive oscillator: solutions for k=0 and the explicit growing solution for k<0), then x(t)=xh(t)+∫t0tg(t−s)f(s) ds(t∈I).

Remarks

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameters m>0, c≥0, k≥0, the interval I with nonempty interior, the continuous f:I→R, the point t0∈I and the data (x0,v0). The homogeneous kernel g and member xh solve the associated all-R homogeneous model; the forced model uses the given time domain I. No extension of f outside I is used.

[F1]

The model and its phase-plane system are those of The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data; x solves the forced model on I exactly when t↦(x(t),x′(t)) solves z′=Gf(t,z) on I. [given]

[F2]

For k>0 the homogeneous model has exactly one global solution for every initial datum, and its three explicit solution families are those of The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data clauses 1-3; in particular the solution g with data (0,1/m) exists, is unique and is defined on all of R. [given]

[F3]

For k=0 the homogeneous model has exactly the solution families of The degenerate and repulsive oscillator: solutions for k=0 and the explicit growing solution for k<0 clauses 1-2, and every interval solution extends to a global member; in particular g with data (0,1/m) exists, is unique and is defined on all of R. [given]

[F4]

Convolution differentiation (Differentiation of a variable-limit convolution integral with a C-one matrix kernel): if I is an interval, t0∈I, U is open with I−I⊆U, G:U→Mn(R) is C1 and b:I→Rn is continuous, then t↦∫t0tG(t−s)b(s) ds is differentiable with derivative G(0)b(t)+∫t0tG′(t−s)b(s) ds. Here n=1, U=R, G=g; when g is C2, the same application with G=g′ is legitimate. [given]

[F5]

Homogeneous uniqueness from Variation of constants for z′=Az+b(t) via the matrix exponential: for a fixed A∈M2(R) and the globally continuous forcing b0(t)≡0, the global solution of z′=Az+b0 with zero datum is z≡0, and every differentiable solution on an interval containing its initial time with that datum is its restriction. [given]

Proof

technique · constructive; build the solution as homogeneous solution plus convolution with the kernel $g$, verify the equation by two applications of the convolution lemma, and invoke the variation-of-constants uniqueness
1.1F2F3

The kernel g exists, is unique and is defined on all of R by [F2] (case k>0) and [F3] (case k=0), with g(0)=0 and g′(0)=1/m. Since g solves m g′′+c g′+k g=0, we have g′′=−(c g′+k g)/m; the right-hand side is continuous because g and g′ are, so g′′ is continuous and g is of class C2 on R.

2.1step 1.1F4

Put F(t):=∫t0tg(t−s)f(s) ds for t∈I. Applying [F4] with kernel g and b:=f gives, at every interior point, F′(t)=g(0)f(t)+∫t0tg′(t−s)f(s) ds=∫t0tg′(t−s)f(s) ds, and applying [F4] once more with the C1 kernel g′ (legitimate by step 1.1) gives F′′(t)=g′(0)f(t)+∫t0tg′′(t−s)f(s) ds=f(t)m+∫t0tg′′(t−s)f(s) ds. If I includes an endpoint, the same split-difference-quotient argument as in the proof of Differentiation of a variable-limit convolution integral with a C-one matrix kernel applies with increments h restricted to the side lying in I; it gives these formulas for the domain-relative endpoint derivatives, first for F with kernel g and then for F′ with kernel g′. The displayed right-hand sides are continuous on I, since f,g,g′,g′′ are continuous and the integrals vary continuously on compact subintervals. In particular F(t0)=0 and F′(t0)=0.

3.1step 2.1F1F2F3construct

Let xh be a homogeneous solution with the data (x0,v0) (existing by [F2], [F3]) and set x:=xh+F on I. [construct] Then x is twice differentiable on I with continuous second derivative, using domain-relative derivatives at included endpoints, and, by step 2.1 and the linearity of the differential expression, m x′′+c x′+k x=(m xh′′+c xh′+k xh)+m F′′+c F′+k F=f(t)+∫t0t(m g′′+c g′+k g)(t−s)f(s) ds=f(t), because the bracket vanishes identically by step 1.1. Moreover x(t0)=xh(t0)+F(t0)=x0 and x′(t0)=xh′(t0)+F′(t0)=v0.

4.1step 3.1F1F5discharge-construct: the constructed convolution is the unique solution∎

Uniqueness: let x~:I→R be any other solution with the prescribed data and put u:=x~−(xh+F), where xh+F is the constructed solution of step 3.1. By linearity, u solves the homogeneous equation on I with u(t0)=u′(t0)=0. Its phase curve U(t):=(u(t),u′(t)) therefore solves U′=AU on I with U(t0)=0, where A=(01−k/m−c/m). Apply [F5] with the globally continuous forcing b0≡0: the unique global solution from zero data is zero, and clause 3 of the matrix variation-of-constants result makes every interval solution with the same data its restriction. Thus U=0 and x~=xh+F. This proves uniqueness using only a forcing defined on its actual domain I for the constructed solution.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources